• 00:05:104 (1) - consider changing the shape of this. Doesnt fit the sound there imo
  00:08:476 (5) - this note is overmapped. Its not wrong or bad, but if more ppl dont like this then you should change it. I think having 00:08:360 (4,6) - as a high spaced jump fits better with that "WUUSH" sound.
  00:09:290 (2,3) - awkward drop off. kinda messes with the visual flow of that part
  00:15:221 - you should put smth here D: Changing this 00:15:104 (4) - to a 1/4 slider works better
  00:27:197 (6,7) - having a slight curve there would work better
  like this

  
  00:42:314 (1,2,3) - the spacing between 1 and 2 is almost inexistent (slider liniency from a squiggy 1/1 slider). There is also no reason to recude the spacing. Keep it the same beteen these 3
  00:46:035 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3) - duuude the jumps. I know its an "Insane" but those are bit much. 00:46:035 - put a 1/2 slider here so the transition starts smoother. Reduce spacing between those 00:47:430 (4,5) - so you emphasize 00:47:895 (1) - more (relative spacing). You could put a 1/2 slider here aswell 00:47:430 (4) - .
  00:51:151 (6) - slider here aswell?
  00:55:104 (6,7) - mb destack these (like here 01:15:570 (7,8,1) - )
  01:00:686 (5) - reduce the spacig on this so 01:00:918 (1) - has more emphasis (move to 232|256) (you could do this on more than just this part. not pointing out or else this would take too long)
  01:02:546 (6,1) - awkward flow
  01:07:197 (3) - higher spacing. like here 01:06:035 (6,1) -

• 00:40:221 (6,1) - no need to stack
  00:52:314 (2) - You double the spacing here. For someone who plays Hard maps this would be a bit too much
  00:57:663 (2,3,4,5) - this square rly looks off-putting. Change it to a curve
  01:03:477 (2,3,4,1) - same
  01:10:918 (3,4) - no need to stack
  01:21:849 (2,3,4) - let the whole pattern here follow the direction of the slider

• 00:11:383 (2) - try using more smooth curves.
  00:36:965 (2,3,4) - you could change this to a 1/2 repeat slider. Its a normal and the chilled part of the song. You need to hold back a bit
  00:37:895 (5,6,7) - same
  00:41:383 (3) - copy paste this and change this 00:41:849 (4) -
  00:52:314 (4) - this kinda doesnt fit. just having these 00:51:616 (1,2,3) - feels a lot better

DavidEd wrote:

No response: Fixed (most likely)

Smokeman

Insane

00:05:104 (1) - consider changing the shape of this. Doesnt fit the sound there imo
00:08:476 (5) - this note is overmapped. Its not wrong or bad, but if more ppl dont like this then you should change it. I think having 00:08:360 (4,6) - as a high spaced jump fits better with that "WUUSH" sound. youre the first to complain then. i like that little fill there and theres a low chance ill change that
00:09:290 (2,3) - awkward drop off. kinda messes with the visual flow of that part
00:15:221 - you should put smth here D: Changing this 00:15:104 (4) - to a 1/4 slider works better
00:27:197 (6,7) - having a slight curve there would work better
like this

00:42:314 (1,2,3) - the spacing between 1 and 2 is almost inexistent (slider liniency from a squiggy 1/1 slider). There is also no reason to recude the spacing. Keep it the same beteen these 3
00:46:035 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3) - duuude the jumps. I know its an "Insane" but those are bit much. 00:46:035 - put a 1/2 slider here so the transition starts smoother. Reduce spacing between those 00:47:430 (4,5) - so you emphasize 00:47:895 (1) - more (relative spacing). You could put a 1/2 slider here aswell 00:47:430 (4) - . some people dont like it, and some people do. and i love to play those jumps so again, low chance of change
00:51:151 (6) - slider here aswell?
00:55:104 (6,7) - mb destack these (like here 01:15:570 (7,8,1) - )
01:00:686 (5) - reduce the spacig on this so 01:00:918 (1) - has more emphasis (move to 232|256) (you could do this on more than just this part. not pointing out or else this would take too long)
01:02:546 (6,1) - awkward flow really? i like it
01:07:197 (3) - higher spacing. like here 01:06:035 (6,1) -

tbh i dont like the way it looks. Some of the patterns dont flow into eachother very well.

