1. add tag cd title 'Original Soundtrack Blue Blur'
2. Normal diff only have 'RMX' tags. please delete it.
3. 02:27:210 - slider volume, reduce gradually? more fit song. like 30%,20%,10%.

1. 00:29:864 (2) - this flow bit bad imo. try move (x:423 y:95). more natural flow. if fix, please fix other DS.
2. 00:39:556 (4) - nothing clap. my suggest, add clap and Additions: soft. it's really good.
3. 00:47:864 (2) - flow is nice. but, this slider reverse point very under. it's beginner diffs, My suggest: make curve
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:50:633 (5) - add clap and Additions: soft
5. 00:58:941 (2,3,4) - same x:320 better. (2) - only x:324. try move.
6. 01:03:556 (2) - add clap and Additions: soft
7. 01:21:095 (4,1) - fmm, this overlaps is not good. try this. if fix please fix next DS. My suggest:
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:25:248 (3) - slider start and reverse and end, all add whistle and Additions: Drum. It's very fit this sound. let's try!
9. 01:40:479 (4) - add clap and Additions: soft
10. 01:51:556 (5) - ^
11. 02:14:171 (3) - move (x:139 y:167). make beautiful triangle (1,2,3) seems more good. if fix please fix next DS.

1. Normal diff only previewtime different please check. you should put 40018.
2. 00:18:787 (4,5,6) - (5) move x:256. center is really good imo. and fix symmetry (4,6).
3. 00:23:402 (3) - move x:386 y:280. make beautiful triangle (1,2,3) better imo.
4. 00:27:556 (7) - doesn't fit music imo. move slider head 00:27:787 - . and add circle here. take vocal sound.
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:34:941 (7) - ^ same thing.
6. 00:39:095 (7) - slider end, add clap and Additions: soft.
7. 00:52:710 (3) - seems bit overlaps. move (x:32 y:204) can fix problem.
8. 00:52:941 (4) - forget clap slider end.
9. 01:03:556 (2) - add clap and Additions: soft.
10. 01:21:325 (4) - add whistle slider head. fit sound imo.
11. 01:25:248 (5,6,7) - same Easy diffs.
12. 01:28:479 (8) - move this slider 01:28:710 - and add circle. follow vocal.
13. 01:51:095 (6) - slider end, add clap and Additions: soft.
14. 02:04:710 (3) - move (x:29 y:134) - (2,3,4) - same DS more cool seems. try it.
15. 02:14:171 (4) - move (x:244 y:178). DS 1.17x was make overlaps.

1. 00:39:095 (3) - add clap slider end and Additions: Soft.
2. 00:50:633 (4) - add clap slider start and Additions: Soft.
3. 01:03:556 (3) - add clap and Additions: Soft.
4. 01:25:248 (2,3,4) - same easy diff.
5. 01:40:018 (3) - add clap slider end and Additions: Soft.
6. 01:51:556 (4) - add clap slider start and Additions: Soft.
7. 02:23:402 (1) - doesn't fit music this. try this.
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:39:556 (5) - add clap and Additions: Soft.
2. 00:50:633 (5) - ^
3. 01:03:556 (3) - ^
4. 01:25:248 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Same Easy diff.
5. 01:40:248 (4,5) - ctrl+G? make jump. make fun play imo.
6. 01:40:479 (5) - add clap and Additions: Soft.
7. 01:51:556 (5) - ^
8. 02:03:095 (1) - should move (x:12 y:88)

[ microism ] wrote:

the offset is wrong, make it 3130 fix

can't mod easy/normal diffs good

hard:
00:57:556 (2,3,1,2,3) - do this: before: http://puu.sh/lJPX9/72234cb733.jpg, after: http://puu.sh/lJPVH/a18391aeac.jpg no
01:23:864 (4,5,1) - this is inconsistent spacing, fix it is jump
02:10:976 (3) - make the slider only reverse once, then nudge it forward 2 times (press K 2 times), then add a note here 02:11:206 (3) -. sorry couldn't explain it better I prefer this way

insane:
00:06:822 (1) - shorten the spinner
00:09:360 - add note here no
00:48:822 (5,1) - (5) is too close to (1), make the spacing even fix
00:50:668 (5,6,7,8,1) - make this straight fix
02:04:976 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - make this straight fix

P o M u T a wrote:

M4M your queue.

