inspectorscout wrote:

Sorry for double post, but the picture I suggested was only for the timeline, the mapping was not DS and looks ugly, so don't copy it :p

No kds, and to make up for the double post, take a star

inspectorscout wrote:

DavidEd's Insane

00:05:722 (1,2) - bend these a bit to each other for flow

quick note: why is this map in 1/6 while other maps are in 1/4? It's a part of my mapping style. I tend to map according to the drums whenever there's a drum roll etc. And if you listen to the mp3, you can clearly hear the 1/6 rolls

01:01:222 (3,4) - there shouldn't be a jump here, you do an antijump, so a jump is not needed if the objects are still as far from each other in time as they were. 5 however, is closer so a jump can be done there, like you did. fix

01:53:628 (6,1) - put the NC 1 note later, since you jumped in that stream, the 6 isn't needed. fix

1. Offset is way to early, probably needs an +15 (3487)
2. Add some combo colours?
3. Uncertainties about the spread. In this case Normal --> Hard. This is due to the complex rythm used in Hard, will point this out in the mod for Hard.
4. Consider ending the spinners on the same time? (The spinner in Insane is ending a bit later)

1. Are the hitsounds on the slider bodies intentional?
2. NCs are kinda a mess sometimes. Try keeping it consistent either musically or with systematic measure (2 stanza measure for instance)
3. 00:03:472 (1,1) - Questionable interval, consult some QATs about this one. See this for reference t/241019&start=0
4. 00:15:472 (4,1,2) - NC's went inconsistent here, intentional or no?
5. 00:30:472 (1,2,3) - Rhythm is weird, especially (3);The 3/2 repeat doesn't fit here, as the repeat itself isn't emphasizing something. I suggest you to change it to something like this:
   
   This way it makes (1,2) consistent with 00:33:472 (4,1) - which is a repetitive motive of the first one
6. 00:37:972 (3) - Again the awkward slider, tho this time the previous notes aren't in need of change as you clearly emphasize something this time (The vocal) Changing 00:37:972 (3) - into a note + 1/1 repeat slider would fit with the start of this combo
7. 00:49:597 (2,3) - Flow is stiff and questionable stacking, try moving 00:50:722 (3) - on the head of 00:48:472 (1) - afterwards just fix the spacing.
8. 00:51:472 (4) - NC
9. 00:55:597 (2,3,1) - Sounds and plays a bit awkward, perhaps try something similar to 00:57:472 (1) - like this:
   
10. 01:21:472 (1) - Woooo helloooo Mr super stack, well eeh you should probably fix this one.
11. 01:54:472 (2,3) - Flow is rather bad, try a ctrl+g on (2) and move (1) to 458|170
12. 02:00:472 (1,2) - Rather awkward flow again due to the bad transition. When using these kinds of patterns its better to move it more out like this Or to move it almost parallel like you have here 03:04:971 (1,2) - :
    
    w

    http://puu.sh/j90B1/9c95d1d909.jpg
    
    This way it flows smoothly on the the next one, with the current one you will have to make rather awkward cursor movements. There are more in the map please check those.
13. 02:42:749 (5,1,2,3) - Remove the repeat on (5) and use two 3/2 sliders. Slider are far more lenient and circle rythms like this aren't recommended for an easy.
    ~~~~~~
    Difficulty is decent. Tho it still needs some work on the NCs and some minor aesthetics (blankets etc.)

1. 00:03:472 (1) - Forgot the hitsound for the spinner?
2. 00:15:472 (5,6) - Emphasize feels rather off, you have utilized the same rhythm for both without actually emphasizing the significant beats. Suggestion:
   
3. 00:17:347 (2) - clap
4. 00:35:722 (4,5) - Remove the circle and extend the slider by 1/2 Fits better IMO, if not at least delete the clap at the end of (4) which sound rather off as the music doesn't have a clap, rather a whistle. Like you have here 00:41:722 (4) -
5. 00:51:472 (5) - NC
6. 00:59:159 (1,2) - Feels a bit weird, as the (2) doesn't have a nice emphasize try:
   
7. 00:59:159 (1) - Remove the NC
8. 01:02:347 (1,2,3) - Plays rather awkward
9. 01:17:722 (4,5) - Sorry but this is a nope nope
10. 01:49:972 (1) - Forgot the hitsound for the spinner?
11. 02:03:472 (5) - NC
12. 02:11:159 (1,2,3) - Same as 00:59:159 (1,2)
13. 02:11:159 (1) - Remove NC
14. 02:24:083 (1) - Remove NC
15. 02:52:971 (1) - Remove NC
16. 03:07:194 (1) - ^
17. 03:15:416 (1) - Same as 01:17:722 (4,5)
    ~~~~~~
    Elements like hitsounds have been nicely executed however the difficulty still needs some more work; for the NCs try to keep it consistent with repetitio's (kiai/kiai for instance), rhythm wise it's okay I guess sometimes it's like you want to emphasize too much like here 01:02:347 (1,2,3) -, and keep an eye on the blankets tho I didn't mention those since I'm one of the lazy modders.

1. Well as said in general there might be a problem with the difficulty spread Normal --> Hard, I'll list them here:
2. The rather big SV jump, the SV jump from 1,10 to 1,60 is rather big and is questionable
3. Complex rhythm usage, for instance this section: 00:19:222 - 00:22:690 especially those 00:20:159 (5,6,7,8) - and 01:37:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
4. I suggest you to ask some QATs about those points above ^
5. Other than that I rather like this diff, The placements/structure is really nice it doesn't have too much nor too less triples, nice job here~
6. 00:16:409 (4,5) - How about un-stacking those? Since like the previous sliders the stacked beat is a bass whilst (4) has the beat of those sliders.
7. 00:43:785 (5) - NC
8. 00:57:472 (1,2,3) - Hmmm IMO it sounds better if those sliders were to follow the vocal as it stands out rather much. like this:
   
   These as well 02:09:472 (1,2,3) -
9. 02:10:784 (4,1) - Fix this blanket a bit
   ~~~~~~
   Nice diff, really like it!

1. Hmm forgot some hitsounds here and there especially on those 1/4 sliders, pls recheck those
2. 00:11:722 (7) - Try adding some hitsounds on those repeats, sounds a bit out of place as of now.
3. 00:11:737 (7) - Snapping error, it should be like this:
   
   An 1/6 with 2 repeats and the next note is on 1/4.
   Fix the timing as mentioned in general and you'll see~
4. 00:16:409 (6,7) - It would be nicer to emphasize these with a jump tho :<, how about this:
   
   w

   
5. 00:16:987 (1) - Should be 1/6 repeat as well tho would play weird as f*ck so idk
6. 00:23:722 (1) - Add some hitsounds on the repeats?
7. 00:51:299 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - You sure about this spike :<?, Also those 1/8 don't sound like 1/8 to me lel. Maybe use some more sliders like you did here 02:03:487 - Oh and also same story about the 1/8 for this one
8. 02:10:784 (6) - NC and remove NC here 02:11:722 (1) -
   ~~~~~~
   Nice diff~ Recheck those snaps after the timing fix, I might have missed some.