Hard

00:40:221 (6,1) - no need to stack
00:52:314 (2) - You double the spacing here. For someone who plays Hard maps this would be a bit too much
00:57:663 (2,3,4,5) - this square rly looks off-putting. Change it to a curve
01:03:477 (2,3,4,1) - same
01:10:918 (3,4) - no need to stack
01:21:849 (2,3,4) - let the whole pattern here follow the direction of the slider

this dif looks a bit awkward while playing aswell D: not really

Normal

00:11:383 (2) - try using more smooth curves. not too big of a deal, but i guess i could do that on some sliders
00:36:965 (2,3,4) - you could change this to a 1/2 repeat slider. Its a normal and the chilled part of the song. You need to hold back a bit
00:37:895 (5,6,7) - same
00:41:383 (3) - copy paste this and change this 00:41:849 (4) -
00:52:314 (4) - this kinda doesnt fit. just having these 00:51:616 (1,2,3) - feels a lot better

00:07:663 (2) - i feel like you are using too many of those slider shapes nothing wrong with that.

This still needs some work, but it doesnt look too bad. hang in there only some fine polishing

(abou tthe math thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summation) think my mind just exploded

Thanks for mod!

Dono027 wrote:

From my queue

[Normal]

00:50:686 (3,4) - Delete circle & add reverse for make a more slower combo.

00:56:267 (4) - Slider : 1/2 beats with reverse

01:02:314 (3,4) - Slider emphasize vocals

01:13:244 (4,5) - Slider emphasize vocals

01:21:849 - make a 1/2 beat slider

[Hard]

00:23:593 - Add circle

00:41:383 (3) - 1/4 beat slider with reverse sounds better

00:59:523 (3,4,5,6) - Make a square pattern or a triangle with (4,5,6) fix

01:18:825 (1) - Make this in 2 sliders. fix

01:24:407 (1) - ^ fix

That's all for my mod !
Good luck for your map !

Nao Tomori wrote:

testplay on insane + some irc

SPOILER

19:46 *DavidEd is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/875557 ELISA - Dear My Friend -Mada Minu Mirai e-]
19:46 DavidEd: insane
19:49 Nao Tomori: this is fun
19:49 DavidEd: oooo
19:49 DavidEd: were there any parts you kinda reacted to?
19:50 [color=#FF0000]Nao Tomori: 00:12:546 (1) - i think you could move this down a little to blanket the end of the note before [/color]
19:50 Nao Tomori: 00:15:337 (1) - i kept misreading this and starting the stream late
19:51 Nao Tomori: might be my problem though
19:51 Nao Tomori: but you could make it all circles as well
19:52 Nao Tomori: 00:24:872 (4) - this maybe you can move it down
19:52 Nao Tomori: but that might change the movement
19:52 Nao Tomori: 00:29:872 (5) - this is actually a slider stream if you look closely
19:53 Nao Tomori: or it goes into 1/8 with the violin/higher instrument
19:53 Nao Tomori: which you can show with sliders
19:53 DavidEd: hmm
19:53 Nao Tomori: maybe better to ignore it at this diff level
19:54 DavidEd: yeah, its probably for the better
19:54 Nao Tomori: 00:36:965 (2,3,4) - i think this rhythm should be the same as the next 3 
19:54 Nao Tomori: 00:37:895 (5,6,7) - 
19:54 Nao Tomori: cuz it is the same sound in the song
19:55 DavidEd: isnt it though?
19:55 Nao Tomori: oh i explained that badly
19:55 Nao Tomori: (3) to (4) is a small jump
19:55 Nao Tomori: but (6) to (7) is a big jump
19:56 Nao Tomori: even though it is very similar sound
19:56 DavidEd: yeah i just fixed that
19:56 DavidEd: wanted a reqtangle
19:56 Nao Tomori: 00:39:058 (2) - maybe you can move this up to blanket 3
19:57 Nao Tomori: 00:46:035 (1) - the NCing here is weird in my opinion
19:57 DavidEd: it wasnt meant to be blankeded
19:57 Nao Tomori: hmm it is fine as is 
19:57 Nao Tomori: i just think blanket might look nice
19:58 DavidEd: yeah
19:58 Nao Tomori: 00:46:500 (2) - this should definitely be blanket
19:58 DavidEd: i copied and pasted the first slider so it looks better
19:58 Nao Tomori: cool
19:58 DavidEd: im gonna remap that part
19:58 Nao Tomori: oh
19:58 DavidEd: the jumps are big
19:58 DavidEd: or well
19:58 DavidEd: nerf them a bit
19:58 Nao Tomori: jumps are fine in my opinion
19:58 Nao Tomori: might be the pp farmer in me though
19:59 Nao Tomori: i think NC ing should be different
19:59 Nao Tomori: 00:47:430 (6) - i think this should b NC
19:59 Nao Tomori:  00:48:128 (2) - this 
19:59 Nao Tomori: etc
19:59 Nao Tomori: to follow the vocals
19:59 Nao Tomori: since you followed the vocals with the jumps anyway
20:00 Nao Tomori: no point in NCing with the guitar
20:00 DavidEd: yeah sure
20:00 Nao Tomori: 00:49:290 (4) - i think you missed a burst here
20:00 Nao Tomori: or a triple
20:01 Nao Tomori: 00:55:104 (6,7) - this was pretty spaced out the first time you did it, i think it should be spaced out a little more here too
20:02 Nao Tomori: well that's pretty much all i could think of 
20:02 Nao Tomori: the rhythm is fine to me

