1. Easy (1.63 stars, 156 notes)
2. Extra (5.51 stars, 579 notes)
3. Hard (3.37 stars, 353 notes)
4. Insane (4.33 stars, 466 notes)
5. Normal (2.3 stars, 253 notes)

smsh150 wrote:

Hello! M4M as I requested :3
[Insane]
00:02:554 (1,2) - just a small thing, you can replace these to x262 y134 so Distant snap is right what ds o.o
00:07:994 (2,3) - Maybe blanketing them right would be better it's semi blanket'd, which is right too
00:10:015 (1) - Imo this note could have bigger jump between (1) and 00:10:171 (2) - . (2) has more impact tho
00:13:435 (4) - For better flow and look you can rotate this slider 30 degree to clockwise, and make a blanket with 00:13:124 (3) - for example ok
00:14:212 (2) - check stacking with 00:13:746 (1) - ok)?
00:14:523 (4) - move bit left to have perfect 2,00x jump to 00:14:678 (5) - .xx doesnt matter in osu
00:25:715 (3) - Having bigger (like 1,20x) distant betwee (3) and (4) would be maybe better tru
00:34:108 (2,1) - check stacking ok
00:37:062 (5,1) - I don't really know, but something here would be mapped a bit differently... I can't imagine better rhythm or everything. The vocal somehow is strange here. Maybe it's just me.... (if you come up with better rhythm or something maybe change it a bit D:) it's fine imo
00:39:393 - and 00:40:637 - missing a triple that you did before every time (for example 00:37:994 (3,4,5) - ) I think you should keep mapping those, it's bit weird to leave them out of mapping, when you did it already before. But ofc this is just my opinion and this is your map and you do what ever you like to. it's fine, those are different rhythms and you don't need to map every sound in a song
00:50:585 (3) - NC would fit here because you did it before in 00:49:031 (1) - and 00:49:497 (1) - sure
00:50:274 (2,1) - check stacking k
00:53:538 (1) - Not sure is this meant to be like this, but I'll still notice: Blanket could be improved blankets are fine. You don't need to make everything so curved, this way works too
01:10:015 (3,6) - blanket could be improved
01:24:316 (3,2) - check stacking
01:33:331 (1,2) - blanket could be improved
01:40:171 - If you wanted to, you could end the kiai time here and start it again at 01:40:792 - will think about it >w<
01:48:720 (2) - replace to x359 y229 for perfect distants it's fine
Since this diff doesn't have spinner, I recommend to add it to 01:55:792 - and end it at 01:58:202 - . It fits pretty well here! I hope you like it too I didnt like it : ( sounds unfitting with the drums in the background to just spin for the vocals

[Hard]
00:02:865 (2,3) - check stacking ok(?
00:05:352 (2) - blanket would be improved na
00:14:678 (4) - Keep prev. 1,30x distant k
00:34:264 (3) - The rhythms here would be maybe better if this was 1/2 slider I mapped the whole section using 3/4 so ill keep it here too
01:10:326 (3) - This could flow better if the tail were down, something like this. Make yourself better than my example xD flow is fine, made the slider bit more curved tho
01:16:855 (1) - blanket would be improved
01:28:435 - Adding break or spinner here would be nice same

Well that's all what I could find from finished diffs (others than extra ://). Good Luck with map, really good mapping style~ <3 thank you <3

Frey wrote:

add 'cut version' into Tags? However, ppl would know it when they see the creator ._ .

1. 00:18:564 (4,1,2) - I'd move 1 a bit more to the left cuz right now there isn't really much of a jump from 4>1 when there could be. Also the flow is kinda linear atm so making the angle a bit sharper would be nice.
2. 00:37:839 (2,3,4,5) - Idk, this felt uncomfortable cuz theres no angle change so its hard to snap.
3. 01:00:689 (6,7,1) - Hmm... idk about the spacing. Doesn't reflect the emphasis in the song too well.

1. 00:21:051 - 00:41:103 - You use so many triplets here xPP. I think it's enough to warrant a possible DQ over spread issues. I mean, all the 1/4 beat you mapped on Extra were also mapped on the Insane. It feels too dense compared to Hard .
2. 00:42:969 (3,4,5,6,7) - Additionally you have these spaced streams in Insane too
3. 01:53:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - Compare this rhythm to Hard, its a huuuge difficulty gap xP.

1. 00:04:264 (2,3) - This triggers me because i have stacking disabled lol. (it's fine dw about it)
2. 00:51:518 (2,1) - They're like almost touching, if you want to move 1 up just a bit more lol.

monstrata wrote:

[*]00:37:839 (2,3,4,5) - Idk, this felt uncomfortable cuz theres no angle change so its hard to snap. i dont really see a problem using linear flow too ;w;

Oh, also is there a reason that Hard/Insane/Extra is tickrate 2? I don't see a reason for that tickrate but its fine if you wanna keep. I used to use tick rate 2 for all the diffs, but it suddenly become a dq reason to have tick rate 1 in lower diffs (which is quite lame lmao) So i'm just using them in the highest difficulties

Milan- wrote:

fk u people

Gaia wrote:

nyan (=^･ω･^)b