1. 00:51:671 (1,2,3) - Realign these? Along with the 1 of the next combo, possibly. These look like they should be in a straight line, but this juts out as being rather ugly.

1. 00:40:160 (1) - Remove the New Combo mark. Your path is predictable enough to warrant properly numbering according to the flow of the phrase.
2. 00:40:509 (2) - Put a New Combo mark here. This is where the new phrase starts, and hey, I personally think it looks better like this, cosmetically.

1. 01:15:392 - Flow-wise, it feels like there should be a beat with a Soft Finish here.
2. 01:26:555 (1) - Finish on the starting point.
3. 01:27:950 (1) - ^
4. 01:29:346 (1) - ^
5. 01:30:044 (3) - ^
6. 01:34:927 (1) - ^
7. 01:37:718 (1) - ^
8. 01:37:718 (1) - Put a Finish here.
9. 01:40:509 (1) - ^

Mogsworth wrote:

SPOILER

I've got a few suggestions. These are just suggestions, mind you, you don't have to do them.

Normal:

1. 00:51:671 (1,2,3) - Realign these? Along with the 1 of the next combo, possibly. These look like they should be in a straight line, but this juts out as being rather ugly.

Hyper:

1. 00:40:160 (1) - Remove the New Combo mark. Your path is predictable enough to warrant properly numbering according to the flow of the phrase.
2. 00:40:509 (2) - Put a New Combo mark here. This is where the new phrase starts, and hey, I personally think it looks better like this, cosmetically.

Another:

1. 01:15:392 - Flow-wise, it feels like there should be a beat with a Soft Finish here.
2. 01:26:555 (1) - Finish on the starting point.
3. 01:27:950 (1) - ^
4. 01:29:346 (1) - ^
5. 01:30:044 (3) - ^
6. 01:34:927 (1) - ^ - fixed!!
7. 01:37:718 (1) - ^ - fixed!!
8. 01:37:718 (1) - Put a Finish here.
9. 01:40:509 (1) - ^ - fixed!!

Not a huge fan of the difficulty spread, but hey, what're you gonna do? The maps here are fine.

Natteke wrote:

3 months old bubble. RANK IT ALREADY