Hinsvar wrote:

holy shit this is fun tbh

appleeaterx wrote:

Yes, full version!
Congrats :3

Exote wrote:

holyyyyyyy mai god congrats tochi, finally

Tenderz wrote:

eeey. congratz

FCL wrote:

tbh this map is good
You did it, gratz

Secretpipe wrote:

nice to see the full ver approved o/

1. 00:32:617 (2,3,4) -
2. 01:08:702 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - really overmapped, if you listen closely, you can hear that none of the blue tick notes are supported by the music, should be plain 1/2
3. 01:17:959 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
4. 01:41:959 (3,4,5,6) -
5. 03:06:988 (3,4,5,6) -

1. 01:38:188 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,1) -
2. 01:49:159 (1,2,3,4,5) -
3. 03:26:874 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
4. 02:52:245 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -

1. 00:22:759 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 00:51:902 (3,4) -
3. 01:33:045 (1,1,1,6) -
4. 02:59:102 (1,3) -

Hinsvar wrote:

did I just miss a massive amount of overmapping and bad patterns and

whoa I need to get shit done right
I think I'm ok with the DQ.

Feel free to poke me back (or not).

Secretpipe wrote:

I knew it ahah anyway ;_;

Secretpipe wrote:

gl for rerank

XeroiZi HD wrote:

1. 04:21:902 (2) - This object touches the HP Bar

Buretsu wrote:

hOi~
From my queue.
As I new in modding, i'll try my best.

You're map is really good, so I think it will be a short mod.

MOUNTAIN

02:03:559 (1,2,1,2) - I think it would be good, if you're increase space between this notes. The current pattern looks/plays better imo.

02:28:931 (1) - after this slider, add something like this http://puu.sh/m9YPV/6e4660c268.jpg I only mapped to the piano, so it will be kinda awkward to play D:

02:59:359 (2) - you really need note here? cause i don't hear any beat on this place. Fixed!

03:08:445 (6) - same. would be good if you just delete this note, and replace 03:08:359 (5) ? Fixed!

03:48:131 (6) - stack slider's start with 03:46:759 (5) The spacing will be too big.

04:27:731 (4) - stack with 04:26:530 (6) Fixed!


Not really big mod, cause I can't find something else, but I hope it was usefull.
Good luck. <3

1. 00:27:559 (2,4) - consider rotating 2 so it flows better into 3, 4 will have to be moved, ex: http://puu.sh/mbPA7/2ccc06f862.jpg
2. 01:56:188 - the gap is a bit out of place imo, how about placing a circle here for vocals?
3. 02:36:388 (3) - i don't hear anything in the music that supports this circle :C consider removing it
4. 02:40:588 (3) - same for this extended slider, no reason it needs to be extended, and it has a similar rhythm as 02:37:845 (3), which is only a 1/2 slider
5. 03:15:559 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - imo, since there are drums here and it's a new phrase in the music, this pattern should have a different design and pattern than 03:14:702 (4,5,6,7). Maybe you can start off with a small distance and then increase it? example in your map: 03:59:102 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1)
6. 03:18:302 (1) - consider changing this into a 1/3 repeating slider to fit the beats in the music
7. 03:23:788 (1,2) - make parallel since they are pretty close together? and consider NCing 2 to make the slider velocity change more obvious
8. 03:31:674 (1,1) - make parallel?
9. 03:39:131 (1) - how about starting the spinner at 03:39:645? that is where the singer says "oh", or maybe start it at 03:39:559, since that is where the wind-up sound starts to play

Raose wrote:

hello! o/

[Mountain]

