I usually opt for an upper mid range card because I know I won't be playing like crysis 3 on max settings on a 4K monitor.
Well, I have a Quad core AMD Phehom 2 X4 Quad core so i think i'll be aightZelda wrote:
Yeah man, make sure that your PSU can handle a 60W graphics card !A Medic wrote:
Just make sure your psu can handle your new card.
He'll be fine lol
Hornet- wrote:
Well, I have a Quad core AMD Phehom 2 X4 Quad core so i think i'll be aight
indeed, i got a feeling that i should take the offer and stay away from skylake for goodxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
it appears to be a nice deal, solid chip, good single core performance too
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Intel-Core ... ating/1316
its not even a bare minimum, i'd call it unuseable for shit when it comes to gaymen relatedabraker wrote:
Intel HD does its job, but you only get the basics. I consider it the bare minimum needed to survive in the gaming world, but you would be starving for more.
Considering I was stuck on early 2000's hardware until 6 years ago, I consider it a blessing. Not having a graphics card sucks. What is this Voodoo3 gpu? Now that is utter shit. It was like using a twig to fight someone with a gun. Then I moved on to Intel GMA for some 4 years until I got the laptop I have right now with the Intel HD graphics.dNextGen wrote:
its not even a bare minimum, i'd call it unuseable for shit when it comes to gaymen related
Talking about chipsets is kind of redundant since the northbridge and the iGPU are both integrated on the CPU die.Zelda wrote:
Depends on which generation, and which games you intend to play, really. HD3000 and above can all manage some lightweight games just fine, while anything below HD3000 is just barely enough to manage hardware acceleration in a desktop environment.
For instance, Killing Floor and such runs just fine on HD3000. It's not going to run anything more demanding than that, but older games and indie games are mostly a-ok. HD4000 is a good bit better than HD3000 too, so video games on an Intel chipset aren't necessarily completely hopeless.
But yeah, don't expect to play the latest AAA games on any Intel chipset, that would just be plain silly.
Seriously?dNextGen wrote:
yfw i got higher score than people using i7 / GTX 980
or perhaps i'm just seeing things
so what should i do regarding that matter thenZelda wrote:
Holy crap that afterburner overlay is ugly
yes, i think i won't be upgrading that for a long time (1-2 years)a1l2d3r4e5d6 wrote:
Seriously?
I never thought that I'd see an i3 doing that.
It's pretty impressive for something of that calibre. Although I don't think an i3 would benefit me as much, seeing as I run a lot of applications in one. It would, however, still be better than my laptop's AMD E2 apu.dNextGen wrote:
yes, i think i won't be upgrading that for a long time (1-2 years)a1l2d3r4e5d6 wrote:
Seriously?
I never thought that I'd see an i3 doing that.
Remove it, it's literally useless information unless you're troubleshooting something. And it gives your eyes cancer.dNextGen wrote:
so what should i do regarding that matter then
what the fuckA Medic wrote:
If you live in the USA Tiger direct is selling 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO SSD for only $36 max is 5 per person right now. Literally a steal.
dNextGen wrote:
that case is ugly af
dNextGen wrote:
i don't want to be an ass but man that case is ugly af
the rest is great though.
xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
dNextGen wrote:
that case is ugly af
I like the case :/dNextGen wrote:
i don't want to be an ass but man that case is ugly af
the rest is great though.