Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

NU-KO - Pochiko no Shiawase na Nichijou (Long Version)

posted
Total Posts
236
show more
xChangJo
114 posts
Joined December 2013
xChangJo
Hi from my modding Queue, nice mapset and too cute song

Mod
Easy:

- I'm too bad to check easy difficult for this reason I pass for this time, sorry u.u

Normal:

- 00:12:478 (3) - Make the blanket with 00:11:853 (2) a little better.
- 00:29:978 (3) - Fix the stack with 00:28:415 (5).
- 00:41:540 (4) - This slider sound a little weird for me (I think is better to replace for a circle + slider or another pattern).
- 00:52:478 (5,6,7,1,2,3,1) - I really like this pattern but maybe is a little hard for a normal.
(well I don't know I think is better if you ask to another person or change for the pattern that you use in the second chorus).
- 01:04:509 (3) - Try to move this note a little down.
- 01:41:228 (4) - Make the blanket with 01:40:290 (2) a little better and fick stack with 01:38:728 (5).
- 01:51:228 (3) - Move this note a little down.
- 01:59:978 (3) - Eliminated the reverse arrow and add a circle.
- 02:23:728 (1) - Fix the blanket with 02:24:665 (2).

Hard:

- 00:26:696 (3) - Stack with 00:25:915 (9).
- 00:30:212 (5,7) - This notes are too hide in this pattern for a hard, maybe separated a little (?).
- 00:53:103 (1) - I think this slider sound a little weird with the voice.
- 01:11:228 (6) - New Combo.
- 01:45:603 (3,4) - Move this notes a little down for don't hide with 01:44:978 (1), and I don't think the jump with 01:46:071 (1) go to kill the players >.<
- 02:21:071 (5) - Stack with 02:19:821 (1).
- 02:55:603 (3,4,5) - this pattern is too unexpected when I play, and the rest of the map don't use similar pattern.

Light Insane:

- 00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think you need to make this a bit easy, because that part is more hard than the intro in the insane.
(is too unexpected for a player who only play the hard difficult too)
- 01:27:321 (1) - Stack the end with 01:26:853 (3).

Insane:

- 00:48:728 (2,4) - Why not make a blanket with 00:49:196 (3).
- 02:16:696 (10,11,12,13) - this pattern break the flow too hard.
- 03:01:384 (2) - Why not blanket with 03:00:837 (4), the same for 03:01:540 (3).
- 03:32:321 (1) - Make this slider more beatifull (?)

Extra:

- I can't pass this T-T but really nice start.
Starfy
1,046 posts
Joined November 2012
Starfy

xChangJo wrote:

Normal:

- 00:12:478 (3) - Make the blanket with 00:11:853 (2) a little better. Can you tell me how?
- 00:29:978 (3) - Fix the stack with 00:28:415 (5). Stacked already
- 00:41:540 (4) - This slider sound a little weird for me (I think is better to replace for a circle + slider or another pattern). I can't see any reason that is weird
- 00:52:478 (5,6,7,1,2,3,1) - I really like this pattern but maybe is a little hard for a normal. I think not really that hard lol
(well I don't know I think is better if you ask to another person or change for the pattern that you use in the second chorus).
- 01:04:509 (3) - Try to move this note a little down. I think no need, the distance is enough
- 01:41:228 (4) - Make the blanket with 01:40:290 (2) a little better and fick stack with 01:38:728 (5). How to blanket it already lol And stack is quite weird
- 01:51:228 (3) - Move this note a little down. [/color]
- 01:59:978 (3) - Eliminated the reverse arrow and add a circle. Nope I'm deliberate to do this
- 02:23:728 (1) - Fix the blanket with 02:24:665 (2). I think the blanket is really enough http://puu.sh/hO9vS/23e115b87e.jpg
Tks for mod
No change~
Last edited by Starfy , edited 1 time in total.
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103 - fixed
02:03:730 - snap to 02:03:728 - fixed
[/quote][/list]

[extra]
  1. 00:16:228 (6) - nc - fixed
  2. 00:22:321 (5) - nc - fixed
  3. 00:23:728 (1,2,3) - this play better - fixed
    SPOILER
    [img]http://puu.sh%20-%20fixed/hKy1P/791603def2.png[/img]
  4. 00:26:853 (4,5) - uhh spacing might be too close , kinda feel awkward , move (5) to x40 y216
  5. 00:32:321 (4,5) - spacing not really good here this one could use more spacing , try place like this - fixed
    SPOILER
  6. 00:37:009 (5,7) - not good overlap , try this - fixed
    SPOILER
  7. 00:56:071 (1,2,3) - try place like this for better flow - fixed
    SPOILER
  8. 01:24:665 (4) - try place this at x232 y144 for better flow here 01:24:353 (3,4,5) - - fixed
  9. 02:06:853 (1,2,3,4) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them - fixed
  10. 02:47:946 (4,5) - , 02:48:259 (6,7) - better spacing them like what you did here 02:47:634 (2,3) - it make sense more - fixed
[insane]

  1. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

    Snapping
    03:12:764 (2) - Unsnapped circle. - fixed

    Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
    00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103 - fixed
    02:03:730 - snap to 02:03:728 - fixed
  2. 00:22:165 (4) - try place this at x180 y40 for better flow - fixed
  3. 00:38:728 (1,2,3,4) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them - fixed
  4. 00:50:759 (9,10) - try place like this for better flow - fixed
    SPOILER
  5. 01:24:196 (3) - try place this at x208 y128 for better flow - fixed
  6. 01:25:915 - should map this beat cus it sound so strong - fixed
  7. 01:53:103 (4,5,6) - try place like this for better flow - fixed
    SPOILER
  8. 02:18:571 (8) - try place this at x128 y188 for better flow - fixed
  9. 02:26:384 (1,2,3) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them - fixed
  10. 02:28:415 (4,5,6) - should make consistent so the flow here is better - fixed
[light insane]
  1. hmm..I think this doesn't looks like light insane or anything because the way you use flow which not really like easy to read imo flow should be a bit easier to read than insane , try not to do something like this 00:12:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - , 00:23:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - , etc it really hard to read also you might need to make spacing a bit more consistent so it will be more like light insane - fixed all the antijumps

  2. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

    Snapping

    Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
    00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103 - fixed

  3. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

    Spinner Length
    02:29:353 (1) - This spinner is 625 ms long, which is shorter than 750 ms; check that it gets at least 1000 on auto. I'm too lazy to check lol - fixed
  4. 00:31:696 (2) - x372 y312 for better flow and consistent spacing here 00:31:228 (1,2,3) - - fixed
  5. 00:57:634 (1,2,3,4) - antijumps might be hard to read here, better spacing them - fixed
  6. 01:22:478 (1,2,3,4) - ^ - fixed
  7. 02:13:571 (1,2,3,4,5) - antijumps might be hard to read here, better spacing them or stacking instead - fixed
  8. 02:52:165 (3) - try place this at x72 y160 for better flow and consistent spacing here 02:51:696 (2,3,1) - - fixed
  9. 03:27:946 (2) - ctrl+g for better flow here 03:27:321 (1,2) - - fixed
  10. 03:42:946 (4) - try place this at x124 y292 for better flow and consistent spacing here 03:42:790 (3,4,5) - - fixed
ok I guess I will mod only 3 diffs but not worry I will give some tips about mapping high diff cus I think the 3 diffs here is have a bit some problem that need to consider

spacing : when it come to spacing you need to make sure that spacing there make sense with the music like when you find beat that sound strong it better to do jumps there so it would feel much better example here in extra 00:12:165 (6,1) - this place is really great to do jumps thing here while this one is not 00:12:790 (3,4) - why ? because if you listen at (4) beat it not really feel that much emphasized so what people get when playing that jumps is an awkward feeling big jumps is not even good tho since if the beat is emphasized yes but if it not emphasized that much to fit the spacing there it still not really good idea so maybe you need to make sure that all jumps is reasonable and make sense with music I can give you advice here when you unusual whether the beat is emphasized or not just make spacing consistent and try not to bother with it as you map more you will understand how to emphasis various beat also antijumps is not a good choice at some point in insane diff 00:38:728 (1,2,3,4) - here try to compare between using antijumps and normally spacing here and you might get an idea in fact antijumps is really great to use only when you want emphasis something that reallyyyyy emphasized in the music so yea that how you use antijumps and yea one more thing

