forum

Mikami Shiori - Minna Daisuki No Uta

posted
Total Posts
10
Topic Starter
PumpkinIcedTea
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 9:42:32 PM

Artist: Mikami Shiori
Title: Minna Daisuki No Uta
Source: YuruYuri♪♪
Tags: Yuru Yuri
BPM: 140
Filesize: 4850kb
Play Time: 04:48
Difficulties Available:
  1. Easy (1.43 stars, 185 notes)
  2. Hard (3.2 stars, 679 notes)
  3. Normal (1.8 stars, 289 notes)
Download: Mikami Shiori - Minna Daisuki No Uta
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
To anyone reading this :
There is a major problem with this beatmap. I was told there are multiple bpms involved in this song and I lack the ability to find them . If there is anyone who can help me with this , please contact me . I would be very appreciative . Thanks
Chihara Minori
Finish This Map Please~
Mikami Shiori always in heart~
Topic Starter
PumpkinIcedTea

eclipselotus wrote:

Finish This Map Please~
Mikami Shiori always in heart~
Hahas yeah I intend to , still working on it :)
wajinshu
hi
[General]
Uncheck countdown
[Hard]
00:00:550 (1,2) -make this a 1/1 slider. slider end at 00:00:978
00:03:550 (1,2,3) - 00:08:050 (1) - In white tick piano sound why did you decide to skip it
00:23:264 (8) - ^
00:13:978 - Here
00:26:907 (4,1) - Overlap
00:35:264 (3,2) - stack the circle with the head of the slider, will look much better imo, no need in these overlaps
00:58:621 - missed circle
01:14:264 (1,2) - improve this blanket please xd
01:22:835 (3,1) - Stack please
01:35:692 (5,1) - Maybe blanket
02:05:692 (5,6) - Blanket please
03:13:407 (1) - X: 288 Y: 208
04:27:550 (5,1) - Stack
GL
Topic Starter
PumpkinIcedTea

wajinshu wrote:

hi
[General]
Uncheck countdown Fixxed
[Hard]
00:00:550 (1,2) -make this a 1/1 slider. slider end at 00:00:978 Fixed
00:03:550 (1,2,3) - 00:08:050 (1) - In white tick piano sound why did you decide to skip it Fixed
00:23:264 (8) - ^ I didn't skip the white piano here :o
00:13:978 - Here I can't get to this exact timing point..
00:26:907 (4,1) - Overlap Fixed
00:35:264 (3,2) - stack the circle with the head of the slider, will look much better imo, no need in these overlaps Fixed
00:58:621 - missed circle Fixed
01:14:264 (1,2) - improve this blanket please xd Uhh idk whats wrong with it though
01:22:835 (3,1) - Stack please Fixed
01:35:692 (5,1) - Maybe blanket Fixed
02:05:692 (5,6) - Blanket please Fixed
03:13:407 (1) - X: 288 Y: 208 Fixed
04:27:550 (5,1) - Stack Fixed
GL
Thanks for you help ! :)
ceLy
NM from my queue
[General]
  1. maybe this need more than one red line, you'd better retiming it imo.
[Easy]
  1. lower sv might be better
  2. 00:01:407 (2) - change to a 2/1 slider
  3. 00:07:835 miss a note
  4. 00:13:835 (1) - i think this should start from 00:14:264
  5. 00:22:407 miss a note
  6. 00:17:692 to 00:24:550 piano but after 00:25:407 change to vocal? That's kinda werid.
  7. 00:27:978 (3,4) - change to a 2/1 slider imo
  8. 00:34:835 (2) - change to two 1/1 slider started from 00:34:835 and 00:35:692
  9. 01:04:835 (2) - dont change sv
  10. in fact i'm really confused about what you mapping to, i suggest to map consistly
[Hard]
  1. 00:02:692 (2,3) - single note is better
  2. 00:05:692 (4) - slider here?
  3. 00:06:978 (3) - 25% to hear it
  4. 00:09:121 (9) - slider here?
  5. 00:13:621 (1,2,3) - 25% to hear it
plz timing it carefully before map it.....
Anyway, GL for ranking it...
JamesHappy
since you asked me to do timings for this thing

BPM: 70 (140 is okay)
offset: 594

there are no BPM changes here, just be careful of the snappings.
bassoons
sorry, bad post, see below
bassoons
No there are not multiple BPMs.

[Hard]

In general, I'm uncertain about using arpeggiated chords as excuses for triples, especially since the pianist is playing many of them at 1/8 not 1/4 time.
Mostly issues with your spacing, which seems inconsistent and hard to get the hang of.

  1. 00:02:692 - Think about only using whistle on the on-beat, 4 sounds a bit much.
  2. 00:05:907 - Also random sounding whistles, they don't feel on purpose to me.
  3. 00:36:764 (2) - is placed too far, there is no piano playing to suggest it should be played on next beat so needs to be closer to tell the player it's continuing.
  4. 00:38:692 (8) - not far enough. You've placed plenty other circles this far at 1/4 time away, it's not easy to know this has a 1/2 gap instead.
  5. 00:45:978 (3,4,5) - first instance of pianist playing an arpeggiated chord at 1/8 time on the beat, your arpeggiated circles are in 1/4 and end up off the beat
  6. 00:58:407 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - all even notes yet all spaced in doubles, and even the doubles are spaced unevenly... pretty confusing imhio
  7. 01:13:407 (2,3,4,5) - Again, uneven placement of doubled notes (particularly spacing from previous slider) suggests something other than even notes to the player. At least giving them roughly even spacing in between the two surrounding sliders.
  8. 01:43:835 - Again, spacing here doesn't indicate timing, and the previous group was in double time to the piano
  9. 02:03:978 - could be spaced further
  10. 02:59:692 (2,3,4,5) - questionable placement again, why are the notes grouped into twos when that's not how they're played.
  11. 03:54:978 (2,3,4,5) - same as above, this time its even worse. Player having seen notes from last comment, now they will see these and expect they are even timing as well...
Trost
Alright I'm sorry to say this but
You're offset is good but bpm should not be 140
It should be 70 so you can snap and time notes they way it should

Please use Beat Snap Divisor 1/8, I know it says recommended for experienced beatmappers but this song requires 1/8 since 1/4 can't do the job well


Why I said I'm sorry is because once you change the bpm...you're going to have to basically remap the whole thing.
This type of map should not have fast sliders since the song is slow, so you should aim for a slow map.

Here's a small clip of how it should sound like and sort of look like

Click here fool
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply