1. Azure (5.88 stars, 1666 notes)

-Tochi wrote:

Really not for ranked? :>

Kibbleru wrote:

-Tochi wrote:

Really not for ranked? :>

not sure haha xD

UndeadCapulet wrote:

From my queue:

Azure

Going to break this mod into two sections, one for regular modding stuff, and the other for personal suggestions that I think would fit well with the mapping style.

Regular modding stuff:
00:32:769 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - These triangles are pretty tedious to play because they're constantly rotating in the same direction. I think it'd be more fun if 00:34:454 (2,3,1,2,3) - traveled clockwise instead of counterclockwise. This gives the dividing sliders a lot more purpose, too, since they point out when the triangles change direction (00:33:106 (2,1,2,3,1,2) - counterclockwise, 00:34:117 (1) - slider, 00:34:454 (2,3,1,2) - clockwise, 00:35:129 (3,1) - slider, 00:35:803 (2,1,2,3,1,2) - counterclockwise). im kinda going for a repetitive structure here imo. and its not really easy to change it anymore xD
01:03:949 (2,3,4,5,1) - Have the stream form a smooth curve with 01:03:949 (2) - 's head. Most players will just hover over the sliderhead of these kinds of sliders, especially when preparing for a spaced stream. Your current arrangement makes that really awkward to play out of.
01:04:707 (2,1) - Please change this. It doesn't really fit in your map, you don't do any other 1/4 snapping stuff out of a circle. And even still, the player just got done with the first spaced stream in the map, don't also have them force their way through the first 1/4 circle snap, it's too big of a difficulty spike.
01:11:870 (1,2) - Swap NC to be consistent with 01:10:522 (2,1) - .
01:16:252 (2,3) - This jump feels excessive compared to 01:18:949 (2,3) - . imo it's pretty called for, also its not too hard difficulty wise. i want to remphasize the strength of the slider head
01:59:230 (2,1,2,3) - Hmm idk about this angle, pretty hard to snap to, especially considering this is the first time 1/3 shows up. I tried a 30 degree rotation, seems to work a lot better. did something else
02:21:983 (1) - A lower slider velocity would be better, right now there isn't enough difference from the earlier section (02:21:140 (6,7) - had just happened). makes sense but i want to keep this for personal preferense, i dont really like excessively short sliders haha ><
02:30:578 (1) - Remover NC for obvious reasons.
02:38:836 (5,6,1) - I think you should stack these. Spacing them out kills the vocal emphasis at 02:39:005 (1,2) - , since there's a constant motion. lower DS instead i like the way it currently looks
02:44:567 (2) - I feel like this should be NC'd? would be kinda spammy
04:14:904 (1) - Shouldn't this start at 04:14:735 ?
04:30:747 (1) - This feels out of place since every other time it's a jump pattern (Though tbh I don't really think any of them should be jump patterns... but I guess that's up to you). hmm not sure lol, kinda wanted a symmetry thing
06:06:308 (5,6,7,1) - These jumps feel overdone at this part, it's the least intense part of the song, doesn't really need any jumps at all. To be honest, I think you should just do the same kind of thing you did in the intro.


Suggestions:
00:02:263 (5) - I think you should NC here, and in any similar place. It makes your map feel more cohesive, because it matches up with NC's like 00:43:218 (1) - , 00:45:578 (1,2,1,2) - , 00:48:275 (1) - , and all the other pattern-based NC's that happen shortly before new measures start. it kinda ruins my pattern im going for
01:48:949 (4) - NC's here, and all similar sliders, seems like a good idea. It breaks it up from the rotated slider pattern and makes for a good lead into the next kick sliders.
03:41:196 (1,2,3,4) - I feel like the DS should be decreasing instead of increasing, because each drum hit is quieter than the previous. i think increasing DS is better for buildup
05:05:129 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - Reusing these patterns over and over throughout your map kinda kills the power they have, I think you should do some other arrangement here not based on symmetry jumps. lol. idk i wana stay consistent, it feels more structured if i kep it this way
05:36:814 (1,2,3) - I know you do a lot of slidertail on dowbeat stuff, but I really don't think it works here. It's better to just fully emphasize the guitar with sliderbodies k ill consider this one.

---

Hope I explained everything well enough...

Do it this map is cool ^^

Kroytz wrote:

azul

00:21:983 (1) - The rhythm from here feels 'empty' seeing as how there are beats unmapped as well as the downbeat being applied to a slider-end. I found this sort of rhythm to be quite good but you could also change (3) to a 1/1 slider and 4 to a 1/1 on red to hit that one background beat http://puu.sh/msvol/80c9fabf85.jpg its kinda the structure im going here for, looking for the empty fill

00:24:342 (7) - The vocal here is too strong to have on a slider-end orz ^

00:39:679 (5) - space lower for anti-jump aesthetic like you did with the rest? not sure wt u mean

00:41:702 - adding circle here beside the slider-end of (2) helps fill in the awkward rhythm gap from 2->3 thats a bit of an overmap imo.