1. Combo colors can fit better the BG, right now they feel a bit random

1. 00:01:732 - no hitsound? a clap will fit really nice this part
2. 00:03:593 - ^ etc, I think you could improve your hitsounding a bit more, there are some parts that can use claps
3. 00:07:895 (2,3) - try to bring less spacing to these objects, since the music is super calm there, the only jump should be at 00:08:360 (4) - where the music become stronger
4. 00:11:732 (5) - sound there isn't that clear, I'd just ignore it, since triplets starting at white ticks doesn't play that nice, rhythmical talking
5. 00:15:104 (4,1) - use 3 circles instead, also start the circle stream at 00:15:570 - for better rhythm, since start a streaming at blue tick is a bit weird, :
   
6. 00:19:523 (5,1) - blanket can use some more work
7. 00:22:314 (2) - the tail of this slider have a really strong sound, i'd use two circles instead and maybe add some hitsound, as I said before I think your hitsounding can still be better
8. 00:24:174 (2) - 00:26:035 (2) - same as above
9. 00:39:756 (4,5) - this can use a better blanket
10. 00:43:011 (2,3) - same
11. 00:52:314 (1) - try a slowdown to fit better the song? music low intensity there, map should do that as well
12. 00:53:360 (4) - idk what are you mapping here, there is only a vocal at the before tick
13. 00:59:988 (1) - you really don't need to NC this, just keep your comboing consistent
14. 01:08:825 (2) - another case where the slider tail have a strong sound, those beats need click action due the loud sounds
15. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC
16. 01:18:360 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - same as 00:15:104
17. 01:22:430 (4) - again I dont get what are your trying to follow, just use a 1/2 slider as you did before

1. 00:11:732 same as insane
2. 00:29:290 (6,1) - seems you have the NC placed at the wrong place, swap NCs there
3. 00:33:477 (2,3,4) - tiny spacing error
4. 01:05:802 (4,1) - blanket can be better
5. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC
6. 01:18:825 (1,2,3) - super weird rhythm for a hard diff, just follow the melody instead of drums + melody, will be something like:
   

1. 00:08:825 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - train patterns doesn't play that nicely on normal diffs, try to make this part less dense
2. 00:19:988 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - there are alot more
3. 01:05:570 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - yeah non stop 1/2s
   Okay this diff need seriously rework, if you are mapping with constant 1/2s then don't overlap objects, because looks really bad and make players want to click objects soon and stop holding others, for the contrary of what some old people believe, non overlapped objects at low bpm like this play better than overlapped ones, Anyways I'd suggest redo rhythms to more simple ones here or do a respacing of this diff and add an easy diff, second option seems better taking in consideration that is just a 1:30 song, ofc you can ask for more opinions

Natsu wrote:

Hi

General:

1. Combo colors can fit better the BG, right now they feel a bit random ah, i took them from the part that starts at 00:46:035 - (in the video) but i might figure something else out if more people react to it.

Insane:

