o/
Gracias eh :p
- insane
- 00:06:105 (1) - remove nc?
- 00:07:967 (10,11) - tbh don't feel like this should be stacked because the strong beat on 00:08:173 (11) - plays quite different than this 00:09:622 (10,11) - (ok. rythm changes and there's that triplet but I think you can manage to make it work
- 00:10:863 (7,8,9) - ctrl+g maybe? makes more sense with previous flow from 00:10:036 (1,2,3) -
- 00:07:967 (10,11) - 00:11:277 (10,11) - both plays the same but drum beats are different hm
- 00:12:105 (5,6,7,8) - maybe rotate this like http://prntscr.com/g3pryx because these notes doesn't have that piano sound of 00:11:691 (1,2,3,4) -
- 00:12:518 (1,2,3,4,5) - something similar i'd say since beats are different so.. they shouldn't play exactly the same as a linear stream (feel like 00:12:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - should have more spacing but.. thats your decision)
- 00:14:794 (4,5) - I think that you should increase spacing on 00:14:794 (4,5) - so it makes more sense when 00:18:105 (6,1) - came in, since.. they're
- like the same thing, but the spacing it's quite similar, I understand the reason behind it but it's quite different
- 00:22:449 (7) - the pitch of the sound on 00:22:449 (7) - it's ehh lower, than 00:21:622 (5) - but 00:22:242 (6,7) - has more spacing than 00:21:622 (5,6) - so it kinda.. doesn't make much sense to me even if it's slow map and all.. easy fix would be swap sliders
- 00:24:725 (1,2,3) - spacing here should be more than the rest of the map previously, the song is building up its intensity to this point 00:24:725 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - but the spacing hasnt really changed, it's the same as before but you can clearly hear that the song it's quite more intense here
- 00:26:587 - imo the sliders from here should be slower
- 00:51:415 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think that this stream should have less spacing than the next one
- 01:05:898 (9) - there's a missing beat on 01:06:053 - make the reverse longer
- 01:06:725 (2) - should do ctrl+g, because it's strong sound, and also, the spacing would make more sense with 01:07:139 (3,4,5) - because rn the spacing it's really.. short
01:10:036 (2) - ^ - 01:11:691 (1,2,3,4,5) - imo this is out of place, the spacing here it's huge compared to the rest of the map, for example.. 00:24:725 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 01:11:691 (1,2,3,4,5) - quite different spacing even if the song it's more intense in the first section mentioned, context may be different, but still the difference it's too huge just to let it pass
- 01:15:622 (2,3) - feel like these should be stacked because it's kick sound, they should play different than 01:15:415 (1,4) -
01:17:070 (1,2,3,4) - ^ - 01:16:656 (2) - ctrl+g?
- 02:05:070 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - isnt the spacing here too much? feels like the same as 01:59:277 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
- 02:17:484 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - yeah this is not 1/4 I know you know it, but I feel like using some sliders here would be better, also works better for a buildup to the next section which is full of streams
- 02:31:449 (24,1) - awkward flow
- 02:29:070 (1) - this whole stream should have more spacing than the rest before, I don't have to explain why
- 02:35:794 (1) - tbh I dont feel like a spinner here it's the best idea but I understand why is it there, just wanted to mention
- 02:50:380 (4,5) - 02:52:656 (4,5) - 02:51:208 (6,7) - spacing is not clear in these, feel like 02:52:656 (4,5) - should have less spacing than the others and so, check the others
- 03:02:173 (1) - spacing in all these patterns should increase it's spacing consecutively, or at least, change it form 03:08:794 (1) - since there's a new sound
Hard - 00:38:173 (5) - nc?
- 00:52:863 (7) - imo this should be a single circle (and the next parts like this too) that slider would be confusing imo
couldn't find anything in normal and easy owo
hope this mod was helpful
gl
Gracias eh :p