00:41:870 (4,5) - Not sure how to combat this awkward rhythm gap but its possible to map 00:42:039 - beat, tho it's be weird to map that one so idk lol ^

01:04:454 (1,2,1) - that's quite the jump there oo

01:10:185 (2) - I think this is supposed to be Additional Normal Clap? Sounds weird having two different claps for the same pattern i think they sound a bit different

01:25:859 (1) - could flow better if this was rotated 90 and repositioned a little that screws up my structure

01:44:567 (2,1) - these jumps are incredibly large... you do this repeatedly so I won't point them out but jeez i dont think they're that hard cuz slider leniency, and its consistent

01:56:196 (2) - ctrl-g would work better for the direction you're going. you could literally ctrl-h all of this 01:56:533 (3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - and nothing would be damaged lol. You do it properly in the next similar section as well so i think changing would be good idea : p

01:59:511 (2,3) - ctrl-g'ing the direction of these two so it's continuing clock-wise hurts the player less for this rhythm I believe.

02:31:926 (1) - this might work better in terms of rhythm: http://puu.sh/mswCb/dccc8a7a2b.jpg i wana start the slider on the guitar thing

02:53:331 (3) - it'd be cool to have this on the slider-end ill think about this one, doesnt seem bad actually

04:58:387 (1) - This imo works much better http://puu.sh/msx3m/9b0e695f25.jpg no sense in having the sliders start at blue tick and ignore the strong vocal there >> i was going for some cool effect thing here, dunno actually lol. if more ppl complain ill change

06:06:814 (1) - gotta hit that downbeat like you did here 06:09:848 (1) - uhm. the way i have it is better for my pattern sttructure of slider things idk

06:12:207 (1) - ^ those strong beats on slider-ends is ugh

06:15:241 (1) - I don't think a spinner is necessary here but it creates a neat effect so I guess its okay? I'd personally just lower volume every so often and reduce spacing more instead of the spinner until the song ends. its more for score diversity.

This song sounds hard to map ;;

1. delete 4 bookmark and osb【【【
   
2. 00:51:983 (3) - 01:02:769 (5) - clap ?
   
3. 01:04:202 (3,4,5,1) - only once ??
   
4. 01:05:634 (2,3) - 01:07:657 (4,5,1) - i will add drum sampleset …… soft addition about 01:05:634 - 01:05:971 - 01:07:825 -
   
5. 01:06:983 - look like add whistle when click …… i prefer and whistle here follow voice ↑↑↑
   
6. 01:15:578 (1,2,1) - just more fun ↓↓↓
   
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:37:151 - like soft clap
   
8. 01:38:162 (1) - ctrl+g ?
   
9. 01:49:286 (1) - about this , i prefer use soft-clap same as 01:49:454 (2) - for the symmetry
   
10. 02:22:320 - miss drum ? look like it's 24clap
    
11. 02:27:713 - 02:31:758 - ↑↑↑
    
12. 02:31:926 - i prefer add drum too ↑↑↑
    
13. 03:05:634 (1,2,3) - more point ? ↓↓↓
    
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 03:36:645 (1,2) - i prefer use 1/2slider + 1/4note to follow guitar
    
15. 03:40:101 - add note ???
    
16. 04:47:432 - miss drum 233
    
17. 04:58:808 (1,2,1,2) - e …… sound like guitar unsnap , but white link more sense ↓↓↓
    
    
    SPOILER

    
18. 05:08:331 (1,2,3) - different with 01:47:432 (1,2,3) - ???
    
19. can't pass

Reditum wrote:

FIND THE BRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Diff:
00:21:645 (1) - but like why though lol there's no reason to do this uh nerf a bit, i wanted to emphasize vocals
00:21:983 (1) - Wopuld be better as a longer slider since she holds out the note for longer than 1 beat, and the cymbals aren't choked on beat 2 i kinda wanted to hit the instrument on the white tick. ahh
00:27:207 (1,2,3) - oh jesus
00:41:365 (1) - the hitsofts sound REALLY out of place here uhm. which ones?
00:54:342 (1) - u have so much space you don't have to have this overlap it looks kinda nice to me tbh
01:17:432 (2) - please do not do this the overlap? or the kickslider?
02:56:365 (1) - like readability is more important than aesthetic i think this is readable tbh, there is an nc on the slider so u can see it through the circles
04:04:117 (1,1,2) - DO NOT DO THIS like if you want to put a break then put a break but if you don't then dont personally, i don't really find a problem with this stuff ;x the music becomes strong for an instant to i mapped it

It's mostly fine and while the gimmicks are really weird and hard to play I've kind of given up on trying to enforce a 2012 mapping style on people so uhhhh yeah . Good stuff

Narcissu wrote:

[Azure]

1. delete 4 bookmark and osb【【【
   
2. 00:51:983 (3) - 01:02:769 (5) - clap ?
   
