Mod as requested from Grune's modding queue
Feel free to implement or reject if you think this is useless ~~o(>_<)o ~~
Icon Bibliography
No emoticon in Black = normal suggestions based on rationale of modding given below~
o(≧v≦)o~~ = everything is good~
Σ( ° △ °|||)︴ = error / mistake / extremely recommended to be modified~
(⊙o⊙)? = unclear / questionable parts, thus cannot give a decisive recommendations~
O(∩_∩)O~ = other comments~
o(≧v≦)o~~ = everything is good~
Σ( ° △ °|||)︴ = error / mistake / extremely recommended to be modified~
(⊙o⊙)? = unclear / questionable parts, thus cannot give a decisive recommendations~
O(∩_∩)O~ = other comments~
General : o(≧v≦)o~~
Mapset Spread : o(≧v≦)o~~
Metadata : (⊙o⊙)?i trust you of course for metadata so i don't check >_<
Timing : o(≧v≦)o~~
Audio (192kbps or lower) : o(≧v≦)o~~
Bg (1366x768 or 1024 x 768) : o(≧v≦)o~~
Hitsounding : o(≧v≦)o~~
Mapset Spread : o(≧v≦)o~~
Metadata : (⊙o⊙)?i trust you of course for metadata so i don't check >_<
Timing : o(≧v≦)o~~
Audio (192kbps or lower) : o(≧v≦)o~~
Bg (1366x768 or 1024 x 768) : o(≧v≦)o~~
Hitsounding : o(≧v≦)o~~
|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|
In general, I will mod based on these considerations ♪(^∇^*)
( X ) I will not take this into consideration when modding
( √ ) I will take this into consideration when modding
( ? ) I might unconsciously take this into consideration when modding
Pitch Agreement / Relevancy : ( √ )
Hand Balancing : ( √ )
(Consistent) Patterning : ( √ )
Possibility of Long Notes Abuse : ( √ )
Ghost Note : ( √ )
Suggestions / Opinion only : ( √ )
( X ) I will not take this into consideration when modding
( √ ) I will take this into consideration when modding
( ? ) I might unconsciously take this into consideration when modding
Pitch Agreement / Relevancy : ( √ )
Hand Balancing : ( √ )
(Consistent) Patterning : ( √ )
Possibility of Long Notes Abuse : ( √ )
Ghost Note : ( √ )
Suggestions / Opinion only : ( √ )
EZ
i think this is better, vary the pattern? since this is not a song where you should take particular attention to PR all of the time, varying the pattern would be better imo
http://puu.sh/iqER1/01a05ff125.png
00:27:438 (27438|0,27438|7,27438|2,27637|3,27637|5) - reverse the placement...
00:27:637 - should be 3 here instead of two.... end note emphasis >_<"
00:28:431 (28431|8,28630|6,28829|5,29027|3,29226|1,30021|7,30219|5,30418|4,30617|2,30815|0) - ctrl H, PR... you make it backward on purpose?
01:12:736 (72736|3,72736|6,73133|5,73531|3,73531|6,73928|5,74325|3,74325|6) - care to vary the pattern? a lot of placing for 9k varying the placement would be better esp for newbie imo
01:17:703 - add 2 note here? better layering imo
http://puu.sh/iqER1/01a05ff125.png
00:27:438 (27438|0,27438|7,27438|2,27637|3,27637|5) - reverse the placement...
00:27:637 - should be 3 here instead of two.... end note emphasis >_<"
00:28:431 (28431|8,28630|6,28829|5,29027|3,29226|1,30021|7,30219|5,30418|4,30617|2,30815|0) - ctrl H, PR... you make it backward on purpose?
01:12:736 (72736|3,72736|6,73133|5,73531|3,73531|6,73928|5,74325|3,74325|6) - care to vary the pattern? a lot of placing for 9k varying the placement would be better esp for newbie imo
01:17:703 - add 2 note here? better layering imo
NM
00:17:703 - add a note here? suits better with an extra piano emphasis
00:18:498 (18498|5,18895|4) - ^ same as above
00:24:061 (24061|2,24458|1,24855|1,25253|3) - how about using 2 as well for same reason above?
atm i know that you're following the beat with 2 notes and the rest with 1,
but using 2 as well imo wiould be better in terms of layering, no?
00:25:650 (25650|7,25749|6,25849|5,25948|4,26047|3,26147|2) - wrong placing, ctrl H and drag 1x to left. PR consideration
00:36:577 - use 2 notes here just like 00:35:782 -
00:36:776 - 00:36:974 - why not express this piano here as well?
00:39:955 (39955|2,40153|5) - same with 00:38:365 (38365|3,38365|7,38564|2,38564|6) - no?