flow: as a player here myself I can say that the flow that really comfortable to play is "circular flow" and yea you map did have some nice flow and alos bad flow , here are nice flow that I find in extra diff 00:30:603 (7,8,1) - , 01:37:478 (1,2,3) - , 01:39:353 (6,7,8,9,10,1) - and here some bad flow 00:54:353 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - , 00:56:071 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - uhh idk how to talk about flow cus it's super subjective things here but if you can take a looks at some ranked maps from popular mappers you can get some ideas here this is the best I can help becuase actually I did try take a look at some popular mappers' maps or play them and try to learn how they create flow lol so it all about experience here if you take a looks at lots of nice maps you will actually get some ideas about flow

aesthetic: well this is the noticable things I can see mostly here you map just overlap notes a lots and I don't mean overlap are bad but some aren't looks nice in my view here some bad overlap in extra 00:56:071 (1,3) - (note touching slider like that is pretty something I can say that many people don't like how it look , try avoid them as possible) note which like overlap with slider or another circle eventhough it overlap like slightly like only the side by side it still not looking good here 02:17:321 (1,5) - 02:15:603 (5,8) - 02:10:759 (5,9) - it like something like unfinished overlap or something I would prefer something like this more 02:01:228 (1,1,1) - this one looks nice also this one too 02:52:790 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - looks nice and great like some nice picture lol , 01:44:353 (4,6,7,3,4,5) - ( try not to overlap notes like this as you can see there is empty space at lower left you can just move those notes to there instead of cluster together like that this can lead to bad flow too) , 01:45:759 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ( same as 01:44:353 (4,6,7,3,4,5) - there is empty at left why you don't go place those there instead) well about those overlap I keep ranting saying try imaging something like river it would make sense if river just flow on there way like what is it but when you overlap notes like that it just looks like a river which keep flowing in circle or flow at random way which not quite smooth yea so you would need to organize how you place notes so it could make the aesthetic of pattern more better also one more thing try not to spacing notes so close like what you did in hard here 00:17:478 (1,2,3,4) - here you can see it all close together now try compare with 00:21:228 (1,2,3,4) - see that the another looks a lots nice yea that how you spacing each notes you spacing them like this 00:21:228 (1,2,3,4,5) - to make it looks good not spacing them like this 00:17:478 (1,2,3,4) -

ahh ok I guess that the problem I can find here so you may want to consider those things I point out though so it make you improve in mapping skill a bit

good luck :)[/quote]

really thanks for the mod
because this is my first map that i want to rank
i will fix all the problem in my next map OWO
and i will remember all your advice of my map.
i fixed all the anti jump that you had mention, so hope you can keep help me to mod my map @@
thanks a lot for your modding :D
arronchu1207
804 posts
Joined December 2012
arronchu1207
Setsurei
[Chu's Easy]
default combo color? fixed ;w;
00:24:353 (1,2) - switch NC ok
00:33:415 (3,1) - overlap ok
00:56:853 (5) - make this 1/2 beat, and add note 00:57:321 - or shift (5) to 00:56:540 - and add note 00:57:321 - shift 5
01:27:165 (5,6) - overlap no
01:32:478 (1,2,3,4) - prevent stack on Easy diff because its confusing ok
01:58:103 (5,6,1) - overlap ok
02:01:228 (4,5,6,7) - same stacking issue ok
03:28:259 (3,4) - ^ no
03:40:290 (1,2) - ^ no
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

xChangJo wrote:

Hi from my modding Queue, nice mapset and too cute song

Mod
Hard:

- 00:26:696 (3) - Stack with 00:25:915 (9). - FIXED
- 00:30:212 (5,7) - This notes are too hide in this pattern for a hard, maybe separated a little (?). - maybe not
- 00:53:103 (1) - I think this slider sound a little weird with the voice.hit sound is GX's work @@
- 01:11:228 (6) - New Combo. - FIXED
- 01:45:603 (3,4) - Move this notes a little down for don't hide with 01:44:978 (1) - FIXED, and I don't think the jump with 01:46:071 (1) go to kill the players >.< - this is a slider OWO
- 02:21:071 (5) - Stack with 02:19:821 (1). - FIXED
- 02:55:603 (3,4,5) - this pattern is too unexpected when I play, and the rest of the map don't use similar pattern. - FIXED

Light Insane:

- 00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think you need to make this a bit easy, because that part is more hard than the intro in the insane.
(is too unexpected for a player who only play the hard difficult too) - FIXED
- 01:27:321 (1) - Stack the end with 01:26:853 (3). - FIXED

Insane:

