short m4m reply
map looks pretty polished already, good luck with it
those overlapped slider pattern in this song are really nice, well done
00:14:370 (8,1,2,3,4) - this felt so "clumped" together when I played it
http://i.imgur.com/c8gAIgx.jpg more liek this maybe?
00:16:545 (2) - move up make a nice blanket and will also flow abit better that way
00:29:220 (2,3,4,5) - ctrl h on this shape would flow so muc hbetter from the slider, but I understand why you made it liek this so do whatever you want with it
00:33:945 (5) - align properly with stream before, looks much more polished that way
00:39:045 (1,3) - those make for an agle that looks really bad imo
00:40:245 (1) - ctrl j on this shape would look and flow better
01:03:795 (2,3,4) - spacing this like 01:03:195 (2,3,4) - would look better
01:07:845 (1,2,3) - bit weird flow http://i.imgur.com/eoqYgh0.jpg maybe more like thiis?
01:12:570 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - stacked 1/4, stacked 1/4, stacked 1/2 ? I think low spacing for the 1/2 would make this better to play
01:29:445 (1,2) - blanket could be better
01:53:895 (5) - moving right or blanketing with 4 would be better here
02:14:745 (3,4) - roatate 4 for better flow
02:32:295 (2,1) - idk about that one
02:51:645 (1,2,3) - space evenly, this play so weird right now
03:31:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - this stream plays so much worse than the others :/
you executed the idea much better, for example here: 03:54:495 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - plays way better
04:48:645 (1,2,3) - still dont like it
04:54:045 (1,2,3) - ^
04:58:845 (1,2) - proper stack?
05:00:795 (5,6) - ^
both ways seem fine, but not stacking looks so weird if played with sliderends imo
00:14:370 (8,1,2,3,4) - this felt so "clumped" together when I played it
http://i.imgur.com/c8gAIgx.jpg more liek this maybe?
00:16:545 (2) - move up make a nice blanket and will also flow abit better that way
00:29:220 (2,3,4,5) - ctrl h on this shape would flow so muc hbetter from the slider, but I understand why you made it liek this so do whatever you want with it
00:33:945 (5) - align properly with stream before, looks much more polished that way
00:39:045 (1,3) - those make for an agle that looks really bad imo
00:40:245 (1) - ctrl j on this shape would look and flow better
01:03:795 (2,3,4) - spacing this like 01:03:195 (2,3,4) - would look better
01:07:845 (1,2,3) - bit weird flow http://i.imgur.com/eoqYgh0.jpg maybe more like thiis?
01:12:570 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - stacked 1/4, stacked 1/4, stacked 1/2 ? I think low spacing for the 1/2 would make this better to play
01:29:445 (1,2) - blanket could be better
01:53:895 (5) - moving right or blanketing with 4 would be better here
02:14:745 (3,4) - roatate 4 for better flow
02:32:295 (2,1) - idk about that one
02:51:645 (1,2,3) - space evenly, this play so weird right now
03:31:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - this stream plays so much worse than the others :/
you executed the idea much better, for example here: 03:54:495 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - plays way better
04:48:645 (1,2,3) - still dont like it
04:54:045 (1,2,3) - ^
04:58:845 (1,2) - proper stack?
05:00:795 (5,6) - ^
both ways seem fine, but not stacking looks so weird if played with sliderends imo
map looks pretty polished already, good luck with it