00:02:052 (3,4) - The slider on the 1/4 is kinda unexpected, I had to listen at 50% to finally hear that the vocal is a bit delayed, but on 100% it's almost unnoticeable imo. If you want to let it be as it is I'd at least increase the spacing so they overlap a bit so it's easier to read
(If you decrease spacing here, might as well do with 00:12:865 (1) , just mentioning it, not necessarily)
00:03:273 (6) - I understand offbeat-sliders when they are mapped because the vocals are on the offbeat, but here these are two piano-hits. imo, the song would call for a bit more emphasis on the slidertail and 00:03:796 (2) (<- would've ignored that if it wasn't for the slider), so I'd suggest to ctrl-g 00:03:273 (6,1) chronologically. Same with 00:16:180 (2,3) , it just feels a bit weird : \ Also 01:49:668 (2,3) -
00:15:482 (5,1) - The slider got an
awkward angle to play, I'd rotate it by around +40°
00:18:360 (5) - Why 1/4 here? O.o
00:28:563 (2) - Mapping the second note when there is no beat in the music and silencing it - I don't see a reason for that and it confuses a bit. A reverse-1/1-slider would seem to fit, or just replace it with a circle lol
00:43:214 (3,4,1,2) - The flow here is very weird because it stops at (4,1) but then continues in the same direction and the slider also goes in that direction. Since I don't really understand the offbeat-slider anyways I'd ctrl-g (1,2) chronologically
00:44:784 (6) - The first two whistles of this combo are both on the downbeat, making the third one stand out in an awkward way. I know, it's mapped to the vocals, but at first it gives the impression that it's mapped to the downbeats making the third a bit weird. Dunno how to fix it though, I'm not good with hitsounding lol
00:50:366 (5,6) - Again the angle of the slider breaks the flow a bit,
this would play and look much better imo
00:51:935 (1,2) - Kinda high spacing here, 2,39x when similar parts like 00:53:156 (1,2) and 00:54:028 (4,5) are just 1,94x : \
01:04:319 (1,2,3,4) - Flow is a bit
weird again, maybe move the stack down a bit?
01:07:982 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Maybe unstack one of these since two of them break the flow pretty hard imo
01:13:214 (5,6) - I know it's a pretty pattern but the slider angle is weird for flow again : \
01:33:621 (3) - Normally I'd say this is a weird angle again, but it fits very good to the tone-shifting of the vocals or something like that, very nice o.o
Actually quite a lot of these angles again in this part, I guess I'll just stop pointing them out, just when it's combined with very high spacing like in 01:41:819 (4,1) it feels especially weird I guess. And there are some that are veery close to weird like 02:12:517 (8,9)
01:49:668 (2,3) - Again I don't really see the reason for this offbeat-slider, would ctrl-g again
02:23:854 (4,5) - Piano and bass have a heave emphasis on (4), so I'd ctrl-g again to emphasize it with the slider too
02:35:889 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Again two stacks in a row, dunno about that
03:31:877 - Even though the missing beat is not that loud it doesn't feel good leaving it out imo, maybe reverse-1/2 that one
03:33:273 - Again leaving out beat, this time this beat is really strong, rhythmically it would seem reaally nice to ctrl-g these two 03:33:098 (3,4)
03:47:575 (2) - This beat really needs more emphasis, maybe turn (2,3) into a slider?
04:10:075 to 04:18:098 - This part still seems mapped too hectic imo, I'd decrease the spacing a bit more, to give some rest to the players in this calm part
04:10:424 (3,4) - see very first point ^^
04:42:517 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - This stream is quite long, and I think it would also give more (imo needed) emphasis on 04:43:009 if you turned (1,2,3) into one 1/2-slider
That's all, I like this map very much