1. Collab Advanced (2,32 stars, 266 notes)
2. Hard (3,49 stars, 395 notes)
3. Hyper (3,87 stars, 456 notes)
4. Near Miss (5,36 stars, 523 notes)
5. Normal (1,94 stars, 192 notes)
6. Squirrel's Easy (1,46 stars, 130 notes)
7. Strategas' Insane (4,68 stars, 540 notes)

Easy by Squirrel
Normal by me
Advanced Collab by me and Spork Lover
Hard by me
Hyper by me
Insane GD by Strategas
Near Miss by me

Tarpey - Close Call on Soundcloud!

BG Source

#1 Kibbleru
Minakami Yuki
#2 Kibbleru
Self-Pop
#1 Minakami Yuki

WISPG_G wrote:

hi \o, mod is here
The first, i dont think that hitsounds cry of crowd fits here, you should remove it. Already removed :p

Light Insane

00:16:998 (2,3) - fix spacing here please Done!
00:23:800 - what about instead of breaks make some creative long sliders? I feel like it fits, I'll map this if more people say the same however
00:51:009 (3) - move this slider to x:390 y:204, but this to x:312 y:257 and other notes under them reciprocally Done?
01:34:266 (3) - may be move start of this slider under end of this 01:33:568 (1)? Better flow like this
01:39:149 (1,3) - dont like this overlap Changed!
01:58:684 (1) - move this slider to x:236 y:267, but this 01:58:684 (1) - to x:309 y:211 Changed in a different way, but with the same effect.

Insane

jumps look like in highscore)) Which is a good thing I suppose
00:17:173 (2,3,4,5,6) - hard to read this spacing imo Feels fine to me, will change if more people point it out
00:23:800 - same as prev diff, i reccomend make here sliders or may be spinners ^
00:48:219 (5) - may be NC here? I just hear this part and other like 1-2-3-4...1-2-3-4...1-2-3-4, sounds same and and may be you should distinguish them Seems pretty unnecessary, but will change if more people point it out as well!

Spork Lover wrote:

Hello! M4M :3

Color coding

Importance:
Red = Unrankable if unchanged
Black = Normal suggestion
Blue = Strong suggestion
Pink = Comment

Light Insane

Light Insane

00:27:986 - This and the other three similar sections should have lowered hitsound volume even further, they feel too loud. Changed hitsound!
00:45:864 till 01:07:928 (6) - 80% is loud when it isn't the peak. The normal hitsound could use lowered volume (As in the main beat.) Changed hitsound!
01:08:452 (1) - Absolutely amazing hitsounds in kiai, lots of props for that! Thank you!
01:29:033 (4,1,2) - I think you should rework this pattern a little bit, feels a bit unpolished imo Changed!
01:46:824 (3) - Move this slider to x:164 y:64, cool symmetrical pattern if you wanna go for that Done!
01:47:521 (1,4) - Ctrl+G will make a fun X-pattern Changed in a different way, but has the same effect
02:16:126 (3,4) - Rotate from Selection centre by 10 degrees Done!
02:17:522 (3,4) - ^^^^ Done!

Near Miss

Extra

Amp the OD up to 8.5 or 9, it's an Extra diff. Changed to OD9!
00:14:033 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Really awkward pattern to play, you should hardly consider changing that, since it don't flow with the two other jump patterns just after. Changed!
00:23:452 (1,2,3) - Mark those three notes and place nr. 1 on x:216 y:144 for a triangle pattern with the previous two notes (00:23:103 (3,4) - ) Here's a picture of it: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4426186 Done!
00:27:986 (1) - Same hitsound problem as in Light Insane. (All 4 sections) Changed hitsound!
01:06:707 (7,8) - Small jump suggestion on those two notes: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4426214 Changed it a little bit, but in a different way
01:07:056 (1) - Move to x:424 y:72, so the spacing fits the 6-note section from the song. Done!
02:03:393 (3) - There's a red dot on the slider. Remove that. x) Done!
02:20:312 (4,5) - Turn 5 degrees from selection centre Done for now, though I might revert this if it causes awkward misses, because this is the end of the song

Really liked the diffs, and will most likely make a normal difficulty on this mapset. I'll poke you when I'm done with it. Make sure to leave feedback on the mod so I can improve Thanks!

