Players who try the map generally don't report issues with it. It's the actual QAT that do the checking.
There should be a clearer indication in-game if the map is qualified or ranked imo.Absolutely this. When somebody links you a map and you download it via osu!direct, there's seemingly no way of being able to tell whether it is qualified or not; perhaps a new icon for qualified maps would be sufficient. Either way, I voted for qualified maps not giving pp - as Xilver said, I'd agree that it is the best compromise. People seem unable to handle disqualifications for maps in which they or others have gained pp from (myself being guilty of that on a few occasions), despite the fact that that is far from the reason for the qualified section.
Am I one of the rare breeds of players left that really doesn't give two shits about this? Just saying.
jesus1412 wrote:I feel like dumb fucks will complain double about "not getting pp from X map" if the pp is removed.I completely agree.
At the same time, however, if you were to implement this, pp gain needs to be hidden from players somehow, otherwise even if a map does not immediately reward a player pp, they will still assume they have obtain those pp, and this would still create drama should a map get disqualified because players will be "expecting a top play". Basically at the end of the day, if a map is dq'ed, you are still going to get people saying "rip my 300 pp score etc etc" even if they never actually got it added onto their Top Plays (yet). I doubt this can be fully avoided, because players can always estimate about how much pp they would have received...I was thinking the same thing
Players who try the map generally don't report issues with it. It's the actual QAT that do the checking.One reason this may happen is because some may see a person pointing out issues in a qualified map as a malicious act, either against the mapper or BNs involved.