3. 01:04:202 (3,4,5,1) - only once ?? ya, this is the only part where i thought it would work :X
   
4. 01:05:634 (2,3) - 01:07:657 (4,5,1) - i will add drum sampleset …… soft addition about 01:05:634 - 01:05:971 - 01:07:825 -
   
5. 01:06:983 - look like add whistle when click …… i prefer and whistle here follow voice ↑↑↑
   
6. 01:15:578 (1,2,1) - just more fun ↓↓↓ will try, may or may not change it back later.
   
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:37:151 - like soft clap
   
8. 01:38:162 (1) - ctrl+g ?
   
9. 01:49:286 (1) - about this , i prefer use soft-clap same as 01:49:454 (2) - for the symmetry
   
10. 02:22:320 - miss drum ? look like it's 24clap
    
11. 02:27:713 - 02:31:758 - ↑↑↑
    
12. 02:31:926 - i prefer add drum too ↑↑↑
    
13. 03:05:634 (1,2,3) - more point ? ↓↓↓
    
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 03:36:645 (1,2) - i prefer use 1/2slider + 1/4note to follow guitar i like my way better, more emphasis on drum
    
15. 03:40:101 - add note ???
    
16. 04:47:432 - miss drum 233
    
17. 04:58:808 (1,2,1,2) - e …… sound like guitar unsnap , but white link more sense ↓↓↓ i wanted to experiment with blue tick here, i think it fits nicely imo but i will change if too many people complain about them
    
    
    SPOILER

    
18. 05:08:331 (1,2,3) - different with 01:47:432 (1,2,3) - ??? yeah, since 2nd kiai a bit different i thinkkk? usually thats how it goes at least for most songs.
    
19. can't pass

ailv wrote:

[Azure]

00:41:365 (1,2,3,4) - To be honest, I don't really know what this is mapped to. Either way it seems that you're missing out on mapping the guitar on the red ticks, but if its deliberately left out for emphasis of something i'm not hearing then theres no reason to change it. this is for the drums

01:14:904 - and 01:13:556 - I'm aware that these are deliberately left out, but they have the same intensity as the red ticks as well, it might be better to just map it instead. that would ruin the intensity of the percussions

01:47:432 (1,2,3) - These feel like they are lacking emphasis. Consider higher SV or bigger spacing imo the slow sv in its own way provides good emphasis to this part too. because of the mechanic ish sounds i think slower sv fits better

01:59:398 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel this is a really big difficulty spike that probably doesn't belong. yeah. uhm still considering haha~

02:00:409 (1) - I don't really see the reasoning for a break here tbh honestly its just because the song gets so repetitive here, it would be kinda boring.

02:27:039 (5) - This probably should end on the blue tick, or you could split it up into two sliders? I don't really know how to change this though, but there is a sound on the blue tick for sure, especially since you have 02:29:988 (6) - here. there is a sound on the red tick, also 2 sliders doesn't fit the structure i was going for

02:39:005 (1,2) - You could probably use a greater spaced jump, because theres a lot more emphasis on the vocal here, especially since a less intense part 02:37:572 (4,5) - has a large spacing.
02:39:174 (2) - This also feels intense, could probably use a high SV here as well.

02:32:685 (1) - This note should start on the white tick instead, since the bandpass on the bass filters in starting there, extend the previous note 02:31:926 (1) - onto the blue tick if it matters. its really hard to pinpoint where it starts, but at least to me it seems like the sound its self builds up from the blue tick o_O which is why there is that wave part of the first half of the slider

02:33:949 - I'm not sure if it matters or not, but i'd map this vocal start here. the song doesn't really build up until the downbeat

03:05:634 (1,2,3) - Feels like it should be more intense, same thing as above 01:47:432 (1,2,3)

03:17:601 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I really don't like this either

04:40:016 (1,2) - 04:41:702 (2,3,4,5,1) - 04:42:713 (3,4) - 04:50:971 (1,2,3) - is there really a reason to make these so wide? They don't fit the rest of the sections mapping and they aren't particularly emphasized in the music either, they seemed to be put in there randomly. This lies in contrast with 04:52:994 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - where the increased spacing is actually mapped to the increasing intensity of the kickdrum.
its more for the structure im building up in this section, with the large spacing im more grouping certain sections together.

05:08:331 (1,2,3) - Same as above, needs more emphasis

05:20:297 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Look at above.