[General]

1. add tag cd title 'Original Soundtrack Blue Blur'
2. Normal diff only have 'RMX' tags. please delete it.
3. 02:27:210 - slider volume, reduce gradually? more fit song. like 30%,20%,10%.

[Easy]

1. 00:29:864 (2) - this flow bit bad imo. try move (x:423 y:95). more natural flow. if fix, please fix other DS.
2. 00:39:556 (4) - nothing clap. my suggest, add clap and Additions: soft. it's really good.
3. 00:47:864 (2) - flow is nice. but, this slider reverse point very under. it's beginner diffs, My suggest: make curve
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:50:633 (5) - add clap and Additions: soft
5. 00:58:941 (2,3,4) - same x:320 better. (2) - only x:324. try move.
6. 01:03:556 (2) - add clap and Additions: soft
7. 01:21:095 (4,1) - fmm, this overlaps is not good. try this. if fix please fix next DS. My suggest:
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:25:248 (3) - slider start and reverse and end, all add whistle and Additions: Drum. It's very fit this sound. let's try!
9. 01:40:479 (4) - add clap and Additions: soft
10. 01:51:556 (5) - ^
11. 02:14:171 (3) - move (x:139 y:167). make beautiful triangle (1,2,3) seems more good. if fix please fix next DS.

[Normal]

1. Normal diff only previewtime different please check. you should put 40018.
2. 00:18:787 (4,5,6) - (5) move x:256. center is really good imo. and fix symmetry (4,6).
3. 00:23:402 (3) - move x:386 y:280. make beautiful triangle (1,2,3) better imo.
4. 00:27:556 (7) - doesn't fit music imo. move slider head 00:27:787 - . and add circle here. take vocal sound.
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:34:941 (7) - ^ same thing.
6. 00:39:095 (7) - slider end, add clap and Additions: soft.
7. 00:52:710 (3) - seems bit overlaps. move (x:32 y:204) can fix problem.
8. 00:52:941 (4) - forget clap slider end.
9. 01:03:556 (2) - add clap and Additions: soft.
10. 01:21:325 (4) - add whistle slider head. fit sound imo.
11. 01:25:248 (5,6,7) - same Easy diffs.
12. 01:28:479 (8) - move this slider 01:28:710 - and add circle. follow vocal.
13. 01:51:095 (6) - slider end, add clap and Additions: soft.
14. 02:04:710 (3) - move (x:29 y:134) - (2,3,4) - same DS more cool seems. try it.
15. 02:14:171 (4) - move (x:244 y:178). DS 1.17x was make overlaps.

[Hard]

1. 00:39:095 (3) - add clap slider end and Additions: Soft.
2. 00:50:633 (4) - add clap slider start and Additions: Soft.
3. 01:03:556 (3) - add clap and Additions: Soft.
4. 01:25:248 (2,3,4) - same easy diff.
5. 01:40:018 (3) - add clap slider end and Additions: Soft.
6. 01:51:556 (4) - add clap slider start and Additions: Soft.
7. 02:23:402 (1) - doesn't fit music this. try this.
   SPOILER

   

[Insane]

1. 00:39:556 (5) - add clap and Additions: Soft.
2. 00:50:633 (5) - ^
3. 01:03:556 (3) - ^
4. 01:25:248 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Same Easy diff.
5. 01:40:248 (4,5) - ctrl+G? make jump. make fun play imo.
6. 01:40:479 (5) - add clap and Additions: Soft.
7. 01:51:556 (5) - ^
8. 02:03:095 (1) - should move (x:12 y:88)