Swegmec wrote:

Hello! From my Mod queue:

My colors are in my signature.
I will do 5 min of modding (top 2 diffs), b/c You only have 5 SP. (Check my conditions)
This took me a LONG time, so I am just doing Near Miss.

Near Miss

Bump the HP up to a flat 7, and AR up to 9.6-9.8. (At high AR, the 0.1 makes a significant difference.) Done! HP-7 AR-9,6

00:02:521 (4,1) - BE CAREFUL when you directly stack notes. It is okay so far, but it can make a map really hard to read. I wanted the map to be a bit of a challenge to read, as I didn't want to just map pp jumps that are super easy to read
00:08:800 (2,3,4) - 3 and 4 have awkward distance spacing, imo. It also isn't even with 2. But this is your choice. Circular flow, seems fine to me
00:12:289 (4,1) - Move 4 farther away, so that the player isn't stuck holding their cursor at the same point. Done!
00:15:080 (7,1,2) - I don't recommend this. I would put a note in-between 1 and 2, and space them out like you have done before. Seems fine to me, but will change if more people point this out
00:17:173 (2,3,4,5,6) - Also a bit confusing to read. Which is what I was aiming for :p
00:23:452 (1,2,3) - Pointless to not follow the same distance snap as previously.Also, these aren't even evenly spaced. Fits the music imo, will change if more people point it out.
00:47:521 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Distance snappppppp!!!!!!! When doing jumps like this, minor differences are okay, but this is not! This flows really well imo, will change if more people point it out.
00:52:754 (4) - Move this down. Done!
01:00:080 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I can kind of see what you were going for, but the distance spacing is off again. It has even spacing
01:04:266 (1) - Kind of just an awkward note here, while the others fit in. Maybe make part of the slider? Done!
01:06:532 (6,7,8) - Again, awkward notes. It seems to me that you just put them in b/c you ran out of room. Fits the music imo, will change if more people point it out
01:07:056 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Distance snap. The dist. from 5-6 is really messed up compared to the others. Fixed
01:12:638 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Very difficult to read. Seems fine to me
01:23:800 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ??? These are completely random and have no purpose (maybe a bit redundant). If in doubt, use the polygon circle option. I don't know, this feels like one of the better parts of the map to me
01:28:335 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - As a general suggestion, don't place notes like this. The note pattern ends up becoming SO random and it makes me wonder why they are there, simply due to the random distance spacing. Go to compose and click polygon circles; maybe make some squares or an octagon, then switch up the notes to make large jumps. This would make it less random. 01:28:335 (2,3,4,5) - are an equal distance away from 01:27:986 (1) - which makes it easier to follow, 01:29:382 (1) - follows the tail of 01:27:986 (1) - to look more aesthetically pleasing. Nothing here was random tbh.
01:35:312 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This could work if you moved 3 up and 6 down, so they were touching diagonally. Done!
01:36:707 (3,4) - Move away from 1 and 2. It often results in awkward notelocks while playing, so I don't want to make add patterns like that
01:47:173 (7,8) - Move away from 5 and 6. ^
02:09:498 (6,7) - Too confusing. I think they are 1/4 notes b/c of the short distance spacing. Fits the music imo
02:20:312 (4,5) - Move away from 3 and 4. As I said, it's to avoid awkward notelocks

Okay, good notes, but meh placement. You need to use distance snap more often. Distance snap is used throughout the entire map except for the first note of every jump so idk

Prismetical wrote:

Heya! M4M ♥

Normal

00:04:266 (1) - I would rotate it like this: The slider after it wouldn't look as good

00:55:893 (1) - too much reverse slider at that point Changed!
01:11:940 (1) - remove new combo Done!
01:19:614 (1,2,3) - in one line: Bended it instead

01:35:661 (1) - remove NC Done!
- why isn't the end mapped here, because at the Light Insane diff, it is mapped... I'll map it when I have more time ^^

Hard

00:44:731 (1,4) - ugly overlay, stack? Done!
- why isn't the end mapped here, because at the Light Insane diff, it is mapped... I'll map it when I have more time ^^

Light Insane

00:27:986 (1,2,3) - pattern could look better, move (3) around Flows pretty well, will change if more people point it out.
00:39:149 (1,4) - stack? Nope
00:46:824 (2) - reverse slider is not visible, big problem Changed!
01:02:521 (4,3) - stack Done!
01:16:300 (5) - NC? Done!
01:19:266 (5) - looks better here imo: Done!
01:42:289 (2) - straighten slider Nope
- why is the end mapped here, but not at the lower diffs? Lack of time

Best wishes!