1. 00:01:732 - no hitsound? a clap will fit really nice this part actually listened to these parts again, and it seems like there actually ARE claps here. it was pretty hard for me to hear though.
2. 00:03:593 - ^ etc, I think you could improve your hitsounding a bit more, there are some parts that can use claps ^
3. 00:07:895 (2,3) - try to bring less spacing to these objects, since the music is super calm there, the only jump should be at 00:08:360 (4) - where the music become stronger makes sense
4. 00:11:732 (5) - sound there isn't that clear, I'd just ignore it, since triplets starting at white ticks doesn't play that nice, rhythmical talking fix
5. 00:15:104 (4,1) - use 3 circles instead, also start the circle stream at 00:15:570 - for better rhythm, since start a streaming at blue tick is a bit weird, :
   i didnt know at the start what to do with this part, this made it play much better
6. 00:19:523 (5,1) - blanket can use some more work obvs fix
7. 00:22:314 (2) - the tail of this slider have a really strong sound, i'd use two circles instead and maybe add some hitsound, as I said before I think your hitsounding can still be betterfix
8. 00:24:174 (2) - 00:26:035 (2) - same as above ill prob fix this but it plays well as it is now
9. 00:39:756 (4,5) - this can use a better blanket obvs fix
10. 00:43:011 (2,3) - same ^
11. 00:52:314 (1) - try a slowdown to fit better the song? music low intensity there, map should do that as well sounds cool
12. 00:53:360 (4) - idk what are you mapping here, there is only a vocal at the before tick OVERMAP
13. 00:59:988 (1) - you really don't need to NC this, just keep your comboing consistent fix
14. 01:08:825 (2) - another case where the slider tail have a strong sound, those beats need click action due the loud sounds ill figure something out
15. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC fix
16. 01:18:360 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - same as 00:15:104 maybe this is better...
17. 01:22:430 (4) - again I dont get what are your trying to follow, just use a 1/2 slider as you did before fix

Hard:

1. 00:11:732 same as insane sounds cool
2. 00:29:290 (6,1) - seems you have the NC placed at the wrong place, swap NCs there whoops
3. 00:33:477 (2,3,4) - tiny spacing error ^
4. 01:05:802 (4,1) - blanket can be better obvs fix
5. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC ^
6. 01:18:825 (1,2,3) - super weird rhythm for a hard diff, just follow the melody instead of drums + melody, will be something like:
   

maybe this is better...

Normal:

1. 00:08:825 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - train patterns doesn't play that nicely on normal diffs, try to make this part less dense
2. 00:19:988 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - there are alot more
3. 01:05:570 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - yeah non stop 1/2s
   Okay this diff need seriously rework, if you are mapping with constant 1/2s then don't overlap objects, because looks really bad and make players want to click objects soon and stop holding others, for the contrary of what some old people believe, non overlapped objects at low bpm like this play better than overlapped ones, Anyways I'd suggest redo rhythms to more simple ones here or do a respacing of this diff and add an easy diff, second option seems better taking in consideration that is just a 1:30 song, ofc you can ask for more opinions will most likely end up in a remap of this diff. i'll see what happens, im not too experienced with lower difficulties. but ill most likely add an easy.

1. 00:02:081 (2,3) - flow here could be improved. maybe rotate this -15 degrees and reposition 00:01:384 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/nMUuJ/8853b8e915.jpg
2. 00:21:616 (4,1) - ctrl+g rhythm to capture downbeat
3. 00:31:151 (3) - NC should be here instead of 00:31:849 (1) -
4. 00:33:709 (2,4) - might be some readability issues since the approach circle of the stacked notes appear before the previous one goes away
5. Maybe you should get some more opinions before changing, but I think the spread could be evened out by using less 1/2 rhythms or replaced some notes with sliders. In terms of note density, normal is almost as dense as your hard diff, which is reflected in the star rating as well.

MokouSmoke wrote:

[Normal]

1. 00:02:081 (2,3) - flow here could be improved. maybe rotate this -15 degrees and reposition 00:01:384 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/nMUuJ/8853b8e915.jpg
2. 00:21:616 (4,1) - ctrl+g rhythm to capture downbeat
3. 00:31:151 (3) - NC should be here instead of 00:31:849 (1) -
4. 00:33:709 (2,4) - might be some readability issues since the approach circle of the stacked notes appear before the previous one goes away
5. Maybe you should get some more opinions before changing, but I think the spread could be evened out by using less 1/2 rhythms or replaced some notes with sliders. In terms of note density, normal is almost as dense as your hard diff, which is reflected in the star rating as well.

1. 00:19:988 (1) - Cntrl G + Cntrl H so it also follows the vocals a bit with the kink
2. 01:15:802 (1) - would extend this by 1 tick and start at 01:15:570 so you follow the vocals here because they reach a highpoint in the song

1. 00:25:570 (1) - would just do what you did at 00:21:849 (1,2) - having the end not clickable is not worth the trade-off for a bit of diversity imo
2. 00:50:221 (2,4) - this kind of stacking might too hard to read for a normal diff espacially since its the only time you stack like this, would just go with something like this
   
3. 00:57:895 (3,4) - move a bit to the right so it doesnt touch 00:56:965 (1) -
4. 01:04:174 (3,3) - only overlap you got so would work around this, (adjusting the tail of 01:03:477 (2) - a bit and keep the same pattern but bit higher perhaps)
5. 01:16:732 (2) - The end definitly needs to be clickable here maybe follow this rythm instead
   