1. Hmm not sure how to mod this, therefore I'll be giving my own general opinion on some parts.
2. 00:23:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Is there a need for such a stream shape :O? Especially (4) is rather uncomfortable placed.
3. 00:32:174 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Kind of a mess, seems really randomly placed.
4. 00:38:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Again
5. 01:17:362 (3,4) - Don't see a need for such a big jump tho :O
6. 01:17:924 (6,7) - Same here
7. 01:18:487 (1) - Considering the music there should be a larger jump here than the previous triplets.
8. Well it's basically this; There is no basic spacing the map goes back to. Emphasis for really strong beats through jumps is completely lost, as there are also jumps before weaker beats.
9. 02:15:487 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Another example; (2) -> (3) -> (4) is good since 4 has the most significant beat and has the larger jumps whereas the next one: (5) -> (6) -> (7) is wrong as (6) is the one that has a larger jumps whilst (7) has a more significant beat. These kind of issue´s repeat throughout the map

inspectorscout wrote:

So, let's start!

Note: add custom colours, it helps a map so much! Done! completely forgot xD

Easy

I know you didn't map on it, but don't use 1/4 in an easy. Change it to 1/2 haihai

00:16:972 (1) - Not sure if you should put a triple slider in an easy, but it's up to you I suggest slider - reverse - note - note still waiting for a QAT answer on this

00:34:972 (1) - maybe you can blanket this one in the previous slider? x 232 y 188, don't forget to change the next note too to keep DS right if you take this suggestion fixed

01:04:972 (2) - as before, not sure ^

01:28:972 (1) - ^ ^

really, really nice diff, you sure know how to blanket nearly everything xD

Normal

00:15:472 (5,6) - this feels weird...maybe 3x a double slider or a 4 (3 reverses), then a double? this would make it more confusing beeing an inconsistent number of reverses

01:21:472 (1,2) - also feels weird since the slider end of 1 feels emphasised... it isn't emphasised, the one right after is though, so I can't put a slider end there
01:27:472 (1) - NC isn't needed i think this one is, but the other one afterwards isn't, so fixed

Hard

Solid, no problems yay

Chen

01:13:034 (4) - feels like it is stopping the flow, maybe on x 372 y 280? I think this one is ok

01:24:847 (3,4) - is this intentional? the DS could be better here it is, it's a small jump before a huge jump let's put it that way, kind of a preparation
nice diff, I like it

That's it! I don't think you need that many mods anymore, you'll get there soon

good luck, and cya

xChippy wrote:

yo, from the m4m queue

[General]

1. Offset is way to early, probably needs an +15 (3487) I guess it was a bit, changed
2. Add some combo colours? fixed from last mod
3. Uncertainties about the spread. In this case Normal --> Hard. This is due to the complex rythm used in Hard, will point this out in the mod for Hard. The normal diff it's not so easy so I think it's ok but I'll check with a QAT
4. Consider ending the spinners on the same time? (The spinner in Insane is ending a bit later) As it is a GD I think it's ok, but I'l make sure

[Easy]

1. Are the hitsounds on the slider bodies intentional? nope, removed
2. NCs are kinda a mess sometimes. Try keeping it consistent either musically or with systematic measure (2 stanza measure for instance) all NC's fixed
3. 00:03:472 (1,1) - Questionable interval, consult some QATs about this one. See this for reference t/241019&start=0 so many rules ; ;
4. 00:15:472 (4,1,2) - NC's went inconsistent here, intentional or no?
5. 00:30:472 (1,2,3) - Rhythm is weird, especially (3);The 3/2 repeat doesn't fit here, as the repeat itself isn't emphasizing something. I suggest you to change it to something like this:
   
   This way it makes (1,2) consistent with 00:33:472 (4,1) - which is a repetitive motive of the first one I wanted to follow the beat / guitars here, as it's a more straight forward and easier pattern imo
6. 00:37:972 (3) - Again the awkward slider, tho this time the previous notes aren't in need of change as you clearly emphasize something this time (The vocal) Changing 00:37:972 (3) - into a note + 1/1 repeat slider would fit with the start of this combo same reason
7. 00:49:597 (2,3) - Flow is stiff and questionable stacking, try moving 00:50:722 (3) - on the head of 00:48:472 (1) - afterwards just fix the spacing. removed the stack and hoping flow is fixed as well
8. 00:51:472 (4) - NC
9. 00:55:597 (2,3,1) - Sounds and plays a bit awkward, perhaps try something similar to 00:57:472 (1) - like this:
   
   mhm I think this one is fine
10. 01:21:472 (1) - Woooo helloooo Mr super stack, well eeh you should probably fix this one. bye mr super stack
11. 01:54:472 (2,3) - Flow is rather bad, try a ctrl+g on (2) and move (1) to 458|170 fixed
12. 02:00:472 (1,2) - Rather awkward flow again due to the bad transition. When using these kinds of patterns its better to move it more out like this Or to move it almost parallel like you have here 03:04:971 (1,2) - :
    
    w

    http://puu.sh/j90B1/9c95d1d909.jpg
    
    This way it flows smoothly on the the next one, with the current one you will have to make rather awkward cursor movements. There are more in the map please check those. what's so bad about the patterns though, I feel like if I change it to be like that I'm almost doing a map that'll go in a straight line without any challenge, even for an easy :c
13. 02:42:749 (5,1,2,3) - Remove the repeat on (5) and use two 3/2 sliders. Slider are far more lenient and circle rythms like this aren't recommended for an easy. agree, changed
    ~~~~~~
    Difficulty is decent. Tho it still needs some work on the NCs and some minor aesthetics (blankets etc.)

