1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted
Very nice, Frey.
posted
Congrats !!
posted
gratz !
posted
Congratz~
posted
for extra diff.






00:08:543 (8) - what is this increase in spacing

00:44:371 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - compared to the kiai this section is overdone as its less intense compared to the kiai but features higher to equal spacing but no real merit behind it?

00:55:343 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - seems out of place and a pause might be better here

01:00:143 (3) - spacing isnt justified rhythmically, u have a pattern of doing big jumps then u go back

01:01:171 (2,3,4,5) - spacing here just reflects a pattern and isnt used to accentuate the beat of the song lo

01:05:628 (4,5) - same sound is given differing distances. this seems random

01:09:743 (4) - higher pitch but less spacing???????

01:15:914 (1,2,3,4) - why such high spacing when 01:16:599 (1,2,3,4) - is more stressed BUT with the same spacing???
posted

Fyre wrote:

for extra diff.

oh hi Fyre, lovely name.




00:08:543 (8) - what is this increase in spacing oh, it's symmetry of 00:07:343 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -

00:44:371 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - compared to the kiai this section is overdone as its less intense compared to the kiai but features higher to equal spacing but no real merit behind it? it's lovely to me, I love this part. The truth is, the total difficulty of KIAI is harder than this part's, you can't just judge it by the spacing.

00:55:343 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - seems out of place and a pause might be better here I followed the fade-in vocal here so it's fine.

01:00:143 (3) - spacing isnt justified rhythmically, u have a pattern of doing big jumps then u go back From my understanding, back-and- forth fits the music :3

01:01:171 (2,3,4,5) - spacing here just reflects a pattern and isnt used to accentuate the beat of the song lo think you just ignored 01:01:343 (3,4,5,6) -

01:05:628 (4,5) - same sound is given differing distances. this seems random Extra should be like an Extra, I don't think we have to map it in dull routine, it should be challenging, or it won't be fun.

01:09:743 (4) - higher pitch but less spacing??????? 01:09:057 (1,3,4) - I do it for the symmetry

01:15:914 (1,2,3,4) - why such high spacing when 01:16:599 (1,2,3,4) - is more stressed BUT with the same spacing??? Random things is more interesting than things you can expect
Sorry for no change, thanks for your advice :)
posted

Frey wrote:

Fyre wrote:

for extra diff.

oh hi Fyre, lovely name.




00:08:543 (8) - what is this increase in spacing oh, it's symmetry of 00:07:343 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -

00:44:371 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - compared to the kiai this section is overdone as its less intense compared to the kiai but features higher to equal spacing but no real merit behind it? it's lovely to me, I love this part. The truth is, the total difficulty of KIAI is harder than this part's, you can't just judge it by the spacing.

00:55:343 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - seems out of place and a pause might be better here I followed the fade-in vocal here so it's fine.

01:00:143 (3) - spacing isnt justified rhythmically, u have a pattern of doing big jumps then u go back From my understanding, back-and- forth fits the music :3

01:01:171 (2,3,4,5) - spacing here just reflects a pattern and isnt used to accentuate the beat of the song lo think you just ignored 01:01:343 (3,4,5,6) -

01:05:628 (4,5) - same sound is given differing distances. this seems random Extra should be like an Extra, I don't think we have to map it in dull routine, it should be challenging, or it won't be fun.

01:09:743 (4) - higher pitch but less spacing??????? 01:09:057 (1,3,4) - I do it for the symmetry

01:15:914 (1,2,3,4) - why such high spacing when 01:16:599 (1,2,3,4) - is more stressed BUT with the same spacing??? Random things is more interesting than things you can expect
Sorry for no change, thanks for your advice :)
Erm...

Visual pattern's are not justification for how spacing is designed. When you use symmetry as a defense in spacing, that's not justification for the playstyle it results in. This is the why this style has seen such a reduction in use, because it doesn't capture the beat properly or emphasize the notes. TBH, most maps like these can be copy pasted to any song with a constant 1/2 and work, because the style doesn't actually accentuate the song, it just randomly justifies a square because "symmetry".

I'll probably dissect this later in detail for this reason.
posted
OwO
posted
@DreaM117er

While it might seem like a salt rampage, this is giving free attention/mods too others' maps. Don't see anything wrong with it lol. Also, trying to nullify the post qualify mod saying he is not a QAT is just ridiculous.

Also I think your avatar is quite... unappropiate?
posted

Raiden wrote:

@DreaM117er

While it might seem like a salt rampage, this is giving free attention/mods too others' maps. Don't see anything wrong with it lol. Also, trying to nullify the post qualify mod saying he is not a QAT is just ridiculous.

Also I think your avatar is quite... unappropiate?
Sure, you are right.

ava...seems fine for me :3
posted
posted
If it's still possible to put in, this song has a PV now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GTwx_pH-Kc
Please sign in to reply.