1. 00:04:407 (4) - makes more sense to stack with (3) here instead, since the sounds are identical (and gives a bit more margin of error bc the jump is on a slider)
2. 01:07:197 (3) - blanket can be a bit better
3. 01:24:407 (1,2) - would make it the same as 00:29:523 (2) - putting a single 1/4 slider in this diff right at the end is kindof a dick move for people who play around this lvl

1. 00:23:477 (7) - maybe place this at x372/y76 to reduce the jump a bit, it's still a relatively quiet part of the song
2. 00:30:221 (8) - you can add a fnish aswell
3. 00:37:197 (3) - x224/y340 for smoother flow
4. 01:18:942 (2,3,4,5,1) - I'd just keep it simple and follow one instrument here and ignore the drum tbh, it plays really weird atm So i'd go for something like this
   

Wishkey wrote:

Heya! from my Q

Really cool map! just gonna give some suggestions here but flow blankets and hitsounds etc seems mostly alright so far

Easy

1. 00:19:988 (1) - Cntrl G + Cntrl H so it also follows the vocals a bit with the kink
2. 01:15:802 (1) - would extend this by 1 tick and start at 01:15:570 so you follow the vocals here because they reach a highpoint in the song

Normal

1. 00:25:570 (1) - would just do what you did at 00:21:849 (1,2) - having the end not clickable is not worth the trade-off for a bit of diversity imo
2. 00:50:221 (2,4) - this kind of stacking might too hard to read for a normal diff espacially since its the only time you stack like this, would just go with something like this
   
   since its not clickable, it shouldnt be hard to read
3. 00:57:895 (3,4) - move a bit to the right so it doesnt touch 00:56:965 (1) -
4. 01:04:174 (3,3) - only overlap you got so would work around this, (adjusting the tail of 01:03:477 (2) - a bit and keep the same pattern but bit higher perhaps)
5. 01:16:732 (2) - The end definitly needs to be clickable here maybe follow this rythm instead
   

hard

1. 00:04:407 (4) - makes more sense to stack with (3) here instead, since the sounds are identical (and gives a bit more margin of error bc the jump is on a slider)
2. 01:07:197 (3) - blanket can be a bit better
3. 01:24:407 (1,2) - would make it the same as 00:29:523 (2) - putting a single 1/4 slider in this diff right at the end is kindof a dick move for people who play around this lvl

Insane

1. 00:23:477 (7) - maybe place this at x372/y76 to reduce the jump a bit, it's still a relatively quiet part of the song
2. 00:30:221 (8) - you can add a fnish aswell
3. 00:37:197 (3) - x224/y340 for smoother flow
4. 01:18:942 (2,3,4,5,1) - I'd just keep it simple and follow one instrument here and ignore the drum tbh, it plays really weird atm So i'd go for something like this
   

Nice set good luck with ranked!

- Frontier - wrote:

[url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/393742&start=0]
[Easy]
00:05:104 (1) - NC
01:02:779 (3) - i think curve slider is better
01:23:244 (1) - NC

[Normal]
00:43:011 (4) - ctrl+h and place to 28|120 is better imo

[Hard]
Looks Great !!

[Insane]
00:39:058 (2) - ctrl+g for flow

Ayyri wrote:

Why is this map so nice? How do you mod nice?? sorry ;v;

SPOILER

General:

A lot of the blankets aren't right, but I'm not going to fill up this whole mod with blankets. Because that's the way to make people angry. So I will only comment if the blanket actually causes something to be wrong with the map - which I doubt will happen. But if you actually want a blanket mod, I could do that in the future. i mean, it does improve the looks of the map. so if you want to you can do that. i dont feel that it neccecary though.

Easy:

01:13:477 - This pause feels a little bit weird, considering how "close" the notes are. But I understand that it's for a dramatic effect. Solution: Either make 01:13:709 (1) - a bit further from 01:13:011 (4) - or make 01:13:011 (4) - a slider.
Same problem as above, except at 01:16:732 - Solution: Consider putting a circle at 01:16:732 - i dont want to make it harder

Normal:

I actually don't have any problems with this difficulty. I think it flows pretty nicely.

Hard:

Same as the normal, I think this flows nicely.

Insane:

Same as the normal and hard, this is a good map.

1. 00:51:616 (4) - A 1/2 repeat slider wouldn't be a problem if you wanted to catch all the powerful drums.

