but that's 51
super nitpicky stuff coming from a 5 digit xd!!!!thanks for the mod, it was helpful :>
00:09:762 (5,6) - i'm intrigued how this has bigger spacing than the similar pattern at 00:11:417 (5,6), they seem to follow the guitar although the second pattern seems more intense than the former. was this intentional? no, arbitrary choice, made it just for patterns purpose
00:16:382 (5,6) and 00:18:038 (5,6) - same situation as above, but the two patterns are almost equally spaced same
00:28:175 (1,2,3,4) - i think this would flow better if 2 was at 4 and 3 was at 2 because of the preceding stream, but that's just me lol i think both works, but i've asked Alheak about it and we decided to make the square simpler; fixed
00:37:072 (5,6) and 00:38:727 (5,6) - you should get the point about these patterns by now lmao same choice
01:35:520 (7) - this circle in the middle of the stream sort of stands out, but i see that it's snapped with 01:36:037 (1), so really to make the stream flow better you'd have to change the subsequent streams, idk if it's that big of a deal tbh i don't get what's wrong with that circle, it looks fine? the flow kind of works here
01:54:141 (5) - move this away from the sliderend since the sliderend-snapped circles preceding it were 3/4 sliders, it might lead to confusion moved it to 01:53:417 (1)'s position instead
02:06:658 (1,2) - d efinitely could be misread as a second 1/4 note, move it farther away from 1 intended to do this 1/2 stack, can't really do anything about it
i'll probably mod more diffs if my mods here were worthy, i just knew the top diff would be the hardest to rank bc controversy
otherwise, this is a phenomenal map, as expected from ekoro. good luck on ur way to rank!!!
goodnight love u sweet dreams
[Oni]That's it. Thank you for your mod!
00:54:761 - why did you skip this one ? not putting a note here doesn't contribute to really reduce the difficulty and it sounds bit weird without it.
if you want something simpler i would do this Changed it.
01:18:244 - add a d here ? it's a bit underwhelming Instead I added one at 01:18:037 (2) - .
01:24:555 - i'd be thinking of making this a dddk to further emphasize on the density increase here Very nice suggestion! Applied.
01:50:417 (2,1,1,2,1) - i can't help but thinking this can be made better, i'd either kill this note 01:50:830 - or move this 01:50:675 (1) - to 01:50:727 - to make a kd kkd Oh, I can understand this. The whole time we have even snappings and then suddenly this. I can agree here. On the otherhand tho, I think it would go more against the guitar, so I would rather stick to it. Maybe we can ask for more opinions. Both ways are very odd. But due to that I would stick more to the one which leans towards the insturment.
00:01:693 - no big deal but i'd REALLY see this as K to mark the contrast with the drum roll just before Changed.
i don't have much to say more it would just be meaningless pinpoints, except i'd rather see a 1.4 SV here but that's a choice
call me back