MrSergio wrote:

Mod requested in my queue, sorry for being late

[General]

• Nothing relevant

[Insane]

• 00:01:281 (1) - I hear this spinner starting from 00:00:820 - tho o woops LOL fixed
  
  00:11:435 (5,6,1) - This pattern feels kinda forced and stands out among the other patterns like 00:10:281 (2,3,4) - or 00:12:127 (2,3,4) - or 00:13:973 (2,3,4) - . Those patterns are using an outer>inner movement, while this one does the opposite, so for consistency what about something like this? (It also plays a bit poorly compared to those other patterns) i didnt do it exactly in the url but i got what you meant and did something else similar o3o
  
  00:37:627 (7,1) - This jump is conflict with 00:38:896 (4,5) - : Same visual distance on the play field, yet different timings (first one is 1/2, second one is 1/1)
  Imo you should reduce the spacing for the first onei just changed the pattern of the thing afterwards. reducing the spacing of the first one breaks the consistency in the map
  
  00:50:896 (2,3,4) - The stack and the passage 3>4 is kinda forced, seeing the direction of 00:50:435 (8,1) - (which is the opposite).
  What about changing the direction of 8 and 1 like this? Having them the other way gives your stack and flow a reason now i actually felt this was one of the easiest to play/read o3o compared to the others. i also dont like straight up circular motion all too much if it isnt mirrored
  
  01:17:435 (4,1) - Seeing your previous spacings, this is quite misleading: it looks more like 1/2, not 1/1
  Well, on a second thought, probably the direction of 01:17:666 (1) - makes so that the players thinks the flow is broken, therefore waits a bit more to understand it, which may be fine. Anyway, keep it in mind just in case (I wasn't able to find a solution anyway) yes that was the goal c: ill keep an eye on it lol

[Hard]

• 00:48:589 (6) - The jump on the next slider feels kinda plane and not emphasized much, so what about moving this circle to around 384;64? nice! did this. except i moved some things a tiny bit to make it look better for my taste

Nice diff

[Normal]

• Nothing, good job c:

[Easy]

• 01:20:204 (2) - Missing Clap and Finish on tail? no :/ the musics just weird like that orz

That's all from me, nice mapset
GL~

1. normal-hitnormal is like 378 kb a bit huge for a hitsound, anyways I did cut a bit of the silent part it should reduce it by 100 kb+ http://puu.sh/mIkgg/d572b2c3e1.wav
2. Are you sure about this metadata?

1. OD so low, I'd go for 7,5 or 8
2. 00:08:896 (3) - slider tick sounds are so annoying reduce volume by 10% just at the ticks, also the slider tail sound a bit strong so consider reduce volume there too
3. 00:16:512 (6,7) - rhythm can be better to be honest, I'd make 6 a slider and then a circle in 00:16:743 - following better the melody.
4. 00:24:820 (1) - seems really off pattern, I mean the slider shape doesn't feel part of the combo 00:25:166 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - I'd use a straight slider instead, maybe just a copy of 00:25:281 (3) -
5. 00:31:627 (2,3) - rhythm choice really weird and doesn't follow the active beats in the music, I highly recommend you to try this instead:
   
6. 00:40:973 (1) - slider tick sounds awful, reducevolume for 10% on it
7. 00:42:589 (6,7) - rhtyhm a bit weird, I'd just follow the vocal, since is more noticeable at normal speed
8. why combos are sometimes following a 1 stanza pattern and sometimes 2?
9. 00:51:820 (7,8) - 00:57:358 (6,7) - bad stack is on purpose?
10. 01:10:512 (1) - same as 00:40:973
11. 01:17:550 - you shouldn't ignore this tbh
12. 01:22:050 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part feels a bit harder than the rest, maybe reduce spacing by a bit..

1. that OD so low.. use 6 or 6,5
2. 00:08:204 (1) - reduce slider tick volume by 10%
3. 00:17:435 (1,2,3) - rhythm on insane its alot better, maybe try the same here, your current one isn't good and don't follow the song really good as insane diff does
4. 00:24:704 don't ignore this strong drums btw, add a circle fit better the music
5. 00:41:781 - just use a 1/1 slider and add a circle in 00:42:127 - fit better the music, i really think 00:42:127 - need a click action
6. 00:55:512 - this really need a click action for obvious reasons
7. 01:13:973 - add a circle to follow the melody better and to avoid the polarity issue
8. 01:17:435 - this also need a click action and you should also consider adding something at 01:17:550 -

1. 00:02:666 (1) - try to use a better rhythm? just use a repeat slider will follow better the song without increasing the difficulty
   
2. 00:04:512 (4) - similar as above:
   
3. 00:08:204 (4) - same a repeat slider its better and doesn't increase the difficulty
4. 00:16:281 (5) - better end this one at 00:16:743 -
5. 00:19:281 (1) - end this one in the next white tick
6. 00:25:512 (4) - isn't better to end this one on the previous red tick?
7. 00:26:666 (1) - at previous white one?
8. 00:26:666 (1) - on previous white tick?
9. 00:27:589 (3) - ^
10. 00:32:204 (4) - Same a repeat slider would work alot better
11. 00:41:435 (1) - previous white tick?
12. 00:44:204 (5) -
    I'll stop here I think you can find the others by your own

