I'd say 15k and under
Alternatively, care about pp and play harder maps you can fc so you can improve.CelegaS wrote:
Don't care about pp and rank, just play harder and harder map and play map you like.
Funnily enough, I've seen that doing this tends to stunt skill progression for most people. Just look at me. :VKheldragar wrote:
Alternatively, care about pp and play harder maps you can fc so you can improve.
Look at me.F1r3tar wrote:
Funnily enough, I've seen that doing this tends to stunt skill progression for most people. Just look at me. :VKheldragar wrote:
Alternatively, care about pp and play harder maps you can fc so you can improve.
Sad but true, pp is evil!F1r3tar wrote:
Funnily enough, I've seen that doing this tends to stunt skill progression for most people. Just look at me. :VKheldragar wrote:
Alternatively, care about pp and play harder maps you can fc so you can improve.
It's equivalent to potential pp gained from an SS. I have word from peppy himself that this is the case.Infevo wrote:
Stars are not equivalent to potential pp gained from an fc, though. The above is just a small hint how a player might end up spamming 4.5 stars with high consistency and acc.
Philosofikal wrote:
It's equivalent to potential pp gained from an SS. I have word from peppy himself that this is the case.Infevo wrote:
Stars are not equivalent to potential pp gained from an fc, though. The above is just a small hint how a player might end up spamming 4.5 stars with high consistency and acc.
I believe that it's max possible combo that goes into the factoring and not actual song length (correct me if i'm wrong). Also, isn't that already factored into the star difficulty?B1rd wrote:
OD + length. Then you have to factor in how hard the map is for its star rating. It's not that hard to figure out though.
Max poss combo doesnt denote total objects ? Learned something newKheldragar wrote:
I believe it's objects and not combo.
With 100 objects you can have anywhere from 100 to i dont even know how much combo, it all depends on slider tick rate and length of sliders used.pandaBee wrote:
Max poss combo doesnt denote total objects ? Learned something newKheldragar wrote:
I believe it's objects and not combo.