hi m4m from queue
[Asterisk]
I'll cover general things more than talking about every patern since that would take a few hours.
NCs seem random to me they don't really have a continuous patern
00:18:704 (3,4) - misleading since you use 1/2 and 1/1 for same spacing
emphasis on notes is a little confusing too. some placed you put jumps, small jumps or even stack them on the same kind of beat 00:24:557 (4) - 00:25:143 (7) - 00:25:728 (2) -
00:23:679 (1,2,3) - not a fan of linear paterns which also have different spacing
00:27:630 (2,3) - if blanket intended it's pretty off 01:11:533 (4,5) -
00:30:850 (2,4,6) - well you can try to make paterns like this look more even, now the structure looks messy
00:51:338 (2) - very strong beat on slider end
00:54:118 (4) - jumps like these don't make sense since they aren't supported by the music at all
00:55:582 (1,2,3) - like you don't space out 00:55:582 (1) - but space out 00:56:021 (1) - which is much weaker
mostly structure and emphasis of beats here is the problem. recheck all of your blankets aswell.
[Az]
00:04:655 (2,1) - this transitions kinda badly also 1 is quite strong yet so close
00:23:386 (1,1) - blanket off 00:24:118 (2,5) - etc etc
okay so I notice you use aesthetics over emphasis of beats 00:28:801 (4,5) - those are weak as fuck yet spaced the most
00:29:533 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this one is much better only if we consider the vocal that strong that it overwhelms the strongest instruments here 00:29:825 (3,6,7) - is weaker than 00:29:972 (4) - ?
well now you emphasise the drum where in the pattern before you didn't emphasise it at all and had it at lowest spacing now it's highest 00:31:435 (6) - 00:30:264 (6) -
00:31:143 (4) - 00:29:972 (4) -
00:38:899 (1,2) - don't suddenly decide to follow vocals when all of the paterns around are instrument based. if you want to follow vocals here you have to do it for the whole paterns not just a few beats in the patern
00:51:045- either map this whole thing or don't map it at all 00:51:338 (1) -
01:00:923 (10,1) - the flow though
00:59:972 (3,5) - doesn't look very nice when it blankets this close keep it the way you did 01:00:996 (1,3) -
01:08:899 (6,7) - I dunno why you keep doing this everywhere to destroy the flow. you can just ctrl+g here 01:09:045 (7) -
01:09:923 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 01:09:484 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - kinda lame that these have same spacing when 01:09:923 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - is more intense
01:23:386 (1,2,3,4) - sounds so wrong tho
looks pretty neat but fix the emhpasis of notes is really wrong, once you fix that this will be a really great map. oh yeah don't forget to recheck blankets.
Good luck!
[Asterisk]
I'll cover general things more than talking about every patern since that would take a few hours.
NCs seem random to me they don't really have a continuous patern
00:18:704 (3,4) - misleading since you use 1/2 and 1/1 for same spacing
emphasis on notes is a little confusing too. some placed you put jumps, small jumps or even stack them on the same kind of beat 00:24:557 (4) - 00:25:143 (7) - 00:25:728 (2) -
00:23:679 (1,2,3) - not a fan of linear paterns which also have different spacing
00:27:630 (2,3) - if blanket intended it's pretty off 01:11:533 (4,5) -
00:30:850 (2,4,6) - well you can try to make paterns like this look more even, now the structure looks messy
00:51:338 (2) - very strong beat on slider end
00:54:118 (4) - jumps like these don't make sense since they aren't supported by the music at all
00:55:582 (1,2,3) - like you don't space out 00:55:582 (1) - but space out 00:56:021 (1) - which is much weaker
mostly structure and emphasis of beats here is the problem. recheck all of your blankets aswell.
[Az]
00:04:655 (2,1) - this transitions kinda badly also 1 is quite strong yet so close
00:23:386 (1,1) - blanket off 00:24:118 (2,5) - etc etc
okay so I notice you use aesthetics over emphasis of beats 00:28:801 (4,5) - those are weak as fuck yet spaced the most
00:29:533 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this one is much better only if we consider the vocal that strong that it overwhelms the strongest instruments here 00:29:825 (3,6,7) - is weaker than 00:29:972 (4) - ?
well now you emphasise the drum where in the pattern before you didn't emphasise it at all and had it at lowest spacing now it's highest 00:31:435 (6) - 00:30:264 (6) -
00:31:143 (4) - 00:29:972 (4) -
00:38:899 (1,2) - don't suddenly decide to follow vocals when all of the paterns around are instrument based. if you want to follow vocals here you have to do it for the whole paterns not just a few beats in the patern
00:51:045- either map this whole thing or don't map it at all 00:51:338 (1) -
01:00:923 (10,1) - the flow though
00:59:972 (3,5) - doesn't look very nice when it blankets this close keep it the way you did 01:00:996 (1,3) -
01:08:899 (6,7) - I dunno why you keep doing this everywhere to destroy the flow. you can just ctrl+g here 01:09:045 (7) -
01:09:923 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 01:09:484 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - kinda lame that these have same spacing when 01:09:923 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - is more intense
01:23:386 (1,2,3,4) - sounds so wrong tho
looks pretty neat but fix the emhpasis of notes is really wrong, once you fix that this will be a really great map. oh yeah don't forget to recheck blankets.
Good luck!