Because it was, at least the "-1 SS" thing. t/342124"Resolved" :/
I don't remember seeing that thread 8 days ago, so I guess it was resolved pretty quickly. I do remember I similar case several months ago, though.
The negative number of A/S/SS ranks should be fixed now. If you can still find instances of this on people's profile's then please link them.Here https://osu.ppy.sh/p/playerranking/?m=0&s=3&o=0&r=&q=&f=
@ Miterosan - Where are you seeing this negative score thing? Is it still an issue? If so, link the page please.
By looking the first two negative ranked score profiles I think this is because of unqualified maps. Both two had plays in at least two difficulty of a map that got unqualified and had very few other plays. I guess it decreases score from every difficulty when the map is unqualified, but ranked score only increases by the score from the best play of the map, and not from the score of every difficulty, so it decreases wrong. Maybe I'm saying very wrong things but At least it seams related to unqualified maps.Well.. Counting that only the best score of a mapset is added to the "Ranked Score" number, I don't think this is really the cause of this "bug/issue". And the score that will be substracted from the Ranked Score number is the same as the score that was added from that map..
Well.. Counting that only the best score of a mapset is added to the "Ranked Score" number, I don't think this is really the cause of this "bug/issue".I was fairly sure that this is actually incorrect, so I decided to do a quick check myself. I played this map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/242938&m=0 on [alacat's Easy] and then [Normal], and this was the change in scores:
8218434086Those are the exact scores I got for playing each difficulty, so I definitely got ranked score for both difficulties in the same mapset.
This have been noted before already though, I don't know if we need a new thread because it's a different problem (another cause) entirelyWell I made a new thread a week or two ago and it got closed immediately for being a "duplicate" despite being completely different so...