1. 00:27:559 (2,4) - consider rotating 2 so it flows better into 3, 4 will have to be moved, ex: http://puu.sh/mbPA7/2ccc06f862.jpg I actually thinks it's better like it already is, it makes it more challenging and interesting flow.
2. 01:56:188 - the gap is a bit out of place imo, how about placing a circle here for vocals? I will consider this one.
3. 02:36:388 (3) - i don't hear anything in the music that supports this circle :C consider removing it
4. 02:40:588 (3) - same for this extended slider, no reason it needs to be extended, and it has a similar rhythm as 02:37:845 (3), which is only a 1/2 slider
5. 03:15:559 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - imo, since there are drums here and it's a new phrase in the music, this pattern should have a different design and pattern than 03:14:702 (4,5,6,7). Maybe you can start off with a small distance and then increase it? example in your map: 03:59:102 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) I changed this part, to make it fit more
6. 03:18:302 (1) - consider changing this into a 1/3 repeating slider to fit the beats in the music
7. 03:23:788 (1,2) - make parallel since they are pretty close together? Looks better like this. and consider NCing 2 to make the slider velocity change more obvious
8. 03:31:674 (1,1) - make parallel? Same reason for the above.
9. 03:39:131 (1) - how about starting the spinner at 03:39:645? that is where the singer says "oh", or maybe start it at 03:39:559, since that is where the wind-up sound starts to play Kinda fixed it by mapping the whole thing.

hope my mod is helpful!!

Strategas wrote:

alright lets do this

[Veela <3]

00:22:759 (1) -kinda yuck, you can improve 00:23:274 (2,3) - blanket if you make them equaly distanced at blanket range. uh not sure how to explain lol This can't be fixed that well without changing the second slider, so i'll keep it.
00:24:817 (1,1,1) - this makes your whole beginning rather inconsistent as these are the only sliders you emphasize through velocity changes, though I don't find them to be that strong compared to the rest
now I looked at it again and found it even more weird that you only follow the vocals in the beginning. from 00:25:502 (1) - you start to finally follow the beat which imo you should do at the beginning aswell. Fixed!
00:25:502 (1,2,3) - so um you start this patern then suddenly switch to 00:26:188 (1,2) - 00:26:702 (1,2) - rather continue doing 00:25:502 (1,2,3) - with the slider and stacking thing, it will just make more sense and be more consistent and will make your patern structured and complete. The two parts are different, thats why i changed pattern.
00:27:559 (2) - then you can start new combo here after you change the above. also the only thing this slider achieves is asthetic thing, but flow wise you don't even follow it because of 00:27:902 (3) - It's to avoid the "too close" inconsistency, also i think the flow is just fine here.
00:28:759 (4,1) - kinda looks weird since it doesn't really blanket, but almost does it. and if you turn stacking on you'll see it's not so nice Better avoid making 1/2 sliders too curvy to fit with my style.
00:32:702 (3) - you could possibly make this into at 3/4 slider to follow the intrument there as you do with your other sliders I'll keep it like it is, because there's a sound on the first circle in the triple.
00:35:959 (2) - suddenly you change what you follow with the sliders, why? there's nothing on this beat that is so important unless I'm deaf. 00:36:817 (5) - 00:37:159 can use 1/4 slider here aswell. It's mostly to avoid the boring repeats, and i don't think it's much trouble. And for the other part to add, i follow the vocal, so it would be a bit random imo.
00:41:445 (2) - can try to make use of this slider be blanketed by the stream before Not really the big blanket master, but i like it like this when it's stacked.
00:41:959 (7) - move this 1 pixel left please now it really bugs me xd Fixed!
00:45:045 (2) - fits much better as slider to follow the wub whatever thing. Not really wub on this part, there's already plenty of 3/4 sliders. xD
00:45:902 (1) - slider looks off, rather use something like 00:47:788 (1) - Fixed!
00:49:845 (5,6) - 01:06:302 (2,3) - you know if you made these sliders at the same angle it would look much better atm 00:49:845 (5) - looks kinda crap lol, it's to make the flow better.
00:51:388 (1) - uh well slider end on strong beat. I know you follow the vocal, but can't ignore it As you said, following the vocal.
00:51:902 (3,4,5) - don't think these slider look that well together, try using another combination Wat, they look fine in my eyes.
00:56:359 (4) - 01:01:674 (3) - strange you emphasize this beat instead of 00:56:531 (5) - 01:02:017 (5) - considering this patern 00:59:274 (3) - is emphasized the most. also regarding 01:01:502 (2,3,6,7) - one of them you emphasize hard the other stack, Will consider this.
01:09:131 (2) - overmap Fixed!
01:11:445 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - these two bursts can be better emphasized if the second one is more spaced (or first one less) Fixed!
01:11:445 (1,1) - blanket off Fixed!
01:15:217 (4) - clap slider end Whistle slider end*
01:19:845 (6) - emhpasis and flow is destroyed on this drum beat with the stack Fits with the vocal.
01:28:245 (2,1) - blanket? Intentionally not.
01:31:331 (1) - meh just use the same shape as 01:30:302 (2) - Boring =.=
01:34:074 (1) - so here you increase sv, but 01:31:331 (1) - decrease uhh. The first one is more obvious in the music.
01:31:845 (2) - this is spaced so much for no reason Fixed a bit..
01:39:559 (1) - this one looks better than the rest of these type you used Thanks lol
01:40:931 (2,3) - these don't blanket that well Fixed!
01:42:044 (4,6) - I think I saw this in the dq but yea overmap Fixed!
01:42:302 (1,4,6,1) - blankets at different range don't look that appealing Still like it as it is.
01:54:388 (6,8) - more overmap Fixed!
01:56:188 - 01:58:931- kind of empty Fits with the music.
01:56:359 (1,2) - could try putting these objects elsewhere to make it less crowded there Will break the flow.
01:59:102 (2,3,4) - the 1/4 and 1/2 gap look almost the same, better make it more obvious Fixed!
02:01:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - not exactly sure what you follow here, but I think you can follow it in a more interesting way. same for the later part I follow the main beat.
02:34:759 (1,2,3) - I think you could use this patern more in this section Naah, don't need to ^^
02:47:102 (2) - random clap on slider end, you didn't use before or later Fixed!
03:03:217 (1) - there's a whistle on the whole slider Fixed!
03:08:188 (4,5,6,7) - emphasis is not very consistant Fixed!
03:19:331 (5) - nc if you do it here 03:20:702 (1) - Removed that NC.
03:50:702 - if I follow your logic correctly there should be a 1/4 slider here aswell Nope
04:21:559 (2) - this jump could be smaller for a better build up it's hand straining atm Fixed!

