[general]
i think the offset is a little too early , try +10ms?
Dazzlin' Drizzle is much of an album release so it shouldnt be as official source
Source wrote:
Where this song originate from. This field should generally only be included for Anime or Video Game songs, and occasionally for Novelty (Movies, TV, or Internet) songs. If the song is from an anime or video game, or is famous for its use as a TV or movie theme, the title of that source goes here.
Rock and Pop songs should generally leave the field blank. This is not to be used for things like album titles.
so move them to tags instead
[Normal]
02:06:277 (1) - instead of a spinner , i think its better to add a circle at 02:07:169- and 02:07:493 - ,imo
since 02:07:493 - is a strong beat , ending a spinner here feels a little weird
02:48:683 (2) - NC ?
[z1085684963]
00:24:358 - 加一个circle吗
00:29:547 - ^
00:43:818 (5) - nc
02:48:683 (3) - nc
[Mecon]
00:43:818 (4) - NC把 , 容易误解
02:08:791 (4) - snap 错了,应该在blue tick
02:10:737 (2) - 这是1/3吧
02:15:926 (3) - ^
02:13:574 (2,3) - 一样
02:18:520 (2) - ^
02:26:304 (3) - ^
02:29:331 (2) - 我感觉这样更好 , 如果你从开始 02:29:547 - 和加个circle在 02:29:331 - . 感觉缺了节奏
03:30:601 - 不必要的green line因为没有spinner
[Insane]
00:31:169 (3) - nc , might cause misread here
00:43:169 - add a circle ?
01:07:007 (5) - how about 3/4 slider and add a circle at 01:07:331 - ?
01:16:412 (3) - nc
01:23:385 (1,2) - swap nc
01:45:277 (9) - 1/12
02:30:196 (3) - NC
02:36:845 (1,2) - swap nc
03:18:034 (4) - nc
03:27:764 (7) - 1/12
[Expert]
01:04:899 (3,4) - personally i think its better if you stack them like you did in every previous part such as 00:55:574 (5,6) -
and others
01:23:385 (10,1) - swap nc ? since its the same bell sound as 01:22:088 (1) -
01:45:277 (10) - 1/12 is more accurate imo
02:09:034 (2) - ctrl g this feel nicer to play
02:14:412 (3,4) - imo its better you change this to a slider or 02:14:196 (2) - to 2 circles , at least it doesnt confuse me ;w;
02:21:926 (2,3,4) - this one plays a little bad , but idk how to tell you so i will just provide a screenshot to see if you get what
i want to express xD
02:32:142 (1,2,3) - i am a little curious of why you mapped a triplet here ? if to follow the song accurately the beat is like this
02:32:791 (5,6,7) - same as above
03:09:683 (6) - should be in red tick
03:12:277 (9) - a little unnecessary imo , better extend the previous slide until here ,it doesnt represent anything either ?
03:13:331 (9,1) - swap nc
03:27:764 (7) - 1/12
03:30:520 (3) - nc because 1/1 might be confusing
力JJBurstOwO打英语2333
good luck !