05:21:308 (1) - Starting here is imho the most intense part of the song, you could do a quick toggle of kiai if you don't want to place a full kiai here instead. but there is a kiai burst here :<

Good luck Kibble bby <3

ailv wrote:

[Azure]

02:32:685 (1) - This note should start on the white tick instead, since the bandpass on the bass filters in starting there, extend the previous note 02:31:926 (1) - onto the blue tick if it matters. its really hard to pinpoint where it starts, but at least to me it seems like the sound its self builds up from the blue tick o_O which is why there is that wave part of the first half of the slider

SuperMIC wrote:

3/3

---

[Azure]

00:04:454 (4) - have this facing the other way? (like a ctrl+h sort of thing) kinda ruins my structure owo
00:05:297 (6) - the synth is now on the white tick, not the red one. I think the player should be clicking on the strong beat im mapping the background thing idk what its called
00:10:690 (6) - ^
00:16:084 (6) - ^
00:37:488 (1) - I think this should be spaced further away ahh idk how to do this one without fking up the previous pattern ;w;
00:41:365 (1,2,3,4) - I don't get why these are sliders instead of circles because there's nothing in the music on the blue ticks ;w; slider heads more emphasis :>
00:45:747 (2) - facing the other way? (same ctrl+h idea)
01:26:702 (1) - awkward flow from (3) to here, move it further right and maybe a little bit down? did something
01:30:999 (2) - i kind of think this should just be two circles because blue tick sliders suk prefer sliders here cuz theres two different drum sounds. same with the rest
01:59:559 - I recommend having this as a slider or a slider and a circle because sudden 1/3 can be unreadable ahha still debating for this one ><
02:37:572 (4) - same argument about two hitcircles instead
03:17:601 (1,2,3) - same 1/3 argument about readability
03:45:831 (2) - for some reason this plays better than the previous blue tick sliders but i still recommend two hitcircles
03:50:971 (1,2) - ctrl+g for better flow? ruins the consistency with the previous pattern.
04:58:808 (1,2,1,2) - eeeeeeeeeeee really suggest a circle and then 1/4 sliders on red/white ticks. at least the white tick 04:59:314 (2) ends on should be clicked on ok
05:20:297 (1,2,3) - same 1/3 thing
06:01:758 (1,2,3) - flow should really have you going from (1) to (3)'s position. Basically ctrl+g (2) and (3) then respace?
06:14:567 (6) - maybe for stronger effect have this as two stacked 1/1 hitcircles? ok, but i didnt stack

---

cool map! and im done

-SMIC

Shiirn wrote:

Suggestions
Major suggestions
Aesthetic suggestions
Unrankable issues

Azure

1. 00:41:365 (1,2,3,4) - The scaled spacing of these can cause players to misread (3). maybe flip 2 to make the difference more apparent. ye
2. 00:49:202 (2,3) - Even spacing from the previous and next notes yet different timing. Hard to read. Move it closer to (1). spaced out the next notes instead
3. 00:55:522 (7) - no reason for sv change? you do this a few times its for the wubby sounds, but i significantly nerfed the sv change
4. 01:16:421 (3) - ridiculously high spacing considering what you normally do, seems more of an oversight than intended play nerfed
5. 01:47:432 (1,2,3) - these aren't triangular, if you care adjusted a bit, same with the other
6. 02:34:623 (3) - ctrl + g this so that 4 isn't ridiculously far away and 100 bait? also lets this be a jump and flow snap from 2->3.
7. 04:31:758 (2) - this entire section, i understand the whole "scaling distance" thing but this starts to really overkill it especially since the highest point isn't at the end, but this particular note here. nerfed some of the larger ones by a good amount
8. 04:43:050 (4) - nvm this is a tiny bit higher but its also far later and actually pointed at by a slider so ok
9. 05:08:331 (1,2,3) - ew triangle again
10. 05:24:511 (4,5) - these aren't parallel if they were meant to be did something
11. 06:06:814 (1) - deserves a click on the end, don't you think? it's the high pitch of the pattern. the way i have it gives a better structure imo, it can work.
12. 06:12:207 (1) - ^

Jebok wrote:

From my modding queue. There is little I can mod in a map that I can't play due to the difficulty but hopefully you'll find something from here helpful in improving your map. If its simply not enough that I put on the table, no need for kudos.