[Normal]

1. 00:03:472 (1) - Forgot the hitsound for the spinner? yap
2. 00:15:472 (5,6) - Emphasize feels rather off, you have utilized the same rhythm for both without actually emphasizing the significant beats. Suggestion:
   
   not exactly like that, but changed
3. 00:17:347 (2) - clap oke
4. 00:35:722 (4,5) - Remove the circle and extend the slider by 1/2 Fits better IMO, if not at least delete the clap at the end of (4) which sound rather off as the music doesn't have a clap, rather a whistle. Like you have here 00:41:722 (4) - that's how I had it before, but it would be bad to have consecutive different reverse sliders, so I just changed it, but removed the clap
5. 00:51:472 (5) - NC
6. 00:59:159 (1,2) - Feels a bit weird, as the (2) doesn't have a nice emphasize try:
   
   it's still highlighting the last kick
7. 00:59:159 (1) - Remove the NC
8. 01:02:347 (1,2,3) - Plays rather awkward why ._.
9. 01:17:722 (4,5) - Sorry but this is a nope nope ok finally change :c
10. 01:49:972 (1) - Forgot the hitsound for the spinner? yep
11. 02:03:472 (5) - NC
12. 02:11:159 (1,2,3) - Same as 00:59:159 (1,2) same
13. 02:11:159 (1) - Remove NC
14. 02:24:083 (1) - Remove NC
15. 02:52:971 (1) - Remove NC
16. 03:07:194 (1) - ^
17. 03:15:416 (1) - Same as 01:17:722 (4,5) keeping as just the end highlight, players don't have to click the 1/4
    ~~~~~~
    Elements like hitsounds have been nicely executed however the difficulty still needs some more work; for the NCs try to keep it consistent with repetitio's (kiai/kiai for instance), rhythm wise it's okay I guess sometimes it's like you want to emphasize too much like here 01:02:347 (1,2,3) -, and keep an eye on the blankets tho I didn't mention those since I'm one of the lazy modders. fixed all NC's and some blankets, but i think the patetrns are fine, it's a medium diff normal

[Hard]

1. Well as said in general there might be a problem with the difficulty spread Normal --> Hard, I'll list them here:
2. The rather big SV jump, the SV jump from 1,10 to 1,60 is rather big and is questionable
3. Complex rhythm usage, for instance this section: 00:19:222 - 00:22:690 especially those 00:20:159 (5,6,7,8) - and 01:37:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
4. I suggest you to ask some QATs about those points above ^ will check
5. Other than that I rather like this diff, The placements/structure is really nice it doesn't have too much nor too less triples, nice job here~ c:
6. 00:16:409 (4,5) - How about un-stacking those? Since like the previous sliders the stacked beat is a bass whilst (4) has the beat of those sliders. feels and plays fine
7. 00:43:785 (5) - NC yap, added
8. 00:57:472 (1,2,3) - Hmmm IMO it sounds better if those sliders were to follow the vocal as it stands out rather much. like this:
   
   These as well 02:09:472 (1,2,3) - both follow the music, and honestly I like both options, so I'm keeping until I get a huge riot to change it eheh
9. 02:10:784 (4,1) - Fix this blanket a bit done
   ~~~~~~
   Nice diff, really like it!

[Chen]

1. Hmm not sure how to mod this, therefore I'll be giving my own general opinion on some parts.
2. 00:23:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Is there a need for such a stream shape :O? Especially (4) is rather uncomfortable placed. yeah, I've tested it tons of times and flows well
3. 00:32:174 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Kind of a mess, seems really randomly placed. it's not random, I actually changed it into this after testing toher patterns
4. 00:38:174 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Again same, and I really like the outcome of this one c:
5. 01:17:362 (3,4) - Don't see a need for such a big jump tho :O I really felt like this part should be highlighted, and did so in every diff, as this is the extra, JUMPS
6. 01:17:924 (6,7) - Same here same
7. 01:18:487 (1) - Considering the music there should be a larger jump here than the previous triplets. it's still a rather large jump considering
8. Well it's basically this; There is no basic spacing the map goes back to. Emphasis for really strong beats through jumps is completely lost, as there are also jumps before weaker beats. I admit my mapping style isn't the most consistent but I always try to get the best flow and fun factor in jumps
9. 02:15:487 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Another example; (2) -> (3) -> (4) is good since 4 has the most significant beat and has the larger jumps whereas the next one: (5) -> (6) -> (7) is wrong as (6) is the one that has a larger jumps whilst (7) has a more significant beat. These kind of issue´s repeat throughout the map

You can poke me in-game if something isnt clear or if you have questions etc.
Good luck

Come[Back]Home wrote:

Normal

00:13:987 (4,2) I think the overlap is not intended since it looks weird fixed
00:18:112 (7) I think moving it too 388/184 would be a better pattern and its nicer to play fixed with previous changed
00:25:612 (3) Move this one too 56/236 for a perfect triangle not going for the triangle pattern here
00:30:487 (1,2) Multiple repeats like that are too confusing for a normal, you should remove them this is the simplest way to map this, and as long as it's consistent I think players will be able to read and play this easily
00:33:487 (1,2) ^
00:36:487 (1,2) ^
00:39:487 (1,2) ^
00:54:487 (1,2,3) Something like this?

SPOILER

Has a better flow this would ruin the blanket and create an overlap, touched it up a bit to try and improve flow
00:59:549 (5,2) Weird overlap fixed
01:13:612 (3) You could move this one up for a perfect triangle not necessary
01:19:612 (3,1) Weird overlap fixed
01:30:487 (1,3) ^ this one is not noticeable in game so it's fine
01:34:237 (2,3) They should be paralel, looks better okay, changed
02:09:487 (1,2,3) The flow here is really akward changed and fixed
03:15:431 (6) I know its short, but no 1/4 in Normal pls okay okay I'll change it :c

xChippy wrote:

[Insane]

1. Hmm forgot some hitsounds here and there especially on those 1/4 sliders, pls recheck those
2. 00:11:722 (7) - Try adding some hitsounds on those repeats, sounds a bit out of place as of now.
3. 00:11:737 (7) - Snapping error, it should be like this: fix
   
   An 1/6 with 2 repeats and the next note is on 1/4.
   Fix the timing as mentioned in general and you'll see~
4. 00:16:409 (6,7) - It would be nicer to emphasize these with a jump tho :<, how about this: looks great
   
   w

   
5. 00:16:987 (1) - Should be 1/6 repeat as well tho would play weird as f*ck so idk remapped
6. 00:23:722 (1) - Add some hitsounds on the repeats? added 1 clap
7. 00:51:299 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - You sure about this spike :<?, Also those 1/8 don't sound like 1/8 to me lel. Maybe use some more sliders like you did here 02:03:487 - Oh and also same story about the 1/8 for this one
8. 02:10:784 (6) - NC and remove NC here 02:11:722 (1) - fix
   ~~~~~~
   Nice diff~ Recheck those snaps after the timing fix, I might have missed some.

