1. 02:38:569 - 02:58:576 -, Hide unnecessary barlines. This part doesn't have any notes, so not affect for playing. However looks really not beautiful, bar lines should be on each first beat.
2. 03:23:069 - Hide barline?
   
   
3. 04:57:686 - Add redline here. Because 04:56:006 - This measure is 7/4.
4. 06:22:237 - Hitsound isn't too small?
5. 06:22:237 - 280bpm. drums sounds like 1/3.
6. 06:39:379 - Barline should be here.
7. 07:08:521 - Add redline here what checked "omit first bar line" for hiding unnecessary barline.

1. 01:36:444 (98) - Normal notes works good enough imo. no strong sound here
2. 03:01:881 (17) - remove finisher? ^
3. 03:10:694 (100,101,102,103) - why not finisher? i think it works better than 1/6. similar way as 03:19:319 (166) -
   
   
4. 03:05:444 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62) - I felt position of 1/1 is weird. no reason that not follow drums rhythm. (add note at 03:06:662 - and delete 03:06:287 (58,60) - 03:05:537 (50,52) - )
5. 03:42:190 (39,40,41,42,43) - lol. isn't it delay? could be on 1/12 tick right.
6. 05:07:166 (106,107,108,109,110,111) - Remove 1/6s and add kat 05:07:466 ? it fits to drums well imo
7. 05:15:446 How about adding spinner here?
   
   
8. 08:14:022 - 08:18:147 - Isn't This part too monotone? Other colors also fits to sound well..

tasuke912 wrote:

Hi.
[ General]

1. 02:38:569 - 02:58:576 -, Hide unnecessary barlines. This part doesn't have any notes, so not affect for playing. However looks really not beautiful, bar lines should be on each first beat.
2. 03:23:069 - Hide barline?
   
   
3. 04:57:686 - Add redline here. Because 04:56:006 - This measure is 7/4.
4. 06:22:237 - Hitsound isn't too small?
5. 06:22:237 - 280bpm. drums sounds like 1/3. hmmm I think it really is 140 with the 1/8 at the ending
6. 06:39:379 - Barline should be here.
7. 07:08:521 - Add redline here what checked "omit first bar line" for hiding unnecessary barline.
   
   Fixed most of ^ except comment

[ Terror Oni]

1. 01:36:444 (98) - Normal notes works good enough imo. no strong sound here But there is a strong cymbal crash on the background ><
2. 03:01:881 (17) - remove finisher? ^ The finisher is more to represent the high tone instrument that plays there (idk how it's called probably the bass)
3. 03:10:694 (100,101,102,103) - why not finisher? i think it works better than 1/6. similar way as 03:19:319 (166) - Oh yes
   
   
4. 03:05:444 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62) - I felt position of 1/1 is weird. no reason that not follow drums rhythm. (add note at 03:06:662 - and delete 03:06:287 (58,60) - 03:05:537 (50,52) - ) Oh done!
5. 03:42:190 (39,40,41,42,43) - lol. isn't it delay? could be on 1/12 tick right. Fixed
6. 05:07:166 (106,107,108,109,110,111) - Remove 1/6s and add kat 05:07:466 ? it fits to drums well imo I think the short 1/6 works pretty well at ending the stanza because it gives a blasting feeling before the SV down ><
7. 05:15:446 How about adding spinner here? There isn't much time I think, and the music doesn't go crazy to ensure a keyboard mashing element ><
   
   
8. 08:14:022 - 08:18:147 - Isn't This part too monotone? Other colors also fits to sound well.. I planned on increasing SV of this, but it would be overkill XD also I think the monotone ending fits more than anything else ;w;

call me back (¦3[▓▓]

Prophecy wrote:

speedrank again;w;

1. 02:38:569 - 02:58:514 - please fix bar lines positions
   
   
2. 04:55:766 (8) - (7/4)
3. 04:57:686 (18) - 4/4
4. 04:58:646 (26) - 6/4
5. 04:59:606 (34) - 4/4
6. 05:01:766 (51) - 4/4
7. 05:03:686 (74) - (7/4)
8. 05:05:366 (90) - 4/4
   
   
9. 07:08:521 - I didn't mean check it to existing red line. uncheck it and add red line here.
   

Aldwych wrote:

Hola Raiden!

Even if you would refuse it, i'll do my own check anyway :V
As i said i find the map generally ok, but i think we can still find something to change/improve. Even if it's pointless

[Terror Ono]

01:00:194 : Due to the "piano" sound (i guess), i would go for k instead, yet i can understand for some contrast but there's no beats to make it d. (Same thing for 01:08:194) apart from the contrast there is a beat... a bass drum hit. My mapping style is based on percussion mostly with really few exceptions (like guitar solos where I improvise a bit more)
01:03:069 : I'm a bit confuse around here about what you want to do. If we look around, you stack 1/2 most of the time once or twice. You did one time 3 but 4 1/2 in a row is a bit too much. Somehow i can understand if you would put a K here because there's a finisher background sound, but because you didn't that's strange imo. finishers only fit at the beginning of stanzas the way i mapped it, besides after the beginning of each stanza there are a handful of notes (be it 3 or 4) and i don't see it as a problem. The melody also sounds different in the 2nd stanza than on the first so I deemed the 1/4 unnecessary
01:16:069 : Did you miss a finisher? Compared to 01:14:569 for example. the snare hit is not as strong as the ones with finishers
03:52:446 : If we compare, this is simillar to 03:57:446 or at least this is maped on the same intention but not on the same way, one got a break + finisher one doesn't both. Maybe uniformize it? There's a similar streams after also. it's different, after the isolated kkkkk (which I intentionally isolated) there is a BPM change which would be shitty to play and to look at if I filled it up, so it's intentional
04:28:166 : Imo, the speed is a bit too much i would reduce a bit, (or find a middle), then max speed at 04:36:806, that makes more sense. the music goes rather nuts at this point already, so it'd be pointless to put less speed at it. Besides the 1/4 patterns like 04:35:366 - would be unreadable due to the scrolling speed
05:57:206 : "That is the coolest Speedup! I gotta get one of those Speedup! That is beautifull i love that!" :V lol ty i also think it's kinda cool

Well not much too say i'm not that pro to play, neither mod it efficiently. Just some stuff that i found.
GL hf vs haters ;p

tasuke912 wrote:

Barlines positions have improved. I think fine.