[Azure]
Shouldn't make jumps bigger than 4.5x unless they really worth addressing. Don't make casual bits of the song with huge spacing of x5 and such.
01:13:724 - Remove NC and place NC at 01:14:061 instead. these nc make sense to me, also seperates the antijump
01:15:072 - Remove NC and place NC at 01:15:578 instead.
01:24:511 (1) - Place the end closer to (2). Next circle at around 3.0 - 3.2 spacing feels better. not sure what u mean about the 2nd part cuz if i place it close to 2 its gunna have further spacing but done i think?
01:27:039 - Remove NC there is literally nothing that happens to make you put new combo here. It shouldn't be about nice colour schemes... its more about seperating the pattern here.
01:29:735 - ^
02:17:938 (1) - Take it out of completely under (7). Maybe x:264 y:344
02:57:039 - To many combos in this bit. Groups of 4 circle or 2 circles and a slider look much better and make more sense to the player. That would be no NC at fallowing points: 02:57:376, 02:58:050, 02:58:724, 02:59:398, 03:00:072, 03:00:747, 03:01:421 . for better readability on the back and forth patterns
03:11:870 (1,3) - No whistle at (1) but add a whistle at (3).
04:59:230 - No NC. to seperate the 2 slider sections.
05:27:039 - ^

Wow that's done. Hope you found that useful and you considered every change. Good luck!

• [Azure]

1. try OD8.5 instead of OD7 since is 5.92 ★
2. 00:47:769 (2) - move to 192 368 to consist the spacing 00:48:022 (3,4,5,1) -
3. 01:07:741 (5) - delete, here doesnt really got a beat tho
4. 01:10:690 (1) - well this sound really weird imo although you add a hs on it, since you are matching the beat so i think the slider should be at 01:10:522 -
5. 01:33:275 (5,6,1) - since you are match vocal here so i think here shouldnt be a triplet
6. 01:47:432 (1,2,3,1) - there doesnt got a beat at sliderend so i think you should mute it
7. 02:39:005 (1) - move to 214 312 to consist the spacing with 02:38:836 (5,6) -
8. 02:58:050 (1,1,1) - mute on sliderend
9. 03:05:634 (1,2,3,1) - same with 01:47:432 (1,2,3,1) -
10. 04:39:174 (5,6) - make spacing bigger, im modding this cause you do the same thing at 04:28:387 (3,4) - 04:33:780 (3,4) -
11. 05:08:331 (1,2,3,1) - same with 01:47:432 (1,2,3,1) -
12. 05:27:039 (1,2) - well the spacing here should be smaller then 05:26:702 (1,2) - cause the electric guitar that you are matching got lower tone
13. 05:28:218 (2,3) - same here
14. 05:44:230 (5) - NC this instead of 05:44:398 (1) -
15. 05:51:308 (3,4) - awkward spacing imo, try to consist the spacing with the previous pattern
16. 06:06:814 (1) - i prefer 2 notes instead of a 1/1 slider
17. 06:12:207 (1) - ^
18. 06:14:904 (2) - NC here instead of NC at 06:14:567 (1) -

1. OD 8 ~ 8.8? 7 is really generous in extra diff.
   
2. 
   
3. 00:45:747 (2) - curving to right? it feel more comfortable for playing, intend circle motion.
   
4. 01:02:601 (3) - add NC as 00:46:421 (1) - ,00:51:814 (1) -
   
5. 00:56:954 (2,3) -
   since 00:57:039 - so strongbeat, don't player want to clickable rhythm?
   
6. 01:58:724 (2) - change to 1/4 slider as 01:59:230 (2) - and 05:19:623 (2,2) -
   
7. 03:16:926 (2,1) - make jump for emphasis finish in head 03:17:095 (1) -
   
8. 03:35:803 (6) - change to 1/4 slider for fill up 03:35:887 - ?
   
9. 03:23:162 (1) - remove NC as 03:21:814 (3) -
   
10. 03:31:252 (3) - move to left a little?
    since, cursor move to deep side-screen, compare with 03:31:421 (4,5) - ,
    some people may feel uncomfortable for playing.

Deppyforce wrote:

m4m from your queue lol

[Extra]
00:00:410 (1) - maybe you could mute the slidertail of this extended slider because the sound on the blue tick is feint
^ applies to all extended slider at the beginning part i don't think its noticeable with soft sampleset so i dont think its necessary
00:41:870 (3) - idk, maybe nc this note? bcuz the spacing in this combo looks like a buildup, so people might misread that this whole combo is all 1/2 gaps buildup, so ncing this would be a bit nicer imo iill think about this later, but imo its really not that hard to just listen to song xd
00:45:662 - drum got ignored :v maybe split this to a double instead (the sound at 00:45:831 - is weaker so i guess this one is fine)
00:50:971 (1) - ^ mm i was pretty systematic with this, would be hard to change and idk waht to change it into :S
00:53:668 (1,2,3) - shouldnt spacing here be either buildup or even instead? makes more sense with the repeating rhythm imo i tried
01:01:758 (1) - drum got ignored
01:02:432 - downbeats work better if theyre clickable instead of landing on it???? i wanted a gap thingy idk how to describe
01:10:016 (1,2) and 01:10:353 (1,2) are different but you copypaste the combo so it technically means that these has same rhythms so maybe make them different?
01:37:657 (2,1) - not sure why spacing is low here, but shouldnt it be bigger than that? (atleast 2x ds imo) maybe try something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4781990 doesnt make much of a difference when ur playing itself cuz of the leniency on sliders
01:45:241 (1,2) - and 01:46:926 (1,2) - should have same spacing?
02:31:926 (1) - could split at start another slider at 02:32:263 - tbh nah xd
02:57:039 - could make a 1/4 kiai fountain effect thing here, to make the kiai's start constant with the other ones (kinda
03:25:016 (1,2,3,4) - listend with 25 playback, pretty sure these sounds are on 1/3 not 1/4
03:53:162 - this shouldnt be ignored imo zxxzzx not that strong to me
04:55:690 (1,2) - is this one a bit undermapped compared to the others idk tried