Shiny Spoon wrote:

ill try my best!!

[Near Miss]

02:09:498 (6,7) - NC on the 6 to emphasize the jump Done!

00:48:219 (5,6,7,8) - NC on 5 ^ Done!

01:46:824 (5,6,7,8) - NC on the 5 to emphasize the jump. Done!

02:09:498 (6,7) - Instead of a NC on the slider you can add a NC on the 6 to emphasize that the jumps are less intense/slowed down. Done!



To be honest....this is really all I can find...I had such a hard time finding things that are wrong. The map is pretty solid, I cant really give any input on anything below 5* for the other diffs

1. I don't know why you add an Widescreen Support

1. I ask you. when you make a normal diff, you use the DS? if you use the DS, why this note 01:07:056 (1,1) - looks no far like DS say ?
2. 00:01:475 (1,2,1,2) - Overlap like this to me it's okay, but if like this 00:08:452 (2,1) - please, fix this.. There must be no overlap like that
3. 00:56:591 (2,2) - Not trying to blanket that?
4. 01:12:638 (1,2,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,1,2) - I think this note looks like is not suitable for normal diffs. Cuz, it looks difficult to play at normal diffs.
5. 01:33:219 (1,1) - Stack looks sucks, Try don't stack that note

1. 00:02:521 (4,2,3,1,2,5,1,3) - I don't know why you like to overlap like this. In my opinion, it's looks ugly
2. 00:17:173 (2) - Try to stop at 00:17:347 - then make the end of this note 00:17:173 (2) - to a new slider then remove 00:17:696 (4) -
   
   
3. 00:49:963 (5,2,4) - Overlap like this make it as invisible, so as to make the players look surprised
4. 01:07:056 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - When i play this, i get surprised. Cuz I thought the pile like that, as there are notes that are on the blue tick

Wou wrote:

From my queue

[General]

1. I don't know why you add an Widescreen Support Disabled!

[Normal]

1. I ask you. when you make a normal diff, you use the DS? if you use the DS, why this note 01:07:056 (1,1) - looks no far like DS say ? There's a big enough pause for the DS to be like this imo
2. 00:01:475 (1,2,1,2) - Overlap like this to me it's okay, but if like this 00:08:452 (2,1) - please, fix this.. There must be no overlap like that Changed!
3. 00:56:591 (2,2) - Not trying to blanket that? Blanketed!
4. 01:12:638 (1,2,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,1,2) - I think this note looks like is not suitable for normal diffs. Cuz, it looks difficult to play at normal diffs. Don't know any other way to map parts like that, but those things are ok enough for a normal imo.
5. 01:33:219 (1,1) - Stack looks sucks, Try don't stack that note Done!

[Hard]

1. 00:02:521 (4,2,3,1,2,5,1,3) - I don't know why you like to overlap like this. In my opinion, it's looks ugly There's like a 3 second gap between the notes, I don't see how they could overlap
2. 00:17:173 (2) - Try to stop at 00:17:347 - then make the end of this note 00:17:173 (2) - to a new slider then remove 00:17:696 (4) - Done?
   
   
3. 00:49:963 (5,2,4) - Overlap like this make it as invisible, so as to make the players look surprised idk pretty easy to read imo
4. 01:07:056 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - When i play this, i get surprised. Cuz I thought the pile like that, as there are notes that are on the blue tick Eh, I really like this but I'll change it if more people point it out

