1. Hard (3.36 stars, 223 notes)
2. Insane (4.62 stars, 363 notes)
3. Normal (1.63 stars, 113 notes)

Ilias wrote:

Normal
00:02:046 (1,2,3,4) - I do not really like stacked notes on easy/normal difficulties, though the rest in the map all seem to be fine. Something about these four kind of bothers me. Would suggest altering slightly.

00:45:588 (2) - I think this slider here should be tilted slightly to face #3
Hard
01:11:302 (2) - I like curve down more than curve up

00:19:874 (2) - Maybe ctrl+g here?

00:39:417 (1) - probably tilt slightly more so that 00:39:417 (1) carries straight into 00:40:788 (1)
Insane
00:32:817 (4) - This kind of looks like a 4 note and a 5 note split, it would be nice if you would move it over a tiny bit to blend in with the other half of stream

01:16:274 (7,1) - Something feels wrong here. Even though the cross shape of 01:16:102 (6,7) and 01:16:445 (1,2) is probably what you're aiming for, #1 breaking the counter-clockwise flow leads straight back into another counter clockwise pattern. I would suggest switching #7 for #1 and altering the jumps that follow to flow slightly better or changing the positioning of #1

01:26:131 (1) - I think the spinner here should be stretched out for another 1/2 of a note.
Note
Please, if you read this, note that there is no note
Actually, there is a note, sorry for late, short, and inexperienced mod yet again , thank you, and goodbye.

limch1210 wrote:

#modreqs.

[normal]
00:07:874 (1) - spacing error
00:13:359 (2,1) - overlap
00:46:274 (3,4,5) - make same with 00:44:902 (1,2) -
01:06:845 (1,2) - how about blanket
01:25:359 (2,3,4) - http://puu.sh/mj95K/00132da82c.jpg
dead link

[hard]
00:03:417 (4,1) - why his is overlap? you can make better pattern like this http://puu.sh/mj99x/86abda09e5.jpg
00:11:645 (2,3,4,5,1) - I think this pattern is not good in hard. How about slider
00:15:417 (2,3,4) - bad overlap
00:32:559 (1,2) - stack.

[insane]
00:07:874 (1,2) - this flow is some awkward.
00:20:217 (1) - http://puu.sh/mj9hC/b3211d5558.jpg
link
00:21:759 (2,7) - stack
00:24:331 (1,4) - overlap
00:31:188 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - this is very difficult to read, Especially 00:31:445 (4,5,6,7,3) - this.
01:23:302 (1,3) - overlap
01:28:788 (1) - how about triple
sound is there

GOOD LUCK

Neoskylove wrote:

Normal

00:40:788 (2,2) - stack.
00:55:874 (1,2) - blanket
01:06:845 (1,2) - blanket

Hard

00:15:588 (3,4) - overlap
00:21:588 (1,3) - overlap
00:38:045 (1) - ?
(._.)?
00:40:788 (1,2) - stack error

Insane

00:21:759 (2,7) - stack
00:22:959 (1,3) - overlap
00:47:645 (1,2,3,4,5) - hard to read

Aeii wrote:

Note: I don't have my usual setup so I can't playtest. This mod will be primarily based on aesthetics rather then gameplay. (Sorry if that makes me seem picky :c)

Insane

00:02:559 (1,2,3) - These have a really similar spacing even thought the notes the brake between 00:02:731 (2,3) - is a lot longer then between 00:02:559 (1,2) - I would recommend moving 00:03:074 (3) - further away.
on hold

00:05:131 (1) - This would look a lot nicer if you blanketed it with 00:05:645 (3) -

00:06:502 (1) - This slider looks really uneven. I recommend moving the first red slider point more left to balance it out

00:10:102 (2) - Uneven spacing

00:11:645 (2,3,4,5) - The stream and slider are way too close considering how far apart they are in the song. Would recommend moving them further apart.

