Gaia wrote:

[all songs have copious amounts of repetition, obvious or not]
00:29:182 (2,1,2,3) - stack these ? But they are? I'm manually stacking from the top note because stacking from the bottom note is stupid.
00:33:082 (6,7,1) - doesnt flow well esp with that linear flow from the last pattern What? Flows fine to me bud.
00:36:382 (3,1,2,3) - stack? Ok
00:45:682 (3,4,5) - u should lower spacing from 3->4 so that emphasis is on the triple 3 & 4 > triplet
00:55:732 (4,5,6) - asdf Wtf are you even trying to explain? Like if I receive a long mod and the modder starts to get tired of pointing out the same issues I can understand what they mean by "asdf" or "sdfnsdifnsioe" but this is like your 4th fucking suggestion mate.
01:14:782 (3) - move it up so it overlaps with 01:14:332 (6) - instead cuz overlap with the sliderbody like that is mehh No. I fucking hate circle overlaps.
01:25:807 (6,7) - overlap these cuz its practically the same spacing as 01:25:282 (4,5) - atm
01:33:982 (2) - is this mapped to the wub? if ya then i think it's 1/12 Nope it's an 8th, slow it down to 25% and listen for the sub bass starting to kick in when the modulation on the wub begins.
02:12:682 (5) - jump this Okay
02:23:182 (1,2,3,4) - same as earlier but not as bad, do try to keep ur 1/4s consistent tho tis an 8th
03:39:082 (5) - this flows kinda awk Seems fine to me
04:18:382 (1,2,3,4) - ya Nah
04:30:982 (3) - up and left a tiny bit :> Okay
04:36:082 (7,8) - this spacing is a bit high imo Nah it's fine
04:51:382 (1,2,3) - not sure why this spacing is lower than others Well idk maybe to emphasise the different fucking sound to all the others (Sorry I'm fucking tired of people pointing this out without giving it even the slightest moment of thought. Like did none of you fucking stop and think "Oh this is spaced differently... I wonder why... Let me listen to all the other instances where he used these kick sliders... Oh I see there's a different sound, that makes sense" If people still had complaints even after understanding that then I'm all ears.)

good luck have fun!

Frostings wrote:

from queue

uh

[my opinion]
I can't really help with this map because I can't sit through this...
You map visually which is nice and the patterns are well-structured, but the rhythm actually destroys the map. It's too predictable and repetitive, and the map gets boring REALLY fast. The patterns are just recycled when the song plays the same parts again... Why the fuck would I change the rhythm when there's no change in the song?

It sort of picked up from the first kiai, but I was hoping for more variation in terms of visuals from the previous section. After the first break and the song just repeats itself and you follow the similar rhythm pattern again and that really did it for me. I've had a quick glance at the rest of the map and it's actually just the same thing again why would I change it?

It's partly the song because it's very uninspiring, but you should definitely look into other rhythm techniques. eg there's more than one way to map a "triple", but you always have them stacked, and placed on the same beats of every bar too.. It's a shame because it's obvious you're technically skilled as a mapper lol out of all the things in the map you pick a fucking triple? There're only 3 ways to map a triple in this song, all stacked, repeat slider & a kick with a note. Repeats don't emphasise the music enough, a kick and a note is too intense for the music and feels clumsy, streams are out of the question because there aren't enough notes to create them which just leaves me with no other option but to stack.

There's really no use in pointing out little things and giving a "traditional mod" when there's an obviously huge flaw in this map
That "flaw" being what? Consistency? You know there is such a thing as forced "creativity".

I think you should learn rhythm variations and definitely employ them here and in future maps, and also maybe pick songs that offer more inspiration so you don't map with both bands tied behind your back, to let yourself shine better I map for the music, I'm not going to force myself to map some trashy j-core or whatever for the sake of giving myself more "options". I couldn't give a shit how repetitive a song is, as long as I enjoy it I'm going to map it. Being creative is not having all the free range in the world and then doing whatever you want, creativity is having restrictions and still making something that's interesting despite your limited options.
[/my opinion]

1. 00:41:332 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 00:50:932 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 01:00:532 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 01:10:132 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 03:14:932 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - 03:24:532 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - The rhythm is a bit awkward to hear. i'd recommend trying other rhythm.

Sylphi wrote:

No kudosu.

[Teki]

1. 00:41:332 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 00:50:932 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 01:00:532 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 01:10:132 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 03:14:932 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - 03:24:532 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - The rhythm is a bit awkward to hear. i'd recommend trying other rhythm.

Sorry for late and modding poorly. but i couldn't find other thing. i think it is enough good.

Kyubey wrote:

00:06:382 (7,8) - this spacing feels forced compared to other same parts Changed
00:39:082 (4,1) - since movement here goes like https://qb.s-ul.eu/S5BOT6Ln.jpg this, spacing feels very small, so i'd suggest to increase it a little Ok
01:02:182 (6,1) - same goes here Ok
I wonder, why didn't you use the same softfinish pattern 04:31:282 - on places like this, while having them 01:38:482 - there and in same places. Is it like that because of that sound in the background which I can hear in first kiai on these places? Atsuro did that deliberately. Notice during 01:38:482 - and 01:38:932 - in the music there is a kind of, metallic door screeching sound in the background. There're also other sounds during the first kiai that aren't in the 2nd kiai, the artist composed the 2nd drop with less SFX to deliberately make it more empty and Atsuro follows this in his hitsounding.