Overall nice! star!
Happy Birthday~ but is 25th DECEMBWER !"#"!#!"$

rfandomization wrote:

Heyo, from your queue! Nice Sonic song

[General]
It looks like there are still Tag/Preview Point conflicts in the Normal difficulty (delete "RMX" from Normal diff tags, fix the preview point and it should be fine)
Maybe try offset of 3,130 for the first timing section? It sounds better to me at least, maybe.
IMO, the section from 02:04:961 to the next kiai (02:12:325) sounds like a great place to have a second break. The music seems to fit it at least. If not, then at least a quick break until 02:08:633 isn't bad either.

[Easy]
(nazi) 00:22:479 (2,3) - The blanket on this slightly overlaps more on the bottom than the top, see from 00:22:104 (2) - at 1/16 snap divisor (Ctrl-G the 2)
00:36:325 (1,2) - I see what you were going for here, I'm not 100% sure about this flow though >.<
00:39:556 (4,1) - Check this blanket here (I do apologize for these, but if I don't point them out, someone will, eh? )
00:46:018 (4) - It's fine, but a circle where the slider currently starts and starting the slider at 00:46:479 sounds better imo, especially as it is in the chorus. Since you use this pattern throughout the song wherever this verse appears, it sounded odd to me to leave that white tick in the middle of a slider. Either that or something like 01:46:479 (3,4) - would also work slightly better.
(minor) 00:50:633 (5,1) - this blanket is slightly off
01:11:402 (1,2) - A racetrack? Beautiful
01:17:402 (4) - The way this slider curves sort of upsets the flow from "3", having something like http://puu.sh/lJOeX/f2f675755c.jpg feels more natural imo.
01:22:479 (1) - This slider feels a bit long. If you did this purposely to accentuate the tiny "pause" that follows it I understand, but I think splitting it into two sliders might be beneficial.

Not a bad Easy at all, some flow choices were a bit bah, but that's more of a style thing than anything else, so I didn't say much about that

[Normal]
00:27:556 (7) - Having a circle here and starting the slider on 00:27:787 sounds better to me. If 3 notes in a row feels too much, then 00:27:095 (5,6) - could be made into a single slider as well
00:31:018 (4) - Having less amount of notes in a Normal is good, but leaving this blank feels off. I would suggest a note here.
00:40:018 (1,2) - Slight overlap
00:41:864 (4,5) - I see why you didn't blanket these, but I feel as though the emptiness above the 5 is less than desirable, and I think a blanket might actually work well here
00:43:710 (1,2,3,4,5) - This rhythm sounds a bit strange to me. Something like this sounds better imo. (The "1" starts where the "1" of the current pattern is). Since you follow the lyrics directly before and after it, the current rhythm sounds a bit out of place. Same thing for the other times this is used such as 00:54:787 (1,2,3,4,5) - 01:44:633 (1,2,3,4,5) - and so on.
00:46:248 (6) - If you decide not to change the above, at least having a note or sliderend here makes it slightly better imo
01:00:325 (5,6,7,8) - This note arrangement is aesthetically a bit displeasing imo. Adjusting the "8" so it forms something like this might not be a bad idea. (it is at x:318, y:241 in that screenshot)
01:13:248 (3,4) - What a perfect opportunity to blanket ;_;
01:37:710 (2,3) - slight overlap
(nazi) 02:00:325 (3,4,5) - very slight overlaps

The purposeful lack of blankets in this difficulty is an interesting choice. I don't quite agree with it, and I wish there were a few more blankets, but it's up to you

[Hard]
00:24:325 (3,4) - Positioning them like this can look and flow better imo.
00:25:710 (3,4,5) - Nice
00:44:633 (2,1) - Idk if this was intended to be a blanket, but even if not, it looks like it was meant to be a blanket and didn't quite make it, so blanketing it properly may not be a bad idea As it is a Hard after all, ignoring DS just a teensy bit here to adjust this shouldn't matter much
00:44:633 (2,2) - This is nice
02:12:787 (2,3,4) - Suddenly having two of these "double notes after sliders" at the end of the song is a bit evil It works rhythmically, but they are a bit of a nasty surprise, it may be worth changing this to something else.
02:14:171 (1,2,3) - Maybe something like this?
02:23:402 (1) - Since there is a strong beat on the red ticks here, having this slider repeat on the blue feels a bit strange imo.