1. 00:12:862 (1) - Consider curving it to increase flow
2. 00:16:987 (2) - Kicksliders such as these are rather hard to understand for newbies. Consider making them 2 1/1 sliders
3. 00:49:612 (2,1) - This overlap is incredibly hard to properly read for a newbie, as a big part of the sldier is covered by the other
4. 01:04:987 (2) - Kickslider, refer to above
5. 01:28:987 (3) - ^^
6. 01:49:987 (1) - Consider extending it 1/1 to end on the drums
7. 02:16:987 (2) - Kickslider, and give it NC, for the BPM change
8. 03:13:875 (3) - Kickslider, refer to above

1. 00:09:862 (2) - Consider curving it to increase flow
2. 00:13:987 (4,1) - Please fix the blanket
3. 01:31:237 (2,3,4) - 3/4 rhythm is incredibly hard to understand, 3/2 make it much easier to understand for a newbie
4. 01:34:237 (2,3,4) - ^^ etc.
5. 02:00:487 (1,2) - Blanket
6. 02:16:987 (2) - NC for BPM change

1. 00:05:737 (1,2,3,4) - Consider making this a reverse 1/4 slider
2. 00:19:987 (4,5,6,7,8) - Rhythm like this is really hard to follow. Try making 1/2 sliders and make it like this
   
3. 00:22:237 (3,4,5) - ^^ etc.

baraatje123 wrote:

M4M

[General]
Seems fine But hey, I suck at this, so there might be stuff wrong
Just one thing (which is already pointed out), the spread between Normal and Hard is kinda high. I'll help you toning hard down I can't seem to understand why, one day we'll need 50 diffs per set to have a good spread >.<
However, there is one major complaint I have about the mappign style. Yo uuse many upbeat sliders. Slider which start at a 2nd or 4th beat and end on a 1st or 3rd beat. Things like that play really badly IMO. I can't really mod it due to that, as there are high amounts of rhythmical issues in it. Note, some people don't mind them, so you're better off asking them for a mod, but I really dislike them, sorry If you're talking about the second part of the chorus, it's following the snare, and the drummer plays the snare every 2nd and 4th beats, so I'm just following the song, I guess it's a matter of taste

[Easy]

1. 00:12:862 (1) - Consider curving it to increase flow okay
2. 00:16:987 (2) - Kicksliders such as these are rather hard to understand for newbies. Consider making them 2 1/1 sliders I only use them in this specific parts of the song, to follow the vocals, instead of having a main beat ending in a slider end
3. 00:49:612 (2,1) - This overlap is incredibly hard to properly read for a newbie, as a big part of the sldier is covered by the other fixed
4. 01:04:987 (2) - Kickslider, refer to above
5. 01:28:987 (3) - ^^
6. 01:49:987 (1) - Consider extending it 1/1 to end on the drums done
7. 02:16:987 (2) - Kickslider, and give it NC, for the BPM change changed NC
8. 03:13:875 (3) - Kickslider, refer to above

[Normal]

1. 00:09:862 (2) - Consider curving it to increase flow I think it's fine
2. 00:13:987 (4,1) - Please fix the blanket I think it's fixed?
3. 01:31:237 (2,3,4) - 3/4 rhythm is incredibly hard to understand, 3/2 make it much easier to understand for a newbie it's a normal, and a pretty slow slider with a reverse, really hard to miss this. 3/2 would be way too long and boring / uninsteresting
4. 01:34:237 (2,3,4) - ^^ etc.
5. 02:00:487 (1,2) - Blanket done
6. 02:16:987 (2) - NC for BPM change done

[Hard]

1. 00:05:737 (1,2,3,4) - Consider making this a reverse 1/4 slider did so, I guess this reduced the spread a bit?
2. 00:19:987 (4,5,6,7,8) - Rhythm like this is really hard to follow. Try making 1/2 sliders and make it like this it's a hard, if players don't get used to this rhythm in this diff it would be impossible to play the insanes
3. 00:22:237 (3,4,5) - ^^ etc.

This diff is by far the best of the set

Okay, that's it
Overall, the map needs much more polishing. Many blankets are off.
I don't want to nazi mod and list them all, so look carefully and change them I just can't find them lol unless by off, you mean just barely to the point where it's barely noiticeable
Also, you should get more mods, as the map itself isn't that great, sorry welp

Als, there is a double green line in "Chen", remove it
At 03:00:020 fixed

Nevertheless, good luck!

1. The starting spinner can start earlier in my opinion

1. 00:25:237 (1) - remove NC?
2. 00:50:737 (1) - ^
3. 01:55:612 (1) - ^, 01:55:987 (10) - add here, just my opinion, next 2 lines too..edit: oh i just noticed, that you have the same moment in song on 00:42:487 (1) - and have the NCs just like was mentonied here >_>
4. 01:56:737 (1) - and remove here
5. 01:58:612 (1) - and here, add here 01:58:987 -
6. 00:09:674 (2,3) - ctrl+G? (don't forget to replace hitsounds if you do)
7. 00:22:987 (1,2,3,4) - it's hard to keep consistency and accuracy on mini-streams, that have 4,6,8 etc circles, maybe add a slider instead of 4th circle?
8. 00:37:049 (4) - not really sure about this move, maybe make diamond and then move next circles, like this http://puu.sh/jpxhH/387ac31c43.jpg? and even stack (8) with (3)
9. 01:06:487 (1,2,3,4) - make it smoother?
10. 01:10:987 (1,2,3) - can't get idea of this pattern, how about making triangle of 1,2,3 or 2,3,4? I mean balanced spacing
11. 01:12:674 (2,3) - ctrl+g? looks so epic for me
12. 01:16:799 (8,9,1) - i don't like placement here, maybe move it down, like a continue of triangle? next circles are up to you
13. 01:19:612 (6) - isn't it too close?
14. 01:24:674 (2) - i'd like to see any kind of balance again, example http://puu.sh/jpxRJ/19cb8ec3c5.jpg move any objects here as you want, it will be cool
15. 01:27:112 (4) - how about removing anti-jump and stacking it with (1)? (needs to change next pattern with it)
16. 01:57:299 (3,1,2,3,4) - not really a nice star (http://puu.sh/jpy7U/60fb6ff7a7.jpg) can it be smoother or it's just me?
17. 02:07:424 (4) - this diff has too many sliders like this, how about rotating, like this http://puu.sh/jpykh/d8e63b4919.jpg? also this pattern is looking like rough star too, but i won't complain about it, because it doesn't matter i guess
18. 02:36:542 (1,2,3,4,1) - and obvious star again. here is some fix, that will make it smoother 02:36:764 (2) - move to x:124 y:209, 02:36:986 (3) - to x:329 y:148, 02:37:208 (4) - to x:126 y:77 02:37:431 (1) - to x:251 y:255, next circles edit as you wish
19. 03:09:875 (6,7,1,2,3) - ugh star again, you can always fix it yourself, by using "create polygon circles" option