Actually, that's all, map doesn't look like having some noticeable flaws.
Call me back.

MrSergio wrote:

uh, looks like I am too late for this :/

If you want I can mod anyway, but with BNs already here Idk how much I can do. You can have a ticket in any case since I couldn't mod in return for your M4M.
Sorry again for the delay @.@

Okorin wrote:

can you explain the reasoning behind a japanese diffname here, the song doesn't have much to do with jp culture or anything like that so i don't get why you would take enemy or something translate it to jap and use it as a diffname idk doesn't seem reasonable to me

the map is still as solid as i remember it being so i'll #2 after clarifying this and why 00:44:332 (1,2,3) - has to be custom stacked
i don't remember anything else usingcustom stacks so it seems out of place

good map

1. I'm a weeb

Okorin wrote:

was just wondering cuz weird design choice (and yes i agree there are weirder diffnames ranked, but do you have to join that club? )
ok here's the thing: http://puu.sh/pAHSw/a1d37e6323.zip

replace your hitsounds with these
(drum-hitclap and soft-hitclap are focused on the right ear while soft-hitwhistle has a focus on the left ear) depending on your volume settings you will only hear the left or the right ear respectively. what i did is taking the much louder ear and making the hitsound mono instead.

1. I found a better mp3 file you can use, so here you go: http://puu.sh/q6xxS/a8e71f8a47 or http://puu.sh/q6yYp/6b2ffdc734.mp3 (see in the box below for more info)
   
   Comparison

   The graph on your left is your current mp3 file. On the right is the improved file. As you can see on top, the bitrate is now 192 kbps instead 128 kbps, so the new file holds more data, meaning the music will have a better sound quality. The new file is now cut at ~19 Khz instead of ~16 Khz, which makes the music sound more in-depth. The blue lines that pitch to the top is removed, in other words I removed the clipping. It should avoid the "fuzzy" or "static" noises, but this evolves with reducing the db of the music. The noises are actually not quite noticeable, so the clipping can stay. I just reduced the db to avoid these kind of situation. So I left you the choice of having the new mp3 file without and with clipping.
   
   You are going to have to move the hitobjects and the timing points by +50.
   I will also mod with the new mp3 file, so you would want to change it immediately before proceeding.

1. 00:54:732 (5,6) - This objects have the same spacing as 00:55:182 (6,1) -, but the sound on (6) and (1) are not similar. In fact (1) has a louder sound than (6). Leaving the spacing of 00:55:182 (6,1) - big and reduce it for 00:54:732 (5,6) - would make much sense.
2. 03:42:432 (4,5) - Add more distance in-between them than 03:42:132 (3,4) -: (5) has a louder beat to be emphasized, and that's the way to often do in this section.
3. 03:47:982 (7) - I would move this circle elsewhere and closer to 03:47:832 (6) -. I felt that the section 03:48:132 until 03:49:932 - has begun too early due to the big spacing, which is inconsistent to similar previous section, like 03:40:332 (5,6) and 03:45:132 (6,7) -.

sheela wrote:

ok

[General]

1. I found a better mp3 file you can use, so here you go: http://puu.sh/q6xxS/a8e71f8a47 or http://puu.sh/q6yYp/6b2ffdc734.mp3 (see in the box below for more info) I just ripped my mp3 off youtube so... hence the shite quality. Yeah changed to your mp3 because it's so much better. I can actually feel the subs.
   
   Comparison

   The graph on your left is your current mp3 file. On the right is the improved file. As you can see on top, the bitrate is now 192 kbps instead 128 kbps, so the new file holds more data, meaning the music will have a better sound quality. The new file is now cut at ~19 Khz instead of ~16 Khz, which makes the music sound more in-depth. The blue lines that pitch to the top is removed, in other words I removed the clipping. It should avoid the "fuzzy" or "static" noises, but this evolves with reducing the db of the music. The noises are actually not quite noticeable, so the clipping can stay. I just reduced the db to avoid these kind of situation. So I left you the choice of having the new mp3 file without and with clipping.
   
   You are going to have to move the hitobjects and the timing points by +50.
   I will also mod with the new mp3 file, so you would want to change it immediately before proceeding.

[Wicked]

1. 00:54:732 (5,6) - This objects have the same spacing as 00:55:182 (6,1) -, but the sound on (6) and (1) are not similar. In fact (1) has a louder sound than (6). Leaving the spacing of 00:55:182 (6,1) - big and reduce it for 00:54:732 (5,6) - would make much sense. Fixed?
2. 03:42:432 (4,5) - Add more distance in-between them than 03:42:132 (3,4) -: (5) has a louder beat to be emphasized, and that's the way to often do in this section. Done
3. 03:47:982 (7) - I would move this circle elsewhere and closer to 03:47:832 (6) -. I felt that the section 03:48:132 until 03:49:932 - has begun too early due to the big spacing, which is inconsistent to similar previous section, like 03:40:332 (5,6) and 03:45:132 (6,7) -. Moved closer

Only minor emphasis problems I could find, nothing major. Please call me back!