Kibbleru wrote:

SPOILER

https://anime-pictures.net/pictures/get_image/456217-1920x1080-heavy+object-j.c.+staff-milinda+brantini-huanghyy-single-short+hair.jpg
https://anime-pictures.net/pictures/get ... t+hair.jpg

we need skystar's tatoe hitsound here 03:36:383 - xddd

KaedekaShizuru wrote:

[General]
AIMOD报视频分辨率超标 改了
看到很多stack就只差一点点的 建议叠好或者错开更多

[Special]
00:23:937 (1) - 尾跟00:22:660 (1) 头叠一下吧
00:27:766 (1) 到00:35:266 (3) - 我不推荐跟vocal 我觉得跟vocal挺好
00:42:128 (3,4,5) - anti-jump NC 个人觉得没必要
03:34:628 (6) - 换成circle这里是三连啊
03:42:447 (1,2) - del
04:02:178 (2,3) - 你这逼死强迫症啊233

GL~

Regraz wrote:

[General]
There are two unsnapped slider-ends in Normal 01:42:447 (2) - and 03:57:550 (3) -
[Special]
00:03:352 (5,1) - A bit weird to play with the sudden jump. Why not keep consistent with spacings among 00:05:107 (2,3,4) - ?

00:04:788 (1) - Better to place 1 like this: http://puu.sh/o3njr/7ca3c72cbf.jpg So that the flow will be as comfortable as 00:03:830 (2,3) -.

00:23:139 (2,1) - Better adding a note at 00:23:777. Since you are mostly following the vocals in this part as well as the spacing between 00:23:139 (2,1) - now is too close to be read as 1/1, adding a note really matters. the blank'd rhythm matches the latter one, and I added NC for the anti-jump

00:35:266 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Personally not a fan of this pattern because those plain pentagon jumps are outstandingly abrupt, compared with the former smooth part. Following pianos are fine since there's no vocal yet in my opinion plain single-taps are way more exaggeratedly overdone. A pattern consists of sliders AND notes will be much better here. 这一段属于过渡段，过渡段用稍微难的对应没有人声的曲子

00:39:575 (1) - Ctrl+G would work better for this pattern. Same for 00:40:852 (1) -

00:45:320 (3,4,1) - I am worried about the notes here. Background ornaments are not snapped to 1/4. 自创三连，挺适合没啥违和感

00:56:011 (2) - I dont think there should be a note, the music hardly supports it. Just leave it empty, and stack 00:56:171 (3) - onto 00:55:852 (1) - (Form up an anti-jump pattern with 00:55:852 (1,2) - ), with some adjustments to following notes, it would be much better.

00:59:203 (5,6) - Too close, plays a bit weird.it's fine in my eyes

01:16:277 (1,2,3) - This overlap makes the map not neat as it could be. Also the flow angle here is too sharp. Better re-arrange the placement here. Same flow issue at 02:30:320 (1,2,3) -

01:35:426 (1,2,3) - Why not use 120-degree pattern here either? (Something like this http://puu.sh/o3oTg/7fbd33d66b.jpg ) 90 degree fits too imo

01:38:777 (3,4) - Straight-line anti-flow is quite annoying. Creating an angle between 3 and 4 would be better for cursor movement of players. http://puu.sh/o3oZ9/b2677f0340.jpg i made it hard to play on purpose to emphasize that downbeat/crash

01:45:160 (3) - This plays quite weird because the strong beat with finish falls onto the end of a slider whereas a quite soft sound with less opportunities to be noticed (01:45:639 (1) - ) falls onto a single hit-circle. Really weird.

01:56:809 (5) - You left the vocal at 01:56:969 in the middle of the slider yet for another identical one at 01:55:213 (5,6,7,1) - , you even used over-maps to emphasize. The contrast is quite inappropriate. as you can see, 这里鼓点独特，为了显示这一独特性就使用与众不同的节奏

02:05:266 (2,3) - Simply, it's excessively large.强调人声 而且在最高难度里不算大

02:40:532 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - The jumps among these notes should be re-arranged for consistency. For some 3-note patterns, jumps are between 1 and 2 while for others, jumps are between 2 and 3.

02:48:192 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - 02:55:372 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ;w;

03:22:819 (4,5,1) - Flow angle is too sharp. to emphasize the heavy: 03:23:138 (1) -

03:37:021 (6,7,1) - 1 Should be on the left of 7 for better flow. current works fine as well

03:42:447 (1,2) - Sounds quite over-mapped.

That's all

Good luck!