05:40:690 (4) - pretty strong, a bit undermapped
06:04:202 - since theres still sound here, change 06:04:117 (2) - to a kick slider would work better, and would be a nice thing to lead the player to the slower part of song imo

pretty fun map, good luck!

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

• [Azure]

1. try OD8.5 instead of OD7 since is 5.92 ★
2. 00:47:769 (2) - move to 192 368 to consist the spacing 00:48:022 (3,4,5,1) -
3. 01:07:741 (5) - delete, here doesnt really got a beat tho triplet for emphasis
4. 01:10:690 (1) - well this sound really weird imo although you add a hs on it, since you are matching the beat so i think the slider should be at 01:10:522 - imo im pretty consistent with this so..
5. 01:33:275 (5,6,1) - since you are match vocal here so i think here shouldnt be a triplet
6. 01:47:432 (1,2,3,1) - there doesnt got a beat at sliderend so i think you should mute it i don't mute if its soft sampleset since its hard to hear anyway
7. 02:39:005 (1) - move to 214 312 to consist the spacing with 02:38:836 (5,6) -
8. 02:58:050 (1,1,1) - mute on sliderend
9. 03:05:634 (1,2,3,1) - same with 01:47:432 (1,2,3,1) -
10. 04:39:174 (5,6) - make spacing bigger, im modding this cause you do the same thing at 04:28:387 (3,4) - 04:33:780 (3,4) -
11. 05:08:331 (1,2,3,1) - same with 01:47:432 (1,2,3,1) -
12. 05:27:039 (1,2) - well the spacing here should be smaller then 05:26:702 (1,2) - cause the electric guitar that you are matching got lower tone
13. 05:28:218 (2,3) - same here
14. 05:44:230 (5) - NC this instead of 05:44:398 (1) -
15. 05:51:308 (3,4) - awkward spacing imo, try to consist the spacing with the previous pattern i emphasis the jumps instead of sliders
16. 06:06:814 (1) - i prefer 2 notes instead of a 1/1 slider
17. 06:12:207 (1) - ^
18. 06:14:904 (2) - NC here instead of NC at 06:14:567 (1) -

idk if your 5 slot include me but any ill still mod it ><
take my star XD
GL

FCL wrote:

ok

• [ok]

1. 00:26:870 (5,6,2,3,4) - Tbh these jumps are not so needed in this part. The Song is feels pretty calm, but you used jumps that will work good in kial sectionr or something similar. Redusing of jumps would be good
2. 00:27:207 (1) - Do you really sure in whistle on slidertail? Sound of guitar doen't provide sound so hard on tail imo, whistle on head will be enough yeah gives a nice emphasis effect.
3. 00:43:556 (1,2) - Is big gap between them really so needed? (2) hasn't some hard sound of something
4. 00:46:168 (2) - Looks pretty odd. Firstly you had used sliderend of kickslider on downbeat, what mean that you make strong beat not clickable. Secondly you had made clickable blue tick plus also has added hs's for him. But blue tick hasn't any sounds if you listen. Given that kickslider would be good fit with song on downbeat I can suggest you just move 00:46:168 (2) - to 00:46:252, seems better for rhythm kinda serves as a leadin to the next section of patterns, imo a slider ending on the down beat fits well for that role, also the additive HSing doesnt sound that bad to me
5. 00:47:432 (1) - selection of rhythm is pretty odd imo. I can understand that you use slider here to fit with some wuub effect, but donwbeat and next blue tick is feels pretty strong. Anyway I think you can save the wub effect if you will use kickslider instead the slider. Something like this can't really think of what i should do for now. i really want to express emphasis on the held guitar here and gives a nice calm effect as a break kinda. i think kicksliders wouldnt suit this purposehttps://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4782196
6. 00:49:202 (2,2) - Btw I can't say same words that before for similar patterns since they good fit with sound, but I still think that before they issure should be fixed since they doesn't fit
7. 03:20:634 (5) - Unlike of your previous patterns the song has provide some other sounds here. Concerning of this I think that 03:20:718 should be clickable making a triplet is less impactful than kickslider jumps though >< idk
8. 03:23:668 (6) - The end of the slider feels good to be clickable since also has hard guitar sound its mainly for a better transition to the next section.
9. 03:25:016 (1,2,3,4,1) - What about to increase ds to 1.2x for example? Guitar feels differens that before and a bit stronger
10. 03:37:488 (1) - Could you make it a bit smoother by moving highest a lower points closer to middle of the slider? uhh stylistic reasons, dont really like my wave sliders to be that compressed.
11. 04:30:578 (2) - This placement has killing structure a bit, so maybe move him to 136;7? seems better
12. 06:04:286 (1) - Given that sliderend has ended at hard melody sound it really look odd. 2 circles instead this looks more wisely the slider is mainly to help me maintain my structure here.

