Maakkeli wrote:

Yo! From my que.

[Insane]

00:10:234 (3,4) - I got to question your spacing with these. Stacking them would seem more appropriate for me at least. It doesn't really interfere with anything
00:11:734 (4,5) - Here too. Yea I'm not a fan of these "big jump then small jump" things. And (5) isn't blanketed correctly ehh everyone has their opinions on mapping, mine are based on what I think is fun. Also I blanketed 5, repositioned notes because of that as well
00:14:434 (5) - Maybe move this a bit upleft so the jump between (4) and (5) doesn't feel so small. I like how it plays
00:21:334 (2) - Hmm... this feels like it overlaps too much but yea this is pretty minor. It's supposed to look like this, no worries~
00:21:634 (3) - Just please blanket this to (2). Its positioning is fine
00:37:984 (5) - Your blanket is off
01:02:584 (1,2,3,4) - Idk this just felt somewhat awkward to play. It played fine on multiple testplays
01:18:784 (1,2,3) - Now this is wrong way around. Don't you think (3) should be the bigger jump?
01:27:634 (7,1,2) - I don't really like the linearity with these.ehh, preferences
01:27:784 (1,2) - What justifys the jump between these? idk, but I made the 01:28:384 (4,5,6) - jump bigger to show that's it's more emphasized
01:32:284 (1,2) - Stack? nah, it feels better like this imo
01:39:184 (3,4,5,6) - Well this is just me nitpicking but meh pattern. #variety
01:42:484 (2,4) - If you're gonna overlap. Overlap them nice and good.
01:54:184 (1) - Is this supposed to be a blanket? lol nope, but made it much more obvious that it isn't one now
01:57:184 (3,4,1) - Just imagine the hnngggghhh I made when I saw this. Stack 01:57:334 (4) - to 01:56:584 (1) - sliderend? but...but..but... why?
02:22:684 (3,5) - Like I said. Overlap them nice and good.
02:46:982 (5,1) - Nice and good mmmm yeaaaa... spicy
02:48:782 (1,2,3) - (3) should be spaced further something happened
02:56:582 (3,4,5) - Hnnnnghhh so linear it hurts so linear it becomes somewhat sexy
03:23:582 (3,5) - Overlap them nice and good
03:27:632 (2) - This maps nothing. Break? but there's a "do do do"
03:30:782 (1) - Pls blanket fixerino but this isn't supposed to blanket anythings anyways, so no fixerino

[Elucidator]

00:10:234 (3,4) - I question your spacing again. Personal preferences
00:13:834 (4,5) - ^ ^
00:19:084 (7) - Space further? I like the current pattern it makes, plus you can emphasize the things by making spacing extremely large or extremely short, this is more toward the short end
00:29:584 (3,4,5) - First a big jump from (2) and then linear patterns with small spacing. I see no problem with this
00:32:134 (7,8) - Spacing questioning Spacing making things so awkward for you dooeeee .3.
00:35:734 (2,1) - Now I can say that this is just inconsistent now it's a different pattern
00:41:134 (6) - Space further from (5)
00:56:884 (4) - Again I think that this should be spaced furthe ehhh
01:18:784 (1,2,3) - (3) should be the one spaced furthest
01:20:134 (4,5) - Questionable spacing #mappingstyleonfleek
01:21:634 (4,5) - ^ #mappingstyleonfleek
01:34:084 (4,5,1,2) - This pattern... Maybe just a normal square? Would look better. I'm pretty sure you're pretty well aware that I put things I like at this point lol
01:40:834 (2,3) - What justifys this jump?
01:58:984 (1) - Why is this nc'd? cuz the follow points make it look ugly .3. plus there's another rising pair that leads into a large combo but that's beside the point lol
02:09:184 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Wat is this spacing? fun spacing
02:26:134 (1) - Remove nc. Then give 02:26:359 (4,5,6,7) - the same spacing as 02:26:359 (4,5,6,7) - and nc (3) then well since you kinda just posted the same timing twice, I just made one combo 6 another 8 then the 5 combo for the large spaced ones
02:45:932 (2,3) - What justifys this jump? You're not mapping something like rave or hardstyle I dunno why, but for everything I map, I just have a preference to bump up the difficulty during the last kiai time, cuz it's like ya know, the last kiai time
02:49:082 (5) - Should be spaced further
02:50:282 (5,6,7) - Too linear for me kappa Kappa
02:59:282 (5,6) - Mom I'm scared 2spooky4u
03:22:532 (3,4) - Questionable spacing preferenceszzz
03:27:632 (4) - This is mapping nothing. Maybe add a break here it goes "do do do"
03:32:732 (2,3) - Helo it's me jumpnazi from the closet /me puts back jumpnazi in closet

Cool map cool song I like this.
Hope I helped at least in some way and hope you don't feel like I'm interfering with your mapping style.
Good luck with this!