Very nice diff! Easily my favorite of the four, this one is a job well done (it's a close contest though, the Insane is awesome and the other diffs aren't bad at all)

[Insane]
00:49:248 (1) - moving this a bit further from "5" might look better
00:51:441 (2) - Making this a slider that curves slightly upwards may not be a bad idea
02:25:248 (1) - Ending this at 02:25:710 and putting two notes at 02:25:825 and 02:25:941 sounds better imo

Can't say much else about this, excellent difficulty.

1. 01:16:976 (3,4) - Spacing error.

1. Check preview time.
2. 00:34:976 (7) - Imo starting the slider from 00:35:206 and expressing the vocals completely would suit better.
3. 01:24:822 (5,6,7) - I feel the placement of (6) can form a smoother flow for this pattern, but fine if this was your intention.
4. 01:28:514 (8) - Similar slider rhythm suggestion, but a suggestion to delete 01:26:437 (2) also includes here for rhythm consistency and for a health rhythm density.
5. 01:43:283 - Missing Clap.

1. 00:16:053 (1,2) - I thought this kind of 1.5x spacing only appeared at new stanzas. At least, please consider making this pattern consistent with 00:24:360 (3,4).
2. 02:12:706 - Consider expressing this beat as you've done at 02:16:053 (1). Perhaps you can consider increasing 02:12:360 (1) by 1/4.

1. 00:10:514 (1,2) - I feel something new starts from 00:10:745 in terms of your selected pattern, and also with the music. Starting the combo from (2) accordingly would be more natural.
2. 00:12:822 (3,4) - 00:13:745 (5,6) - Since the intro of the music has a slightly weaker drum than parts after 00:25:283, I wouldn't recommend using such jumps, so you can create a difference in your map.
3. 00:34:514 (1,2,3,4) - This jump, especially the one at (3,4), really feels forced and uncomfortable in flow. A random suggestion of mine is to stack (3) above (1).
4. 01:29:899 (1,2) - While there were several similar usages, this was one of the most noticable random jumps in this difficulty. I can't see the musical support behind this placement, but only your intention for the sake of (1,3,5,7) (2,4,6) cross pattern. The pattern itself is pretty well made, but you should reconsider it's appropriateness. Perhaps a scale such as 01:33:591 (1,2) would be enough for your (1,2), but the current feels too large.

Strategas wrote:

Hi, M4M.

[Insane]

00:10:745 (2) - this jump doesn't really makes sense, much rather have a jump on 00:10:976 (3) - is make sense becaise vocal is high
00:13:745 (5,6) - same music on 5 is much stronger than on 6 fix but jump stay
00:13:745 (5,1,2,3) - uh if you wanted to blanket it's off intentional
00:25:283 (1) - I'm suprised you use slider velocity the same everywhere, even if the intensity changes is fine
01:49:745 (5,1) - fix blanket ok
00:28:976 (1) - kinda inconsistant spacing with 00:17:899 (1) - fix
00:30:822 (1,2,3,4) - I can see you're going for a square but the 4 lacks emphasis it feels like no
00:57:591 (4) - feels a little too curved for me no
01:18:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - too spaced for this calm part the song is quiet, the beat is like low, is better make antispacing than out space
01:44:668 (1) - inconsistant spacing with 01:42:822 (1) - fix
02:04:976 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - even this out fix

[Hard]

00:25:745 (3,4,5) - wouldn't this be cooler if they blanket eachother? 00:58:976 (3,4,5) - something like this except that all of them would be same distance
00:38:206 (1,3) - blanket?
00:42:822 (2,3,1) - doesn't look the best imo fix
00:44:668 (2,1) - blanket a bit off
00:58:976 (3) - move this closer to 00:59:437 (4) -
02:24:130 (2,3) - fix fix

[Normal]

00:27:591 (7) - maybe start this slider here 00:27:822-
looks fine to me

[Easy]

01:17:437 (4) - ds? fix

oh yeah and the volume of hitsounds is kinda low in some parts of every diff I think
Good luck!