1. isn't ar 9,4 too high for a 172 bpm song? 9,3 it's fine imo.. your choice tho
2. i would silence your sliderslide in the calm parts like here 00:50:312 - otherwise, you'll have to have sliders in the same parts (musically speaking) to make a constant rhythm with sliderslide xd
3. 00:25:196 - - 00:29:382 - 00:34:963 - 00:40:545 - consider mapping these parts with slow long sliders with random and interesting shapes... it'll make your map more interesting
4. 00:45:777 (1) - delete this NC or add NC here 00:45:080 (2) - (deleting is better)
5. 00:49:614 (4) - NC maybe? for consistency
6. 00:50:312 (1) - this feels kinda weird... because you were emphasising all those points previously
7. 01:15:952 (3,4,5) - uhm... why is this spacing that high... it plays weird because you tend to stack the triplets... so normal spacing would be better imo
8. 01:20:312 (4,5,6,7,8) - increasing distance in a linear way doesn't play good... it's awkward to play, i would recommend you a pattern like this
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:21:882 (4,5,6,7,1) - this is also a linear pattern... but i don't really have a suggestion to make so i'm just gonna mention it
10. 01:26:417 (7) - move this slighly up to have equal DS... you tend to have the same distance in this kind of pattern of note-triplet-note (01:10:545 (4,5,6,7,8) - this one for example, so do this, for consistency)
11. 01:26:591 (1,2) - ctrl + g maybe... to emphasize 01:26:591 (1) - also, it flows better xd
12. 01:19:440 (6,1) - stacking those 2 notes doesn't make much sense... at least for me
13. 01:25:021 (8,1) - spacing between this 2 feels extremely awkward... i think you should have a jump between these 2. a pattern like this might be better
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:29:033 (6,7) - this feels awkward because you're decreasing DS without any rhythm/music change, i would change to something like this
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 01:36:184 (7,1) - spacing should be higher imo, also it doesnt play that good because the flow suddenly breaks to downside
16. 02:05:661 (1,4) - stack? you tend to do that... so that's why i'm pointing it xd

Kagetsu wrote:

from #modreqs

[Near Miss]

1. isn't ar 9,4 too high for a 172 bpm song? 9,3 it's fine imo.. your choice tho Will probably stay at 9,3 now
2. i would silence your sliderslide in the calm parts like here 00:50:312 - otherwise, you'll have to have sliders in the same parts (musically speaking) to make a constant rhythm with sliderslide xd Added slilent sliderslide!
3. 00:25:196 - - 00:29:382 - 00:34:963 - 00:40:545 - consider mapping these parts with slow long sliders with random and interesting shapes... it'll make your map more interesting This seemed like a good idea as I was mapping it, gonna map it if more people point it out
4. 00:45:777 (1) - delete this NC or add NC here 00:45:080 (2) - (deleting is better) Done!
5. 00:49:614 (4) - NC maybe? for consistency Done!
6. 00:50:312 (1) - this feels kinda weird... because you were emphasising all those points previously Added emphasis!
7. 01:15:952 (3,4,5) - uhm... why is this spacing that high... it plays weird because you tend to stack the triplets... so normal spacing would be better imo Done!
8. 01:20:312 (4,5,6,7,8) - increasing distance in a linear way doesn't play good... it's awkward to play, i would recommend you a pattern like this Done!
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:21:882 (4,5,6,7,1) - this is also a linear pattern... but i don't really have a suggestion to make so i'm just gonna mention it Changed it but it's still linear :/
10. 01:26:417 (7) - move this slighly up to have equal DS... you tend to have the same distance in this kind of pattern of note-triplet-note (01:10:545 (4,5,6,7,8) - this one for example, so do this, for consistency) It's stacked on 01:23:975 (2,1) - so idk
11. 01:26:591 (1,2) - ctrl + g maybe... to emphasize 01:26:591 (1) - also, it flows better xd I think mine flows better
12. 01:19:440 (6,1) - stacking those 2 notes doesn't make much sense... at least for me Changed!
13. 01:25:021 (8,1) - spacing between this 2 feels extremely awkward... i think you should have a jump between these 2. a pattern like this might be better Did something different
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:29:033 (6,7) - this feels awkward because you're decreasing DS without any rhythm/music change, i would change to something like this Done!
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 01:36:184 (7,1) - spacing should be higher imo, also it doesnt play that good because the flow suddenly breaks to downside Done!
16. 02:05:661 (1,4) - stack? you tend to do that... so that's why i'm pointing it xd oops done

cool map/song i enjoyed playing it... have a star and good luck xd

Deppyforce wrote:

i like short songs

[General]
00:01:475 - offset should be here lol changed

[Normal]
normal diff needs constant spacing. like 00:15:428 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - is 0.9x ds but the part before that is 1x ds, some part are even 0.8x ds, like the beginning of the map. remap lol Remapped