00:12:674 (3,4) - Is not the same spacing as 00:13:017 (5,6) -

00:13:874 (3) - In my opinion this would flow better if you rotated it around 140 degrees clockwise. Right now the jump between 00:13:702 (2) - and 00:13:874 (3) - seems really awkward to play. It would also flow better with 00:14:217 (4) -

00:17:817 (2) - This looks really ugly. Consider moving it more left so it creates a square like 00:17:988 (3,4,5,6) -

00:17:988 (3,4,5,6) - Uneven spacing

00:20:217 (1) - Just a suggestion. If you remapped the slider to be more curvy (doesn't have to be a wave, you could do it like 00:22:959 (1) - ) you could blanket it with 00:21:417 (2) - As right now this part doesn't look that nice

00:23:474 (2) - Could be blanketed better

00:24:845 (2,3,4,5) - Uneven spacing for no reason

00:25:531 (1) - This slider looks really awkward to play. I would make it a curve (like 00:22:959 (1) -) so that it points more towards 00:26:045 (2) - It's jus that currently the angle between 00:25:531 (1,2) - feels and looks really weird, especially since the slider suggests an upward movement.

00:26:902 (1,2) - This is mapped wrong. The slider is too long and the music doesn't suggest it should be. Especially since you haven't done anything like this before so it will be really hard to read. Make the slider shorter and you should be fine.

00:30:502 (3) - You could make this slider look nicer by making it more even.

00:31:017 (4) - You could blanket this with 00:30:502 (3)

00:35:302 (1,2) - Any reason why these aren't the same?

00:46:445 (1,2,3) - Uneven spacing

00:50:388 (1) - Again this slider seems too long. (I would map it to 00:50:559 instead)
No change

00:50:731 (2,3,4) - Uneven spacing

00:51:417 (6,7) - Has lower spacing then the rest of the pattern

00:53:131 (1,2,3) - Uneven spacing

00:54:159 (4,5,1,2) - These two have inconsistent spacing

01:07:702 (2,3,4) - Uneven spacing

01:09:588 (1,2,3) - Uneven spacing

01:10:617 (4,5,1,2) - same problem as 00:54:159 (4,5,1,2) - I understand if you want them two to increasing DS but at least you could make it consistent. Right now this feels more like a mapping error especially since the spacing difference is too small to be noticed in game.

There's a lot more I could write about but it would mostly be spacing errors. The entire map seems like it was mapped without using distance snap (which you shouldn't do, especially since a lot of the errors don't seem to make sense) I would recommend going over the map and fixing all the little distance inconsistencies within. Sorry this may come off as overly picky but I wan't this map to be as good as it can be!

Other then that the map seems pretty good!

eclipselotus wrote:

little check here

NORMAL:
00:03:074 (3) stack this with (2)
00:31:359 (1) too early, start it at 00:31:531 end at current point
00:37:188 (1) too late, ^ 00:37:017
00:39:417 feel like something missing here, slider recc and end 00:40:102
00:57:588 (2) move this one to 00:57:931 and replace it ofc
01:06:502 (6) replacing this with 1.0x ds
01:28:788 (1) end the slider 01:28:702

HARD:
00:18:159 (2) ctrl+g
00:36:674 (1) beter slider please
01:25:874 (2) move it a little bit here

INSANE:
00:21:245 (2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) love that jump
00:49:188 (1,2) i like this

riantra testplay w
I like the Insane overall :3
Good Luck~

Baraatje123 wrote:

Just saw this map appearing
Metadata is incorrect
artist: 高坂穂乃果(CV.新田恵海)、南ことり(CV.内田彩)、園田海未(CV.三森すずこ)
Romanized artist: Honoka Kosaka (CV: Nitta Emi), Kotori Minami (CV: Uchida Aya), Umi Sonoda (CV:Suzuko Mimori)
Title Future style (Movie Edit)
romanized title Future style (Movie Edit)
source:Love Live! The School Idol Movie
tags: μ's u's lovelive LL muse second years Bokutachi wa hitotsu no hikari 僕たちはひとつの光 (This is a song from the single with Future style and Bokutachi, not required to add to tags)

._.

ohmanpasi wrote:

Hi,
random mod for Insane

Check AiMod for all difficulties please

00:58:274 (8) - unsnapped note
00:58:445 (9) - ^
01:25:702 (8) - ^

00:59:988 (1) - In my opinion the slider doesn't flow very well

Try this: http://puu.sh/mMdMo/b2feb04284.jpg

Mapset is good and nice mapping style in the Insane difficult
Good luck with the mapset.

hyouri wrote:

[hard diff]

• 
  00:02:731 (2) - Should be put on top of 3 imo
  little changed
  00:13:017 (4,5) - CTRL + G

