My Little Acc wrote:

Modmod !

*red = unrankable

NORMAL :

00:29:756 - Blanket (Not critic)
01:21:383 (1) - This circle come too fast (for Normal Diff) fix

HARD :

00:31:151 - Blanket, not critic fix

INSANE :

I think it's ok, but Slider Velocity is maybe a little slow for Insane.

Great song, and good mapping !

TheOnlyLeon wrote:

Hey, from my queue, BTW, this is just a general check, stuff like metadata is not being looked at.

NORMAL

00:07:663 - (2) This slider shape is strange looking, the curves are too tight and there's a weird pinching on the corners of the slider path, You could try other things, but I'd suggest getting rid of one point and just making it a basic curve since it has to fit in such a small space.

00:09:523 - (2) ^^^^^^

00:12:546 - (1) ^^^^^^

00:31:849 - (2) ^^^^^^

No changes

OK, I really like the Normal, it's just that you have that same slider shape popping up all over the map, and that one shape just looks awful imo. It comes up a couple other times later but I got sick of just examining the sliders so I skipped ahead looking for any other issues, didn't really see any. Nice diff.

HARD

00:09:290 - (1,2) I'm going to assume this positioning was intentional, but on the off chance it wasn't, these aren't parallel. fix

00:51:383 - (6,7,1) This seems harsh, the entire map up until this point is 1/2 or 1/1 in terms on clickable objects, then for this one instance you throw on 1/4, STACKED 1/4, and then never use it again. This comes out of nowhere and could result in a break solely because the player has already gotten in such a cemented rhythm of 1/2. I'd recommend changing this out to maintain consistency. used another pattern

01:04:174 - (2,3,4,1) I get the square being used here, but the slider above is pulling inwards, so the sudden change to directly down is unnatural and doesn't make too much sense, I'd pull 3 and 4 to the right to make a diamond shape, it might make a couple of the notes look closer together than you wanted, however this would significantly improve the directional flow of the map. changed slider

Yea, that's it. the difficulty is still really clean, I really had to nit-pick to get anything to say at all. Good job so far.

INSANE

00:46:035 - (9.10,11,1,2,3) I get that this is the highest difficulty, but in general the map itself is quite easy, and a stream that ends off immediately into a large jump pattern, I know a lot of people MY rank that struggle with that, and the demographic for this set is much lower, so this is just cruel. Either nerf the size of the jumps so that it's easier to catch onto, or cut 3 or 4 from the length of the stream into a kick slider, so that you don't have to stream directly into the jump pattern.

00:48:360 - (3) All perfect triangles, then this random note over here, in itself this isn't normally a problem, but it's literally the only instance of it in the entire segment, so it ends up just REALLY out of place visually. I'd recommend shifting this around so that it's either consistent or consistently misaligned, take your pick.

no change, valid points though might concider nerfing the pre chorus A BIT, but not too much. i really like how it turned out.

That's all, honestly the set it really good right now, and the fact that you've got it to this state with as few mods as you have is amazing, so great work on that. All I could find were minor polish points that could be cleaned up on. Great set, have a Star.

XxSeonxX wrote:

hello, from my queue

General
ctrl+shift+a and fix the problems
since you are having same colour combos, why not just make 2 combos instead of 4? actually forgot to add combo colors. thanks for reminding me!

Insane
00:48:360 (3) - I think having this circle higher is better since other jumps are further apart no change


I can't see much problems from this map, its nice :O, good luck
Have a star

1. Widescreen support conflicts in Insane.
2. hitsounds with possible delay >5ms:
   soft-hitclap2.wav
   << Actually I rechecked this in Audacity and I'm pretty sure that this would be considered an unrankable issue, according to Osu! Ranking Criteria :
   

   Hitsounds must have an acceptable range of delay under 5ms, unless there's a special purpose. Every hitsound file should start in time, preferrably at 0ms. This is to ensure that every map doesn't sound mistimed, and therefore could provide acceptably synchronized rhythm feedback to players.

1. OD could have turned down a bit since it's the easiest diff in the mapset.
2. 00:29:756 - I feel like there should be a slider here to emphasize that high pitch sound and end it on 00:30:221 . So my suggestion here would be either Ctrl+g the rhythm here 00:29:290 (1,2) or just simply delete 00:30:221 (2) and make 00:29:290 (1) a reverse slider.
3. 00:36:732 (1) - It's kinda confusing because this isn't mapped on the piano while the rest of the combo 00:36:965 (2,3,4,5,6,7) did emphasize it.
4. 00:58:825 (1,2) - A spacing error.