there's a lot of unnecessary overlaping, which makes a lot of paterns look too messy, too many tbh to point them out. I guess 90% of them are intentional to make it more interesting and challenging.

I can see you put a lot of work in this map and it's really fun, however these days map asthetics are more important than gameplay to rank a map, so make sure you fix those so people can enjoy playing your map when it's ranked. Also sorry for any gramatical mistakes or dumb sentences since I'm really sleepy lol. Good luck! Thanks!

Rameses B and Veela are the best couple btw xdxdxdxd

1. The beatmap is good, but I feel lots of problems with consistency in note placements, as this is a DnB marathon map, one of the main things that are REALLY important, is the aesthetics and looks of the map that must feel really clean and have a nice flow, which often feels wrong in this map for me (I'm NOT saying it's a bad map, it's an awesome map, I'm just emphasizing that it could be better), so the suggestions I'll give below aren't something like ''This is bad, change.'' but something more like ''I think this can be improved if you (insert comment here)'', So I hope this mod helps you <3

1. 00:22:759 (1,2,3) - I get the impression that this was supposed to be a blanket, but the shape of 1 doesn't really make any sense with 2 and the little overlap on 3 IMO is useless and bad because it doesn't even is balanced in his curve...so I highly suggest you adjust shape of 1 or 1 and 3.
   
2. 00:24:302 (4) - This could've been stacked on the start of 00:22:759 (1) - for more consistency in note placements. If you apply this, you could also rotate 00:24:817 (1) - -25° Clockwise with selection centre(and adjust next notes) so it doesn't touch previous location of 00:24:302 (4) - . OR you could also make his curve to the left, so this whole section have a cleaner look Like this for example
   
3. 00:30:645 (4) - If you place it somewhere like x:248 y:164, you have a much flow-friendly and cleaner look on this section, which also will have a cleaner and better motion of the jumps to 00:30:988 (1) - As you can clearly see here, and if you do that, you could also use the curve from 00:30:988 (1) - to blanket the note 4(of course you'll need to adjust its position slightly), making this shape less random and giving it more purpose to the whole pattern, AND that would also remove the location overlap with 00:31:502 (3) - that imo was random and little ugly >.<
   