[Hard]
00:09:498 (5) - you should make the sliderhead more visible, this is actually hard to read for this diff. easiest way to fix would be changing stack latency until these are actually stacking Changed it a bit, might be more visible idk
00:20:661 (4) - rotate this 90 degress anti clockwise flow better to me idk Done!
00:45:952 - theres still sound here, should be mapped Done!
01:07:056 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the spacing here should be bigger instead of smaller than 01:05:661 (1,2,3,4,5) Done!
01:18:219 (1,2,3) - same about stack Changed it a bit, might be more visible idk
01:40:545 (5,2) - ^ Changed it a bit, might be more visible idk

[Near Miss]
00:15:080 (7) - should be slider imo to make it constant with 00:13:684 (5) - Done!
you can map the part you put breaks with long sliders, the map will be more interesting that way Mapped
01:06:532 (6,7,8) - this anti jump dont fit imo lol, the ds should be increasing like the jumps before Changed
01:19:614 (1) - strong, shoudnt be stacked Done in previous mod
01:53:103 (1) - ^ seems fine imo

yea gl

firedigger wrote:

SPOILER

15:08 firedigger: yo
15:09 firedigger: let's mod some of your maps
15:09 xChorse: Thanks
15:09 *firedigger is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/877625 Tarpey - Close Call [Near Miss]]
15:11 firedigger: 00:08:452 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - so you have a pattern that requires actually playing the game here on quiet beats
15:11 firedigger: 00:11:242 (1,2,3,4) - but the on the real beats it's 1.5* pattern
15:11 firedigger: that's no good
15:12 xChorse: I don't really want to add extra difficulty on the earlier parts of the map
15:12 firedigger: right
15:12 firedigger: reduce it
15:12 firedigger: it can be considered overmapped in numerous places
15:13 firedigger: 00:14:033 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - WOW
15:13 firedigger: like that
15:13 xChorse: still feels easy compared to other 5,3* maps here
15:13 firedigger: feels inconsistent with the music
15:15 firedigger: 00:23:452 (1,2,3) - if you are deliberately making them close, I would recommend making a stack. Also, NC on slider might be a good idea
15:16 xChorse: NCed the slider
15:16 firedigger: 00:57:114 (6) - why is that a jump?
15:16 xChorse: don't want to stack them
15:16 firedigger: Just make sure people won't try to 1/4 the taps there
15:17 xChorse: If people actually folow the beat I don't think they'd even try streaming there
15:17 xChorse: and 00:57:114 (6,1) - is a jump while 00:56:940 (5,6) - follows the flow
15:18 firedigger: what is "follows the flow"?
15:18 firedigger: it's double spaced
15:18 firedigger: for no reason
15:19 xChorse: circular flow that expands or something idk
15:19 xChorse: feels fine to me
15:19 xChorse: same concept with 00:57:289 (1,2,3,4) -
15:19 firedigger: My evaluation methods on spacing are formal, get ready
15:20 firedigger: sliders have strong sound each, so the UNIFORMLY increasing spacing is OK
15:21 firedigger: 01:00:080 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - (456) isn't consistent with shape of (123)
15:21 firedigger: same problem
15:22 firedigger: 01:04:266 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - hello, unexpectedely hard pattern
15:23 firedigger: 01:13:335 (5) - I would suggest NC here
15:24 firedigger: 01:17:870 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - no advanced pattern here, really? Fairly intensive music fragment
15:26 firedigger: 01:35:312 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - here as well
15:27 firedigger: you difficult pattern placement is not completely clear to me
15:27 firedigger: Try to reconsider all the places that you would define as "intense" in kiai
15:28 xChorse: Honestly I don't even see what's considered as difficult
15:28 xChorse: the only one that's pretty hard is 01:51:707 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
15:28 firedigger: ehm, well, as the very least look at average note spacing in the pattern
15:29 firedigger: well yeah, but mapping has more to it than 1 hard pattern in the end
15:29 firedigger: you should make sure the pattern difficulty complements the music intensity
15:33 xChorse: so do parts like 01:46:126 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - fit?
15:33 firedigger: that's exactly what makes sense
15:33 firedigger: there's a bit more intense, then even more intense
15:33 firedigger: and the pattern complements that
15:34 xChorse: ok gonna remap some parts to follow the same style