1. 00:59:988 (5) - I don't know what this kickslider emphasized on, compared to 01:05:337 (3) .
2. Nice.

1. 00:08:477 - I can understand that what you're trying to do but I would make this beat either a sliderend or just leave this beat empty, up to you.
2. 00:36:965 - You could make this clickable so you can start emphasizing that piano sound here.
3. 01:05:104 (2,3,4) - 01:07:197 (3,4,5) - Not sure if this is intentional but it would be more preferable if they were placed identically.

• 00:05:104 (1) - consider changing the shape of this. Doesnt fit the sound there imo
  00:08:476 (5) - this note is overmapped. Its not wrong or bad, but if more ppl dont like this then you should change it. I think having 00:08:360 (4,6) - as a high spaced jump fits better with that "WUUSH" sound.
  00:09:290 (2,3) - awkward drop off. kinda messes with the visual flow of that part
  00:15:221 - you should put smth here D: Changing this 00:15:104 (4) - to a 1/4 slider works better
  00:27:197 (6,7) - having a slight curve there would work better
  like this

  
  00:42:314 (1,2,3) - the spacing between 1 and 2 is almost inexistent (slider liniency from a squiggy 1/1 slider). There is also no reason to recude the spacing. Keep it the same beteen these 3
  00:46:035 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3) - duuude the jumps. I know its an "Insane" but those are bit much. 00:46:035 - put a 1/2 slider here so the transition starts smoother. Reduce spacing between those 00:47:430 (4,5) - so you emphasize 00:47:895 (1) - more (relative spacing). You could put a 1/2 slider here aswell 00:47:430 (4) - .
  00:51:151 (6) - slider here aswell?
  00:55:104 (6,7) - mb destack these (like here 01:15:570 (7,8,1) - )
  01:00:686 (5) - reduce the spacig on this so 01:00:918 (1) - has more emphasis (move to 232|256) (you could do this on more than just this part. not pointing out or else this would take too long)
  01:02:546 (6,1) - awkward flow
  01:07:197 (3) - higher spacing. like here 01:06:035 (6,1) -

• 00:40:221 (6,1) - no need to stack
  00:52:314 (2) - You double the spacing here. For someone who plays Hard maps this would be a bit too much
  00:57:663 (2,3,4,5) - this square rly looks off-putting. Change it to a curve
  01:03:477 (2,3,4,1) - same
  01:10:918 (3,4) - no need to stack
  01:21:849 (2,3,4) - let the whole pattern here follow the direction of the slider

• 00:11:383 (2) - try using more smooth curves.
  00:36:965 (2,3,4) - you could change this to a 1/2 repeat slider. Its a normal and the chilled part of the song. You need to hold back a bit
  00:37:895 (5,6,7) - same
  00:41:383 (3) - copy paste this and change this 00:41:849 (4) -
  00:52:314 (4) - this kinda doesnt fit. just having these 00:51:616 (1,2,3) - feels a lot better

DavidEd wrote:

No response: Fixed (most likely)

Smokeman

Insane

00:05:104 (1) - consider changing the shape of this. Doesnt fit the sound there imo
00:08:476 (5) - this note is overmapped. Its not wrong or bad, but if more ppl dont like this then you should change it. I think having 00:08:360 (4,6) - as a high spaced jump fits better with that "WUUSH" sound. youre the first to complain then. i like that little fill there and theres a low chance ill change that
00:09:290 (2,3) - awkward drop off. kinda messes with the visual flow of that part
00:15:221 - you should put smth here D: Changing this 00:15:104 (4) - to a 1/4 slider works better
00:27:197 (6,7) - having a slight curve there would work better
like this

00:42:314 (1,2,3) - the spacing between 1 and 2 is almost inexistent (slider liniency from a squiggy 1/1 slider). There is also no reason to recude the spacing. Keep it the same beteen these 3
00:46:035 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3) - duuude the jumps. I know its an "Insane" but those are bit much. 00:46:035 - put a 1/2 slider here so the transition starts smoother. Reduce spacing between those 00:47:430 (4,5) - so you emphasize 00:47:895 (1) - more (relative spacing). You could put a 1/2 slider here aswell 00:47:430 (4) - . some people dont like it, and some people do. and i love to play those jumps so again, low chance of change
00:51:151 (6) - slider here aswell?
00:55:104 (6,7) - mb destack these (like here 01:15:570 (7,8,1) - )
01:00:686 (5) - reduce the spacig on this so 01:00:918 (1) - has more emphasis (move to 232|256) (you could do this on more than just this part. not pointing out or else this would take too long)
01:02:546 (6,1) - awkward flow really? i like it
01:07:197 (3) - higher spacing. like here 01:06:035 (6,1) -

tbh i dont like the way it looks. Some of the patterns dont flow into eachother very well.

