GARNiDELiA - MIRAI (TV Size)

posted
Total Posts
83
show more
Zerss
:D~
Topic Starter
HonKAn
OMG~~~ :):)
Niedola
꺄아아아악 버블이야!!!!!
Realazy
You must not silence both slider ticks and slider slides together. insane does this a lot of times and even uses muted sliderends on top of that, so what's the point of ending these sliders so late then. if you dislike the sound of ticks so much, you may use tick rate 0.5 or a silent file for soft-slidertick, but you may not use 5% volume lines to achieve that

여보세요!

[Zerss's Normal]

00:07:173 (1,2,3) - i wouldn't really use this kind of variation here as it causes the stronger downbeat to be on a sliderend instead of emphasizing it properly like 00:01:173 (1,2,3,4) - does
00:35:673 (2,2) - this overlap can be pretty confusing since the 2nd slider appears before the first one has even ended, would be nice to at least unstack it from the sliderend
00:50:673 (2) - you should consider unstacking this since you don't use stacks for 3/4 rhythms and it could be very confusing with the 1/2 stack right before at 00:46:173 (4,1) - and the 1/1 stack right after at 00:52:548 (1,2) -
01:10:548 (4) - missed NC i assume? nc patterns in the kiai aren't that long

[rui's Hard]

you should consider lowering the AR here, 8 seems really over the top given how slow the song is and how simple is the map... 6 or7 would feel much better here imo

00:38:298 (2) - i don't really agree with this slider skipping a strong beat at 00:38:673 - considering both the guitar note and vocals, it would be nice if you could map this red tick in some way, like with a repeat slider, or 1/2 slider + circle, anything really

[Insane]

i really don't think you should use as many muted sliderends because you're muting both sliders which end on nothing, and sliders which end on actual sounds in the music... a clear example would be 00:38:298 (1,2) - where there are vocals on 1's sliderend, but it's muted, and there is nothing on 2's sliderend, which is also muted. it ignores the music a lot, and i don't agree with it

same concern as rui's diff, ar8.3 seems pretty high for this map, i think you should really consider lowering the AR here too, like 7.5 would be much better imo

00:34:173 (1) - i don't really understand why this has an NC, if you follow stuff like 00:30:798 (1,2) - then you should remove the NC on 00:34:173 (1) -
00:40:548 (1,2) - it would be better to swap NCs here since the vocals start on 2, not on 1
00:43:173 (1) - i don't understand why this is NC either
01:23:673 (1) - i don't think the spinner starts in a good spot here, it's going through 2 distinct sounds, and it would be better to start the spinner on 01:25:548 - and map a slider on 01:23:673 - for example, like the other diffs did

call me back once the things in bold are fixed and everyone has replied
rui

Realazy wrote:

[rui's Hard]

you should consider lowering the AR here, 8 seems really over the top given how slow the song is and how simple is the map... 6 or7 would feel much better here imo
OK. changed AR7

00:38:298 (2) - i don't really agree with this slider skipping a strong beat at 00:38:673 - considering both the guitar note and vocals, it would be nice if you could map this red tick in some way, like with a repeat slider, or 1/2 slider + circle, anything really
fixed. used note + 1/2 slider pattern.
Thank you Realazy
Zerss

Realazy wrote:

00:07:173 (1,2,3) - i wouldn't really use this kind of variation here as it causes the stronger downbeat to be on a sliderend instead of emphasizing it properly like 00:01:173 (1,2,3,4) - does ok
00:35:673 (2,2) - this overlap can be pretty confusing since the 2nd slider appears before the first one has even ended, would be nice to at least unstack it from the sliderend slightly unstacked. i really want to give this back and forth feel as the bass goes along
00:50:673 (2) - you should consider unstacking this since you don't use stacks for 3/4 rhythms and it could be very confusing with the 1/2 stack right before at 00:46:173 (4,1) - and the 1/1 stack right after at 00:52:548 (1,2) - ok
01:10:548 (4) - missed NC i assume? nc patterns in the kiai aren't that long yup
slt real alors ça fait quoi de mod une vieille map qui date de quand j'avais trois mois ds le mapping mdr?
thx
Topic Starter
HonKAn

Realazy wrote:

You must not silence both slider ticks and slider slides together. insane does this a lot of times and even uses muted sliderends on top of that, so what's the point of ending these sliders so late then. if you dislike the sound of ticks so much, you may use tick rate 0.5 or a silent file for soft-slidertick, but you may not use 5% volume lines to achieve thatok ,i'm check

여보세요!
[Insane]

i really don't think you should use as many muted sliderends because you're muting both sliders which end on nothing, and sliders which end on actual sounds in the music... a clear example would be 00:38:298 (1,2) - where there are vocals on 1's sliderend, but it's muted, and there is nothing on 2's sliderend, which is also muted. it ignores the music a lot, and i don't agree with it change.


same concern as rui's diff, ar8.3 seems pretty high for this map, i think you should really consider lowering the AR here too, like 7.5 would be much better imo
fix

00:34:173 (1) - i don't really understand why this has an NC, if you follow stuff like 00:30:798 (1,2) - then you should remove the NC on 00:34:173 (1) - fix
00:40:548 (1,2) - it would be better to swap NCs here since the vocals start on 2, not on 1 fix
00:43:173 (1) - i don't understand why this is NC either fix
01:23:673 (1) - i don't think the spinner starts in a good spot here, it's going through 2 distinct sounds, and it would be better to start the spinner on
fix01:25:548 - and map a slider on 01:23:673 - for example, like the other diffs did fix

call me back once the things in bold are fixed and everyone has replied
Zerss's , rui's diff update
Thanks you // Realazy~
Realazy
new metadata rules :unamused:
kwk
ok
Mordred
you did it!!
Topic Starter
HonKAn

Mordred wrote:

you did it!!
yeah!
Dailycare
'God'
vocaloid2003
nice
Please sign in to reply.

New reply