4. 00:40:074 (5) - You could either stack this already with the tail from 00:39:217 (1) - or just place a bit higher the entire pattern, both would make it a bit more clean and structured
   
5. 00:41:188 (8,1) - This ending moment of stream, would look a bit more consistent if you place the stream in a position where these notes could stack with the previous location from 00:39:902 (4) - , in this case, minor adjustments from the previous pattern could do it easily
   
6. 00:41:445 (2) - place a bit more higher for a better blanket Like this?
   
7. 00:46:931 (5) - This makes the pattern look a bit messy because it overlaps too much with the locations from 00:47:445 (1,1) - and the blanket isn't right with 00:47:102 (6,7,8,9) - . So I would suggest you adjust the direction that 00:46:417 (3) - is facing, than place 00:46:759 (4,5) - in better positions where they don't seem messy
   
8. 00:47:445 (1,1) - Although I understand that 00:47:788 (1) - Makes a blanket with 00:48:474 (4) - . It looks messy because his tail makes we thing that it's blanketed with 00:47:102 (6,7,8,9) - , but it's not, and his shape constrasts with 00:47:445 (1) - which doesn't look good, so I highly suggest you adapt this >.<
   
9. 00:49:159 (3) - It overlaps a little the previous location from 00:48:302 (3) - and makes it look a bit messy, so I suggest you place this a bit more to the right or anywhere you feel like
   
10. 00:49:331 (4) - This would have a better flow and better look if you just stack ir already with 00:48:474 (4) -
    
11. 00:49:502 (1,2,3,4,5) - This could've been blanketed better with 00:48:988 (2) - , and I also suggest you place 00:48:645 (5) - a bit higher so it doesn't touch the position of the notes on the stream, will give a much a cleaner look
    
12. 00:50:017 (6) - Just an suggestion...what do you think if you make a slight curve in this so it will make a little blanket with the stream? Will not change a lot in gameplay, but will surely look more sexy. 00:49:845 (5) - Could also have a curve, but for the opposite side (the side where the stream is facing)
    
13. 00:50:188 (1) - You could either stack it with 00:49:331 (4) - or just place it more to the left for a cleaner look
    
14. 00:50:702 (3) - Why not just stack with any of the notes from the stream? making it more clean
    
15. 00:51:388 (1) - I know that you stacked his tail with the head of the other slider, but the strong curve that it forces on aim seems a bit way too forced imo. Maybe stack his head instead? will make a more open curve which is way more aim-friendly and also have a more constant DS. That would also remove the useless overlap of positions with 00:52:245 (4) - which makes it look kinda random
    
16. 00:52:245 (4) - Maybe just stack it already with 00:51:217 (6) - ? Would still have the same DS as 00:52:588 (5,6) - and would also look more polished
    
17. 00:53:274 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This looks really messy, a simple way of making it more clean is by repositioning 00:53:617 (3,4,6) - a bit , so it looks more polished Like this ?
    
18. 00:54:302 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again, for a better looking, you could place it more below so it doesn't overlaps with the previous position from 00:53:274 (1) - which also looks useless...You could make the stream start at x:80 y:228 for example
    
19. 00:57:217 (4) - move it just a bit to the left so it doesn't overlaps with the position of 00:56:188 (3) -
    
20. 00:57:731 (6) - The tail of this slider overlaps a lot with the positions from 00:56:874 (1,2,3) - which makes it look reallllyy messy and random...there are plenty of space available in the playfield, so strong and random overlaps like this makes it look really ugly and unpolished, which imo DnB maps (specially the long ones) must have at maximum, which is clean patterns and polished placements...One good way of solving this, is by positioning 00:57:731 (6,1) - more below and make the head of 1 stack with the old triplets Like this (ignore the single note 4 randomly placed in the corner xD) but that would require you to adjust the other notes, especially the note 4
    
21. 00:58:759 (1) - stack it's tail with the head of 00:58:074 (1) - already? his overlap is useless xD
    
22. 00:59:959 (1) - stack his tail with tail from 00:58:759 (1) - ?
    