1. HP -1
2. 00:21:112 (1) - you started new pattern and new combo a bit early, check out the big white tick, in terms of logic this song is linear and has equal segments every 8 white ticks, you can even try to hear it. i think you can understand me
3. 00:27:112 (1) - same as ^, remove NC and add 00:27:487 (4) - here. You can see right variant for example in [Chen] diff
4. 01:53:643 (6) - replace NC to this circle?
5. 00:07:049 (3) - stack with start of 00:05:924 (2) ?
6. 00:30:487 (1,2,3,4) - not really nice, how about this http://puu.sh/jpAW2/7969095336.jpg ?
7. 00:45:862 (2) - stack with 00:44:362 (3) ?
8. 00:46:612 (6) - i think it's too close to the previous one
9. 00:58:237 (3,4,5,6,1) - and i think you can increase DS here a bit
10. 01:18:862 (2,3) - ctrl+g?
11. 01:23:924 (5,6) - hmmm, this moment is questionable for me, i want to ctrl+g it, but then the balance of spacing is required. this moment is up to you.
12. 01:29:830 - low-spacing stream can be added here, instead of emptiness, or i don't know, but it looks strange for me atm
13. 01:58:237 (5) - http://puu.sh/jpBOS/860744c76c.jpg awwwww so close, move it a bit to the left?
14. 02:00:112 (4,5,6) - stack with 01:58:987 (1) ?
15. 02:01:799 (1) - not sure that this upbeat is ok, but i think it's easy replaceable with 2 circles
16. 02:16:987 - add circle here
17. 02:25:875 (1) - stack with 02:24:542 (4) ?
18. 03:02:542 (4) - more stacks for the god of stacks stack it with whatever you want . _.
    Nice diff, somehow reminds me my maps

1. HP -1
2. Well, I didn't found any NC issues, looks good.
3. This map is all about blankets, more than patterns, not sure that i can provide something, but i'll try.
4. 00:15:112 (3,4,1) - move to x:241 y:157 <- first obvious blanket that i found
5. 00:17:362 (2) - you can stack this with 00:15:862 (2) and then move (3) or (1) to make balanced triangle
6. 00:18:487 (1) - then move this for blanket..
7. 00:33:674 (2,4) - ctrl+g?
8. 01:33:862 (4) - looks too close to the prev triplet, i'd recomment to move it a bit higher
9. 01:37:237 (1) - very confusing rhythm, at least for me, very easy to get 100

1. 00:08:362 (3) - isn't it overlap?
2. 00:30:487 (1) - in sliders like this i'd recommend to remove second repeat and add circles or remove repeats at all and add another slider, 2x repeats are kinda confusing
3. 01:04:987 (2,3,4,5) - this moment looks ugly ingame, but i can understand logic :\

Morbon wrote:

Hello, M4M here. I'll start with the hardest diff, because i can't do it otherwise.
Keep in mind, that i'm not very good in easier diffs, instead of this i can provide more feedback with extra+ diffs.
Also my english sux
[General]

1. The starting spinner can start earlier in my opinion it's following a specific sound,can't really explain xd

[Chen]

1. 00:25:237 (1) - remove NC? yap, I completely forgot to recheckthe NC's in this diff >.<
2. 00:50:737 (1) - ^ fixed
3. 01:55:612 (1) - ^, 01:55:987 (10) - add here, just my opinion, next 2 lines too..edit: oh i just noticed, that you have the same moment in song on 00:42:487 (1) - and have the NCs just like was mentonied here >_> fixed all of them
4. 01:56:737 (1) - and remove here yap
5. 01:58:612 (1) - and here, add here 01:58:987 - ^
6. 00:09:674 (2,3) - ctrl+G? (don't forget to replace hitsounds if you do) I guess it's ok if I do, becomes easier to read
7. 00:22:987 (1,2,3,4) - it's hard to keep consistency and accuracy on mini-streams, that have 4,6,8 etc circles, maybe add a slider instead of 4th circle? I'll have to keep this, feels wrong to skip the main beat with a slider end, even if it's a 4 note stream
8. 00:37:049 (4) - not really sure about this move, maybe make diamond and then move next circles, like this http://puu.sh/jpxhH/387ac31c43.jpg? and even stack (8) with (3) I like that pattern :c
9. 01:06:487 (1,2,3,4) - make it smoother? fixed and also made some changes to the chorus in general
10. 01:10:987 (1,2,3) - can't get idea of this pattern, how about making triangle of 1,2,3 or 2,3,4? I mean balanced spacing done
11. 01:12:674 (2,3) - ctrl+g? looks so epic for me done, follows the vocals better
12. 01:16:799 (8,9,1) - i don't like placement here, maybe move it down, like a continue of triangle? next circles are up to you keeping this
13. 01:19:612 (6) - isn't it too close? I think fixed?
14. 01:24:674 (2) - i'd like to see any kind of balance again, example http://puu.sh/jpxRJ/19cb8ec3c5.jpg move any objects here as you want, it will be cool need to highlight the jump to the snare
15. 01:27:112 (4) - how about removing anti-jump and stacking it with (1)? (needs to change next pattern with it) I really want to keep this pattern
16. 01:57:299 (3,1,2,3,4) - not really a nice star (http://puu.sh/jpy7U/60fb6ff7a7.jpg) can it be smoother or it's just me? all notes are pretty far away in timing, I guess it wouldn't make much difference
17. 02:07:424 (4) - this diff has too many sliders like this, how about rotating, like this http://puu.sh/jpykh/d8e63b4919.jpg? also this pattern is looking like rough star too, but i won't complain about it, because it doesn't matter i guess changed one or two, but I think it's ok for the most part
18. 02:36:542 (1,2,3,4,1) - and obvious star again. here is some fix, that will make it smoother 02:36:764 (2) - move to x:124 y:209, 02:36:986 (3) - to x:329 y:148, 02:37:208 (4) - to x:126 y:77 02:37:431 (1) - to x:251 y:255, next circles edit as you wish fixed
19. 03:09:875 (6,7,1,2,3) - ugh star again, you can always fix it yourself, by using "create polygon circles" option

I suck with shape patterns
I can't check blankets\some flow problems, because it's not my best ability, sorry.
[Hard]

1. HP -1 good point
2. Well, I didn't found any NC issues, looks good.
3. This map is all about blankets, more than patterns, not sure that i can provide something, but i'll try.
4. 00:15:112 (3,4,1) - move to x:241 y:157 <- first obvious blanket that i found fixed, the rest is due to the stack
5. 00:17:362 (2) - you can stack this with 00:15:862 (2) and then move (3) or (1) to make balanced triangle no need for it imo
6. 00:18:487 (1) - then move this for blanket..
7. 00:33:674 (2,4) - ctrl+g? ok, test with the new spacing, also changed the other pattern
8. 01:33:862 (4) - looks too close to the prev triplet, i'd recomment to move it a bit higher this is due to the stacking rules
9. 01:37:237 (1) - very confusing rhythm, at least for me, very easy to get 100 it's following the song, using sliders would make it too easy / uninsteresting

That's all for me
[Normal]

1. 00:08:362 (3) - isn't it overlap? it's allright
2. 00:30:487 (1) - in sliders like this i'd recommend to remove second repeat and add circles or remove repeats at all and add another slider, 2x repeats are kinda confusing while I usually agree with this, on this diff the song ask for this, and it's consistent so I think it's rankable
3. 01:04:987 (2,3,4,5) - this moment looks ugly ingame, but i can understand logic :\

I can't find other issues, sorry.
[Easy]
zzzz i can't find anything


Good luck with map!