1. Last kiai (well both) can follow the song a bit better and use some more circles instead of just sliders, so imo this diff can be a bit more harder than actually is-

Natsu wrote:

Hi, sorry for late~

General:

1. normal-hitnormal is like 378 kb a bit huge for a hitsound, anyways I did cut a bit of the silent part it should reduce it by 100 kb+ http://puu.sh/mIkgg/d572b2c3e1.wav o nice thanks c:
2. Are you sure about this metadata? uh ye should be o3o source by kwan in the description

Insane:

1. OD so low, I'd go for 7,5 or 8 ok
2. 00:08:896 (3) - slider tick sounds are so annoying reduce volume by 10% just at the ticks, also the slider tail sound a bit strong so consider reduce volume there tooo ye
3. 00:16:512 (6,7) - rhythm can be better to be honest, I'd make 6 a slider and then a circle in 00:16:743 - following better the melody. i prefer not to break pattern and rhythm here as it likely to throw people off since the clap pattern continues to this
4. 00:24:820 (1) - seems really off pattern, I mean the slider shape doesn't feel part of the combo 00:25:166 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - I'd use a straight slider instead, maybe just a copy of 00:25:281 (3) - truetrue ill make it the same as the other thing tho cuz 00:25:281 (3) - is part of a triangle pattern that doesnt include that
5. 00:31:627 (2,3) - rhythm choice really weird and doesn't follow the active beats in the music, I highly recommend you to try this instead:
   would rather follow ... bass? guitar? idk what it is but its low pitched lol the thing that i also followed for 00:32:204 (1,2,3) - after
6. 00:40:973 (1) - slider tick sounds awful, reducevolume for 10% on it ye lol 15
7. 00:42:589 (6,7) - rhtyhm a bit weird, I'd just follow the vocal, since is more noticeable at normal speed sure. also changed 00:57:358 - for consistency
8. why combos are sometimes following a 1 stanza pattern and sometimes 2? uh i have 2 stanza all the way except.. transition drums like 00:16:973 (1) - , screaming parts that differ a lot from surrounding parts at 00:22:973 - and 00:30:358 - , slowdown parts like 00:40:973 (1) - 01:10:512 (1) - 01:17:435 - , and for the section at 00:41:435 - , 1 stanza patterns are for the 2 buildup stanzas before repeats of the main rhythm. so like 00:46:973 - 00:54:358 - 01:01:743 - 01:09:127 - another look and i decided transition drums dont really need NC o3o so those are gone lol
9. 00:51:820 (7,8) - 00:57:358 (6,7) - bad stack is on purpose? oops no i think i messed that up from rotating or osmething
10. 01:10:512 (1) - same as 00:40:973 yee
11. 01:17:550 - you shouldn't ignore this tbh making 01:17:435 (4) - into a slider would misrepresent the difference in music between 01:17:666 - and 01:16:512 - and adding a note to 01:17:550 - doesnt represent the slowdown & buildup well :/ imo atm its miss a clap for a better follow of the music
12. 01:22:050 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part feels a bit harder than the rest, maybe reduce spacing by a bit.. yaa

Hard:

1. that OD so low.. use 6 or 6,5 ok o3o
2. 00:08:204 (1) - reduce slider tick volume by 10% yee
3. 00:17:435 (1,2,3) - rhythm on insane its alot better, maybe try the same here, your current one isn't good and don't follow the song really good as insane diff doesi feel that rhythm is too annoying/difficult to play for hard. i remember i didnt enjoy it lol. having double hitcircles is also too difficult for this part so id rather make it different
4. 00:24:704 don't ignore this strong drums btw, add a circle fit better the music oops yes
5. 00:41:781 - just use a 1/1 slider and add a circle in 00:42:127 - fit better the music, i really think 00:42:127 - need a click action i actually think the opposite o-o i feel that would make the object density too high relative to 00:42:358 (3,4,1) - that has a stronger vocal section and 00:42:127 - is sort of a pickup note
6. 00:55:512 - this really need a click action for obvious reasons uhh doesnt it already have some action there?
7. 01:13:973 - add a circle to follow the melody better and to avoid the polarity issue this breaks consistency with the other 3/2 pauses and shouldnt be too big of a polarity problem as its consistent within the music and is preceded by 3/2 to match the polarity
8. 01:17:435 - this also need a click action and you should also consider adding something at 01:17:550 - got the action goin but 01:17:550 - same as insane

Normal:

1. 00:02:666 (1) - try to use a better rhythm? just use a repeat slider will follow better the song without increasing the difficulty ok o-o
   