Sonnyc wrote:

[Easy]

1. 01:16:976 (3,4) - Spacing error. fix

[Normal]

1. Check preview time. fix
2. 00:34:976 (7) - Imo starting the slider from 00:35:206 and expressing the vocals completely would suit better. f I add more notes and slider start in red tick is make me too much click is little hard, so this slider 1/1 could be fine
3. 01:24:822 (5,6,7) - I feel the placement of (6) can form a smoother flow for this pattern, but fine if this was your intention. fix
4. 01:28:514 (8) - Similar slider rhythm suggestion, but a suggestion to delete 01:26:437 (2) also includes here for rhythm consistency and for a health rhythm density. same before
5. 01:43:283 - Missing Clap. fix

[Hard]

1. 00:16:053 (1,2) - I thought this kind of 1.5x spacing only appeared at new stanzas. At least, please consider making this pattern consistent with 00:24:360 (3,4). fix
2. 02:12:706 - Consider expressing this beat as you've done at 02:16:053 (1). Perhaps you can consider increasing 02:12:360 (1) by 1/4.fix

[Insane]

1. 00:10:514 (1,2) - I feel something new starts from 00:10:745 in terms of your selected pattern, and also with the music. Starting the combo from (2) accordingly would be more natural. (2) the vocal is high, so i make jump here, and no NC, sorry
2. 00:12:822 (3,4) - 00:13:745 (5,6) - Since the intro of the music has a slightly weaker drum than parts after 00:25:283, I wouldn't recommend using such jumps, so you can create a difference in your map. fix
3. 00:34:514 (1,2,3,4) - This jump, especially the one at (3,4), really feels forced and uncomfortable in flow. A random suggestion of mine is to stack (3) above (1). I don't see problem there flow... the flow look fine for me is like pattern zig-zag, stay
4. 01:29:899 (1,2) - While there were several similar usages, this was one of the most noticable random jumps in this difficulty. I can't see the musical support behind this placement, but only your intention for the sake of (1,3,5,7) (2,4,6) cross pattern. The pattern itself is pretty well made, but you should reconsider it's appropriateness. Perhaps a scale such as 01:33:591 (1,2) would be enough for your (1,2), but the current feels too large.no, (1) before slders the beat withou vocal look normal but then next (2) there high vocal this is why i make jump, but the play look fine

Not a bad 2013ish map. Good luck!

DarkDunskin wrote:

You will add these, will you?

http://puu.sh/lN16R/70a54a0ea1.rar

Pereira006 wrote:

DarkDunskin wrote:

You will add these, will you?

http://puu.sh/lN16R/70a54a0ea1.rar

dude ! are you stalker my perfil ? lol you look my perfil everyday if something happen LOL
but you have promise to me if I add you taiko, you gonna start look people to mod taiko and BN taiko, because I'm lazy and can't m4m in taiko

DarkDunskin wrote:

Of course I have to stalk you. You always map awsome songs but you never tell me ;D

Same Update as I send you ingame: http://puu.sh/lO5V8/83eb3e35ab.rar

Let's get to work~

1. 00:27:591 (2,1) - These two could be a blanket

1. 00:27:822 (4) - I know that the slider is probably mapped to the vocals, but I feel like the beat at 00:28:053 (5) shouldn't really be skipped over, although maybe since it's a hard it's okay.
2. 00:31:514 (4) - same as above on the white tick
3. 00:35:206 (4) - ^
4. 01:11:437 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Maybe some of these could be a slider instead, this many circles in a row seems a bit hard for a Hard imo
5. 01:33:591 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as above especially with the three single taps after that pattern.
6. 01:55:745 (1,2,1) - These cliders could maybe be a little bit curved?
7. 02:08:668 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Again with the bunch of circles, could be swapped with sliders at some points
8. 02:25:283 (1) - Could make this a repeat slider where the repeat is at 02:25:745 (2) - .