Morbon wrote:

[DavidEd's Insane]

1. HP -1 true... i missed once in a stream and half my hp was gone xD
2. 00:21:112 (1) - you started new pattern and new combo a bit early, check out the big white tick, in terms of logic this song is linear and has equal segments every 8 white ticks, you can even try to hear it. i think you can understand me i see what you mean. fix
3. 00:27:112 (1) - same as ^, remove NC and add 00:27:487 (4) - here. You can see right variant for example in [Chen] diff fix
4. 01:53:643 (6) - replace NC to this circle? it kind of follows with the 1/6 slider and the snare is a much louder and recognizable sound so that's why i put it there.
5. 00:07:049 (3) - stack with start of 00:05:924 (2) ? fix
6. 00:30:487 (1,2,3,4) - not really nice, how about this http://puu.sh/jpAW2/7969095336.jpg ? fix
7. 00:45:862 (2) - stack with 00:44:362 (3) ? fix
8. 00:46:612 (6) - i think it's too close to the previous one
9. 00:58:237 (3,4,5,6,1) - and i think you can increase DS here a bit nah, i like how smooth it is already
10. 01:18:862 (2,3) - ctrl+g? fix
11. 01:23:924 (5,6) - hmmm, this moment is questionable for me, i want to ctrl+g it, but then the balance of spacing is required. this moment is up to you. just stacked it with the previous (1) slider
12. 01:29:830 - low-spacing stream can be added here, instead of emptiness, or i don't know, but it looks strange for me atm the drum part stops here, and thats kind of what i was going for here
13. 01:58:237 (5) - http://puu.sh/jpBOS/860744c76c.jpg awwwww so close, move it a bit to the left? fix
14. 02:00:112 (4,5,6) - stack with 01:58:987 (1) ? wasnt it already? xD
15. 02:01:799 (1) - not sure that this upbeat is ok, but i think it's easy replaceable with 2 circles nah, its ok
16. 02:16:987 - add circle here added
17. 02:25:875 (1) - stack with 02:24:542 (4) ? fix (misstake by me) xD
18. 03:02:542 (4) - more stacks for the god of stacks stack it with whatever you want . _. stacked it wherever i want

Tarrasky wrote:

mod in Insanes diff suggest by - Milhofo -

Chen

00:23:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - porque essa stream está tão desregulada? dá para fazer algo mais bonito aqui já está mais bonito xd
00:28:987 (1) - adicione clap okay
uma dica que pode ser aplicada em todas as dificuldades, essa parte 00:06:487 - 00:18:487 - é um refrão como os outros 2 kiais, o que acha de adicionar kiai time aqui tambem? eu acho que fica bacana ^^ adicionei tambem, não tinha posto porque achava que ficava kiaia a mais ahah

caso queira que eu veja as outras dificuldades só falar comigo em jogo, vc pediu só as insanes então ta ai ^^ era só essas, obrigado o/(

Tarrasky wrote:

DavidEd's Insane

00:09:487 (1) - Finish here to be constant like 00:15:487 (1) - added
00:11:737 (7) - this slider can finish in 00:11:924 - and you add a circle in 00:12:018 -, if you listen in 25% slow, the song seems perfect i like it
00:27:862 (1) - unnecessary new combo mustve forgotten hehe
00:40:987 (1) - i dont like this kind of spin in the middle of the song, It gives to clearly hear that this part can be mappable. Of course the spin is not wrong, just think what could be better ill concider it
00:53:362 (2) - same about 00:11:737 (7) - like it
01:18:487 (1) - finish, of course added
01:39:487 (1) - same about 00:40:987 (1) -, THIS 01:49:987 (1) - is a good example of spin, i like ^^ i wanted to capture that ''windy'' tone that builds up. mapping it would only make the note at 01:42:487 be awkward to map, unless i put a spinner from 01:41:737 and i dont like fast spinners xD

CSLM wrote:

David

1. 00:16:987 (1) - reduce a reverse, it's 1/6 until 00:17:174 - not until 00:17:237 -
2. 00:52:987 (1) -
3. 00:56:737 (3,4,5,6,1) - *nazi* bad star pattern, make a better with the tool of polygonal circle creation (in compose, or push Ctrl-Shift-D)
4. 02:04:987 (1) - same thing what i said in 00:52:987 (1) -
5. 02:05:362 (2) - reduce a reverse

CSLM wrote:

hi, m4m from your queue, sorry for the late
new page wow

Unrankeable
Important
Suggestion

General

1. i think will be better the unicode source: 東方Project sure thing
2. don't you think the gap of CS between Easy, Normal and Hard a little strange? CS2.5 => CS3.5 => CS4? :/ reduces the CS of normal to 3.2, looks more equilibrated and more apropiated for a Normal diff imo [/color]

Easy

1. 01:54:112 (1) - i think will be better if you delete this, 'cause also what is less unrankeable, it's less confusing for the newbies imo, for the strong vocal. [/color]
2. 02:16:987 (1) - due to the change of BPM, a pattern of sliders can't be more confusing, why? because you maked the same in the 160 BPM part, i suggest what you change this to a spinner, make a transition less confusing [/color]
3. 03:00:098 (2,3,1) - a spacing of this kind (in triangle) is never good on a easy diff, 'cause the newbie can hit (1) instead of (3). Make a longer space between (2) and (1) for avoid this I'll see what I can do

Normal

1. 00:31:424 (2,3) - it's better imo if you delete one reverse of (2) and move (3) to 00:31:987 - of that way follow more the vocal and the drums imo I'm following the guitar xD
2. 00:37:424 (2,3) - ^
3. 00:55:237 (3) - i think what wll get better the flow if you change the curvature of this slider, make a better effect regarding 00:56:737 (5) - and it's less confusing imo ok
4. 00:59:174 (4,5,6) - follow more the instruments imo if you delete (6), move (5) to 00:59:737 - and make a reverse in (4), that apply too with 01:09:487 (1,2,3) - 01:21:487 (1,2,3) - 02:50:764 (1,2,3) - 03:04:986 (1,2,3) - I like how it is now :3
5. 01:00:862 (2,4) - try of avoid overlaps like this ones, looks very ugly and could be confusing ok, changed
6. 01:31:237 (2,3) - this patterns would look better imo if make instead of 2 3/4 reverse sliders, 3 3/4 sliders without reverse: http://puu.sh/jzbzj/e82cb49ca6.jpg the same with 01:34:237 (2,3) - 01:37:237 (2,3) - and 01:40:237 (2,3) - (but with this one a pattern like this: http://puu.sh/jzc0Y/6dbd60d232.jpg will follow more the instruments imo) idk yet
7. 01:59:737 (5,1) - overlap fixed
8. 02:13:237 (3,6) - ^ yap
9. 02:16:987 (1,2) - the same thing what i said in Easy, it's better a spinner what a slider/hitcircle pattern

