Oh, we actually missed the birthday of the map.
Well, whatever.
Well, whatever.
Everything else has been accepted. Also thank you very much for the star!Jonawaga wrote:
Hello, M4M~!
[~(Ai)Mod~][~Mod~]
- Check your kiai times. They look unsnapped.
- Fix the Bugged SV.
- Set a consistent preview point.
- Preferably change "bgbgbg.png" to "bgbgbg.jpg", cuz y'know, it saves space.
Overall nice job with this map~!! Have a well-earned star!
- 00:44:752 (9,10,11) - / 00:49:998 (47,48,49) - Since these patterns are very similar both with the lyrics and with the instruments, I would prefer if they're mapped the same way. Either 00:50:162 (49) - switch that to k or switch 00:44:916 (11) - that to d.
- 02:26:228 (533) - This isn't good position for a finisher in my opinion. Other finishers, such as 02:25:572 - here, have clearly audible cymbals in the music, but there isn't a cymbal noise 02:26:228 - here, only a drum. Unless you want to emphasize that drum, I recommend you remove the finisher from this position. If you would like, consider removing 02:26:801 (537) - this and adding a finisher 02:26:719 (536) - there.
- 02:51:473 (718) - I recommend switching this to k because the pitch is more similar to 02:51:637 (719) - this than 02:51:309 (717) - that. Since 02:51:637 (719) - is significantely stronger than (718) I didn't change to k, I want to make sure the sax on (719) is emphasized properly.
- 02:54:424 (741) - Similar to what I said about the finisher 02:26:228 (533) - here, it's just my opinion though.
- 03:02:293 (799,800) - I recommend removing (100) and adding a finisher to (799). I think you understand what I mean now
and probably you disagree lolbut either way I'll stop with that. :3 100? :^) Changed anyways.- 05:05:572 - / 05:15:408 - Since this is the same as 01:04:260 - / 01:14:752 - this, I encourage you to make it kiai time. It's fine if you don't though. I haven't set this part on Kiai to increase the impact of 05:16:064 - 05:26:555 - but I understand what you mean. No change howevber.
Thanks!BoberOfDarkness wrote:
So I finally manage to start working on thatCTB
- 00:36:555 (7,8) - I feel you should't place hyperdash to this note, I would moved them around 00:36:391 (5,6) - and then place hyper from (8) to 00:36:719 (1) - - Fiddled around a little and made another type of hyper.
- 02:09:834 (2,4) - I don't like idea of those slow sliders here - They fit the vocals.
Thats all from me right now
Just years too late from my side, I'm too zzzzzzxfraczynho wrote:
Here I am finally xD[General]Other than that seems reaaally nice for me, you choiced a good song made a good job on there :p[Taikovic Inner Oni]
- Well as I said Preview timing could be really nicer, the silence is a little long when selecting so it's a little confusing and not that hype. If you want to hold it then 00:00:982 - is really better imo :p (remember to change the ctb aswell in that case) Uh, I am actually curious why I have placed it so damn early at all. lmao
- I can agree if you don't like it since it's personal but 00:01:310 - D could be interesting if you don't have problem with making people wait for next note xD Oh believe me, I actually had a note here but people were like ";; stop doing that" so I removed the note just for people's sake.
- 00:24:588 (14,15,16) - these three kats sounds a little exagerated so 00:24:588 (14) - don could fit better I use kat for the reason of emphasizing the piano well.
- 00:27:211 (29) - 00:29:834 (44) - ^ ^
- 00:33:441 (62,63,64,1) - this doesn't make sense at all for me since 00:33:441 - you're mapping the piano then suddenly 00:35:408 - an spinner to emphasize the background sound that is coming from 00:33:769 - , deciding for one of them should be better I agree at some point that the sudden density change - or rather focus change - isn't everybody's taste but I found that cool from the very begin and I don't want to change it near end.
It does make sense but it's nothing someone needs to like purely from the concept.- 00:53:605 (74) - kat on here so you make a mirror from 00:53:113 (69,70,71) - and follows the kick better, also emphasize on next D It'd only make sense if I would also map 00:53:687 - with a kat note so kdkkD could indeed cover the kicks at 00:53:605 - / 00:53:687 - well.
- 00:56:965 - 00:58:277 - you could add a note on them, there's a sound that I feel could be really mapped imo they are not so significant to have them mapped with objects.