- 00:48:728 (2,4) - Why not make a blanket with 00:49:196 (3).why need to blanket @@?
- 02:16:696 (10,11,12,13) - this pattern break the flow too hard.other modder mod this part like this so what can i change do you got a collapse text?
- 03:01:384 (2) - Why not blanket with 03:00:837 (4) - FIXED, the same for 03:01:540 (3).maybe not this note
- 03:32:321 (1) - Make this slider more beatifull (?) - FIXED

thanks dor the mod :)
Bewww
53 posts
Joined October 2012
Bewww
i'm dont think my mod help alot but i have few things:

Hard:
SPOILER
00:13:103 (5) - maybe this little change better ?
00:23:103 (7) - move to x:331 y:244
00:26:696 (3) - ^ x:140 y:98
00:33:415 (7) - ^ x:434 y:251
00:33:571 (8) - ^ x:359 y:277
00:39:978 (1) - dont think this is immportant bu mb dont curve this sldier so hard or do it as line?
01:53:571 (6) - same jumps same space? move to x:210 y:39
02:06:071 (4) - i think x:410 y:336 is better .
02:39:353 (1,2,3) - move it a bit left out sldier head for same spacing .
02:54:821 (4) - a bit right . like on 1 little step.
02:58:103 (3) - x:106 y:221 for better flow and same spacing

Light insane:
SPOILER
00:54:665 (6) - move it on x:113 y:110
01:18:259 (8) - ^ x:57 y:149
01:20:212 (2) - move ot for do 1 line with sldiers?

Same musci, same jump, same distance snap?
02:13:884 (2) - x:193 y:119
02:14:196 (3) - x:302 y:154
02:14:509 (4) - x:340 y:256
02:14:821 (5) - x:230 y:229

02:22:321 (7) - move it for better flow to x:385 y:247
02:41:071 (5) - ^ x:77 y:106
02:54:665 (5,6) - move it a bit left for god same spasing?

Insane:
SPOILER
01:28:728 (1,2) - may be better do like

for better flow.
02:18:571 (8) - move it on x:105 y:212 ?
02:23:415 (4) - curve it a bit more? move last point of slider from (x:379 y:170) to (x:362 y:178)
02:52:321 (1) - mb move it on x:241 y:347?
02:53:259 (3) - to close to slider i think what a bout move it on x:62 y:194 or somewhere around this point.
02:59:040 (2) - mb move a bit right? to x175 y:352
02:59:666 (5) - i think this is better
03:01:384 (2) - move it on x:400 y:174?
03:02:790 (1) - ^ x:76 y:116
03:08:103 (1) - what about dont curve so ahrd and smooth it?
03:30:603 (5) - move to x:168 y:28?

And sry if all my things was wrong or dont help you :D
If it help you also can mod my map https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/320526
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
[quote="Bewww"]i'm dont think my mod help alot but i have few things:

Hard:
SPOILER
00:13:103 (5) - maybe this little change better ?FIXED
00:23:103 (7) - move to x:331 y:244FIXED
00:26:696 (3) - ^ x:140 y:98maybe not
00:33:415 (7) - ^ x:434 y:251FIXED
00:33:571 (8) - ^ x:359 y:277FIXED
00:39:978 (1) - dont think this is immportant bu mb dont curve this sldier so hard or do it as line?FIXED
01:53:571 (6) - same jumps same space? move to x:210 y:39FIXED
02:06:071 (4) - i think x:410 y:336 is better .FIXED
02:39:353 (1,2,3) - move it a bit left out sldier head for same spacing .FIXED
02:54:821 (4) - a bit right . like on 1 little step.FIXED
02:58:103 (3) - x:106 y:221 for better flow and same spacingFIXED

Light insane:
SPOILER
00:54:665 (6) - move it on x:113 y:110FIXED
01:18:259 (8) - ^ x:57 y:149FIXED
01:20:212 (2) - move ot for do 1 line with sldiers?no

Same musci, same jump, same distance snap?
02:13:884 (2) - x:193 y:119FIXED
02:14:196 (3) - x:302 y:154FIXED
02:14:509 (4) - x:340 y:256FIXED
02:14:821 (5) - x:230 y:229FIXED

02:22:321 (7) - move it for better flow to x:385 y:247FIXED
02:41:071 (5) - ^ x:77 y:106FIXED
02:54:665 (5,6) - move it a bit left for god same spasing?what? is the same space@@

