m4m reply
general
seems fine
seems fine
Insane
00:36:010 (5) - how about nc and some more spacing for this note since it was more emphasized in the music than 00:35:260 (2,3,4) -
00:44:010 (2) - how about moving this up/right to make a trianlge with the sliderstart/end? stacks on tail feels wrong here for some reason
00:47:510 (3) - bit more spacing for emphasis might be nice here, like you did for 00:52:260 (5,6) - etc
00:50:010 (1,2,3,4) - doesnt seem to flow well into the stream, maybe rotate the stream by 60°? http://i.imgur.com/10Kqqnn.jpg
00:54:010 (5,6,1,2) - really sharp angles play bad here imo
01:00:760 (1) - curve this less, such curving for a slider that small look bad
for 01:36:010 (1) - and around that: do you really want to have so many strong piano hits not clickable ;_;
02:13:010 (4,5,6) - angle this wide plays bad here imo
02:35:010 (3) - higher spacing as it is way stronger than 2?
00:36:010 (5) - how about nc and some more spacing for this note since it was more emphasized in the music than 00:35:260 (2,3,4) -
00:44:010 (2) - how about moving this up/right to make a trianlge with the sliderstart/end? stacks on tail feels wrong here for some reason
00:47:510 (3) - bit more spacing for emphasis might be nice here, like you did for 00:52:260 (5,6) - etc
00:50:010 (1,2,3,4) - doesnt seem to flow well into the stream, maybe rotate the stream by 60°? http://i.imgur.com/10Kqqnn.jpg
00:54:010 (5,6,1,2) - really sharp angles play bad here imo
01:00:760 (1) - curve this less, such curving for a slider that small look bad
for 01:36:010 (1) - and around that: do you really want to have so many strong piano hits not clickable ;_;
02:13:010 (4,5,6) - angle this wide plays bad here imo
02:35:010 (3) - higher spacing as it is way stronger than 2?
vass
00:36:010 - this is way too strong for a sliderend imo. make it clickable
00:40:010 - ^
00:42:010 (5) - dont you want to put the nc here instead of 00:43:010 (1) - ? current one doesnt make sense
00:44:010 - sliderend thing, wont mention again
00:47:510 (4,1,2,3) - keep the same spacing for the 1/4 gaps here, would play/read better
01:00:010 (1,2,3) - dont feel a straight line is the best representation of music/emphasis/intensity here
01:01:010 (4) - move up to not cover that much of the slider, much nicer to read
01:08:510 (2,3) - same, but it is a bit better here
around 01:26:010 (5) - same as insane for "ignoring" (not clickable) strong piano sounds. but since this is a hard it's probably fine here :/
especially 01:36:010 (1) - 01:40:010 (1) - etc really lacks some clickable stuff imo
and then you map triples on barely audible 1/4 as 01:50:760 (3,4,5) - which doesnt go well with what you did above
02:31:510 (5) - move this to not have it a straight line as it takes much emphasis away from 5 which it shouldnt
02:32:510 (1,2,3) - ^
same for (most) of the other straight lines. dont seem fitting with the music as the last element of the seems to be the strongest musical on placed you used them
02:34:010 (1) - piano not clickable again etc.
00:36:010 - this is way too strong for a sliderend imo. make it clickable
00:40:010 - ^
00:42:010 (5) - dont you want to put the nc here instead of 00:43:010 (1) - ? current one doesnt make sense
00:44:010 - sliderend thing, wont mention again
00:47:510 (4,1,2,3) - keep the same spacing for the 1/4 gaps here, would play/read better
01:00:010 (1,2,3) - dont feel a straight line is the best representation of music/emphasis/intensity here
01:01:010 (4) - move up to not cover that much of the slider, much nicer to read
01:08:510 (2,3) - same, but it is a bit better here
around 01:26:010 (5) - same as insane for "ignoring" (not clickable) strong piano sounds. but since this is a hard it's probably fine here :/
especially 01:36:010 (1) - 01:40:010 (1) - etc really lacks some clickable stuff imo
and then you map triples on barely audible 1/4 as 01:50:760 (3,4,5) - which doesnt go well with what you did above
02:31:510 (5) - move this to not have it a straight line as it takes much emphasis away from 5 which it shouldnt
02:32:510 (1,2,3) - ^
same for (most) of the other straight lines. dont seem fitting with the music as the last element of the seems to be the strongest musical on placed you used them
02:34:010 (1) - piano not clickable again etc.
normal
00:35:510 - having a sliderend on sth this hard to hear but nothing on 00:35:768 - feels a bit weird
maybe you should put breaks in those long unmapped gaps since current one drains the whole time which seems a bit "unfair" for a normal
besides that this diff looks nice already
good luck!00:35:510 - having a sliderend on sth this hard to hear but nothing on 00:35:768 - feels a bit weird
maybe you should put breaks in those long unmapped gaps since current one drains the whole time which seems a bit "unfair" for a normal
besides that this diff looks nice already