Hope it's helpful, gl

Lami wrote:

1. OD 8 ~ 8.8? 7 is really generous in extra diff.
   
2. 
   
3. 00:45:747 (2) - curving to right? it feel more comfortable for playing, intend circle motion. i like the structure mine gives better c:
   
4. 01:02:601 (3) - add NC as 00:46:421 (1) - ,00:51:814 (1) -
   
5. 00:56:954 (2,3) -
   since 00:57:039 - so strongbeat, don't player want to clickable rhythm? the current one allows the next 2 beats to be more impactful
   
6. 01:58:724 (2) - change to 1/4 slider as 01:59:230 (2) - and 05:19:623 (2,2) - the first kiai a little different than the other 2 so i keep it like this.
   
7. 03:16:926 (2,1) - make jump for emphasis finish in head 03:17:095 (1) -
   
8. 03:35:803 (6) - change to 1/4 slider for fill up 03:35:887 - ? i dont think its that necessary to
   
9. 03:23:162 (1) - remove NC as 03:21:814 (3) -
   
10. 03:31:252 (3) - move to left a little?
    since, cursor move to deep side-screen, compare with 03:31:421 (4,5) - ,
    some people may feel uncomfortable for playing.

skystar? GL

-Maruk- wrote:

Hi~ m4m
[Azure]
add AudioLeadIn 2000 plz
try OD8

00:21:983 (1) - 1/1 Reverse
00:37:994 (4,2) - (4) x260 y96 (2)x272 y100　It looks beautiful little hard to do ><

img

00:48:527 (2,3) - put the NC to accent? don't really want to nc spam tbh
00:53:921 (2,3) - ^
00:59:230 (2,4) - ^
00:41:870 (1,2) - This spacing is confused. (3) NC and (4) Ctrl G
01:20:297 (3) - Why didn't the same distance here? move to x9 y323 I think it's best
02:40:016 (3) - 02:40:016 (3) add circle 02:40:185 (4) add 1/2 Slider This allows follow the vocal hmm going for the drums/instrument here
06:14:904 (2) - 1/2 Slider there would be no sound on the end :X

nice map!! Good luck

Satellite wrote:

amazing <3

El SolarBeam wrote:

hi kibb, sorry late M4M

[Azure]

1. 00:15:241 (4) - While I understand the intention of 00:14:230 (2,4,6) - , I think the flow would be better if you made a nice triangle from 00:15:241 (4,5,6) - because the music goes lower and lower on this part so it's strange to see 00:15:747 (5,6) - have that much larger space than 00:15:241 (4,5) -
2. 00:26:196 (3,4,5,6,1) - Idk but I'm not really fond of the sharp turn between 00:27:039 (6,1) - and 00:27:207 (1,2) - , It'd be nice to put 00:27:039 (6) - on the 3rd quadrant instead of 4th one to make the flow a bit oval. Maybe a bit of illustration
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:38:668 (2) - Why not curve it upward instead? I think it would make a better transition between both 00:38:162 (1,2) - and 00:38:668 (2,3) -
4. 00:46:758 (4,6) - Blanket?
5. 00:48:275 (1,2) - I'm sure you can curve 00:48:275 (1) - to follow the border of 00:48:527 (2) - nice and neat i honestly prefer the current one idk why lol
6. 00:52:151 (4) - Quite nazi but move the tail to x:404|y:224? To make it parallel with 00:52:404 (5) -
7. 00:57:376 (1) - Idk but I think this shape represents the music better
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:59:061 (1,3,5) - Fix the triangle?
9. 01:02:938 (4) - Rotating it more anti-clockwise would give more variant in the flow used here imo. The current pattern can be anticipated with only a dropdown flow, which make the curve slider no different with a linear one. My point is, giving it a bit of circular feeling would make it better
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 02:14:735 (6) - Try ctrl+g? Provoking player to forget anticipating a kick slider with holding key on the head lol. Alright this one is a joke
11. 03:47:432 (3) - For this one I think a wavy slider would fit the music here (and the other sliders on this part is curved normally so this makes it more consistent in style) uhhhhh.. i usually lead in wave sliders with curvy sliders and these things with straight sliders. idk what im saying
12. 05:56:702 (3,4) - Can try making a blanket or make a triangle with the tail instead (I'd prefer triangle tho)