I would add more modding because I feel like for 3* this is hard enough as a "hard" difficulty map, but it lacks a difficulty inbetween hard and insane that would be perfect for mapping

anyway i dont deserve kudosu for this, good luck o/

Shyotamaze wrote:

Hi, from #modreqs

General

1. Nothing to say

Normal

1. 00:01:359 Maybe add a hitcircle here
2. 00:02:559 Maybe add a slider like this one 00:02:045 (1) - and delete 00:02:731 (2) -
3. 00:05:131 (1) - Maybe a slider instead
4. 00:39:417 (1,1) - Fix blanket (nazi), you could also rotate it a bit to make it look better with the previous slider

Hard

1. 00:26:902 (1,2) - Fix blanket
2. 01:25:531 (2,3) - ^

Insane

1. 00:22:959 (1,2) - Fix blanket (nazi)
2. 00:46:274 (3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - It looks a bit random imo, try something different
   on hold

A lot of nazi blankets lol (sorry), nice map
Good luck!

Normal

Hard

Insane

AwisaRawwrrr wrote:

Hi. from #modreqs

Normal

1. 00:14:731 - I heard a beat here. Since it's not 'Easy', try adding some note here or make 00:14:388 (3) as a slider that ends in 00:14:731
   vocal end at 00:14:388 - ,so i think don't need this(on hold)
2. 00:17:474 - ^
   same(on hold)
3. 00:26:388 (2) - Try to break it down into a 1/1 slider + two hit circles like this or other alternate things.
4. 00:27:759 (1,2,3,4) - why not try this one? Screenie1, Screenie2, Screenie3.
5. 00:31:531 (1) - Try to shorten this spinner
6. 00:33:245 - Why did you leave a space here? I can still hear a beat. Try to make mapping here. Suggestion: just fix the hitsound of slidertick Screenie1, Screenie2, Screenie3.
7. 00:42:502 - Add hit circle here.
8. 01:00:331 - ^
9. 01:01:702 - ^
10. 01:06:845 (1) - Fix the slider shape

Hard

1. 01:11:302 (2) - Fix the slider shape and rather make a blanket with (1)
2. 01:28:788 (1) - This isn't 'Insane' to add some beats that are not included. I don't hear any beat here. Kindly remove this one.

Insane

1. 00:20:217 (1) - This type of slider (bouncing 3 times) is rather uncommon in Insane mapset. Consider breaking it down.
   no change
2. 00:49:198 (1,2) - Isn't this too far? and try to balance the pattern (because 1 & 2 are in 1/2 pattern, and 2 & 3 are in 1/1 pattern)
   changed a little
3. 01:20:559 (1) - Fix slider shape please.
   on hold

So far, it's a good map. Keep up the good work ^^v :^)

1. Inconsistency in LetterboxInBreaks
   {Hard} : 1
   {Insane} : 0
   {Normal} : 1
2. Inconsistency in ComboColours
   { Hard} :
   Combo1 : [27,64,192] Combo2 : [255,128,0] Combo3 : [139,145,146]
   { Insane} :
   
   { Normal} :
   Combo1 : [27,64,192] Combo2 : [255,128,0] Combo3 : [139,145,146]
3. 不要なOSBは削除してください。
   

1. HP-1 OD-1
2. 00:02:559 (1) - New comboは不要です。
3. 00:05:131 (1) - ^
4. 00:07:874 (1) - ^
5. 00:31:531 (1,1) - Spinnerの後には休憩が必要です、Unrankableなので必ず変えてください。理想としては 00:31:188 (5) - これを削除し、5のあった場所からspinnerを配置し、以下のような音取りがベストです。
   
6. 00:39:417 (1,1,2,3) - 意図的にパターンを変更しているようですが、音に合ってないです、音はありますが、前者の 00:33:931 (1,2) - このパターンと統一したほうがいいです。
7. 00:42:502 (2) - clap抜け？
8. 00:48:674 (3,4,5,6) - 一番最低難易度設定のdiffでスタックは好ましくないのでSliderに変更するか、もしくは少しずらしてください。ただ、00:54:159 (3,4) - このような連続しない場合のスタックは問題ありません。
9. 01:05:131 (2,3) - ^
10. 01:25:359 (2,3,4) - ^

