DahplA wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:25:867 - Similar to the above mod, some of the notes here get really quiet. - If it is audible, it is rankable. In fact they are audible. But thanks for your advice!

-

The rest of the set is really well done. I love this song, and the mapping plays our really nicely. Good luck. - Thank you very much!

Marianna wrote:

General

1. Conflict tags

Easy

1. 00:07:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - This is very intense for an easy, could be replaced by sliders - I ... OK I will try it.
2. 00:20:534 (6,1) - Snap NC - I don't know what is that... What do you mean?
3. 00:56:089 (5) - NC - Fixed
4. 00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1) - I do not really feel the pace here ....
   - if I change the sliders like it, it will be much more wierd. And actually the drum hit sets on 00:26:089 - 00:26:534 -

Normal

1. CS could be a more accurate number, 3.8 is too high for normal diff - reduce to 3.5
2. 00:43:201 (2) - That might be a little prettier - Change into a normal slider
3. 00:58:312 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - This is very intense for beginners - I think it is not difficult and normal players can deal with it.

Hard

1. I found no error -

Narcissu wrote:

要rank你必須找BN，不給你點也會大概告訴你什麼地方不行。而且找摸的話，你都湊了很多摸了可以歇歇了…新人的mod用處相對BN也會小很多。比如CelsiusLK現在接M4M你就可以去要，而且現在快期末了找BN會很難……

1. 00:01:423 (7) - I believe you're missing the drum sound here on this note. fixed
2. 00:07:201 (5) - I would add a NC here to indicate the start of the drums. fixed
3. 00:10:089 (6) - I suggest changing this from a slider into two circles. This makes it much better to emphasise both sounds. fixed,but the same place i decided to keep.
4. 00:24:978 - The hitsounds get very quiet here. This will be an unrankable issue, as it doesn't give the players any audible feedback. I strongly advise you increase the volume here.

1. ……这个难度……作者是否了解滑条叠放一般会导致unrankable？比如00:03:645 (1,3) ，还有这种可能也危险01:29:867 (14,15,16,17)，可能还有 这里的节奏是重复的，叠滑条我感觉更加符合节奏.......16和17我旋转了90°改成个正方形，应该好读一点了√
   
2. NC加得也有点问题，有些是按小节加的有些不是。还有一堆10+CB，全都应该拆，不一一说 这里的FINISH我觉得才是NC......NC我是在某些配合FINISH和连打的地方才会额外加，可能听起来有些乱，我再去检查一遍。CB已经拆了√
   
3. 连打间距普遍太太太大了，对比一下bpm和难度相近的rank图，大部分连打都在0.8以下，只有个别地方根据需要（合曲）才会出现1的连打，而这个图把1.1当成常规，偶尔才出现低ds的连打。最好大改 最初听这个曲子我第二个想到的梗就是和大间距连打......“剑歌行”这个题目和曲风给我的感觉都是十分逍遥轻快的，所以反映到图里我也希望能做出那种感觉......0.8的我觉得还有些停滞的感觉，不够轻快，所以只在部分地方用........这个原谅我坚持我的意见。不过最大的那个间距连打我改小了，那个确实有些反人类【笑】
   
4. 00:10:756 (1) - ds 这个我不是很明白，是说前面那个滑条和它的DS有问题，还是它和后一个NOTE的DS有问题？
   
5. 00:13:423 (2) - 与1的，和与3的ds最好一致，这里倒是可以antijump但是我觉得123的ds该统一 Fixed
   
6. 00:17:423 (7) - 有点远 Fixed
   
7. ……总之先处理最前面那3条吧

1. 00:03:645 (1,3) - PLEASE NOT THIS, I BEG YOU, THIS ISNT 2009
   
2. 00:05:423 (5,7) - ^
   
3. 00:14:312 (4,6,8) - If you are going to do this, at least make all of the sliders the same equal distance from each other!
   
4. 00:16:978 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - Why is there jump streams in a 3.9* difficulty?? that is way too much
   
5. 00:19:201 (4,2) - Why is 4 farther away from 3 then 2 is from 1? it should be equal distance for both notes!
   
6. 00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Please don't remove or mute hit sounds on this part, when people play it will instantly make them think that they missed a note and jsut throw them off rhythm
   
7. 00:28:756 (2,2) - ugly overlap here
   
8. 00:30:534 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - Restore the hitsounds please!! like the other one i mentioned before
   
9. 00:40:312 (1,1,1,1) - ^
   
10. 00:42:978 (2,3,4) - ugly looking triple and also the overlap of the 1 slider looks bad as well
    
11. 01:04:756 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - These jumps dont make sense to me at all, they look like they were randomly placed, they go from big to small and its just not very structured well
    
12. 01:24:534 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - no jump streams please ;-;
    
    [Hard]
    
13. 00:22:756 (4) - This is way to close to 00:22:312 (3) - because it is very far apart on the time line
    
14. 00:44:756 (6,7) - fix blanket
    
15. 00:46:089 (2,3) - fix blanket
    
16. 00:35:645 (1,3,3) - You are putting too much emphasis on the string sounds here, because you are skipping a lot of drum beats! that is never good honestly
    
17. 01:25:868 (2) - This slider is ugly because it is too curved
    
18. 01:26:979 (4,1) - fix blanket
    
    [Normal & Easy]
    
    Just tons of blanket problems everywhere honestly!