1. 00:13:053 (4) - Similar to the Hard, I know that is more mapped to the vocals but maybe it would be better to have a beat at 00:13:283 - since this is an Insane after all.
2. 00:31:514 (4) - ^ with the following white tick
3. 00:35:206 (4) - ^
4. 00:44:668 (4,5,6) - Maybe move this whole pattern a little bit down so it's closer to the next one and there isn't such a gap? 00:44:437 (3) - has is 1.2x while 00:45:360 (6) - is 2.2x which could be a bit more even.
5. 00:58:976 (3,4,5) - Another pattern with a bit of weird spacing that could be evened out if you wish to change it
6. 01:02:206 (1) - Again, I assume this is mapped to the vocals and all but maybe it could be good to map some of the beats its skipping since this is an Insane..
7. 01:24:706 (2) - Slider shape could be tweaked a bit for flow
8. 02:03:130 (1) - Same as the other long-ish slider I pointed out.

StarrStyx wrote:

m4m

[Insane]
How about lowering the hp... having the same od and hp on a slow song isnt really the best combination
00:28:976 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the spacing here isnt really consistent while the song doesnt have any ups and downs in its tune the spacing is consistency because you can see in 00:29:206 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) the placements are same then do CTRL whtevet to make jump becasue this vocal is really high, is make sense to follow song, stay
00:34:976 (3,4) - this jump doesnt fit the music in any way - compared to other objects' spacing, especially when the current section isnt exactly a chorus and not really anything to emphasize the vocal still high, jump stay
01:28:514 (3,4) - ^ same
01:02:206 (1) - instead of a long slider, I think the rhythm in the song actually allows for a bit more variation in this part Ifollow vocal, the vocal is long, so I make slider long, I follow more vocals than everthing
01:18:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this part is too extreme - nothing special in the song, yet random jumps here, which are a rather big difference from the spacing and placement of other objects. Also 01:19:976 (6,7) - this huge spacing, same reasoning as 00:34:976 (3,4) I mentioned above same happen before, the placements is same, jump to follow vocals highs, stay,
01:34:514 (5,6,7,8) - the spacing here is a bit too random. Especially when the tune is rather consistent not really any major bursts or anything, yet the spacing between 01:34:976 (7,8) - is so small compared to 01:34:514 (5,6) - same
02:04:283 (3,4) - spacing issue again no
02:03:130 (1) - maybe add some variation? same explain before
02:02:206 (3,1) - stack for a cleaner look? fix
02:12:706 (2,3) - a suggestion would be to use a 3/4 slider instead, so as to let the slider end on the red tick and make it better for ppl to play the following triple. Same goes for other patterns near the end of the map No

There are a lot of spacing issues, that dont really fit the music in relevance to how you space your other objects. I think it would be better to have a good look at the spacing and try to keep the emphasis consistent through the map

There no problem Spacing inconsistency because all spacing is pretty consistency cuz the placements is same, look this print example this http://puu.sh/lP9Rj/b6134ed768.jpg my style make DS Normal then use CTRL to make jump, because the vocal is like up down up down, so jump is amke sense to follow song, you can see my maps ranks have same this patterns. There no problem spacings