1. 3diff構成であればAR7.5 CS3.8くらいが好ましいと思います
2. 00:25:531 (1,2) - 音取りは逆にしたほうがより合うと思います。
   

1. 00:45:759 (1) - Nc spam
2. 00:48:674 (4,5) - Ncを入れるかctrl+gを行うかしないとunrankableになりうる問題です。00:48:674 (1,2,1,2) - ここだけもう一度考えて欲しいところです。
3. 01:06:159 (3,4,5,6,7) - これも3diff構成だと通すのは難しいです。
4. 01:24:331 (5,1) - ちょっとこの間隔は読みづらいです、まだ 01:24:674 (1,2) - これがctrl+gした形であればわかりやすいですが・・・。一度考えて欲しいです。

Satellite wrote:

Hello.

[General]

1. Inconsistency in LetterboxInBreaks
   {Hard} : 1
   {Insane} : 0
   {Normal} : 1
2. Inconsistency in ComboColours
   { Hard} :
   Combo1 : [27,64,192] Combo2 : [255,128,0] Combo3 : [139,145,146]
   { Insane} :
   
   { Normal} :
   Combo1 : [27,64,192] Combo2 : [255,128,0] Combo3 : [139,145,146]
3. 不要なOSBは削除してください。
   

[Normal]

1. HP-1 OD-1
2. 00:02:559 (1) - New comboは不要です。
3. 00:05:131 (1) - ^
4. 00:07:874 (1) - ^
5. 00:31:531 (1,1) - Spinnerの後には休憩が必要です、Unrankableなので必ず変えてください。理想としては 00:31:188 (5) - これを削除し、5のあった場所からspinnerを配置し、以下のような音取りがベストです。
   
6. 00:39:417 (1,1,2,3) - 意図的にパターンを変更しているようですが、音に合ってないです、音はありますが、前者の 00:33:931 (1,2) - このパターンと統一したほうがいいです。
7. 00:42:502 (2) - clap抜け？
8. 00:48:674 (3,4,5,6) - 一番最低難易度設定のdiffでスタックは好ましくないのでSliderに変更するか、もしくは少しずらしてください。ただ、00:54:159 (3,4) - このような連続しない場合のスタックは問題ありません。
9. 01:05:131 (2,3) - ^
10. 01:25:359 (2,3,4) - ^

[Hard]

1. 3diff構成であればAR7.5 CS3.8くらいが好ましいと思います
2. 00:25:531 (1,2) - 音取りは逆にしたほうがより合うと思います。
   

[Insane]

1. 00:45:759 (1) - Nc spam
2. 00:48:674 (4,5) - Ncを入れるかctrl+gを行うかしないとunrankableになりうる問題です。00:48:674 (1,2,1,2) - ここだけもう一度考えて欲しいところです。
3. 01:06:159 (3,4,5,6,7) - これも3diff構成だと通すのは難しいです。
4. 01:24:331 (5,1) - ちょっとこの間隔は読みづらいです、まだ 01:24:674 (1,2) - これがctrl+gした形であればわかりやすいですが・・・。一度考えて欲しいです。

RecheckでMetadata確認しますが、ソースがあるなら用意していただけると助かります。
Call me Back.

1. BGですが画質悪いと思うので、おそらくこちらのほうがきれい・・・？なので一度確認してみてください。
   
   img

   

1. 00:40:788 (2,3) - これは 00:39:417 (1) - ここと音取り合わせてください
2. 01:26:045 (1) - remove finish. Hardではついてなかったので、こちらもあわせて。

1. 01:26:131 (1,1) - 終わり方は他diffとあわせたほうがいいかもしれません・・・。

1. 00:09:417 (2,3) - i like these - so you should do the same for 00:10:102 (2,3) - these.
2. 00:13:359 (1,2) - you should place this like this for consistency
3. 00:14:045 (3,4) - the overlap like this looks kinda bad, either remove it, or make more of it overlap. (i did this
4. 00:20:217 (1) - i dont like this - but i know youve done it for a reason, so it should be fine, maybe consider other options for it.