其实差不多是为了凑字数的个人意见

Zero__wind wrote:

thzz's Insane
00:09:096 (3) - a whistle may sound nice here with the high-pitch melody indeed, ok
00:11:011 (1,3) - just saying, you may blanket them, not really a problem though~ stack with 00:12:128 (3) -
01:09:814 (6) - if you move it to (282,63) it may flow better imo I tried but I felt it weird a bit. sorry~
01:33:192 (1) - this NC seems unnecessary to me, maybe remove it? retention plz
01:58:245 (6) - according to the music, this note also calls for a clap fixed
02:13:086 (1) - redundant NC here, the slider is with the same speed as 02:12:447 (1) - so I don't think it's worth another NC I like such NC for emphasizing. retention
02:46:277 (5,6) - this plays better if with a bigger spacing imo, maybe move it to the upleft a bit to around (304,44) ?　change to another pattern
03:06:702 - I'm not sure why you dragged the break time here, it doesn't seem to fit the music from my point of view. maybe just it leave it natural? I see. fixed
04:02:497 (3,4) - stack them? I think you seldom place 1/2 beats like this so it looks quite surprising fixed
04:01:380 (1) - remove the NC? viewing through your whole diff, it seems you've never used NC for short streams like this. removing NC on 04:01:699 (1) - is also fine indeed. remove NC on 04:01:380 (1) -
nice diff, nothing much~ thx~

Zero__wind wrote:

General
低难度有些没用的绿线注意删一下吧
03:41:330 (1) - 各个diff都有的这个spinner 90%音量太吵了 像Easy那样把音量降下来吧
04:06:725 (1) - 结尾这个spinner，直接整体5%音量总感觉还是不太合适，音量递减吧

Easy
00:07:181 (1) - 因为你在00:07:979 (2) - 的尾巴上加了whistle 我总感觉在1的尾巴上也whistle一下比较好
00:32:873 (1,2) - 1.06x 了 稍微调一下间距吧
01:06:703 (2,4) - 这应该可以blanket的 稍微调整一下3的位置
02:23:299 (2,4) - ^
01:13:724 (1) - 尾巴clap
01:20:745 (4) - clap？ 03:50:745 (3) - 这里有
01:44:362 (1) - 头上可能finish好些？
03:24:574 (1) - ^
03:32:234 (1) - 尾巴clap
03:41:330 (1) - 这个总感觉放在Easy太短了点 不如前面滑条别折返了 从03:41:170 - 再起一个滑条 到03:43:085 - 停
04:05:529 (3) - 头上finish一下？感觉跟04:04:252 (1) - 比较搭配

Normal
00:47:554 (4) - 像Easy里面头上whistle比较合适
00:55:852 (7,1) - exchange NC?
01:17:394 (3) - clap
02:03:511 (4,1) - 为什么我感觉它们不是平行的
03:10:532 (1) - 尾巴clap
03:11:489 (3) - clap
03:33:351 (3) - 或许头上clap一下 这个听起来不好
03:51:383 (1) - 还是换whistle吧 finish太吵了 Hard就是whistle

Hard
01:33:352 (3,4) - 这个节奏总感觉还是不太直观 考虑把3换成一个1/2 slider 然后再在01:33:671 - 放一个1/4的折返
02:00:320 (1) - 大概没必要NC？NC分一下梗
02:32:713 (5) - 也加上clap呗 鼓音还是有的
03:09:734 (3,4,5) - 不是什么大事儿 不过这个间距 一眼看过去就觉得很别扭……
03:12:447 (3) - 没音效？
03:13:404 (2) - 总感觉往右边放一放打起来舒服一些 (472,144) 这样子，把1稍微挪一下就可以
03:16:596 (4) - 尾巴也clap？ 军鼓
03:27:447 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - 还好我不打DTxD 不然要哭了

Insane
01:41:490 (3,2) - 感觉离得也太近了不好看 01:41:809 (1,2,3) - 一起往下挪一挪就好
02:14:362 (6) - 不知道为什么这里节奏比Hard还要空 感觉有点奇怪
02:21:383 (1) - 感觉CTRL+G会舒服一些 后面的2可以调一下位置 或者就不动我觉得也不错 我倒觉得往下走舒服点
03:48:829 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - 这个梗和第一段里的那个相似的梗相比间距好像小了不少 虽然也不能说是什么问题 就是感觉有点不协调

Special
01:06:543 (4,5,6,7) - 这种地方其实让我觉得挺奇怪的 明明5啊7啊才是重音但却是小间距 反而4，6跳那么远 总觉得不太舒服
01:26:969 (3,4) - 这里的节奏吧 从01:27:128 - 起个滑条感觉更合曲？
02:03:032 (6) - 头上clap一下吧
02:42:926 (4) - 这个就有点太夸张了吧 音乐已经不是这样走的了 挪到中间的位置 (168,192) 这个样子，感觉要合适得多
02:50:426 (1,1,1,1) - 这个梗里只有这组note不是等间距排开的？不太理解 哦好像上面的也不太对 我觉得还是都再调一下吧 让这几个1 02:50:426 (1,1,1,1) - 几个2 02:50:585 (2,2,2,2) - 几个3 02:50:745 (3,3,3,3) - 分别等间距地摆个造型呗 现在这让人有种半吊子的感觉

