Yeah also from 02:18:022 on, none of these timing sections should be 3/4, they're still all 4/4, just some cool rhythms happning but they don't change the timing signature
Also, in the highest diff, why is 03:33:652 (1) offbeat, ignoring that really strong downbeat that has not been ignored at 03:31:284 (1) -? Just for comparison 03:32:389 (1) and 03:34:915 (1) are totally fine since there are none of these extremely strong beats there, unlike at 03:34:915 (1) -
Also, 02:14:864 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Why is (5) emphasized the most here (and (6) really much for this combo too)? I see zero differentiation between those notes that have strong vocals on them and those that don't have them, it's a bit better in the next combo since at least (5,6) are only equally emphasized, and not more than the rest, still kinda sad to see jumps over every single note here when they are so different
Also, in the highest diff, why is 03:33:652 (1) offbeat, ignoring that really strong downbeat that has not been ignored at 03:31:284 (1) -? Just for comparison 03:32:389 (1) and 03:34:915 (1) are totally fine since there are none of these extremely strong beats there, unlike at 03:34:915 (1) -
Also, 02:14:864 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Why is (5) emphasized the most here (and (6) really much for this combo too)? I see zero differentiation between those notes that have strong vocals on them and those that don't have them, it's a bit better in the next combo since at least (5,6) are only equally emphasized, and not more than the rest, still kinda sad to see jumps over every single note here when they are so different