- 01:02:457 (146,147) - ctrl+g cause pitches? Yeah, thought the same while playing. Thanks for strengthing that feeling. :3c
- 01:19:998 (121) - I don't feel like this really needs a big note tbh I probably love it waaaay too much to work with big notes but I like this one a lot so no change.
- 01:24:588 (157) - ^ same mmm That on the other hand sounds plausible to change it as simple note. At least it doesn't sound that significant that should be different from 01:23:932 (155) - (which is a simple kat as well)
- 01:30:654 (200) - 01:30:326 - fits better for the break imo wh.. this is indeed a weird break spot, changed.
- 02:35:900 - I think isn't that dense if you add a note on here, noticed you wanted to break on here but could be enough with 02:39:178 - It isn't dense at all but I feel it works out better to skip that beat to strenghten the voice here a bit.
- 02:54:424 (741) - same about big note usage, by deleting I don't hear anything that strong Song itself doesn't but how I use the finisher by having them consistent after each 16/1 makes them viable.
- 03:09:506 (858,859,860,861,862,863,864) - I highly suggest to delete this stream, is reaaaaaaaaaally overmapped; there isn't any sound else than relax voice Man.. I really hate to remove that stream but I guess nothing else is left for me. Removed the entire stream.
- 03:15:244 - add k? Moved 03:15:572 - instead, to be consistent with 01:30:654 (200) - .
- 03:59:834 - same as above, add? ~
- 04:18:359 (1336) - same about finisher usage ~
- 04:34:752 (1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463,1464,1465,1466) - this really feels weird, probably 04:34:752 (1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456) - dkddk d on these could fit better changed to kkddk instead.
- 04:38:932 (1486,1487) - delete these cause no sound on there and makes a good space for next D :p buh-byeee
- 04:49:670 - k too? Yeah, something like that.
- 04:54:506 (1601,1603) - delete aswell? a lil overmapped imo I used kkddkkd for the first two refrain as well, doesn't look wrong to me either way.
- 04:55:736 (1612,1613,1614,1615,1616,1617) - dkddk d too? aye, applied my changes here.
Let me know when you apply it, anyways I'd like to read 1 more comment specially on some finishers usage and some parts that are a lil overmapped
thanks, did some line fixes for volume and snapping.-Kazu- wrote:
damn at this point it's really hard to point stuff that really matters, a lot of good modders were here x_x
[General][Taikovic Inner Oni]
- I'd recommend you set the preview point at around 01:14:998 - or something, I saw you were aware that the preview point was kinda early so maybe this is a nice spot (or 04:13:359 - for the same purpose but avoiding playing the whole song in the preview w) This is me, being individual and I already decided to stay with the current preview point.
- 02:13:769 (465,466) - delete first, change second to k. This way you make a little more emphasis on the vocals while also making 02:14:096 (467) - more notorious as the prominent drum sound in this pattern. If it wasn't for vocals, I'd also delete 02:14:916 (471) - to make the pattern feel better on itself. Applied to the first point, made consistency changes as well.
- 02:16:391 (480) - I'd say move this to 02:16:555 - and change it to k. Better drum following and a bit better transition between a pattern and the other. Cool.
- 02:21:637 (507) - (mostly personal suggestion, as I don't really like much those "k d d d d k") delete this note and not necessary but 02:21:801 (508) - could become a k Applied to the first point.
- 02:27:211 (540) - The song doesn't really call for this to be a finisher, as it instead goes for the trills that start at 02:26:883 - . This may be a little harder than you want for this diff, so I don't think a long deathstream starting from 02:26:883 is the solution here.
- 02:54:424 (741) - that doesn't really need to be a finisher removed~
- 03:05:736 (826) - (personal suggestion, don't really like kdkdk so I'd understand if you don't agree on this one) maybe you could delete this note so that 03:05:900 (828) - is better represented as the main snare here Well.. I indeed don't like that point. I find kdkdk pretty.
- 03:39:998 - starting here, the drums go like 1/2 "dk kd" so probably it'd be nice if you did that aswell yap
- 04:00:818 (1216,1217,1218,1221,1222,1223,1226,1227,1228) - to make a bit of variance between these, maybe you could make them "ddk dkk ddkkd" (also personal suggestion in case a bit of variance here weighs more than consistency). In any case, I really see the last ddk as a ddkkd working perfectly so at least consider that one Used ddk kkddk ddk instead.
- 04:48:441 (1545,1546) - how about a little CTRL+G here for a slightly nice pattern? nice one
though nothing really was slightly wrong for me to point out x_x This should have been ranked since years wwww ☆☆☆☆☆