[Hard]
00:43:514 (3,1) - blanket for better look? intentional
01:11:437 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - although it's a hard, I dont really recommend putting so many circles in a row, since it could tire out ppl whose level are at playing Hards. A circle - circle - slider combination works in the case imo
same thing in different areas of the diff stay, circles look better for me, Idon't feel add slider because is doesn'tt sense to follow tthis song, Circle stak for better this level hard
01:18:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as above, although you did do the thing i suggested above for 01:19:745 (5,6,7) - so it's better off changing it that way imo same before
01:17:668 (2,3) - you could probably make a 1/1 slider and then followed by a circle since the current sliderend and sliderhead at 01:17:668 (2) and 01:18:130 (3) - respectively dont have anything to emphasize fix my own
01:27:130 (4) - better not make antiflow for a Hard; ctrl g that is not antiflow, that is jump flow look fine
01:49:283 (4) - ^ same before

Normal and Easy seem fine

Overall Im not a big fan of how you place your sliders on blue ticks, but I assume you know what you're doing anyway.
good luck


my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/386151

Shinenite wrote:

Hello, for m4m!

[Easy]

1. 00:27:591 (2,1) - These two could be a blanket intentional

[Hard]

1. 00:27:822 (4) - I know that the slider is probably mapped to the vocals, but I feel like the beat at 00:28:053 (5) shouldn't really be skipped over, although maybe since it's a hard it's okay.sorry, no stay
2. 00:31:514 (4) - same as above on the white tick sorry, no stay
3. 00:35:206 (4) - ^ sorry, no stay
4. 01:11:437 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Maybe some of these could be a slider instead, this many circles in a row seems a bit hard for a Hard imo fix
5. 01:33:591 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as above especially with the three single taps after that pattern. fix
6. 01:55:745 (1,2,1) - These cliders could maybe be a little bit curved? stay parallel
7. 02:08:668 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Again with the bunch of circles, could be swapped with sliders at some points no
8. 02:25:283 (1) - Could make this a repeat slider where the repeat is at 02:25:745 (2) - no.

[Insane]

1. 00:13:053 (4) - Similar to the Hard, I know that is more mapped to the vocals but maybe it would be better to have a beat at 00:13:283 - since this is an Insane after all.sorry, no, prefer vocal than beats
2. 00:31:514 (4) - ^ with the following white tick no
3. 00:35:206 (4) - ^ no
4. 00:44:668 (4,5,6) - Maybe move this whole pattern a little bit down so it's closer to the next one and there isn't such a gap? 00:44:437 (3) - has is 1.2x while 00:45:360 (6) - is 2.2x which could be a bit more even. fix
5. 00:58:976 (3,4,5) - Another pattern with a bit of weird spacing that could be evened out if you wish to change it fix
6. 01:02:206 (1) - Again, I assume this is mapped to the vocals and all but maybe it could be good to map some of the beats its skipping since this is an Insane.. As Insane, you can follow whatever you wanna, follow hard beats, follow hards melodies, follow hard instrumentals, and my style for this map is Hard follow vocals than over beats, is actually is fine, follow vocal stay
7. 01:24:706 (2) - Slider shape could be tweaked a bit for flow fix
8. 02:03:130 (1) - Same as the other long-ish slider I pointed out.fix

Hopefully this mod was of some use! Didn't find anything wrong with the normal. Some of the things I pointed out do probably go against the mapping style you did for this map but oh well. Good luck with it! It's quite a fun map to play.

• Insane

ProEzreal wrote:

• Insane

-00:28:976 (1) - I really don't get the jumps here, make it symmetrical or turn it into something else. I have explain before, the (1) beat normal without vocal then next object (2) start high vocal so the jump make sense a lot and is still symentrical
-01:00:245 (6) - This note doesn't look so good, align it better.ok
-01:20:206 (7) - Move it a little closer to 01:19:976 (6). Just a little. same before
-01:19:976 (6) - Again, make the jumps a little prettier. same before

Not too much to mod, good luck on getting ranked.

1. Muzu has Widescreen support activated. Disable it.

1. 00:28:514 - 00:32:206 - 00:35:899 - Add d here, there's a clear sound.
2. 01:22:514 - 01:23:899 - Try changing these notes to k, i think they both follow better the vocals as k.
3. 01:29:437 - 01:33:130 - 01:36:822 - Same as first point.
4. Not much to point out, you're using your own style to follow the music/vocals so i don't have much that i would change.

