897
Hello, I'd like to order 912 pizzas.AnnaRazy wrote:
*911, what's your emergency?*
Non-immediate visibility of the number is a defect found within just few photos (ex.: 922; 875). Despite the fact it's true it takes more seconds to detect what are the correct ciphers you must look at than in, other examples, 909 and 896, the problem preoccupying me is making someone else consume an additional futile amount of Wi-Fi data to load what sort of sigma vehicles and promotional online pics. :v On the competitive side, if one were a poster timing to seconds, then those aren't supposed to complicate visualisation, and checking previous number or thread post counter would be as shrimple as that. 🦐🍤Achromalia wrote:
yeah boxing them is a smarter compromise, and it helps for retaining some accessible visual readability that the images might not have ^^
It's true, there may be reasons in the subconcious that I didn't explain and that others, while observing or more likely quickly distractedly looking, have found, but were never elaborated across my thought route; dw. What's important is it doesn't constitute a nuisance inside the game, which is already confirmed by two of you, so, glad it doesn't for now!Achromalia wrote:
mm, the process there makes sense to me, it's a balance of priorities really and there's a fair range of reasons why a choice would be justified-- i don't particularly think too much about it but i do enjoy what you share through images anyway :>
Ducati > Royal Enfield (imo)Mysdibule wrote:
939Ducati SuperSport 939 S What I meant without offense is... What's up with the 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓀𝓎 emojis combo'ing?Rhythm32 wrote:
The models look sick. So I think I do.Mysdibule wrote:
935Porsche 935 Vaillant 1-20 Tamiya model Do you agree with them?Rhythm32 wrote:
✨😻❤️🔥💯🎉🤯😳😣😫😩😵💫😵💫😵💫😖😖😖😖💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