23. 01:01:159 (1) - blanket his start with the stream? this pattern suggests an blanket, but there are no blankets
    
24. 01:05:445 (1) - Stack tail with 01:05:102 (4) - ? the little overlap will be gone and it will give more clean look
    
25. 01:08:874 (7,8) - Move both to the right for more clean look? Like this?
    
26. 01:09:902 (5) - Place a bit higher to remove the useless overlap with 01:09:045 (8) - ?
    
27. 01:10:931 (3,5) - adjust their positions to something Like this for more clean look? Tail from 5 is stacked with the single note 01:10:074 (6) - and 3 is placed just a bit more below
    
28. 01:12:131 (1,4) - Fix blanket

Seto Kousuke wrote:

[Overall]

1. The beatmap is good, but I feel lots of problems with consistency in note placements, as this is a DnB marathon map, one of the main things that are REALLY important, is the aesthetics and looks of the map that must feel really clean and have a nice flow, which often feels wrong in this map for me (I'm NOT saying it's a bad map, it's an awesome map, I'm just emphasizing that it could be better), so the suggestions I'll give below aren't something like ''This is bad, change.'' but something more like ''I think this can be improved if you (insert comment here)'', So I hope this mod helps you <3

[Montanhas]

1. 00:22:759 (1,2,3) - I get the impression that this was supposed to be a blanket, but the shape of 1 doesn't really make any sense with 2 and the little overlap on 3 IMO is useless and bad because it doesn't even is balanced in his curve...so I highly suggest you adjust shape of 1 or 1 and 3. Fixed!
   
2. 00:24:302 (4) - This could've been stacked on the start of 00:22:759 (1) - for more consistency in note placements. If you apply this, you could also rotate 00:24:817 (1) - -25° Clockwise with selection centre(and adjust next notes) so it doesn't touch previous location of 00:24:302 (4) - . OR you could also make his curve to the left, so this whole section have a cleaner look Like this for example Remade this whole part.
   
3. 00:30:645 (4) - If you place it somewhere like x:248 y:164, you have a much flow-friendly and cleaner look on this section, which also will have a cleaner and better motion of the jumps to 00:30:988 (1) - As you can clearly see here, and if you do that, you could also use the curve from 00:30:988 (1) - to blanket the note 4(of course you'll need to adjust its position slightly), making this shape less random and giving it more purpose to the whole pattern, AND that would also remove the location overlap with 00:31:502 (3) - that imo was random and little ugly >.< Fixed!
   
4. 00:40:074 (5) - You could either stack this already with the tail from 00:39:217 (1) - or just place a bit higher the entire pattern, both would make it a bit more clean and structured Feels like it would be awkward to play, so I'll keep this.
   
5. 00:41:188 (8,1) - This ending moment of stream, would look a bit more consistent if you place the stream in a position where these notes could stack with the previous location from 00:39:902 (4) - , in this case, minor adjustments from the previous pattern could do it easily Same as above.
   
6. 00:41:445 (2) - place a bit more higher for a better blanket Like this? Inconsistent spacing for the next stream.
   
7. 00:46:931 (5) - This makes the pattern look a bit messy because it overlaps too much with the locations from 00:47:445 (1,1) - and the blanket isn't right with 00:47:102 (6,7,8,9) - . So I would suggest you adjust the direction that 00:46:417 (3) - is facing, than place 00:46:759 (4,5) - in better positions where they don't seem messy This pattern is triangle pattern, it plays well, and it fits well imo. So I'll keep it like it already is.
   
8. 00:47:445 (1,1) - Although I understand that 00:47:788 (1) - Makes a blanket with 00:48:474 (4) - . It looks messy because his tail makes we thing that it's blanketed with 00:47:102 (6,7,8,9) - , but it's not, and his shape constrasts with 00:47:445 (1) - which doesn't look good, so I highly suggest you adapt this >.< Doesn't make sense to change this part, it will only ruin it more lol.
   
9. 00:49:159 (3) - It overlaps a little the previous location from 00:48:302 (3) - and makes it look a bit messy, so I suggest you place this a bit more to the right or anywhere you feel like Fixed!
   