Bubbled! #1

1. 02:52:569 - This timing section should be removed. To be honest, this whole section is incorrectly timed. I am 100% sure the metronome doesn't change erratically like this, but it's not mapped so w/e.
   Because of this, I would propose a more correct change.
   1. 02:38:569 - Set a 240 BPM timing section here and make it 3/4. The music gives off a waltzy feeling so leaving it 3/4 all the way to 02:55:069 - is fine. Just because there is a tone at a given time, it doesn't mean a downbeat should be there. This would simplify a lot of things, and with 3/4 heavier notes actually do come on the downbeats (can't really be coincidence).
   2. 02:55:069 - Leaving it as 4/4 as it's noticeably different here and 4/4 fits. Others between can get removed.
      Apart from the first red line I am suggesting, all these are kinda optional since it's not mapped, but it would be nice to change.
2. 03:23:069 - This note is way too early. Try moving the red line to 03:23:087 and making it 120 bpm. There is no indication of a different BPM for this section, despite the offset shift. (EDIT: Don't forget to include another red line at 03:23:069 - for "omit the first barline" thingy. Actually you found this so THANKS. ╭( ･ㅂ･)و )
3. 03:23:440 - This would need +6 offset. You made such a change here - 03:57:446, and that change is good. Basically, you just need to bring it in line.
4. 03:47:440 - Same here, +6 to bring it in line.
5. 04:58:646 - This one is wrong. If you listen carefully, a downbeat could be found at 04:59:606. The evidence is at 04:54:086. This piece of music repeats throughout this section a lot, and is always 2 bars of 4/4, and then a switch.
   
   To make this easier and more simple, just change it to the following (ignore if you already have), I will explain at the end why.
   
   1. 04:56:006 - 3/4
   2. 04:56:726 - 4/4
   3. 04:59:606 - 3/4
   4. 05:01:766 - 4/4
   5. 05:03:686 - 3/4
   6. 05:04:406 - 4/4
   7. 05:07:286 - 3/4
   The reason for this is just pure logic:
   04:54:086 - 2 bars of 4/4 and then a change at 04:56:006. However, I would also notice that 04:56:726 - is the next heavy beat. Because of this, while the way of using 7/4 wouldn't be much too incorrect, but 3/4 + 4/4 would be correct regardless, and because of this, you can justify the 3/4 later.
   04:59:606 - This is the part where I really need to explain why this should be 3/4. First of all, if you follow the logic I explained above, then this would work, but 05:00:086 - sounds really heavy. That doesn't mean it has to be a downbeat though, it's just syncopated. Leaving this whole section in 3/4 and listening to the more subtle sounds would actually support this 3/4 (quiet drum rolls at 05:00:326 - and 05:01:046, and 2 additional strong syncopated drum hits on 05:00:806 - and 05:01:526 - .)
   And this just repeats.
   At the very end, it's slightly different, but the music "cuts off" compared to this so I think it fits too.

• 06:09:792 - 6/4

1. 06:11:125 - 4/4
2. 06:12:903 - 6/4
3. 06:14:236 - 4/4
4. 06:16:014 - 6/4
5. 06:17:347 - 4/4
6. 06:19:124 - 6/4
7. 06:20:457 - 4/4
8. 06:22:237 - and you need to fix the note, it escaped the green line which brings it to a stream end.
   
   If you listen to the melody, it has a distinct pattern which begins at 06:09:792 and repeats. This time, it's a 6/4 section then two 4/4 sections and this cycle repeats.
   
9. 07:08:521 - Add +8 offset here, it's a little early.

1. 02:38:569 - I still think this section is 4/4, the echoes sound like Half-note in this song, isn't it? If using 3/4, barelines looks really out of place especially 2nd and 4th. I can't agree without official data tbh
   
   Following tab isn't official, but it still keeps 4/4 rhythm.
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
2. 03:23:821 (2,3) - I thought it should keep 1/1 rhythm in the similar way as 03:26:946 (6,7) -. 3/4+6/4+3/4 rhythm doesn't fit to the sound well and it seems like rhythm breaker.

tasuke912 wrote:

Few things

1. 02:38:569 - I still think this section is 4/4, the echoes sound like Half-note in this song, isn't it? If using 3/4, barelines looks really out of place especially 2nd and 4th. I can't agree without official data tbh Bringing perfect timing to that section is borderline impossible, and we shouldn't care too much because it isn't even mapped. I agree with lolcubes here, the song gives out a waltz-y feeling so I preferred to keep it 3/4, the echoes are just reverberations of the instrument but the main downbeats come down in 3/4 signature, it can't be a coincidence ;w; fixed
   
   Following tab isn't official, but it still keeps 4/4 rhythm.
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
2. 03:23:821 (2,3) - I thought it should keep 1/1 rhythm in the similar way as 03:26:946 (6,7) -. 3/4+6/4+3/4 rhythm doesn't fit to the sound well and it seems like rhythm breaker. fixed

alienflybot wrote:

this is so easy

Prophecy wrote:

#EDIT : teach me to map perfect map pls ;w;w;;w;w;