1. 00:02:779 (3) - Just a circle works
2. 00:07:895 (2,3) - works well as just a circle at each spot.
3. 00:09:756 (2,3) - 1/1 slider can work here.
4. 00:15:104 (2) - Good circle to delete, adds more emphasis when you click 00:15:337 (3,4) -
5. 00:19:523 (4) - Single Circle
6. 00:23:477 (5) - Could remove
7. 00:33:709 (2,4) - both of these could be removed.
8. 00:46:267 (2,5,2) - putting all these on the offbeat can be a bit confusing (though the last 2 is fine). Stuff like 00:46:035 (1) - or 00:47:430 - is more dominant. A rhythm like this for this section might also be more appropriate for this diff (mostly follows instruments) http://puu.sh/o7vq3.jpg
9. Kiai: http://puu.sh/o7vK8.jpg (Far left is the start) Some places you can put some gaps in. It really shouldn't be this dense to start.
10. Kiai 2nd half of first one, starting from the green line: http://puu.sh/o7vOM.jpg

1. 00:49:290 (6,7,8) - I don't really feel this triplet. A 1/2 slider would be more appropriate in this situation.
2. 01:09:988 (1) - Loosen this curve a little? it doesn't need to directly flow into the upcoming note.
3. 01:13:709 (1,2) - would probably benefit more with the same spacing as 01:14:639 (4,5) -

Lanturn wrote:

[Easy]
Every slider in this diff feels the same.. Other shapes wouldn't hurt imo.

• 00:51:616 (4) - A 1/2 repeat slider wouldn't be a problem if you wanted to catch all the powerful drums.

[Normal]
Uh. i feel like you should nerf this even more. Some examples below. You don't have to do all, but I'd really suggest taking a few of these to dumb down the diff a little so it feels more balanced density wise.

• 00:02:779 (3) - Just a circle works
  00:07:895 (2,3) - works well as just a circle at each spot.
  00:09:756 (2,3) - 1/1 slider can work here.
  00:15:104 (2) - Good circle to delete, adds more emphasis when you click 00:15:337 (3,4) -
  00:19:523 (4) - Single Circle
  00:23:477 (5) - Could remove
  00:33:709 (2,4) - both of these could be removed.
  00:46:267 (2,5,2) - putting all these on the offbeat can be a bit confusing (though the last 2 is fine). Stuff like 00:46:035 (1) - or 00:47:430 - is more dominant. A rhythm like this for this section might also be more appropriate for this diff (mostly follows instruments) http://puu.sh/o7vq3.jpg
  Kiai: http://puu.sh/o7vK8.jpg (Far left is the start) Some places you can put some gaps in. It really shouldn't be this dense to start.
  Kiai 2nd half of first one, starting from the green line: http://puu.sh/o7vOM.jpg

[Insane]

• 00:49:290 (6,7,8) - I don't really feel this triplet. A 1/2 slider would be more appropriate in this situation.
  01:09:988 (1) - Loosen this curve a little? it doesn't need to directly flow into the upcoming note.
  01:13:709 (1,2) - would probably benefit more with the same spacing as 01:14:639 (4,5) -

Hopefully something helps. make sure to nerf Normal just a bit more if you can.

1. Title is not matched to romanised title. please change to the following value.

   Title: Dear My Friend －まだ見ぬ未来へ－

2. Offset is not fit the music imo. how about changing to 1401 (+17)?

1. 00:06:965 (2) - Add clap on slider's end.
2. 00:27:430 (4) - Add new combo and remove new combo on 00:29:290 (1) for consistency.
3. 00:43:477 (2) - I think there is no strong sound emphasizing to use clap sound.
4. 00:49:756 (3,1) - Same as above. toggle new combo on each thing.
5. 01:08:360 - New combo cycle is a bit broken. i think it woud be better to change for consistency.
   1. 01:10:221 (1) - Remove new combo
   2. 01:12:081 (3) - Add new combo
   3. 01:13:709 (1) - Remove new combo
   4. 01:15:570 (3) - Add new combo
   5. 01:16:965 (1) - Remove new combo