Hard

00:40:221 (6,1) - no need to stack
00:52:314 (2) - You double the spacing here. For someone who plays Hard maps this would be a bit too much
00:57:663 (2,3,4,5) - this square rly looks off-putting. Change it to a curve
01:03:477 (2,3,4,1) - same
01:10:918 (3,4) - no need to stack
01:21:849 (2,3,4) - let the whole pattern here follow the direction of the slider

this dif looks a bit awkward while playing aswell D: not really

Normal

00:11:383 (2) - try using more smooth curves. not too big of a deal, but i guess i could do that on some sliders
00:36:965 (2,3,4) - you could change this to a 1/2 repeat slider. Its a normal and the chilled part of the song. You need to hold back a bit
00:37:895 (5,6,7) - same
00:41:383 (3) - copy paste this and change this 00:41:849 (4) -
00:52:314 (4) - this kinda doesnt fit. just having these 00:51:616 (1,2,3) - feels a lot better

00:07:663 (2) - i feel like you are using too many of those slider shapes nothing wrong with that.

This still needs some work, but it doesnt look too bad. hang in there only some fine polishing

(abou tthe math thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summation&#41; think my mind just exploded

Thanks for mod!

Dono027 wrote:

From my queue

[Normal]

00:50:686 (3,4) - Delete circle & add reverse for make a more slower combo.

00:56:267 (4) - Slider : 1/2 beats with reverse

01:02:314 (3,4) - Slider emphasize vocals

01:13:244 (4,5) - Slider emphasize vocals

01:21:849 - make a 1/2 beat slider

[Hard]

00:23:593 - Add circle

00:41:383 (3) - 1/4 beat slider with reverse sounds better

00:59:523 (3,4,5,6) - Make a square pattern or a triangle with (4,5,6) fix

01:18:825 (1) - Make this in 2 sliders. fix

01:24:407 (1) - ^ fix

That's all for my mod !
Good luck for your map !

Nao Tomori wrote:

