btw I love your avatar Soul EvansSoul Evans wrote:
people these days and their qualified maps getting Kwan'd, makes me a little nervous about my meta-data
or else i will get kwan'd
yea because i believe im the only QAT who check maps on my own accord nowadays, as we rely on people's reports before taking down maps since the change to the QATSoul Evans wrote:
people these days and their qualified maps getting Kwan'd, makes me a little nervous about my meta-data
or else i will get kwan'd
all ok nowIamKwaN wrote:
i am okay with everything listed above, leave him to choose probably
ahaha thanks~paperlens wrote:
so which one is rightbtw I love your avatar Soul EvansSoul Evans wrote:
people these days and their qualified maps getting Kwan'd, makes me a little nervous about my meta-data
or else i will get kwan'd
这图需要重P成粉短发性药(不paperlens wrote:
thank you for your help KK!
thank you for your suggestion but I won't change this partFeerum wrote:
Hi!
Before i requalify i would like to discuss about one pattern in your Map.
I did keep an eye on this Map while it was in Qualify and a lot of player didn't like your 1/8 JS in the SHD difficulty.
I think you know which one i mean, it's this one:
Basically i don't have anything against it but what is really disturbing for the most and really uncomfortable to play are following:
The really dense JS is here already enough i think so there is no need to add triple jacks into this 1/8 jumpstream.
I will not tell you to remove this 1/8 JS because i think it fit good enough into this but i would like to suggest you some other Pattern which remove the tri-jacks from it and makes it better to play:
[SHD]
My first suggestion would be follwoing:
This one contains [12][13][34][24] (and this repeats all the time)
I kinda like these pattern because they are not that easy to hit and still remove the pretty evil tri jack from your pattern.
My 2nd suggestion would be following:
This one contains [12][23][34][14] Jumps which goes full on comfortable play.
the disadvantage here is that these Pattern are also very mashable which makes it very easy to pass.
Tell me what do you think about it.
I really highly suggest to remove at least the tri-jacks from both JS.
I don't know if you saw the feedback to your Map but the most dislike these JS.
Should you apply the change to the 1st JS don't forget to arrange the 2nd one at 02:38:099 - too
How to lose all respect 101 ft. paperlenspaperlens wrote:
5. I'm not the man who listens much to the players now.
Just don't give up . . I don't know who you are but i can't just sit by to see that . . I know what feel you feelingpaperlens wrote:
yes you guys are right, but that doesn't change anything, maybe change this map into unrank only
and I will be truely sorry for KK and Feerum then
Agree with that, it is harder than Shana's map C18H27NO3Pope Gadget wrote:
I'm telling you, those bursts really are not okay. They are an unnecessarily huge difficulty spike in comparison to the rest of the chart, and quite simply it's unfair.
trust me , I really want to add thatRoX2_Fang wrote:
Why not Add Note "헉"? jk
ok broAnother Lie wrote:
Agree with that, it is harder than Shana's map C18H27NO3Pope Gadget wrote:
I'm telling you, those bursts really are not okay. They are an unnecessarily huge difficulty spike in comparison to the rest of the chart, and quite simply it's unfair.
See those
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5473274 Shana's map 5.15 Stars
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5473282 Yours 4.9 Stars (those bursts are make it harder)
Another Lie wrote:
Agree with that, it is harder than Shana's map C18H27NO3Pope Gadget wrote:
I'm telling you, those bursts really are not okay. They are an unnecessarily huge difficulty spike in comparison to the rest of the chart, and quite simply it's unfair.
See those
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5473274 Shana's map 5.15 Stars
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5473282 Yours 4.9 Stars (those bursts are make it harder)
Pope Gadget wrote:
I'm telling you, those bursts really are not okay. They are an unnecessarily huge difficulty spike in comparison to the rest of the chart, and quite simply it's unfair.
If your point in "map quality" i'm absolutely say his map are good (Including Identity Part. III) but, i'm pointing to that chart (not PP and star) it will be difficult even rank 4k like me can pass that with A -_-biemote wrote:
cuz the 12 34 pattern makes the star difficult fly much higher with note density than other reasons,
it's quite normal this map's star difficult is lower than C18H27NO3
this is a good map i think.....hmmmmmm
it will be a pity if we just focus on the star(maybe PP) and ignore the map quality.
isn't it a good map??every place can show there music perfectly.CommandoBlack wrote:
I want to be explained why this got ranked. I see so many things wrong with this in my opinion. I want to make my mapping better so if this is considered good enough to be ranked, I want to know why.
其实那个秒杀段的确很屎（）[Crz]Sword wrote:
主难度又没有抓音不准，又没有overdose overmap，又没有sb排列，不知道有什么好喷的。isn't it a good map??every place can show there music perfectly.CommandoBlack wrote:
I want to be explained why this got ranked. I see so many things wrong with this in my opinion. I want to make my mapping better so if this is considered good enough to be ranked, I want to know why.
DON'T JUDGE A MAP WITH YOUR OWN HABIT THANKS.
看了三个box里的话，嘛我觉得现在的players都太急躁 有个打不了的地方就说“怎么这么屎”。关于这个我也是挺夫妻。。
以后请继续加油！还想看到你更多的rank歌曲