Good stuff :>

SPOILER

tbh i wasn't expecting you to get it so quickly lmao

1. not really a big deal, but the music starts to get louder at the beginning up until 00:21:983 (1) -, so maybe you could start increasing hitsound volume as well? feels like the hitsounds start to get drowned out as the music starts to get louder
2. 01:47:432 (1,2,3) - again, not really a big deal, but the slider ends are kind of loud here; also occurs at 03:05:634 (1,2,3) - and at 05:08:331 (1,2,3) -. actually i think this might be because you used have a custom hitsound for soft-hitnormal, but you don't have one for soft-hitnormal2, so it sounds slightly louder here since you switched from S:C1 to S:C2
3. 02:18:696 (2) - mm why is this skipping the drum beat at 02:18:780 - ? seems kind of odd because this is the only part of the map where you skipped a drum beat like this
4. 03:12:207 (5) - feels a little awkward to play imo; the (1,2,3,4) burst promotes a downwards movement, and then this slider is slightly angled upwards and feels off compared to that burst
5. 03:37:994 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - kind of a similar thing to the above point; the stream feels a little rigid since it's a straight line and the (8) has a weird curve to it; maybe curve the stream a bit or something idk
   
   SPOILER

   just an idea here, not really a big deal tbh
   

Momochikun wrote:

yo quib,

[Azure]
Anyway, do you mind using colorhax ? some of your SV change is really hard to read imo im bad at using it uhh ill think about how im gunna do it i guess. maybe when near ranked cuz the modding process will undoubtfully fuck some of them up lol
00:34:623 (3,1) - swap the whistles ? i think it more fit to the guitar
01:09:005 (1,2) - i missread this as 1/4 actually xD true haha
01:13:556 - note ? there're drum played here i wanted to emphasize the 2 notes b4 more so i skipped this one
01:15:072 (1) - this SV change is really unpredictable orz >< unsure whatt to do here, i dont think its that bad
01:16:421 (3) - not sure if you intentionally skip the 3/4 thing me neither, dont think i noticed when i mapped it first and now its kinda hard to change cuz i would have to change all of them ><
02:34:117 (1,2) - try this arrange if you feel like it http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4786271
03:50:129 (4) - finish instead whistle ?
03:51:477 (4) - ^
04:15:241 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - whoa this one is so cool :3
05:12:881 (1) - you dont need a NC here
04:51:140 (2) - place this more upward so you dont get linear flow to (3) ? thats kinda uncomfortable to play imo
04:14:735 (1) - its pretty hard to point when this slider is going to start since ther're no exact sound that played on the bgm
05:29:314 - oh you dont place a note here too ? lol
05:59:567 (2) - missing clap ?

gl~

Doormat wrote:

hi i'm here because of this:

SPOILER

tbh i wasn't expecting you to get it so quickly lmao

[Azure]

1. not really a big deal, but the music starts to get louder at the beginning up until 00:21:983 (1) -, so maybe you could start increasing hitsound volume as well? feels like the hitsounds start to get drowned out as the music starts to get louder increments of volume would be so small that it wouldn't matter much tbh ><
2. 01:47:432 (1,2,3) - again, not really a big deal, but the slider ends are kind of loud here; also occurs at 03:05:634 (1,2,3) - and at 05:08:331 (1,2,3) -. actually i think this might be because you used have a custom hitsound for soft-hitnormal, but you don't have one for soft-hitnormal2, so it sounds slightly louder here since you switched from S:C1 to S:C2 at first i thought it would be okay since i use the default soft hitnormal, but fixed
3. 02:18:696 (2) - mm why is this skipping the drum beat at 02:18:780 - ? seems kind of odd because this is the only part of the map where you skipped a drum beat like this uhh, cuz the drum i skip is different than the ones u click ><
4. 03:12:207 (5) - feels a little awkward to play imo; the (1,2,3,4) burst promotes a downwards movement, and then this slider is slightly angled upwards and feels off compared to that burst for these ones, i kinda do this mainly because it looks better asthetically and since they're sliders, u can litteraly stray off the entire path, as long as u hit the head and end, ull get 300 since there isnt any sliderticks.
5. 03:37:994 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - kind of a similar thing to the above point; the stream feels a little rigid since it's a straight line and the (8) has a weird curve to it; maybe curve the stream a bit or something idk
   
   SPOILER

   just an idea here, not really a big deal tbh
   

yeah that's it i'm a shitmodder. cool map have some stars