仅供参考

我原来是保持相同的形状来扩大的 这样打起来很容易打到 因为相对幅度一致
03:16:436 (2,3) - 这里又有之前01:06:543 (4,5,6,7) - 这种不太舒服的感觉 2离前面1的间距太大了 然后到3的间距又太小
03:16:755 (4) - 大概也需要clap一下吧
03:37:340 (1) - 感觉CTRL+G舒服得多 我试了试不好
03:54:670 - 像guest I一样加个转盘呗我觉得挺合适的 本来在Insane里就想说不过感觉可能有点难(?) 不过最高难度的话就没关系了吧
04:01:380 (1) - 个人喜好吧 但我感觉不要让这个1穿过04:01:699 (1) - 会更好看 也就是说把04:01:380 (1) - 的尾巴压在04:01:699 (1) - 上 而不是把头压在上面个人习惯吧

美丽
Good luck~

smallboat wrote:

耽擱了數天

[Easy]

1. 03:46:277 (1,2) - 差了0.10x間距調一下吧
2. 03:48:511 (3) - 節奏擺放物件間隙一樣但上面節奏間隔不一樣，你確定這樣擺可以? 我是覺得還是照間距比較好
3. 03:50:106 (2) - 同03:46:277 (1,2)

[Normal]

1. 00:17:075 (5) - 這note還是建議還是保持一致間距比較安全點
2. 00:35:426 (1) - 同上
3. 01:42:447 (2) - 這樣聽的話好像尾端少了whistle? (加了其他難度記得加)
4. 03:28:723 (5) - 也是間距
5. 03:47:394 (3) - 聽音樂好像可以加個whistle? 加了clap (加了其他難度記得加)

[Hard]

1. 01:06:703 (3) - 聽音樂好像可以加個finish? (加了其他難度記得加) 别的难度没加了吧
2. 04:03:933 (6) - 也許可以配合音樂調個Ctrl+g一下 感觉差别不大

[Insane] Diff這樣看好像能DT，看看OD要不要再加個0.5看? OD7刚好平衡gap

1. 00:38:298 (1,1) - 同樣部分的跳點錢間距不太一樣呢，把00:39:575 (1) - 跟00:39:415 (2) - 移近一點好了?
2. 00:56:330 (3,1) - 交換NC? 第一個Vocal應該是從00:56:330 (3) - 開始吧? 这里是跟鼓点的NC

[Special]

1. 00:42:766 (5) - 這兒是首Vocal試試加上NC?
2. 01:12:288 (1) - 聽起來怎麼音效空了，原來是忘了finish? 这里本来就没finish
3. 02:28:883 (1) - 同上
4. 03:50:106 (5) - 換了一個新的vocal段落了加個NC吧

白天幾乎在忙，晚上再密我吧

smallboat wrote:

[thzz's Insane]

1. 01:06:064 (1) - Consider to add finish in sliderhead? Heavy drum imo. because there's no cymbal, I didn't put finish. retention.
2. 02:22:660 (1) - The same as above ^
3. 01:20:107 (3) - Add a new combo to readable this jump part? ok
4. 03:19:468 (2) - Feel it is heavy vocal, so I think it should add a new NC imo fixed
5. 03:28:085 (3) - Try to move to near (423|341) here? Feel the flow so sharp imo good.

1. 03:15:319 - 这里可以加个圈?
2. 01:17:394 (3) - 这个圈可以去了 \

1. 03:40:372 - 试试这个节奏? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4901398

1. 02:13:724 (5) - hard这里nc了 要么都不nc 你统一下

1. 00:48:032 - add a circle here?
2. 02:13:086 (2) - this nc is unnecessary imo, consider to remove that
3. 03:20:745 (1) - ^
4. 03:27:766 (1) - ^

1. 04:05:210 (7) - 我还是觉得这里可以放1/4

ZZHBOY wrote:

菲裘
[Easy]

1. 03:15:319 - 这里可以加个圈? ok
2. 01:17:394 (3) - 这个圈可以去了 \ 这里本没有圈

[Normal]

1. 03:40:372 - 试试这个节奏? 我觉得现在的挺好https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4901398

[special]

1. 04:05:210 (7) - 我还是觉得这里可以放1/4觉得1/2的跳更能突出鼓点

怎么感觉你所有图都一个样 好了喊我把

ZZHBOY wrote:

[thzz]

1. 00:48:032 - add a circle here? ok
2. 02:13:086 (2) - this nc is unnecessary imo, consider to remove that fixed
3. 03:20:745 (1) - ^ I take NC per 4 beats, so this NC is necessary imo.
4. 03:27:766 (1) - ^ ok

Fycho wrote:

osu! needs more and more kano

Lami wrote:

Fycho wrote:

osu! needs more and more kano

Aleycks wrote:

osu! needs more and more pp