Insane:
SPOILER
01:28:728 (1,2) - may be better do likeFIXED

for better flow.
02:18:571 (8) - move it on x:105 y:212 ?FIXED
02:23:415 (4) - curve it a bit more? move last point of slider from (x:379 y:170) to (x:362 y:178)FIXED
02:52:321 (1) - mb move it on x:241 y:347?FIXED
02:53:259 (3) - to close to slider i think what a bout move it on x:62 y:194 or somewhere around this point.FIXED
02:59:040 (2) - mb move a bit right? to x175 y:352FIXED
02:59:666 (5) - i think this is betterFIXED
03:01:384 (2) - move it on x:400 y:174?no
03:02:790 (1) - ^ x:76 y:116FIXED
03:08:103 (1) - what about dont curve so ahrd and smooth it?maybe not
03:30:603 (5) - move to x:168 y:28?FIXED

i will mod your map, but i cant mod Easy diff @@, sorry about that
and your hard isnt finish so i wont mod either
and thanks for the mod :)
Narcissu
1,744 posts
Joined August 2012
Narcissu
random mod …… no kd (＞﹏＜)

這歌好洗腦啊

SPOILER

SPOILER
20:15 MoleAkarin: wocao
20:15 Narcissu: = =
20:15 Narcissu: 串跪了呢
20:15 MoleAkarin: 这连打
20:15 MoleAkarin: 没节奏么;w;
20:16 MoleAkarin: 这二连我第一次居然连过去了
20:17 Narcissu: ………………
20:17 Narcissu: 我還以為很簡單desu
20:20 Narcissu: - -
20:20 MoleAkarin: ;w;
20:21 Narcissu: 看上去要FC是不可能的？
20:21 MoleAkarin: 我觉得
20:21 MoleAkarin: 看脸
20:21 MoleAkarin: ;w;
20:21 MoleAkarin: 看脸
20:21 MoleAkarin: 可能
20:21 MoleAkarin: ;w;
20:21 Narcissu: 額……
20:21 Narcissu: 姐姐覺得做的怎麼樣
20:21 MoleAkarin: 短滑条我不擅长啊;w;
20:21 Narcissu: ;w;
20:21 MoleAkarin: 有几个地方
20:21 Narcissu: 我也不擅長 = =
20:21 MoleAkarin: 突然近了
20:21 MoleAkarin: 有点不顺手
20:22 MoleAkarin: 其他都还好
20:22 MoleAkarin: 初见杀也不太人性;w;
20:22 MoleAkarin: 那段连打挺一般的其他都挺好的;w
20:22 Narcissu: 唔……
20:22 MoleAkarin: 要rank了的话我会努力fc的.-.
20:22 MoleAkarin: 毕竟有pp;w;
20:23 Narcissu: 好誠實 = =
20:23 MoleAkarin: od8.7.....
20:23 MoleAkarin: ;w;
20:23 Narcissu: ;w;
20:23 Narcissu: 不說都不知道
20:23 MoleAkarin: 这个挺好听的啊;w;
20:23 Narcissu: 那這個ACC其實挺不錯的麼……
20:23 Narcissu: 嗯嗯
20:24 MoleAkarin: 节奏下的好吧.-.
20:24 MoleAkarin: 没有特别不顺的地方

[Extra]

03:02:790 - 這裡開始應該都是snap在 1/3 和1/2上面的，1/6都需要改掉

03:08:936 (4) - 應該是1/3長度

03:09:821 (1) - 結束在03:10:186 - ，這個開頭似乎真的是1/2 好奇怪啊= =

03:10:915 (4) - 應該是2/3長度

03:12:321 (3) - 開始在03:12:373 -

03:12:946 (4) - 應該在03:12:997 -

03:13:571 (6) - 後移1/6

我聽力不是很好……其他的不太確定 Orz

又長又這麼多難度很難rank的吧……先從單難度app或者短圖做起吧，習慣了rank需要的條件以後再做這個= =
Sakaue Nachi
558 posts
Joined September 2012
Sakaue Nachi
[Extra]
00:25:603 (5,6,7,8) - 这里间距再大点合适点
00:28:259 (1) - 这个直接叠在前面的4上
00:34:353 (3,4,5,6) - 这里突然用小间距有点违和
00:58:415， 02:14:665这里加个圈好点
01:09:821 (8) - 这个跳大点合适点
02:04:978 (1) - 这个向下弯好看点啊
03:04:873 (1) - 这里开始的一段有很多鼓音，感觉跟了比较合适，和人声一起跟也行