SkinnyJommy wrote:

HI! Nm from my queue!!

• 
  [Hard]

1. 00:22:756 (4) - This is way to close to 00:22:312 (3) - because it is very far apart on the time line - I will fix it. I am thinking where should I put.
   
2. 00:44:756 (6,7) - fix blanket - fixed
   
3. 00:46:089 (2,3) - fix blanket - fixed
   
4. 00:35:645 (1,3,3) - You are putting too much emphasis on the string sounds here, because you are skipping a lot of drum beats! that is never good honestly - I dont know how to deal with it as I actually followed melody here.
   
5. 01:25:868 (2) - This slider is ugly because it is too curved - I change it into two single circles.
   
6. 01:26:979 (4,1) - fix blanket - fixed
   
   [Normal & Easy]
   
   Just tons of blanket problems everywhere honestly! - I try my best to fix them

Anyways thats it for my mod! BnS is so cool omfg, cool song as well!! - And, what is BNS

GL with this

1. 00:26:534 (4,1) - I think this shoud have more spacing so it will emphasis (1) better , try move (1) to around x408 y120 ?
2. 00:28:756 (2,1) - similiar ^^ ^^^ , try move (1) to around x400 y23 ?
3. 00:32:534 (3,1) - ^^^ ya lol , try move (1) to around x8 y240 ?
4. 00:33:201 (3,1) - using low spacing there feel like it make this play weird imo so try move (1) to around x84 y124 ?
5. 00:43:645 (5,1) - better spacing make thing here play better imo try move (1) to around x212 y48 ?
   
   imo the spacing can be a bit more consistent with music more

1. 00:04:978 (5,1) - 1/4 spacing here kinda big , might be pretty hard for hard diff I would decrease it a bit , doing this 00:06:756 (5,1) - is fine
2. 00:45:867 (1,2) - oop a little inconsistent in spacing
3. 00:48:534 (3,4) - same , I just found by accident tho
4. 01:25:867 (2,3) - better use consistent spacing for better flow imo

1. beginning part have a bit too much 1/2 there that might be a problem for normal player it would be better to use less 1/2 there
2. 00:17:867 (1,2) - flow kinda weird imo , try move (2) to around x236 y260 ?
3. 00:20:534 (3) - try curve the another way ? so it will make flow here 00:20:312 (2,3,4) - better imo
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:55:201 (5) - similiar ^^^
5. 01:28:534 (1) - why nc ? lol
   
   yea consider the beginning part that has like a lots of 1/2 would be good idea

1. 01:25:423 (1) - try this ? might flow better imo
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:27:201 (1,2) - flow might be too hard for beginner , try this
   SPOILER

   

CelsiusLK wrote:

m4m as requested

[hard]

1. 00:04:978 (5,1) - 1/4 spacing here kinda big , might be pretty hard for hard diff I would decrease it a bit , doing this 00:06:756 (5,1) - is fine - Fixed.
2. 00:45:867 (1,2) - oop a little inconsistent in spacing - Oh get it. I dont know why I made such a mistake
3. 00:48:534 (3,4) - same , I just found by accident tho - Fixed too.
4. 01:25:867 (2,3) - better use consistent spacing for better flow imo - Fixed~

[normal]

1. beginning part have a bit too much 1/2 there that might be a problem for normal player it would be better to use less 1/2 there - I change most of them into 1/2 repeating sliders or 1/1 sliders.
2. 00:17:867 (1,2) - flow kinda weird imo , try move (2) to around x236 y260 ? - oh I want it. but ok i fixed.
3. 00:20:534 (3) - try curve the another way ? so it will make flow here 00:20:312 (2,3,4) - better imo - fixed. I dont know it is not a good flow but just thought it may be funny.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:55:201 (5) - similiar ^^^ - fixed~
5. 01:28:534 (1) - why nc ? lol - I dont know. Maybe someone controlled me to do so. oh It is terrified!
   
   yea consider the beginning part that has like a lots of 1/2 would be good idea - I think the song consists by 1/2 rhythm so.....

