1. High Class (2,05 stars, 296 notes)
2. Plebian (1,46 stars, 197 notes)
3. Queen (3,44 stars, 501 notes)

Auxent wrote:

я хочу кекс.

Xinely wrote:

placeholder

• 
  General

1. i think you can try reduce the bg size file, 2 mb for just a bg is really big imo i can help if u need it good point, fixed that!
2. just asking for confirmation that you're really gonna use soft-sliderslide in here? it's not silent which usually ppl wont do intended to be that way, it sounds nice, if you ask me

• 
  Easy

1. 00:13:508 (2) - i'd say rotate 10 degree clockwise here to make the flow feels better, according my own taste though I'd rather keep it as it is, I feel it works better with the general style I try to keep here
2. 00:28:949 (4) - nazi but i'd say copy paste and flip from 00:28:067 (3) - , somehow this one looks different and cause different shape and flow as well
3. 00:29:391 - somehow finish sounds so noisy and doesnt fit with the music here (if u agree then do for all diffs) sure
4. 00:36:449 (5) - just my taste but according your previous flow, imo flow feels better if you make circular flow one with move this to 368,120 I see the point here, but I'd rather go for a slightly different flow here. the first part of the pattern goes with he main vocal, the second cathes up with the bacground vocals. hope it makes sense to you
5. 01:43:949 (1) - somehow i cant understand why 3/2 slider repeat here, the vocal in 01:44:832 - is higher and should be mapped rather than in 01:44:611 - imo
6. 02:01:596 (1) - same as above done both of them in a proper way
7. 02:29:832 - need finish here imo because the cymbal (if u agree then do for all diffs) done
8. 03:17:038 - probably map this as you did in 01:02:920 (3) - ? good point

• 
  Normal

1. AR 6 seems a bit faster for a normal diff, try AR 5,5? That's more of a Normal+, if you ask me, The difficulty doesn't feel like an average Normal should
2. 00:31:155 (2,3) - just my taste but imo symmetrical will improve the design a lot here http://puu.sh/mpfDt/922d232236.jpg but that's a flow thing, it shouldn't be symmetrical :C
3. 00:43:067 (5) - i'd say no anti jump here as the diff is normal and 00:43:067 (5,6) - they have similar kind sound but you do differently for them that's a manual stack, not much of a problem
4. 02:32:920 (4,1) - im sure that blanket could be better here done

• 
  Hard

1. 00:07:111 (2) - somehow i dont really get why antijump in here suddenly, if want to emphasis vocal then better to use normal spacing manual stackings, for the vocals, emphasizes long 1/2 chain going afterwards.
2. 00:26:082 (4) - somehow i dont think the jump fits in here as no strong music, i'd say 132,316 for normal spacing true
3. 00:51:891 (4,5,6,7) - similar with above, better use normal spacing or at least reduce the spacing a bit disagree, I love the way vocal gets stronger here and give it as much emphasis as I can
4. 01:04:464 (4,6) - somehow i dont really get why antijump in here, the musics are drums and they arent weak here circle-stack-circle > jump > circle-stack-circle goes with the drums as vocals are not here
5. 01:57:626 (5) - at least give NC if you want to map as anti jump that's the same stack thingy, I just want it feel a little wilder \w/
6. 02:00:714 (3) - similar with 01:04:464 (4,6) - same, I guess
7. 02:24:538 (1) - increase the spacing a bit like 184,76 for make neater design done something similar
8. 02:54:538 (1) - just suggestion you probably want to end the spinner in end of vocal 02:56:744 - ? nice catch!