10. 00:49:331 (4) - This would have a better flow and better look if you just stack ir already with 00:48:474 (4) - The jump would be bigger which doesn't fit very well.
    
11. 00:49:502 (1,2,3,4,5) - This could've been blanketed better with 00:48:988 (2) - , and I also suggest you place 00:48:645 (5) - a bit higher so it doesn't touch the position of the notes on the stream, will give a much a cleaner look Doesn't really play well, even if it will look at bit cleaner.
    
12. 00:50:017 (6) - Just an suggestion...what do you think if you make a slight curve in this so it will make a little blanket with the stream? Will not change a lot in gameplay, but will surely look more sexy. 00:49:845 (5) - Could also have a curve, but for the opposite side (the side where the stream is facing) Nah, not i like it when it's more straight than curved.
    
13. 00:50:188 (1) - You could either stack it with 00:49:331 (4) - or just place it more to the left for a cleaner look Already stacking with something.
    
14. 00:50:702 (3) - Why not just stack with any of the notes from the stream? making it more clean Fixed!
    
15. 00:51:388 (1) - I know that you stacked his tail with the head of the other slider, but the strong curve that it forces on aim seems a bit way too forced imo. Maybe stack his head instead? will make a more open curve which is way more aim-friendly and also have a more constant DS. That would also remove the useless overlap of positions with 00:52:245 (4) - which makes it look kinda random I like it better as it is.
    
16. 00:52:245 (4) - Maybe just stack it already with 00:51:217 (6) - ? Would still have the same DS as 00:52:588 (5,6) - and would also look more polished Really awkward.
    
17. 00:53:274 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This looks really messy, a simple way of making it more clean is by repositioning 00:53:617 (3,4,6) - a bit , so it looks more polished Like this ? Fixed!
    
18. 00:54:302 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again, for a better looking, you could place it more below so it doesn't overlaps with the previous position from 00:53:274 (1) - which also looks useless...You could make the stream start at x:80 y:228 for example The overlap is intentional.
    
19. 00:57:217 (4) - move it just a bit to the left so it doesn't overlaps with the position of 00:56:188 (3) - Kinda fixed..
    
20. 00:57:731 (6) - The tail of this slider overlaps a lot with the positions from 00:56:874 (1,2,3) - which makes it look reallllyy messy and random...there are plenty of space available in the playfield, so strong and random overlaps like this makes it look really ugly and unpolished, which imo DnB maps (specially the long ones) must have at maximum, which is clean patterns and polished placements...One good way of solving this, is by positioning 00:57:731 (6,1) - more below and make the head of 1 stack with the old triplets Like this (ignore the single note 4 randomly placed in the corner xD) but that would require you to adjust the other notes, especially the note 4 First of all, the overlap is intentional (most overlaps are.) and second of all, it will make the spacing harder which is unnecessary for this part of the song.
    
21. 00:58:759 (1) - stack it's tail with the head of 00:58:074 (1) - already? his overlap is useless xD Uh, intentional.
    
22. 00:59:959 (1) - stack his tail with tail from 00:58:759 (1) - ? Fixed!
    
23. 01:01:159 (1) - blanket his start with the stream? this pattern suggests an blanket, but there are no blankets Yes, no blankets.
    
24. 01:05:445 (1) - Stack tail with 01:05:102 (4) - ? the little overlap will be gone and it will give more clean look Intentional overlap.
    
25. 01:08:874 (7,8) - Move both to the right for more clean look? Like this? Nah, fits fine here.
    
26. 01:09:902 (5) - Place a bit higher to remove the useless overlap with 01:09:045 (8) - ? Intentional.
    
27. 01:10:931 (3,5) - adjust their positions to something Like this for more clean look? Tail from 5 is stacked with the single note 01:10:074 (6) - and 3 is placed just a bit more below Well, this is also intentional, and i like it like as it is.
    
28. 01:12:131 (1,4) - Fix blanket Fixed!

