Okay, I guess I'll say something then since he mentioned my name. I don't think this will get past qualification that easily because current dq system relies on community, and I'm pretty sure at least some parts of the community are gonna disagree with current title(and there's a chance of a drama later on anyways). If you want my honest opinion, you don't need to use something because people told you to do so, I would like to see a discussion here why this or that title is suitable, and then we can move on. I also would like to see what defines "sensible" so at least I(or others) can be convinced with the naming.
Looked through things, didsome research. We could not get a clear proof of the fact that these two songs are inparable, but having them together sounds very natural and well-thought, at least to me and the mapper.
Pretty sure that rolling back to the previous title would work a lot better.
you still need the approval of QATs, since if we qualify this, then probably they will DQ, anyways I also think the current one is better, song compilation doesn't make sense
well i got oko's approval earlier but he told me to ask kwan does that mean i didn't get his approval what is life?
is there like a simple way to get all qats to take a look at this and then make them express their opinion rather than me just running around the irc chat asking them?
I wasn't being serious.. just seems like nobody can give a real answer This whole thing is just getting ridiculous more pages metadata discussion than mods soon
Tbh, if it's only two songs, the title should be as it was is now. If you find any music compilation map on osu, it's mostly 4 or more songs, besides, we already had the case where there was a map with two songs in one mp3 file and both titles were in the name.
Tl;dr I'd put "songs compilation" in the tags if anything and leave the name as it is currently
implying there has ever been more mods than memes in this map's forum LOL but this is really fun maybe we could like talk about the meaning of life or something here too?
also @_DT3 I don't think adding "songs compilation" to tags is really necessary since this isn't one. But thanks for sharing your opinion!
Okay so we ( = multiple BNs, QATs and staff) had a fun conversation about this which got everybody involved tilted, leading to the conclusion that the problem lies entirely in mp3-editing not being forbidden and approval being a thing; As it stands you're free to do whatever you want when you edited a song yourself so the current title is completely fine.
I believe nothing changed except the title back-and-forth, but I just checked the map real quick again anyways so I'm just gonna give a bubble here again bc symbolism~
#1 or #2 or whatever, this still needs a third BN anyways