1. 00:01:860 - d sounds better imo.
2. 00:03:591 - I think it would sound and play better if you follow the 1/4 rhythm instead of doing a 1/2 rhythm here.
3. 00:28:514 - 00:35:899 - Same as Muzu, add a d here.
4. 00:31:976 - I don't think that this 1/6 fits, the sound for this one is a k(kkd), kkd being 1/8, but it looks like you dont want to use 1/8 so i just suggest to leave this as kkd 1/4.
5. 00:39:591 - Same here, there's no point on having a 1/6, leave it as ddk.
6. 00:43:053 - ^ Blah.
7. 00:50:668 - ^
8. 00:54:130 - ^ I'll actually stop pointing them, if you apply, please search for others 1/6. The song has no 1/6 sound.
9. 01:29:437 - 01:36:822 - Same as Muzu, d here.

KASUM1 wrote:

The gap between Easy and Normal in SV is good but Normal and Hard is small while SV between Hard and Insane is good. but why it's only normal-hard? o.o

Also the DS in normal and hard the same 1.2 >//<

I can't find a specific reason for that

Lno wrote:

I'm pretty sure my concerns were specified. This map has a total of 3 taiko mods and no mods or comments from a taiko BN yet it got qualified because the standard diffs are good. I also pointed out my concerns for the misuse of 1/6 and the awkwardness of playing when it comes to the gaps.
Taiko Icons arent needed any more when the BN has the opinion that everything seems fine.

If you want a few timing point examples:
00:31:976 - This is actually 1/8 (mapped as 1/6) but plays better as 1/4. 1/6 aren't unrakable you know and I won't take them out because to me and many others they play fine. Also Lost the Lights mentioned that point too but this is simply a matter of opinion here which I considered before.
01:36:130 (129,130,131) - The awkward gaps. I'm also not forced to map straightforward 1/4 patterns. I thought it might be a nice option to insert a few breaks here so it doesnt get too monotone.

There's also this:

SPOILER

This so sweet from Raiden <3

qoot8123 wrote:

There isn't taiko custom hitsound in folder, should set the hitsound sample to "default" instead of "custom 1".
This is indeed a mistake I made. I never intended to use costum sounds in any way. But since it wont make any difference while playing because there arent any custom sounds I see no problem in keeping it like this.

Current setting

muzu is lacks of 3/2 and 2/1 breaks, although the bpm is slow , dunno taiko QAT is allow it or not .
In my opinion this Difficutly plays easy enough to go as a muzukashii. And this is indeed the first time this issue is mentioned sooooooooo I'd wait for a BN or QAT to decide this.

Nwolf wrote:

The 1/6 is not part of this song's snapping and we've had too many DQ's recently (aka more than 1) because of wrong snapping, which is the case here. It's unreasonable as well (you can't map 1/12 on something like Tenshi Teki!), and "it plays fine" is hardly ever an argument, because Shinsekai is also playable and not considered a good map.

Sorry, I should have been more accurate on this matter but it seemed easier to me to counterargument "...plays better as 1/4 (Lno)" with "plays fine too". You're quite wright that I didn't map along any 1/6 drumlines of the song, but this hardly doesn't mean for them to be unreasonable of sorts.
As for example I'm always using them as a certain bass part of the melody reoocurs at 00:43:053 (125,1,2,3) - 00:50:668 (40,41,42,43) - 00:54:130 (54,55,56,57). These spots seemed to me as good acceleration points and allign very well with 1/4 notes before, which work as a nice stylistic device to express the dynamic of the song itself. I'm also being consistent in patterning at these points because no acceleration effect would work with e.g. kdkd or dkkd 1/6 patterns which where suggested in previous mods. Given the low BPM of the song they aren't even hard to play for more experienced players.