00:24:640 (3) - idk why this slider ended on yellow tick if drum sound is on white tick. And also this is not in rhythm. Cut this slider to white tick pls
It's actually good for rythme I don't know the problem00:25:840 (3) - ^
00:24:640 (3,6) - located too close (almost a overlap), move 00:25:240 (6,7,1) - right
moved00:27:040 (3) - maybe more curve this slider? In this sutiation it looks ugly and also symmetry with 00:26:590 (1) - is lost
changed the shape00:31:840 (3,3) - stack
this is already stack ?00:42:190 (2) - nc
If everyone always say me differents NC propositions it's will never be OK, also I don't change it anymore00:44:590 (3) - ^
00:47:590 (1,2) -
this is better for rhythm imo
mhmm It's look kinda flat00:49:240 (7,8) - hmm...this sounds is different from 00:48:790 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , maybe make here kickslider?
Ok !00:51:490 (4,5) - make here triple
Changed00:58:690 (2) - make here two kicksliders to separate two different sounds
changed01:04:090 (5) - make here kickslider to emphasize vocal and to fill unfair 1/2 pause 01:04:165 - on strong drum sound place
ok changed something but not at this time01:05:290 (5) - ^
01:03:940 (3,7) - nazi stack?
lol wut01:06:940 (1) - remove nc, it makes no sense
already changed ^^01:07:540 (6,1) - swapped nc, and also make something like
this changed01:10:690 (1,1) - fix bad overlap
fixed01:27:490 (2) - stack end of repeat with end of slider 01:26:290 (5) -
There is no repeat here o.o01:42:490 (5) - make kickslider
changed01:43:690 (5) - ^
01:55:990 (3,5) - fix blanket
ok01:57:190 (5,6,7,8) - unstack it, this compressed kicksliders is uncomfortable to play imo
already changed01:58:540 (5) - stack end of repeat with start of kickslider 01:57:640 (8) -
changed02:04:390 (5,6,7,8) - unstack
same02:06:640 (7) - make kickslider
too hard to play02:07:690 (3,4) - try to avoid this bad overlap
already changed02:09:190 (5,2) - too close ^
02:10:240 (3,4,5) - looks like ugly, at least curve slider ^
02:16:990 (1) - remove nc
02:22:990 (5) - nc?
02:31:090 (5,6) - triple?
02:38:140 (5,2) - too close
why ? I think it's cool02:38:740 - 02:38:965 - 02:39:415 - 02:39:640 - add claps here
changed02:44:290 (4,3) - bad overlap
changed02:48:490 (2,5) - too close, move 02:49:090 (5,2) - left
changed02:50:965 - put here note to contrast with triple 02:50:290 (5,6,7) -
Changed02:54:190 (1,3) - curve blanket, move (3) up
it's look good actually02:59:440 (3,4) - maybe make here kickslider to contrast with kickslider 02:58:990 (1) - ?
No it's good03:02:590 (9) - nc
why ?03:04:990 (6) - move this slider to 207 185 to more symmetry with 03:05:440 (7) -
Fixed03:05:890 (8,6) - stack
changed03:11:890 (4,3,4) - reduce overlap here for better look, move repeat up
moved03:12:790 (9,10) - curve blanket
fixed?03:19:390 (9) - nc
same, why03:21:640 (8,6) - stack
?03:23:590 (5) - stack end of slider with end of slider 03:22:390 (5) -
03:26:890 (3,1) - too close, spread them out
changed03:39:790 (4) - nc?
NO 04:13:884 - unjustified and overstated sv, reduce it at least to 1.25x
Changed04:49:866 (8,5) - maybe blanket?
Ok ok04:55:416 (5,1) - hmm too close imo, move note to 250 206 for example
05:22:566 (1) - imo
this is looks better
Yes but it's not really cool for flow06:00:066 - 06:00:666 - 06:01:266 - 06:01:866 - maybe add claps here to emphasize guitar?
Changed06:06:966 (5) - nc?
Nop06:41:766 (5) - ^
Nop #207:07:416 (4,1) - swapped nc
??07:18:366 - reduce volume here because this sounds in 07:18:366 (2) - is less than in 07:18:966 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -
fixed