Hard

1. 00:16:987 (1,2,3,4) - i think better a square pattern, make a better flow imo it's ok
2. 01:00:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - i like this <3
3. 01:06:112 (4,5) - mmm, stack? not really needed
4. 01:29:549 - you should add a note here, 'cause the calm part of the chorus start in 01:29:737 - not in 01:29:362 - and without a note there you'll give a bad impression imo I had on but apparently I had to reduce the difficulty to have a better spread
5. 01:41:643 (8) - transform this in a note with a slider, don't leave 01:41:737 - 01:42:112 - in white plzz, it's where have most intensity that part imo the snare is the most intense part, hence why I highlighted it
6. 02:16:987 (1,2) - the same thing what i said in Easy/Normal

i don't know mod extras, sorry ;3;
GL with rank
choo choo~

1. 00:31:987 (3) - 00:37:987 (3) - not seeing what the repeats are supposed to be following here. the emphasis for vocals and instrumentals are on white ticks for both of them
2. 02:53:431 (3) - would be way better to have the finish on the tail of this actually clickable cuz important beat dfdfdfsdfx

1. difficulty settings (aside from cs) should be buffed by at least 1
2. 00:30:487 (1) - when there's multiple repeats on a 1/2 slider, there's like no time to react to the second repeat. using 1 reverse+circle would work better, especially on ones like 00:31:424 (2) - since there would be snarehit on the circle
   yea that's kinda it lol. the section with lots of 3/4 sliders is kind of awkward but like cant really do much about it cuz of difficulty restrictions

1. 00:06:112 (2) - first strong beat of the song is on a sliderend nice111111111111 same on extra too could you not
2. 00:31:799 (7,1) - so this is the only spacing variation thing on the entire diff. spacing variation is fine on hards, but like if you're gonna include it, do it consistently and in more places than just this. 00:37:799 (7,1) - is the same as the first thing, yet no spacing change. all the downbeat cymbal stuff in the kiai could also work, etc. easiest thing ot do is just not have the spacing variation tho
3. 00:32:174 (2) - 00:38:174 (2) - not seeing how the reverse on this is supported at all. red tick has nothing important, same as easy lul
4. 01:25:612 (5) - 01:26:362 (2) - the points of emphasis are on both of these sliderends i dont understand rhyhtm choiceeeeeeee. 01:28:049 (2) - and the reverse here nice
5. 01:32:737 - ignoring these is more acceptable on normal since you can't really do 1/4 spacing stuff there, but here you could easily cover the snare by using a 1/4 slider after these (and every other time this happens cuz it's everywhere)
6. 02:11:549 (2,3,4) - hello milhofo or should i say mil-i-dont-have-stacks-enabled-in-the-editor-or-testplay-my-maps-hofo yay

1. source is wrong oh no!!
2. 00:20:643 (5) - sounds way better to not have the snare on the slidertail. circle+1/2 slider like 00:22:424 (4,5) - works great fantastic wonderful do it
3. 00:40:987 (1) - ending spinner on the downbeat followed by 1/2 spam ew. ending the spinner 1/2 earlier (where there's a vocal!!) and having a circle on the downbeat is a good idea
4. 00:50:174 (2) - not liking the sliderending on strongbeat you've got here and no where else in the entire map why:(
5. 00:53:362 (2,3,4) - 02:31:209 (1,2,3) - new combo on the white tick like 01:53:362 (5,6,1) - makes the 1/6 wtf rhythm way easier to comprehend
6. 01:35:737 (4,5,6) - pretty weird rhythm when the points of emphasis are here and not what you mapped at allllllllll

1. 00:12:018 (1,2) - swapping new combos on these makes it way easier to comprehend how long to hold the 1/6 slider. david's diff does it at 01:53:362 if you want a reference
2. 00:17:737 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - lower jump and stream spacing would fit with the percussion disappearing reeeeally nicely. having them the same as everything else in the section is weird when music is not the same at all. would probably apply to the section at 01:45:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - too smaller sapcing is cool
3. 00:20:643 (5) - reading hwat i said about this on david's diff = good idea. would work fine with the example there, or just a double instead of circleslider since that seemst o match your overall rhythm choices better
4. 00:49:424 (5,6) - sounds way better to not have slidertail on uh the place where it is for emphasis reasons yeah. reverse on 00:50:174 (2) - is pretty much the same thing. don't do that thx
5. 00:53:362 (1,2,3) - nice 1/6 u got there
6. 01:30:112 (4) - cutting off a reverse on this makes it way easier to not break when transitioning into the next object. i remember someone calling this "buffering the repeat" and that sounds pretty legit right
7. 01:32:643 (3) - 01:38:643 (3) - UH maybe don't do that since there isn't actually 1/8 there. the effect of silent 1/8 sliderends for the previous stuff is probably fine, but a 1/8 reverse when there's nothing is what. doing a double like 01:41:643 (3,4) - is way better
8. 01:35:643 (3) - should see what i said on david's diff here and arrange comboing/stream angles accordingly
9. 02:53:653 (5,6) - 03:07:875 (5,6,7) - "i have 4 beats to cover, so 2 sliders works great!" <-- hopefully not what you're thinking. for rhythm that actually makes sense to play, clicking on the last beat of the stream is best. it's the most powerful and it gives you an easily understandable time between clicking it and the next note (1/2, instead of your current 4/6 wtf). 4 circles, 1/6 slider with 1 repeat + circle, or full on 1/6 slider with 2 repeats all work great, but what you have doesnt
   
   now for the recurring things that are more like overall thoughts rather than "pls fix"
   