00:50:385 (50385|7,50385|4) - 2 here
00:51:974 (51974|7,51974|2,51974|5) - yet 3 here?
same emphasis, make it consistent >_<
00:58:630 (58630|4) - i think this starts at 00:58:431 -
01:01:610 (61610|5,61710|6,61809|7,61908|8,62405|5,62504|6,62604|7,62703|8) - reverse the stairs, PR consideration
01:17:504 - use 3 here, same exact emphasis with 01:17:703 -
00:18:498 (18498|5,18895|4) - ^ same as above
00:24:061 (24061|2,24458|1,24855|1,25253|3) - how about using 2 as well for same reason above?
atm i know that you're following the beat with 2 notes and the rest with 1,
but using 2 as well imo wiould be better in terms of layering, no?
00:25:650 (25650|7,25749|6,25849|5,25948|4,26047|3,26147|2) - wrong placing, ctrl H and drag 1x to left. PR consideration
00:36:577 - use 2 notes here just like 00:35:782 -
00:36:776 - 00:36:974 - why not express this piano here as well?
00:39:955 (39955|2,40153|5) - same with 00:38:365 (38365|3,38365|7,38564|2,38564|6) - no?
00:50:385 (50385|7,50385|4) - 2 here
00:51:974 (51974|7,51974|2,51974|5) - yet 3 here?
same emphasis, make it consistent >_<
00:58:630 (58630|4) - i think this starts at 00:58:431 -
01:01:610 (61610|5,61710|6,61809|7,61908|8,62405|5,62504|6,62604|7,62703|8) - reverse the stairs, PR consideration
01:17:504 - use 3 here, same exact emphasis with 01:17:703 -
yoshilove's EX
00:03:994 - use 4 notes here, same emphasis with 00:07:173 -
00:08:763 - same here >w<b
00:22:272 (22272|7,22272|2,22670|5,22670|3) - same emphasis with 00:21:478 - so make it consistent please >_<
00:23:067 - 3 notes enough here, doesn't make any sense to use 4 since earlier 4 has more emphasis ;w;
00:33:001 - audible piano sound, why omitted here ;w;
00:35:981 - 00:36:180 - these here as well
00:51:676 - 00:52:272 - use 4 notes here, clear different emphasis with 00:51:974 -
00:56:445 - use 3 or 2 notes here.... very loud beat. yet you use 3 here 00:53:266 -
01:00:815 - use 3, same emphasis with 00:59:623 -
01:02:802 - 3 here.... emphasis on beat ;w;
01:05:981 - also here
01:17:504 (77504|6,77504|8,77703|5,77703|3) - this should have 3 notes just like 01:17:107 - same exact emphasis
01:25:849 - 01:26:643 - utilising 2 notes here would make more sense imo
01:21:279 (81279|8,81378|7,81478|6,81577|5,81676|4,81776|3,81875|2) - i cannot see which sound you're representing here ;w;
00:08:763 - same here >w<b
00:22:272 (22272|7,22272|2,22670|5,22670|3) - same emphasis with 00:21:478 - so make it consistent please >_<
00:23:067 - 3 notes enough here, doesn't make any sense to use 4 since earlier 4 has more emphasis ;w;
00:33:001 - audible piano sound, why omitted here ;w;
00:35:981 - 00:36:180 - these here as well
00:51:676 - 00:52:272 - use 4 notes here, clear different emphasis with 00:51:974 -
00:56:445 - use 3 or 2 notes here.... very loud beat. yet you use 3 here 00:53:266 -
01:00:815 - use 3, same emphasis with 00:59:623 -
01:02:802 - 3 here.... emphasis on beat ;w;
01:05:981 - also here
01:17:504 (77504|6,77504|8,77703|5,77703|3) - this should have 3 notes just like 01:17:107 - same exact emphasis
01:25:849 - 01:26:643 - utilising 2 notes here would make more sense imo
01:21:279 (81279|8,81378|7,81478|6,81577|5,81676|4,81776|3,81875|2) - i cannot see which sound you're representing here ;w;
Excellent Beatmap!!! Nice Song!!! d(≧v≦)b~~
Good Luck for rank!! O(∩_∩)O
extra stuffs to make your beatmap more sophisticated
WARNING: CREDIT GOES TO RESPECTIVE USERS, I DID NOT CLAIM ANY RIGHTS TO THEIR WORKS!
hitsound tutorial + download pack
LordRaika's Hitsound Guide
wants to improve your background / audio / video? visit the link below v
Ringating's BG, Audio and Video Improvement Queue
wants to improve / add video for your beatmap? visit the link below v
Shad0w1and's HD Video Encoding Queue
tools made by Agka for SV / BPM changes calculator (?)