testplay on insane + some irc

SPOILER

19:46 *DavidEd is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/875557 ELISA - Dear My Friend -Mada Minu Mirai e-]
19:46 DavidEd: insane
19:49 Nao Tomori: this is fun
19:49 DavidEd: oooo
19:49 DavidEd: were there any parts you kinda reacted to?
19:50 [color=#FF0000]Nao Tomori: 00:12:546 (1) - i think you could move this down a little to blanket the end of the note before [/color]
19:50 Nao Tomori: 00:15:337 (1) - i kept misreading this and starting the stream late
19:51 Nao Tomori: might be my problem though
19:51 Nao Tomori: but you could make it all circles as well
19:52 Nao Tomori: 00:24:872 (4) - this maybe you can move it down
19:52 Nao Tomori: but that might change the movement
19:52 Nao Tomori: 00:29:872 (5) - this is actually a slider stream if you look closely
19:53 Nao Tomori: or it goes into 1/8 with the violin/higher instrument
19:53 Nao Tomori: which you can show with sliders
19:53 DavidEd: hmm
19:53 Nao Tomori: maybe better to ignore it at this diff level
19:54 DavidEd: yeah, its probably for the better
19:54 Nao Tomori: 00:36:965 (2,3,4) - i think this rhythm should be the same as the next 3 
19:54 Nao Tomori: 00:37:895 (5,6,7) - 
19:54 Nao Tomori: cuz it is the same sound in the song
19:55 DavidEd: isnt it though?
19:55 Nao Tomori: oh i explained that badly
19:55 Nao Tomori: (3) to (4) is a small jump
19:55 Nao Tomori: but (6) to (7) is a big jump
19:56 Nao Tomori: even though it is very similar sound
19:56 DavidEd: yeah i just fixed that
19:56 DavidEd: wanted a reqtangle
19:56 Nao Tomori: 00:39:058 (2) - maybe you can move this up to blanket 3
19:57 Nao Tomori: 00:46:035 (1) - the NCing here is weird in my opinion
19:57 DavidEd: it wasnt meant to be blankeded
19:57 Nao Tomori: hmm it is fine as is 
19:57 Nao Tomori: i just think blanket might look nice
19:58 DavidEd: yeah
19:58 Nao Tomori: 00:46:500 (2) - this should definitely be blanket
19:58 DavidEd: i copied and pasted the first slider so it looks better
19:58 Nao Tomori: cool
19:58 DavidEd: im gonna remap that part
19:58 Nao Tomori: oh
19:58 DavidEd: the jumps are big
19:58 DavidEd: or well
19:58 DavidEd: nerf them a bit
19:58 Nao Tomori: jumps are fine in my opinion
19:58 Nao Tomori: might be the pp farmer in me though
19:59 Nao Tomori: i think NC ing should be different
19:59 Nao Tomori: 00:47:430 (6) - i think this should b NC
19:59 Nao Tomori:  00:48:128 (2) - this 
19:59 Nao Tomori: etc
19:59 Nao Tomori: to follow the vocals
19:59 Nao Tomori: since you followed the vocals with the jumps anyway
20:00 Nao Tomori: no point in NCing with the guitar
20:00 DavidEd: yeah sure
20:00 Nao Tomori: 00:49:290 (4) - i think you missed a burst here
20:00 Nao Tomori: or a triple
20:01 Nao Tomori: 00:55:104 (6,7) - this was pretty spaced out the first time you did it, i think it should be spaced out a little more here too
20:02 Nao Tomori: well that's pretty much all i could think of 
20:02 Nao Tomori: the rhythm is fine to me

1. Combo colors can fit better the BG, right now they feel a bit random

1. 00:01:732 - no hitsound? a clap will fit really nice this part
2. 00:03:593 - ^ etc, I think you could improve your hitsounding a bit more, there are some parts that can use claps
3. 00:07:895 (2,3) - try to bring less spacing to these objects, since the music is super calm there, the only jump should be at 00:08:360 (4) - where the music become stronger
4. 00:11:732 (5) - sound there isn't that clear, I'd just ignore it, since triplets starting at white ticks doesn't play that nice, rhythmical talking
5. 00:15:104 (4,1) - use 3 circles instead, also start the circle stream at 00:15:570 - for better rhythm, since start a streaming at blue tick is a bit weird, :
   
6. 00:19:523 (5,1) - blanket can use some more work
7. 00:22:314 (2) - the tail of this slider have a really strong sound, i'd use two circles instead and maybe add some hitsound, as I said before I think your hitsounding can still be better
8. 00:24:174 (2) - 00:26:035 (2) - same as above
9. 00:39:756 (4,5) - this can use a better blanket
10. 00:43:011 (2,3) - same
11. 00:52:314 (1) - try a slowdown to fit better the song? music low intensity there, map should do that as well
12. 00:53:360 (4) - idk what are you mapping here, there is only a vocal at the before tick
13. 00:59:988 (1) - you really don't need to NC this, just keep your comboing consistent
14. 01:08:825 (2) - another case where the slider tail have a strong sound, those beats need click action due the loud sounds
15. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC
16. 01:18:360 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - same as 00:15:104
17. 01:22:430 (4) - again I dont get what are your trying to follow, just use a 1/2 slider as you did before

1. 00:11:732 same as insane
2. 00:29:290 (6,1) - seems you have the NC placed at the wrong place, swap NCs there
3. 00:33:477 (2,3,4) - tiny spacing error
4. 01:05:802 (4,1) - blanket can be better
5. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC
6. 01:18:825 (1,2,3) - super weird rhythm for a hard diff, just follow the melody instead of drums + melody, will be something like:
   

1. 00:08:825 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - train patterns doesn't play that nicely on normal diffs, try to make this part less dense
2. 00:19:988 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - there are alot more
3. 01:05:570 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - yeah non stop 1/2s
   Okay this diff need seriously rework, if you are mapping with constant 1/2s then don't overlap objects, because looks really bad and make players want to click objects soon and stop holding others, for the contrary of what some old people believe, non overlapped objects at low bpm like this play better than overlapped ones, Anyways I'd suggest redo rhythms to more simple ones here or do a respacing of this diff and add an easy diff, second option seems better taking in consideration that is just a 1:30 song, ofc you can ask for more opinions

Natsu wrote:

Hi

General:

1. Combo colors can fit better the BG, right now they feel a bit random ah, i took them from the part that starts at 00:46:035 - (in the video) but i might figure something else out if more people react to it.