10. spacing is pretty what a lot of the time. jumps emphasize the object being jumped to (which i think you know already), but it gets misleading in a lot of places here. for example, 00:09:112 (8,1,2) - 1 is more emphasized than 2, yet there's smaller spacing to 1 than to 2, making it seem like you're emphasizing 2 more. same sorta thing happens everywhere, like 02:27:209 (4,1,2,3) - 01:12:112 (7,1,2) - 01:15:112 (6,7,1) - etc yhou get it. weird emphasis paired with the "everything is a jump hype!!!" you've got going on makes it look like a lot of your spacing is unstructured which is no bueno and explaining how to make things structured is impossible B)))))))))
11. i can't really say problems with flow because people say it's too subjective, but i'm thinking that anyway. most of the time you've got great circle->circle movement, but you're ignoring the way sliderbodies influence movement a lot. 01:21:674 (2,3) - 01:22:424 (5,6) - so for these, the angle between the previous object and sliderbody is really sharp, forcing super uncomfortable movement. 01:18:674 (2,3) - 01:19:424 (5,6) - on the other hand do the exact opposite with nonsharp angles and they play nicely. a similar thing applies to sliderend stuff too, but yeah. i won't say you need to change that kind of stuff, but it's part of what's keeping me from saying "great map!"

pishifat wrote:

. . . . . ., ,. ,. n,. nm,./d.g dhhbng.thm,f.hmfrth,fth

[easy]

1. 00:31:987 (3) - 00:37:987 (3) - not seeing what the repeats are supposed to be following here. the emphasis for vocals and instrumentals are on white ticks for both of them
2. 02:53:431 (3) - would be way better to have the finish on the tail of this actually clickable cuz important beat dfdfdfsdfx

[normal]

1. difficulty settings (aside from cs) should be buffed by at least 1 ok I suck at spreads I know
2. 00:30:487 (1) - when there's multiple repeats on a 1/2 slider, there's like no time to react to the second repeat. using 1 reverse+circle would work better, especially on ones like 00:31:424 (2) - since there would be snarehit on the circle
   yea that's kinda it lol. the section with lots of 3/4 sliders is kind of awkward but like cant really do much about it cuz of difficulty restrictions

[hard]that sv jump from normal tho lol...

1. 00:06:112 (2) - first strong beat of the song is on a sliderend nice111111111111 same on extra too could you not
2. 00:31:799 (7,1) - so this is the only spacing variation thing on the entire diff. spacing variation is fine on hards, but like if you're gonna include it, do it consistently and in more places than just this. 00:37:799 (7,1) - is the same as the first thing, yet no spacing change. all the downbeat cymbal stuff in the kiai could also work, etc. easiest thing ot do is just not have the spacing variation tho changed it because of a previous mod, changed it back
3. 00:32:174 (2) - 00:38:174 (2) - not seeing how the reverse on this is supported at all. red tick has nothing important, same as easy lul
4. 01:25:612 (5) - 01:26:362 (2) - the points of emphasis are on both of these sliderends i dont understand rhyhtm choiceeeeeeee. 01:28:049 (2) - and the reverse here nice
5. 01:32:737 - ignoring these is more acceptable on normal since you can't really do 1/4 spacing stuff there, but here you could easily cover the snare by using a 1/4 slider after these (and every other time this happens cuz it's everywhere)
6. 02:11:549 (2,3,4) - hello milhofo or should i say mil-i-dont-have-stacks-enabled-in-the-editor-or-testplay-my-maps-hofo yaynoob mapper pls teach how to map

[x]tfw you have a lot to say about a diff but you have no idea how to say it

• it has potential but the mapper fcked it up D:

1. 00:12:018 (1,2) - swapping new combos on these makes it way easier to comprehend how long to hold the 1/6 slider. david's diff does it at 01:53:362 if you want a reference
2. 00:17:737 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - lower jump and stream spacing would fit with the percussion disappearing reeeeally nicely. having them the same as everything else in the section is weird when music is not the same at all. would probably apply to the section at 01:45:487 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - too smaller sapcing is cool
3. 00:20:643 (5) - reading hwat i said about this on david's diff = good idea. would work fine with the example there, or just a double instead of circleslider since that seemst o match your overall rhythm choices better
4. 00:49:424 (5,6) - sounds way better to not have slidertail on uh the place where it is for emphasis reasons yeah. reverse on 00:50:174 (2) - is pretty much the same thing. don't do that thx
5. 00:53:362 (1,2,3) - nice 1/6 u got there I had it on previous versions of the map but removed it due to popular demand ("too confusing and hard to play"), added it back though
6. 01:30:112 (4) - cutting off a reverse on this makes it way easier to not break when transitioning into the next object. i remember someone calling this "buffering the repeat" and that sounds pretty legit right weird, but ok
7. 01:32:643 (3) - 01:38:643 (3) - UH maybe don't do that since there isn't actually 1/8 there. the effect of silent 1/8 sliderends for the previous stuff is probably fine, but a 1/8 reverse when there's nothing is what. doing a double like 01:41:643 (3,4) - is way better doubles are scary
8. 01:35:643 (3) - should see what i said on david's diff here and arrange comboing/stream angles accordingly
9. 02:53:653 (5,6) - 03:07:875 (5,6,7) - "i have 4 beats to cover, so 2 sliders works great!" <-- hopefully not what you're thinking. for rhythm that actually makes sense to play, clicking on the last beat of the stream is best. it's the most powerful and it gives you an easily understandable time between clicking it and the next note (1/2, instead of your current 4/6 wtf). 4 circles, 1/6 slider with 1 repeat + circle, or full on 1/6 slider with 2 repeats all work great, but what you have doesnt I changed the first one, agreed that it shouldn't start on a 1/6, but going to keep the pattern that's made of a triple + kick slider, the last note isn't clickable, but it's the most straight forward pattern imo
   
   now for the recurring things that are more like overall thoughts rather than "pls fix" tried to fix flow and spacing, literally went through the whole map, hopefully I fixed most if not all of them
   
10. spacing is pretty what a lot of the time. jumps emphasize the object being jumped to (which i think you know already), but it gets misleading in a lot of places here. for example, 00:09:112 (8,1,2) - 1 is more emphasized than 2, yet there's smaller spacing to 1 than to 2, making it seem like you're emphasizing 2 more. same sorta thing happens everywhere, like 02:27:209 (4,1,2,3) - 01:12:112 (7,1,2) - 01:15:112 (6,7,1) - etc yhou get it. weird emphasis paired with the "everything is a jump hype!!!" you've got going on makes it look like a lot of your spacing is unstructured which is no bueno and explaining how to make things structured is impossible B)))))))))
11. i can't really say problems with flow because people say it's too subjective, but i'm thinking that anyway. most of the time you've got great circle->circle movement, but you're ignoring the way sliderbodies influence movement a lot. 01:21:674 (2,3) - 01:22:424 (5,6) - so for these, the angle between the previous object and sliderbody is really sharp, forcing super uncomfortable movement. 01:18:674 (2,3) - 01:19:424 (5,6) - on the other hand do the exact opposite with nonsharp angles and they play nicely. a similar thing applies to sliderend stuff too, but yeah. i won't say you need to change that kind of stuff, but it's part of what's keeping me from saying "great map!"

[]

tldr the first 4 diffs could easily be rankable but the last one ehhh idk i tri v hard