Aurani wrote:
I constantly joke around with my teammates when I'm playing Anivia and no one EVER tried to report me for it or tell me I'm trolling. People I did that to were the sort that understood League as a game, not as a "fuck my mother is going to castrate me if I don't win" challenge.
While ranked is indeed supposed to be seriousWhat's your point?
Also, going 0-9 with 30cs doesn't mean trolling either, it means the guy is totally inept at playing that champion and has no knowledge of how to come back after the initial loss.It's trolling. At maximum, any sane person getting stomped in lane would die no more than 4 times. After that 4th death, it's obvious that the player made too many mistakes and should minimize losses, rather than go in and feed more. "Oh, I lost my lane, might as well feed and not try anymore because I don't want my teammates to carry me" is trolling.
I do agree that toxic people should be shot to death whilst drowning in their own piss, but I honestly don't think how you could improve it apart from reintroducing the community-judging.Bring tribunal back. All I'll say.
As far as afking goes, it also doesn't really work the way you think. Yeah, afkers are not punished enough, I agree, but even if they introduce more severe rules, you as a "good" player won't notice shit. Why? Because most people you play with, you only see once, at BEST twice if you queue up again at the same time, and what does that mean? You only ever get to see them afking once. So, no matter how good the system is, you can't possibly punish someone who afk'd just once in the last 20 or 50 battles, as it may have been an emergency or something beyond his control. That, however, doesn't mean jack shit to you, because you just lost that game and to you his ONE afking meant a whole lot more than it objectively should.And if you have time for only ONE game each day, a single AFK in a single game means more than you think it does.