1. Tagに"ラブライブ！"を追加？

1. 00:54:674 - tickの音が大きいので-10%くらいに設定しましょう
2. 01:11:131 - ^
3. 00:59:988 (3) - 始点にfinish

1. 00:03:074 (3,4,1) - スタックさせてしまうとわかり辛いと思うので00:55:188 (3,4,1) - このあたりのように間隔を空けて配置してみてはどうでしょう？
2. 00:11:817 (4) - 次のスライダーの方向に置くと流れがよくなると思います。
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:12:331 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - ここ00:13:359 (1) - の折り返し部分が見えづらいので移動させてください
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:33:245 (1) - new comboいらないと思います。
5. 00:42:159 (1) - Insane diffと同じです
6. 01:23:645 (1,2,1) - このあたりの音取りに違和感があったのでこのような音取りはどうでしょう？
   

1. OD+1? 少し増やしてもいいと思います。
2. 00:07:874 (1) - 始点にfinish
3. 00:09:245 (1,2) - 直線状に配置すると連打からの入りがやりにくいと感じました。少しずらすか別のパターンを試してみてください
4. 00:33:931 (1) - 始点にfinish
5. 00:42:331 (1) - ここのspinnerは特にまとまった音がないので通常通り配置することをお勧めします。
6. 00:46:445 (1) - ここのnew comboいらないと思います。
7. 00:54:159 (4) - このあたりの音のnew comboなんですが01:04:102 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - この辺のパターンで統一するとよりわかりやすいと思います。別の箇所も確認してみてください。01:10:617 (4) -
8. 01:02:559 (1) - ここはsoft-finishよりsoft-whistleのほうがいいと思います。
9. 01:02:731 - ここにも強い音があるのでこの辺りを1/2の音で取ってあげると叩きやすいと思います。

NucleaRaven wrote:

Hi

[Insane]

1. 00:09:417 (2,3) - i like these - so you should do the same for 00:10:102 (2,3) - these.
   changed circle
2. 00:13:359 (1,2) - you should place this like this for consistency
   fix
3. 00:14:045 (3,4) - the overlap like this looks kinda bad, either remove it, or make more of it overlap. (i did this
   fix
4. 00:20:217 (1) - i dont like this - but i know youve done it for a reason, so it should be fine, maybe consider other options for it.
   i like this sorry no change

nice map (i was planning on mapping this song too :3).
Good luck! #loveliveforever

alacat wrote:

[General]

1. Tagに"ラブライブ！"を追加？

[Normal]

1. 00:54:674 - tickの音が大きいので-10%くらいに設定しましょう
2. 01:11:131 - ^
3. 00:59:988 (3) - 始点にfinish

[Hard]

1. 00:03:074 (3,4,1) - スタックさせてしまうとわかり辛いと思うので00:55:188 (3,4,1) - このあたりのように間隔を空けて配置してみてはどうでしょう？
2. 00:11:817 (4) - 次のスライダーの方向に置くと流れがよくなると思います。
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:12:331 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - ここ00:13:359 (1) - の折り返し部分が見えづらいので移動させてください
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:33:245 (1) - new comboいらないと思います。
5. 00:42:159 (1) - Insane diffと同じです
6. 01:23:645 (1,2,1) - このあたりの音取りに違和感があったのでこのような音取りはどうでしょう？
   

[Insane]

1. OD+1? 少し増やしてもいいと思います。
2. 00:07:874 (1) - 始点にfinish
3. 00:09:245 (1,2) - 直線状に配置すると連打からの入りがやりにくいと感じました。少しずらすか別のパターンを試してみてください
4. 00:33:931 (1) - 始点にfinish
   要らないと感じたのでno change
5. 00:42:331 (1) - ここのspinnerは特にまとまった音がないので通常通り配置することをお勧めします。
6. 00:46:445 (1) - ここのnew comboいらないと思います。
7. 00:54:159 (4) - このあたりの音のnew comboなんですが01:04:102 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - この辺のパターンで統一するとよりわかりやすいと思います。別の箇所も確認してみてください。01:10:617 (4) -
8. 01:02:559 (1) - ここはsoft-finishよりsoft-whistleのほうがいいと思います。
9. 01:02:731 - ここにも強い音があるのでこの辺りを1/2の音で取ってあげると叩きやすいと思います。

call me back

alacat wrote:

ok, Qualify!

IamKwaN wrote:

where did you find that Artist?

those are supposed to be dot instead of comma