was it posted already?
00:54:882 (1) - Some cosmetics, when you try to make such small little sliders curvy, you make them ugly honestly. When you have such a small slider, better keep it straight, it will look a lot better. http://i.imgur.com/uNqtba3.png Imo yours looks way worse.
01:03:111 (1,2) - Fix this huge readability issue, this is not some Expert diff where you should play with reading. kk
01:08:597 (1,2,3,4) - This is too cluttered, do not place everything in one single place, it hurts to play. Space out the sliders and make some usual shapes, not this little corner thing. Song needs more emphasis here, it doesn't hurt to play either
02:15:797 (1,2,3,4) - Yeah hello 2011. Hello
02:22:654 (1,2,3,4) - Again 2011. This is really ugly and shouldn't be used nowadays. Hello again
Penis sliders are unrankableShow me a rule in wiki which says it.
+ the path is not readable at all so you want to redo it.It's totally readable imo, did you play it?
Every slider must have a clear and visible path to follow from start to end. Sliders which overlap themselves in a way that makes any section unreadable or ambiguous (including "burai sliders") cannot be used. This is so that no slider has an appearance that is confusing or impossible for the player to read. Additionally, the slider borders must never be covered up from the slider being packed in too tightly. However, sliders that cross over themselves are fine as long as the borders are clearly visible.This, however, would be a valid reason (the thing I underlined). Your personal dislike of the slider shape does not make the slider unrankable.
198,167,69968,6,0,B|201:194|209:215|237:238|269:244|307:232|320:207|323:182|323:182|267:163|267:163|264:79|329:29,1,384,0|14,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:This is the code for a rankable version of this slider. If you guys are still going to bitch about it being inappropriate (while it clearly isn't), then just remove it completely and add a spinner from 01:09:968 - to 01:11:340 - . But if you do it, I will hate and disrespect you to the end of my life for being a nitpicky boring snob. I'm not making those dicksliders because I'm an immature stupid child, I'm adding them because that's the best thing that I could do to fit the song lyrics and mood. Don't the lyrics "big fat hard bass" tell you anything? Exactly, the song is basically about associating bass with you know what. So I made a map which will bring similar associations with sliders. Get some common sense of humor and stick to ranking rules.
If we're talking about Collab Hard, I should say it needs a LOT of work besides the storyboard.
First of all, the AR should be at least 7, possibly even 7.5-8. If you want to make the diff easier to fit in the diff spread, do not lower the AR-OD-HP, change the diff itself accordingly.
01:13:054 (1,2,3) - The triples should be removed or be used rarely. Right now this diff's rhythm is just the same as Light Insane, but without so much jumps. It's almost no difference, while the Normals beneath the Collab Hard are a lot easier in terms of rhythm.
01:30:540 (1,3) - Nobody is using those 5-note repeat sliders anymore. They are very confusing because it's hard to say whether it's a triple or a 5-note slider. Especially with your low-ass AR. This is a lot better: http://i.imgur.com/HDhorle.png
00:54:882 (1) - Some cosmetics, when you try to make such small little sliders curvy, you make them ugly honestly. When you have such a small slider, better keep it straight, it will look a lot better. http://i.imgur.com/uNqtba3.png
01:03:111 (1,2) - Fix this huge readability issue, this is not some Expert diff where you should play with reading.
01:08:597 (1,2,3,4) - This is too cluttered, do not place everything in one single place, it hurts to play. Space out the sliders and make some usual shapes, not this little corner thing.
02:15:797 (1,2,3,4) - Yeah hello 2011.
02:22:654 (1,2,3,4) - Again 2011. This is really ugly and shouldn't be used nowadays.
02:37:740 (1) - Distance from the previous slider should be the same as before (02:37:054 (3,4) - ) otherwise it will confuse everybody.
02:37:740 (1,2,1,2) - Why is this so cluttered? It plays badly, looks badly and also has some readability issues on the last circle (2). Do not stack all this stuff.
02:41:168 (7,8) - This is an antijump, fix this spacing. Everybody will think it's a 1/2.
02:45:968 (1,2,3) - Do not stack it please. Same aforementioned problems. Readability and 2011.
03:01:740 (3,4,1) - This is a slow calm part, better do not use such large jumps here. Better use same speed and patterns you used in the very beginning here 00:32:940 (1,2,3) - . It will fit the song perfectly. Right now this part is too jumpy and too fast.
03:11:854 - Well, you'd better add a note here for the synth.
Yeah, just look at it:
03:13:397 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - Here, in the (almost) kiai, you have no jumps, just simple small spacing. And before, in a slow part... 03:07:225 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - it was a lot faster and with jumps.
Remove most of the triples or replace them with a 3-note slider everywhere. This is too difficult according to the diff spread.
Remove 5-note little repeat sliders as they're very confusing. Better to replace them with a 4-note kickslider + 1/2 slider afterwards. http://i.imgur.com/HDhorle.png
Fix the stacked sliders patterns, they look bad and play bad.
This is not the only diff that needs some huge rework.
Tari's Insane also has a few important crucial things to fix.
01:08:597 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,1) - This whole pattern is not really well-made. The symmetrical jumpy pattern is almost harder as the pattern of Kyshiro in this part. It should be made a lot easier. And I don't really like the lazy-symmerical way. What? this isn't an lazy assymetrical way, this pattern is great build up here, and is very easy to play due to the previous combo, You just move down and up. I don't agree with this at all.
01:09:625 (7,1) - This anti-jump is a very bad idea here too.
01:10:740 (1) - This slider is a mess. First, it should never start and end on a blue tick. That doesn't make sense. Second, it should not be that fast.
It's better to remove this fast slider and just make this: http://i.imgur.com/3fTYdqw.png
02:26:768 (1,1,1) - Same.
01:11:511 (3,4,5) - 01:17:340 (5,6) - Upbeat sliders. There are lots of them. You just start them on a low beat, red tick. In such a bassy song with clearly distinguishable hardest beat on white ticks... That's really unacceptable. It plays weirdly and must be fixed throughout the whole diff. what? please don't be single minded, there are beats in the red ticks too, and they are very apparent in 100% playback rate, the white beats obviously prominent, but you need to realize there are beats in the red ticks too, that don't follow the same upbeat white tick track.
01:19:311 (8) - This should be removed, there's no sound here. I find this one is good, there
01:22:568 (4) - 01:24:282 - 01:25:654 (3) - 01:26:168 (6) - 01:27:025 (5) - Same, and so on. A lot of those here. Listen to it with 25% playback rate please, there are sounds there. Also, removing the blue ticks would cause difficulty spread issues amuck, something your complaining about largely.
02:26:425 - Why no note here? Add one?
03:16:654 (2) - This blanket ruins your flow and speed, move the circle somewhere else.
Well... I'm listing only the most important crucial things here. I don't see this ranked unless everything above is sorted out.