2. 00:04:512 (4) - similar as above: ^
   
3. 00:08:204 (4) - same a repeat slider its better and doesn't increase the difficulty a sure. a little worried about the 2/1 spacing at 00:04:281 - tho
4. 00:16:281 (5) - better end this one at 00:16:743 - that would follow guitar better but the way it is now follows drums better and is more consistent with the previous patterns. for the consistency, id rather keep as is
5. 00:19:281 (1) - end this one in the next white tick o ye
6. 00:25:512 (4) - isn't better to end this one on the previous red tick? errr this is a bit complicated and it seems you really want this o-o ill just discuss it a bit with you
7. 00:26:666 (1) - at previous white one?
8. 00:26:666 (1) - on previous white tick?
9. 00:27:589 (3) - ^
10. 00:32:204 (4) - Same a repeat slider would work alot better ye fixed
11. 00:41:435 (1) - previous white tick?
12. 00:44:204 (5) -
    I'll stop here I think you can find the others by your own

Easy:

1. Last kiai (well both) can follow the song a bit better and use some more circles instead of just sliders, so imo this diff can be a bit more harder than actually is- i mean i dont think i have much options on how to map the kiai lol given the typical easy diff restrictions as main rhythm is 3/2 all the way except for the bits like 01:16:050 - but i need that to be a slider tail b/c its 3/2 all the way before that. so i cant space into a circle with 3/2 spacing.i think. do you have any ideas? :/

I really did like Insane and Hard diff, so rework normal diff rhtyhm (and maybe some in Easy dif) and send me a forum pm when you feel ready, gonna leave a star icon for now

1. Consider adding 'Saitama' to the tags as the BG is full of him lol.

1. 00:26:204 (8,9,10,11,1) - Stacking 5 notes like this ruins the intensity of the vocals that land on 00:26:435 (10,11,1) -, so I'd recommend a slider or some repositions as the last 3 notes have much more impact. I am aware it goes with the consecutive drums, but what I said still stands heh.
2. 00:52:973 (2) - Rather than this bland slider, why not fill the emptiness with a pattern that supports the vocals? Something like that http://puu.sh/nDMEN/2cc8fd58cd.jpg as the downbeat doesn't really have any significant appearance in this combo.
3. 01:14:550 (7,1) - Is this stack really necessary? It makes things tight more than it should, and it is the only stack in the whole kiai sections, 0.5x spacing would work well just like at anyother place.
4. 01:24:935 (4,5) - I don't feel like having those too close is the right choice, especially because of the placement of 01:25:743 (1) - and the overall intensity in the end of the kiai, here's just a random idea - http://puu.sh/nDMSs/657604506f.jpg
5. 01:26:089 (2,4) - More of a suggestion than an improvement, but how about CTRL+G on those individually? imo it gives a slightly better feel with the movement.

Avishay wrote:

Hey.

[General]

1. Consider adding 'Saitama' to the tags as the BG is full of him lol. LOL true

[Insane]

1. 00:26:204 (8,9,10,11,1) - Stacking 5 notes like this ruins the intensity of the vocals that land on 00:26:435 (10,11,1) -, so I'd recommend a slider or some repositions as the last 3 notes have much more impact. I am aware it goes with the consecutive drums, but what I said still stands heh. mm i agree with 00:26:666 (1) - but i just dont feel pickup note vocals are worth breaking drum buildups so i only made it spaced for 00:26:550 (11,1) - o3o
2. 00:52:973 (2) - Rather than this bland slider, why not fill the emptiness with a pattern that supports the vocals? Something like that http://puu.sh/nDMEN/2cc8fd58cd.jpg as the downbeat doesn't really have any significant appearance in this combo. did something but i didnt want to break the pattern i had next so instead of a slider i just made it a circle. did the same for 01:07:743 (2) -
3. 01:14:550 (7,1) - Is this stack really necessary? It makes things tight more than it should, and it is the only stack in the whole kiai sections, 0.5x spacing would work well just like at anyother place. tbh at first it was like this cuz i ran out of room for my pattern lol but then i started to like it cuz i felt like it matched how at this point, the melody ends and repeats again. it makes for a sort of separation in the repeats while still fitting with how the end of the melody plays lower pitched notes and never goes below the note at 01:14:666 - , so i felt 01:14:666 - was significant enough for a difference in spacing while fitting the music. if there wasnt screaming at 01:21:935 - , i wouldve mapped the same thing there.
4. 01:24:935 (4,5) - I don't feel like having those too close is the right choice, especially because of the placement of 01:25:743 (1) - and the overall intensity in the end of the kiai, here's just a random idea - http://puu.sh/nDMSs/657604506f.jpg increased spacing but didnt make it have such intense back and forth between 01:24:935 (4,5) - jump cuz it feels like its slowing down to me with the drums
5. 01:26:089 (2,4) - More of a suggestion than an improvement, but how about CTRL+G on those individually? imo it gives a slightly better feel with the movement. ehh i prefer it the way it is since im not looking for a more smooth motion. id like to keep my angles sharp to match the sort of on and off of the guitar here

Everything else is okay, call me back.

Bearizm wrote:

xd

IamKwaN wrote:

Ah, shit. I forgot to tell you to fix the romanization as we are forced to use Hepburn romanization under the Ranking Criteria.

Please change the "wo" in the romanised title to "o". You can poke me for a bubble after fixing the title.

Really sorry for any inconvenience caused.

Please don't slap my face ;w;..