1. Only this difficulty is not setted combo color. is there a special reason?
2. 00:02:779 (3) - Change to one circle like 00:04:639.
3. 00:06:500 (3,4) - It would be fit more overall feeling to use 1/2 slider because it is calm part compared to other parts.
4. 00:09:523 - It is empty although there is vocal sound. how about using slider like 00:02:081 or 1/2 repeat slider?
5. 00:12:314 (5) - Remove for making little break.
6. 00:13:477 (2,3) - How about changing rhythm to like this following vocals?
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:17:663 (3) - Change to one circle and change 00:18:128 (1) to 1/2 slider like 00:21:849 instead.
8. 00:21:616 (4) - It is calm part. so i think it is necessary to reduce circles.
9. 00:25:104 (3) - Same as 00:17:663.
10. 00:26:965 (3,4) - Same reason as 00:21:616. change to 1/2 slider.
11. 00:29:058 (4) - Remove.
12. 00:32:546 (4,5) - Change to 1/2 slider for consistency.
13. 00:36:732 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Umm... there is a bit many circles. try to reduce circles!
14. 00:40:918 (2) - Change to 1/2 slider and change 00:41:848 (2) to one circle instead. it would be better rhythm flow.
15. 00:41:383 (1) - Remove new combo for consistency.
16. 00:42:314 (3) - Add new combo for consistency.
17. 00:51:151 (4,1,2) - Try this rhythm for emphasizing last drum sounds?
    SPOILER

    
18. 00:53:477 - Other thing is similar. you should reduce circle and make more break imo.

1. 00:15:802 - Inherited points are duplicated.

Sylphi wrote:

Sorry for late.

[General]

1. Title is not matched to romanised title. please change to the following value.

   Title: Dear My Friend －まだ見ぬ未来へ－

2. Offset is not fit the music imo. how about changing to 1401 (+17)?

[Easy]

1. 00:06:965 (2) - Add clap on slider's end.
2. 00:27:430 (4) - Add new combo and remove new combo on 00:29:290 (1) for consistency.
3. 00:43:477 (2) - I think there is no strong sound emphasizing to use clap sound.
4. 00:49:756 (3,1) - Same as above. toggle new combo on each thing.
5. 01:08:360 - New combo cycle is a bit broken. i think it woud be better to change for consistency.
   1. 01:10:221 (1) - Remove new combo
   2. 01:12:081 (3) - Add new combo
   3. 01:13:709 (1) - Remove new combo
   4. 01:15:570 (3) - Add new combo
   5. 01:16:965 (1) - Remove new combo
      
      fixed all

[Normal]

1. Only this difficulty is not setted combo color. is there a special reason?
   i mustve forgotten
2. 00:02:779 (3) - Change to one circle like 00:04:639. theres a vocal beat there
3. 00:06:500 (3,4) - It would be fit more overall feeling to use 1/2 slider because it is calm part compared to other parts.
4. 00:09:523 - It is empty although there is vocal sound. how about using slider like 00:02:081 or 1/2 repeat slider? its better with a break here
5. 00:12:314 (5) - Remove for making little break.
6. 00:13:477 (2,3) - How about changing rhythm to like this following vocals? did something simular
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:17:663 (3) - Change to one circle and change 00:18:128 (1) to 1/2 slider like 00:21:849 instead. vocal beat here
8. 00:21:616 (4) - It is calm part. so i think it is necessary to reduce circles.
9. 00:25:104 (3) - Same as 00:17:663. vocal beat here
10. 00:26:965 (3,4) - Same reason as 00:21:616. change to 1/2 slider. i like it as it is for now
11. 00:29:058 (4) - Remove vocals again
12. 00:32:546 (4,5) - Change to 1/2 slider for consistency. nothing interesting to map here
13. 00:36:732 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Umm... there is a bit many circles. try to reduce circles!
14. 00:40:918 (2) - Change to 1/2 slider and change 00:41:848 (2) to one circle instead. it would be better rhythm flow. did something simular
15. 00:41:383 (1) - Remove new combo for consistency.
16. 00:42:314 (3) - Add new combo for consistency.
17. 00:51:151 (4,1,2) - Try this rhythm for emphasizing last drum sounds? i like the way it looks like right now
    SPOILER

    
18. 00:53:477 - Other thing is similar. you should reduce circle and make more break imo. i mean, the chorus should be more intense than the rest of the map, but ill concider thinking of deleting some notes here and there where it fits.

[Hard]

1. 00:15:802 - Inherited points are duplicated.