Insane:

1. 00:01:732 - no hitsound? a clap will fit really nice this part actually listened to these parts again, and it seems like there actually ARE claps here. it was pretty hard for me to hear though.
2. 00:03:593 - ^ etc, I think you could improve your hitsounding a bit more, there are some parts that can use claps ^
3. 00:07:895 (2,3) - try to bring less spacing to these objects, since the music is super calm there, the only jump should be at 00:08:360 (4) - where the music become stronger makes sense
4. 00:11:732 (5) - sound there isn't that clear, I'd just ignore it, since triplets starting at white ticks doesn't play that nice, rhythmical talking fix
5. 00:15:104 (4,1) - use 3 circles instead, also start the circle stream at 00:15:570 - for better rhythm, since start a streaming at blue tick is a bit weird, :
   i didnt know at the start what to do with this part, this made it play much better
6. 00:19:523 (5,1) - blanket can use some more work obvs fix
7. 00:22:314 (2) - the tail of this slider have a really strong sound, i'd use two circles instead and maybe add some hitsound, as I said before I think your hitsounding can still be betterfix
8. 00:24:174 (2) - 00:26:035 (2) - same as above ill prob fix this but it plays well as it is now
9. 00:39:756 (4,5) - this can use a better blanket obvs fix
10. 00:43:011 (2,3) - same ^
11. 00:52:314 (1) - try a slowdown to fit better the song? music low intensity there, map should do that as well sounds cool
12. 00:53:360 (4) - idk what are you mapping here, there is only a vocal at the before tick OVERMAP
13. 00:59:988 (1) - you really don't need to NC this, just keep your comboing consistent fix
14. 01:08:825 (2) - another case where the slider tail have a strong sound, those beats need click action due the loud sounds ill figure something out
15. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC fix
16. 01:18:360 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - same as 00:15:104 maybe this is better...
17. 01:22:430 (4) - again I dont get what are your trying to follow, just use a 1/2 slider as you did before fix

Hard:

1. 00:11:732 same as insane sounds cool
2. 00:29:290 (6,1) - seems you have the NC placed at the wrong place, swap NCs there whoops
3. 00:33:477 (2,3,4) - tiny spacing error ^
4. 01:05:802 (4,1) - blanket can be better obvs fix
5. 01:17:430 (3) - missing NC ^
6. 01:18:825 (1,2,3) - super weird rhythm for a hard diff, just follow the melody instead of drums + melody, will be something like:
   

maybe this is better...

Normal:

1. 00:08:825 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - train patterns doesn't play that nicely on normal diffs, try to make this part less dense
2. 00:19:988 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - there are alot more
3. 01:05:570 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - yeah non stop 1/2s
   Okay this diff need seriously rework, if you are mapping with constant 1/2s then don't overlap objects, because looks really bad and make players want to click objects soon and stop holding others, for the contrary of what some old people believe, non overlapped objects at low bpm like this play better than overlapped ones, Anyways I'd suggest redo rhythms to more simple ones here or do a respacing of this diff and add an easy diff, second option seems better taking in consideration that is just a 1:30 song, ofc you can ask for more opinions will most likely end up in a remap of this diff. i'll see what happens, im not too experienced with lower difficulties. but ill most likely add an easy.

1. 00:02:081 (2,3) - flow here could be improved. maybe rotate this -15 degrees and reposition 00:01:384 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/nMUuJ/8853b8e915.jpg
2. 00:21:616 (4,1) - ctrl+g rhythm to capture downbeat
3. 00:31:151 (3) - NC should be here instead of 00:31:849 (1) -
4. 00:33:709 (2,4) - might be some readability issues since the approach circle of the stacked notes appear before the previous one goes away
5. Maybe you should get some more opinions before changing, but I think the spread could be evened out by using less 1/2 rhythms or replaced some notes with sliders. In terms of note density, normal is almost as dense as your hard diff, which is reflected in the star rating as well.