[easy]

1. 01:25:423 (1) - try this ? might flow better imo - Oh yeah fixed.
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:27:201 (1,2) - flow might be too hard for beginner , try this - Fixed too
   SPOILER

   

good luck - Thanks!

kanor wrote:

⁄(⁄ ⁄•⁄ω⁄•⁄ ⁄)⁄

XiaofengTiger wrote:

kanor wrote:

⁄(⁄ ⁄•⁄ω⁄•⁄ ⁄)⁄

卡诺我想问一下你们风蓝的人是不是很喜欢用颜表

1. 00:26:534 (4,1) - I think this shoud have more spacing so it will emphasis (1) better , try move (1) to around x408 y120 ?fixed
2. 00:28:756 (2,1) - similiar ^^ ^^^ , try move (1) to around x400 y23 ? fixed
3. 00:32:534 (3,1) - ^^^ ya lol , try move (1) to around x8 y240 ? enm....if i move this 1,the note will be out of the range ,whcih may be unrankable.......so i think it better to keep
4. 00:33:201 (3,1) - using low spacing there feel like it make this play weird imo so try move (1) to around x84 y124 ? beacause this tis a triangle00:33:423 (1,2,1) -so i dont want to change this.....
5. 00:43:645 (5,1) - better spacing make thing here play better imo try move (1) to around x212 y48 ? fixed
   
   imo the spacing can be a bit more consistent with music more

Axey wrote:

:D


Hard

整个diff就用了4个左右的whistle=.= 其实像kiai部分都可以加一点 自带的whistle就行

不太喜欢自带的Whistle，哔哔声不好听的说 至于custon的whistle嘛~我做这个图音效的时候还是不是很懂音效所以很多音效都放在了finish里头了，其实可能部分是应该为whistle的……我当时的想法是让finish、clap、whistle什么的都有对应的音效好啦然后就没想那么多了~

Lyric wrote:

[Kanor's GuJian]
00:23:201 (1,2,3,4) - 统一一下间距。 fixed
01:30:756 (1,2,3,4) - ^

Lyric wrote:

[Easy]
00:30:312 (1,2) - 节奏错了。Slider1 应该在 00:31:201 结束，00:32:089 - 这里应该有音。 - 我这里跟的是弦乐，不切鼓点了
00:44:534 (3,1) - 贴得有点近，不美观。 - 改了摆放以及后面的
01:25:423 (1,1,1) - 这里为什么要用 3/4 slider？ - fixed
[Normal]
00:18:756 (3,4) - 不要出现这种Flow，断滑条率几乎100%。 - 修改了，以及后面一段的摆放
00:26:089 (1,2) - 两个红线的Note太过突兀，不如改成从 00:25:867 开始的两个 1/2 slider。- 既然这样我去掉那两个圈好了
00:26:978 (3,4,5) - 音效是不是太响了。 - 这里还好吧~
[Hard]
00:11:645 (3,2) - 这两个怎么不一样。 - ？是不一样……
01:32:534 (1) - 放到中间？ - 是说转盘后接note最好不要放中间那样

neonat wrote:

Easy

00:23:201 (3) - honestly, pretty empty section after this note, especially with the pipa/guzheng and dizi holding that tune - added a 1/1 reversal slider.
00:24:978 (1,2) - this rhythm is kinda odd, and doesn't really fit well in the Easy, maybe try this: - ok i get it

SPOILER

00:30:312 (1,2) - same thing as ^ and also do not NC 00:30:312 (1) but NC on 00:32:089 instead to follow the pattern - I keep NC and rhythm fixed.
00:49:423 (4,1) - could lower 00:49:867 (1) more to the right to be more in line with the previous object - I try
01:04:089 (1,2,3,4,5) - I'd still think you should split it with more than 1 NC - fixed
01:23:645 (3) - same as 00:23:201 (3) - added two 1/1 sliders here

Normal

Kinda big increase in density in objects from Easy imo

00:04:312 (2,3) - spacing - fixed
00:06:089 (2,3) - flow between them is weird - tried to fix it. Now (3) is a straight slider
00:08:534 (3,1) - quite cramped - changed the pattern here.
00:10:089 (3,4) - swap positions, circle before slider - get it.
00:16:089 (1,2,3,4) - quite excessive here - I dont know what should i do
00:26:978 (1) - you should not overlook 00:26:756 - starting 1/2 beat later is off - added a circle on 00:26:756 -

Hard

00:07:201 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4) - the NCs at 00:07:867 (1,1) are unnecessary - fixed
00:12:312 (5,1) - I don't think you should stack
00:15:867 (5,1) - ^ - fixed both
00:19:645 (1) - this doesn't match the music's beat (snapping) - fixed(?)
00:58:312 (4,5,6,7,8) and 01:01:867 (4,5,6,7,8) - you NCed in Normal, but not here. Decide to have it or not, don't have differing ones on different difficulties, especially when the Hard is the one with more objects - fixed

neonat wrote:

GuJian

00:11:645 (4,1) - they don't match the instrument rhythm (snapping) enm.....i had use 25% speed to hear the rhythm. its really not 1/4 or 1/6,so to be the same diffuclt i ues 1/4.......
00:13:867 (3) - ^ so on so forth