Hendrix89 wrote:

Hi there time to mod your map

General:

The first kiai time in you song doesn't feel like a kiai to me. I'd take it out. Kiai time is more of an undefined thing, and whoever is the owner of the map decides what feel strong in the song, so I feel like the initial vocals with chopping is strong enough to have a kiai time

Insane:

00:18:184 (1,2) - make these 2 sliders into 4 singles I like the way they currently are at the moment, I was mainly focusing on the fact that single tapping 200 bpm, even for four notes, is quite hard to do for the target audience (at least what I'm thinking is the target audience lol), so I tried to not have too much single tapping
00:54:484 (9) - add a single stacked under notes Like mentioned in the Extra, the music doesn't really call for another note to be placed
01:01:384 (1,2,3,4,1) - gradually increase the spacing between these notes I feel that the current spacing is good, since it's a consistent beat to follow the humming
01:07:384 (1,5,9) - take out the sliders and put in singles, the sliders feel awkward to play fixed a few things up so things should play more smoothly
01:11:434 (8) - stack on 01:11:584 (1)
02:16:084 (3) - turn this into two singles I kinda like the slider the way it is right now
03:07:082 (1,2) - make this last jump big

Elucidator:

00:19:384 (1) - reduce SV to 1.3, feels to fast at 1.4 I feel like this is good, it plays smoothly in my opinion, and test players have not mentioned it, but I'll keep this in mind if a future mod mentions it as well
00:54:484 - add a note The beats in the song do not call for another note besides the three
01:14:584 (4) - extend this slider by a 1/2 note and delete the following slider 01:14:884 (5) then add a single at 01:15:034
01:15:184 (6) - same as above I instead made it two single tap notes for this thing, for variation
02:15:934 (2,3,4) - ctrl G ehh the pattern that it makes doesn't really feel nice imo
02:26:284 (1,2,3,4,5) - this spacing seems a bit excessive and the music doesn't justify the extreme change in spacing, i'd move it down to 1.3x Meh, in my opinion (weak as it is since I've just been decaying in rank), all you need to do is move your cursor faster for things such as pentagon spaced streams, but again, I will keep this in mind if future mods mention it
02:52:682 (1,2) - ctrl G, big jumps are fun It kinda feels wonky if you go from that far from the slide and back inwards, I don't feel like it plays well ;-;
02:53:282 (1,2) - ctrl G
02:59:282 (5) - move this note more to the left somewhere around x:113 y:60
03:07:382 (3,4) - ctrl G If this is done, it ruins the linear feeling I was going for
03:36:182 (1,2,3,4) - not a big fan of the stack stream I would change it so its like the rest of the stream, just my opinion though Spaced streams are more of a preference

Overall it's a pretty fun map and mapped pretty well. Try not to go crazy with the SV because when it gets too high it just gets obnoxious to play.
Good luck with the map Thanks, as for the SVs, I'll keep an eye out for anything that's mentioned about them in future mods, and if there is more instances then I will make the change

[ Rizen ] wrote:

[easy]

1. 00:01:009 (1) - I personally think this spinner is too long. It would tire people out before they start playing the actual song... Consider starting at 00:04:459 (1) - Ehh, it fits since there's like that whole like starting up whirring at the start ;-;
   I fixed all of these things the best I could (and to an extent)
2. 00:12:184 (1) - This slider looks quite awkward here because it's the only straight one... maybe make it a pointy one or a curved one
3. 00:22:984 (3,1) - Try this rhythm instead? img
4. 00:33:184 (2,3) - try this instead img
5. About NC, make it one NC every 2 measures... eg. NC at 00:31:384 (3) - remove NC at 00:32:584 (1) - and NC 00:33:784 (1) - , etc.
6. 00:45:184 (3) - end this on the large white tick and not the white tick after the large one. Reason is because there's no sound to justify a slider end on the current white tick
7. 00:55:084 (2) - Start this on the large white tick, ending on the same point. Then place a circle at 00:55:084
8. 01:10:984 (2) - maybe blanket this around 01:09:784 (1) - ?
9. About NCing, if you apply what I said about it earlier, stong beats such as 01:19:384 (3) - and 01:28:984 (3) - will be NC'd
10. 01:34:984 (2) - This looks very sloppy as it looks like the two sliders are touching... consider blanketing it instead
11. 01:42:784 (1) - misblanket
12. 02:10:984 (2,3) - The flow emphasizes that the slider 3 will start from the top, but it doesn't. consider changing this part around
13. 02:21:184 (3) - blanket this around the slider head of 02:19:984 (2) - ?
14. 02:25:984 (2) - the starting straight of this slider is not parallel with 02:24:184 (3) -
15. 02:50:582 (2) - not parallel with 02:49:682 (1) -
16. 02:58:982 (3) - misblanket
17. 03:04:982 (3) - ^
18. 03:18:182 (1) - consider ending at 03:21:782 - , and starting the next section at 03:22:982 -

[Normal]

1. Personally, I think the slider velocity of this difficulty is too high for a normal, but that's just my opinion
2. 00:02:658 - what I said in Easy
3. <insert what I said about NC in Easy>
4. 00:16:984 (3) - you could make a triangle shape like this
5. 00:17:584 (4) - the flow is in the opposite direction... maybe make it a peak shape img
6. 00:22:384 (1,2) - Too confusing in a normal diff... avoid doing overlaps like this
7. 00:50:584 (3) - I think this slider here looks kinda out of place as it is straight, unlike the previous two sliders
8. 01:12:184 (5,1,2) - something like this instead? img
9. 01:28:384 (1) - no need to NC. No change in SV and it breaks the NC rhythm
10. 02:12:484 (1,2,3) - I don't agree with the slider spacing here. it looks like slider 2 is closer to slider 1 rhythmically but isn't Try spacing it so it's even
11. 02:16:684 (4) - blanket
12. 02:22:984 (2) - copy and paste 02:22:084 (1) - , rotate 180 degrees and cut the repeat. Looks nicer
13. 02:44:582 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - too difficult in a normal difficulty... try cutting some out
14. 02:52:982 (1,2,3,4) - http://puu.sh/kDJtn/c6caf39b55.jpg It overlaps in the picture ;w;
15. 02:54:182 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - what I said about 02:44:582 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -