JUDYDANNY wrote:

Finally I come. If I suggested to same places, That sounded not the best. Plz reconsider.

Symbol meaning

　

1. >> Normal suggestion.
   Big text >> Strong suggestion.
   >> Questionable imo.
   >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
   No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.

[Oni]

1. Some Intentional variation needs more making a lower of frequency. Maybe 1/2 colors are too much variation. yea
   
   
   
2. 00:29:183 (25,26) - d ? going on before kdd’s seems more kind as flow. same as 00:34:416 (51,52,53) - . kay
   
3. 00:30:404 - d? Instrumental still need to keep tensinon. but i follow the vocals and it goes up
   
4. 00:40:171 - k? the ½ rhythm d-d-d seems not the best as usual flow. but the pitch on triplet is same at all
   
5. 02:54:125 - ^
   
   00:56:044 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - again, plz change more kat. Try to remove them{(14)~(20)} and listen again. Don sounds too over. e.g. ddk-d-kkd or kkk-d -kkd.
   03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - ^ when i playback 50% they does same pitch on instrument
   
6. 01:11:392 - 　k? a little variated (same as 01:12:962 - )sounds better and plays too imo. now is better for me. also the music sounds faint
   
7. 03:25:433 (27,28) - dk? ^ ^
   
8. 02:10:782 - k? comparing with 02:04:939 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - , there’re too unbalanced the kat sound. Consider again to follow it more. that note sounds emphasis to low pitch
9. 02:10:346 - ^? ^
   
10. 02:13:137 - k seems better to build up.yap
    
11. 02:07:555 - ^ ^
    
12. 02:18:718 - ^ , similer as 02:10:782 - suggestion. ^
    
    02:21:160 (2,3,4) - , 02:22:555 (2,3,4) - kdk? for expression the gap what to follow. sorry i forgot to remap this part =.= remapped
    
13. 02:50:113 - change to d,02:51:334 (14,15) - dk , 02:53:078 (22,23) - dk?
    
    • Intentional kkkd (02:50:113 (8,9,10,11) - ) weird to me. too much k’s.
      (14,15) dk is avoiding to perfect matching before dkkd.
      (22,23) , ½ dk rhythm sounded….. better my opinion. kay :/
14. 02:57:439 (19,20) - dk? If you really hope to follow the Main part. now is better for me
    
    
    
    03:00:055 - again, more kkd plz, please compare with 1st( same as 00:47:671 (8,9,10) - ) . It seems not good intention. Making a consistent is the best to use ¼ colors for stability.
    e.g. 03:01:624 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - k-d-ddk-k-d>>> kkd-d-k-d-k ? added a bit
    
    
15. 03:53:079 (6,7,8) - ddk seems better for synthesizer and bass drum kick. the synth sounds high on first stream :/ so impossible to change to d i guess
    
16. 03:59:881 - k? synthesizer sounded little up. i know, but the pitch little up doesn't reinforce to put k for me :/
    
17. 04:05:462 - ^? ^
    
18. 04:11:044 - ^? ^
    
19. 04:22:206 - , 04:24:299 - , 04:32:671 - ^ ? ^
    
20. 04:07:555 - ,04:10:433 - , How about more 5-plots variation? plays better to me. yea, done

Nishizumi wrote:

[notice][Oni][list] 00:56:044 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - again, plz change more kat. Try to remove them{(14)~(20)} and listen again. Don sounds too over. e.g. ddk-d-kkd or kkk-d -kkd.
03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - ^ when i playback 50% they does same pitch on instrument

Nishizumi wrote:

00:56:044 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - again, plz change more kat. Try to remove them{(14)~(20)} and listen again. Don sounds too over. e.g. ddk-d-kkd or kkk-d -kkd.
03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - ^ when i playback 50% they does same pitch on instrument

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Nishizumi wrote:

[notice][Oni][list] 00:56:044 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - again, plz change more kat. Try to remove them{(14)~(20)} and listen again. Don sounds too over. e.g. ddk-d-kkd or kkk-d -kkd.
03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - ^ when i playback 50% they does same pitch on instrument

Where do you compare with??? Dont look at short phrase.
03:05:636 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - intentional focus to follow the bass drums, and 03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - d-ddd-d-ddd~~ seems Backsounds hits on tam purely , But sounds off there. from here to 03:10:869 - i follow the drums at all, i playback rate it to 50% they are sounds faint, even though on 03:10:171 is a little bit high but it doesnt dominant to change to k. also, they're same like the first before kiai time. so i'm sure to keeping this.

Why these are not simple on Instrumental...

If you follow the electronic, suggest to change kkd-k-ddd.

SKSalt wrote:

Help request from JUDY.

Nishizumi wrote:

00:56:044 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - again, plz change more kat. Try to remove them{(14)~(20)} and listen again. Don sounds too over. e.g. ddk-d-kkd or kkk-d -kkd.
03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - ^ when i playback 50% they does same pitch on instrument

"playback" mean volume in game? aaa I mean this https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/bPnFxqm.png. If it's true, I think it's not good. It is your setting to the last and is different from the general setting. Various people play the Ranked map. So please think in general setting. Playback should be 100% when you consider pattern. I listened music in this part. I heard to the difference in sound definitely. you're wrong, pls open this url http://puu.sh/o0EU6/a7086057d3.jpg and see on corner right bottom, that's what i mean.

Anyway, If I make this part, it will be kkd k ddd. Same as JUDY. 1st, 00:56:044 (14,15) - is same electronic sounds in 00:55:520 (9,10,11,12) - . 2nd, 00:56:392 (17) - has a beginning vocal sound. 3rd, 00:56:567 (18,19,20) - keep ddd because it should put gap with 00:56:916 (21) - (kicksound) Also about 03:09:997 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - same as above. i don't want to follow as you said like *1st : follow the electronics. 2nd because of vocal sound, and 3rd because gap with (21) *< but i agree with 3rd x_x* it's not my mapping style to combine any sound to other sound like that. i follow the drums at all *only in the part* and (14 to 20) sounds faint, looks weird for me to put a k.

This map is fun. Good luck with the rank Nishizumi

Eiuh wrote:

fun fact: removing the 1/6 parts makes the star rating drop by 2 stars lol

not that that makes the map any less fun or well-made, grats

PatZar wrote:

cacad awkkaw