JBHyperion wrote:

Sorry for the delay |:

General Comments:

1. Song Folder: BG has quite a large filesize at nearly 1MB - here's a compressed version with minimal loss in quality that will save some space in thew beatmap folder I changed the background before you modded
2. Song Setup: Normal has default combo colours, please change these to the customs found on the other diffs Same as above
3. Metadata: No issues
4. Timing: No issues
5. Hitsounds: For some reason, Audacity doesn't want to open soft-hitclap2.wav, and I noticed that the file size is surprisingly low. Just to be safe, replace it with this its probably better to be safe then, fix
6. AIMod: No issues

Difficulty-Specific Comments:

Easy

1. 00:10:238 (3,4) - Flow here is not immediately obvious, new players might misread since the tail is the more direct continuation of the direction from (2,3). I'd unblanket this, rotate (4)'s tail 90 degrees clockwise, or Ctrl+G and rotate 90 degrees anticlockwise to move the tail away
2. 00:43:494 (2,1) - ^ Perhaps stack (2) on the tail of 00:41:400 (5) -?
3. 00:45:121 (2,1) - Blanket can be improved here, spacing is closer at the bottom than the top. Move 00:46:052 (1,2,1,2) up to y-128
4. 00:57:214 (1,2,3,4) - Flow here could lead to (3) being skipped accidentally, how about something like this - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4950048 ? You'll need to move 00:53:028 (3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) left a bit to make room, but you can then rotate 01:00:935 (1) clockwise a little to respace this I did something simular, so i hope this works good too
5. 01:25:121 (1,1) - Thoughts on starting the spinner at 01:25:587 - instead? 1/1 spacing here would give plenty of time to react to the spinner, at the moment it appears at almost the same time as 01:25:121 (1) so could confuse new players ill be generous to the newer players

Besides that, really nice diff.

Normal

1. 00:18:145 (1) - Move to [300,340] for an even triangular pattern here with 00:16:982 (2,3) tails, and to bring it away from the almost-overlap with (2). If you do this, you'll need to respace 00:18:145 (1,2) and following to maintain constant DS
2. 00:18:610 (2,3) - Curious as to why you chose to stack here but not to at 00:22:331 (2,3) - etc. did something better
3. 00:31:866 (3) - Increase the curve here for a better blanket, middle grey sliderpoint to [304,84]
4. 00:33:028 (1,2,3) - Watch spacing here, some small but noticeable changes make this pattern look a little awkward. Move (2) to [225,317]
5. 00:38:610 (1) - One pixel right for a perfect stack with the tail of 00:37:447 (3) thought it was pefectly stacked at first
6. 00:42:331 (1) - Would prefer if the curve on this was increased a bit, blanket looks quite flat atm. Centre sliderpoint to [151,53] and tail to [88,84] looks nicer
7. 00:46:052 (1,2,3) - Again, watch for spacings here, (2) is quite close to the body of (3) and a little further from (1) than necessary
8. 00:53:028 (4) - Move to [81,129] for a better blanket, spacing is currently lower at the bottom than top. Shouldn't affect 00:53:028 (4,1) too much due to the 1/1 spacing
9. 00:57:912 (3,4) - Space this manually, since the stack brings (3) very close to the tail of 00:56:982 (1) - something like [99,209] works if you then move 00:58:610 (5) in the same way
10. 01:04:191 (3,3) - Avoid this overlap if possible please - although it breaks symmetry, you could move 01:04:656 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - to [312,147] and then 01:11:866 (5) to [273,64] to get around this i remade the slider instead and fixed flow

Hard

1. 00:33:959 (3) - I can't hear a sound on the 1/4 to justify this repeat, plus it feels awkward this being the only slider of it's type in the section. I know you were going for some variety but it feels very forced so I'd prefer a 1/2 slider instead
2. 01:18:842 (6,7) - Interesting rhythm choice, however I feel it would be much better to make 01:19:540 - clickable to add emphasis since it's such a strong sound. How about something like this? i just replaced the last repeat slider with a triple cause that makes the last note clickable, and i wanted it to be a bit harder at the climax
   
   SPOILER

   

Nothing else to say really, very clean and fun to play. Good work!

Insane

1. 00:06:982 (1) - Missing out on the "click" drum sound at 00:07:447 - atm, perhaps split this into 3/4 slider and 1/2 slider or similar? i like how it is now cause it kinda builds up to the drum fill before the first kiai
2. 00:22:563 (3,4,5,6,7) - Shape looks a little messy to me, this pattern can be made more even if you move (4) to [444,154] and (7) to [375,80] wooow, i thought i fixed this xD
3. 00:52:331 (1,2) - More spacing to this perhaps? That clap sound is really strong and could do with some extra emphasis
4. 01:18:959 (2,3,4,5) - Similar to the suggestion in hard, perhaps reverse the order of these to go repeat slider > triplet so that the last beat is clickable made it into a single stream instead

All in all, great set. Feel free to call me back once you have a couple more mods.

Good luck!