MokouSmoke wrote:

[Normal]

1. 00:02:081 (2,3) - flow here could be improved. maybe rotate this -15 degrees and reposition 00:01:384 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/nMUuJ/8853b8e915.jpg
2. 00:21:616 (4,1) - ctrl+g rhythm to capture downbeat
3. 00:31:151 (3) - NC should be here instead of 00:31:849 (1) -
4. 00:33:709 (2,4) - might be some readability issues since the approach circle of the stacked notes appear before the previous one goes away
5. Maybe you should get some more opinions before changing, but I think the spread could be evened out by using less 1/2 rhythms or replaced some notes with sliders. In terms of note density, normal is almost as dense as your hard diff, which is reflected in the star rating as well.

1. 00:19:988 (1) - Cntrl G + Cntrl H so it also follows the vocals a bit with the kink
2. 01:15:802 (1) - would extend this by 1 tick and start at 01:15:570 so you follow the vocals here because they reach a highpoint in the song

1. 00:25:570 (1) - would just do what you did at 00:21:849 (1,2) - having the end not clickable is not worth the trade-off for a bit of diversity imo
2. 00:50:221 (2,4) - this kind of stacking might too hard to read for a normal diff espacially since its the only time you stack like this, would just go with something like this
   
3. 00:57:895 (3,4) - move a bit to the right so it doesnt touch 00:56:965 (1) -
4. 01:04:174 (3,3) - only overlap you got so would work around this, (adjusting the tail of 01:03:477 (2) - a bit and keep the same pattern but bit higher perhaps)
5. 01:16:732 (2) - The end definitly needs to be clickable here maybe follow this rythm instead
   

1. 00:04:407 (4) - makes more sense to stack with (3) here instead, since the sounds are identical (and gives a bit more margin of error bc the jump is on a slider)
2. 01:07:197 (3) - blanket can be a bit better
3. 01:24:407 (1,2) - would make it the same as 00:29:523 (2) - putting a single 1/4 slider in this diff right at the end is kindof a dick move for people who play around this lvl

1. 00:23:477 (7) - maybe place this at x372/y76 to reduce the jump a bit, it's still a relatively quiet part of the song
2. 00:30:221 (8) - you can add a fnish aswell
3. 00:37:197 (3) - x224/y340 for smoother flow
4. 01:18:942 (2,3,4,5,1) - I'd just keep it simple and follow one instrument here and ignore the drum tbh, it plays really weird atm So i'd go for something like this
   

Wishkey wrote:

Heya! from my Q

Really cool map! just gonna give some suggestions here but flow blankets and hitsounds etc seems mostly alright so far

Easy

1. 00:19:988 (1) - Cntrl G + Cntrl H so it also follows the vocals a bit with the kink
2. 01:15:802 (1) - would extend this by 1 tick and start at 01:15:570 so you follow the vocals here because they reach a highpoint in the song

Normal

1. 00:25:570 (1) - would just do what you did at 00:21:849 (1,2) - having the end not clickable is not worth the trade-off for a bit of diversity imo
2. 00:50:221 (2,4) - this kind of stacking might too hard to read for a normal diff espacially since its the only time you stack like this, would just go with something like this
   
   since its not clickable, it shouldnt be hard to read
3. 00:57:895 (3,4) - move a bit to the right so it doesnt touch 00:56:965 (1) -
4. 01:04:174 (3,3) - only overlap you got so would work around this, (adjusting the tail of 01:03:477 (2) - a bit and keep the same pattern but bit higher perhaps)
5. 01:16:732 (2) - The end definitly needs to be clickable here maybe follow this rythm instead
   

hard

1. 00:04:407 (4) - makes more sense to stack with (3) here instead, since the sounds are identical (and gives a bit more margin of error bc the jump is on a slider)
2. 01:07:197 (3) - blanket can be a bit better
3. 01:24:407 (1,2) - would make it the same as 00:29:523 (2) - putting a single 1/4 slider in this diff right at the end is kindof a dick move for people who play around this lvl

Insane

1. 00:23:477 (7) - maybe place this at x372/y76 to reduce the jump a bit, it's still a relatively quiet part of the song
2. 00:30:221 (8) - you can add a fnish aswell
3. 00:37:197 (3) - x224/y340 for smoother flow
4. 01:18:942 (2,3,4,5,1) - I'd just keep it simple and follow one instrument here and ignore the drum tbh, it plays really weird atm So i'd go for something like this
   

Nice set good luck with ranked!