So...I decided to stop right here because stuff like these were happening over and over and over again...sorry if I sounded rude at some point or looked like I'm trying to ''impose on you something''....it's just that lots of times the patterns looked messy and randomly placed...So based on all the stuff I pointed out above, if you at least agrees with 1 of them, search the entire map because they'll appear again other times...You can improve a lot of patterns to make them look more clean and polished without even changing the pattern at all, just by adjusting a little some notes. This would give the map a waaay more polished and clean look, which makes DnB maps what they are x]

I hope this helps you <3

Secretpipe wrote:

Mountain Dew

Aeril wrote:

hi m4m xd love your maps tochi Thanks x)
(most of these are going to be nazi aesthetic things xd) pls don hurt me

1. 00:52:588 (5,6) - why is this so spaced compared to the rest of the section? It's equally spaced lol
2. 01:09:045 (8,1) - why is this so close compared to the rest of the section? xd Fixed!
3. 02:35:445 (1,2) - why is this NCd? its part of the same notes as the combo before Fixed!
4. 02:37:159 (1) - maybe stack on 02:37:502 (2) to match 02:35:102 (3,1) or unstack 02:35:102 (3,1) - to fit the style of the rest of this section They're both unstacked?
5. 03:11:445 (1,2) - why these so close unlike the rest of the section? There's a part right after that, that's the same lol.
6. 03:12:045 (4,5) - ^ Same, also the rhythm on these are different from the others which can confuse players, so it's better to keep the spacing smaller here.
7. 03:19:331 (1) - why NC? still same notes NC, and removed NC many times on this in many mods xD I think i'll remove it..
8. 03:22:074 (6) - i think this looks better either stack or spaced a bit further than how close it is now Both too extreme lol.
9. 03:23:788 (1,1) - maybe make these parallel Intentional, i like it like this.
10. 03:31:674 (1,1) - ^ Same as above.
11. 03:32:874 (5) - move to y=76 so it comes straight off? Nah, kinda looks bad imo.
12. 05:28:244 (3) - NC maybe like 05:27:216 (1)? Fixed!
13. 05:29:273 (3) - ^

my god though this map plays so well

Yoges wrote:

[Mountain]

1. 00:28:502 (2,3) - Like these are 1/4 and you have a lot of other notes in this section that are 1/2 so why not lower the ds down to like 0.4x-0.3x and create something more stream like? It's not that hard to see that it's a small triple.
2. 00:32:702 (3,4) - Yeah that can be very easily mistaken for a 1/4 because you've stacked the 4 with the 2 and the 3. For an easy fix I'd just do something like what i suggested for 00:28:502 - and put an NC on the 4. Same as above, the 1/3 are much more spaced, so it would be random to make a small spaced 1/2 at this part.
3. 00:33:731 (1,2,3) - Like the 1 and 3 are both repeat sliders which lead me to mistake the 2 for a repeat slider. You also have a few streams in this section which causes a lot of confusion with the rhythm because you're trying to follow the vocals, high hats, drums and synths. General rule of thumb when making stuff like this, mix streams with kick sliders or repeats with streams, don't mix all three at once, remap this section following that rule and you'll find it's a lot easier to follow everything in the music that way. I'd suggest applying that to any other sections like this in the map. I will consider this, but i will keep it as it is because: Remember this is an Expert difficulty, it's allowed to map to everything as long as it fits and isn't overmapped, so i will highly keep this. I might change mind if a BN/QAT mentions it.
4. 01:44:359 (3) - NCs on all SV changes Fixed!
5. 01:47:274 (4,1) - Flow's a bit sharp and uncomfortable here. I'd just Ctrl+J the 1 and put it back where it was Did it on purpose, i think it plays better that way and less confusing imo.
6. 01:56:017 - Why're you ignoring the stream notes here? They're extremely low, and it feels weird to play it with streams there.
7. 03:28:588 (1,2,3) - That is just, like no one's going to be prepared for that. you're going from fast kick sliders suddenly to a much slower 1/2 triplet. I'd just turn those notes into a repeat. I don't see the problem here tbh, i've seen many people play it with success.
8. 04:44:702 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - The kick sliders here don't play very fluidly. There's not really much room to make it more fluidly here.

Zexous wrote:

good stuff here