[Insane]
00:15:134 (1) - 叠在前面8上，是个惯用手法
00:25:915 (7) - 放到前面5上然后00:26:071 (8) - 放到346,362
01:37:009 (2,3) - ctrl+g吧
03:01:384 (2,3) - 同上
03:27:166 (7) - 移到185,346

[Light Insane]
00:49:196 (2) - 这个完全叠好点，你前面的部分都是完全叠的，一致好点
02:42:165 (4) - 同上
00:57:634 (1,2,3,4) - 这里要不间距大点要不间距很小很小
02:19:978 (1,2) - 02:20:603 (1,2) - 间距大点啊，这里是跳点这么小间距不舒服

其他那些没什么好说的good luck~
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
[Extra]

03:02:790 - 這裡開始應該都是snap在 1/3 和1/2上面的，1/6都需要改掉FIXED

03:08:936 (4) - 應該是1/3長度FIXED

03:09:821 (1) - 結束在03:10:186 - ，這個開頭似乎真的是1/2 好奇怪啊= =FIXED

03:10:915 (4) - 應該是2/3長度FIXED

03:12:321 (3) - 開始在03:12:373 - FIXED

03:12:946 (4) - 應該在03:12:997 - FIXED

03:13:571 (6) - 後移1/6FIXED

我聽力不是很好……其他的不太確定 Orz

又長又這麼多難度很難rank的吧……先從單難度app或者短圖做起吧，習慣了rank需要的條件以後再做這個= =[/quote]

好喔 謝謝MOD
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
[quote="Sakaue Nachi"][Extra]
00:25:603 (5,6,7,8) - 这里间距再大点合适点FIXED
00:28:259 (1) - 这个直接叠在前面的4上FIXED
00:34:353 (3,4,5,6) - 这里突然用小间距有点违和沒打算改@@
00:58:415， 02:14:665这里加个圈好点會對不到音樂
01:09:821 (8) - 这个跳大点合适点FIXED
02:04:978 (1) - 这个向下弯好看点啊FIXED
03:04:873 (1) - 这里开始的一段有很多鼓音，感觉跟了比较合适，和人声一起跟也行FIXED

[Insane]
00:15:134 (1) - 叠在前面8上，是个惯用手法FIXED
00:25:915 (7) - 放到前面5上然后00:26:071 (8) - 放到346,362 形狀會很奇怪
01:37:009 (2,3) - ctrl+g吧FIXED
03:01:384 (2,3) - 同上FIXED
03:27:166 (7) - 移到185,346FIXED

[Light Insane]
00:49:196 (2) - 这个完全叠好点，你前面的部分都是完全叠的，一致好点已經疊再是上面了@@?
02:42:165 (4) - 同上同上
00:57:634 (1,2,3,4) - 这里要不间距大点要不间距很小很小FIXED
02:19:978 (1,2) - 02:20:603 (1,2) - 间距大点啊，这里是跳点这么小间距不舒服FIXED

謝謝MOD :D
Xinchii
1,240 posts
Joined January 2011
Xinchii
嗨你好 From queue ~

好大致上的改進方向HW跟LK說了 , 所以我就不說廢話了
做個單Diff的mod騙kd會不會感覺很偷懶阿ㄏㄏ

[General]
  1. Starfy's Normal的LetterboxInBreaks忘記關惹
  2. 喔還有 , custom colour也不一樣 , 統一一下ㄅ
[Insane]
  1. 00:19:978 - 因為這段空白比較短 , 我覺得不太需要Break time @@ (其他Diff同樣建議)
  2. 00:37:790 (3) - 太靠近(1)的尾巴了 , 不太整齊 , 可以往旁邊移一些
    SPOILER
  3. 00:39:353 (5) - 這個音跟(3)是同樣強度的 , 但是(3)有個反跳的梗這邊沒有會覺得不太平衡
    還是建議改放個大一點的跳
  4. 00:40:290 (3,4) - 這邊之後的雙擊跟Ex難度不一樣 , 沒有跳梗來配合 , 所以玩的時候挺拘束的 , 而且紅線上的鼓拍也讓人很想敲
    比較建議把
    00:40:290 (3,4) - , 00:40:915 (4,5) - , 00:41:540 (4,5) -
    00:45:290 (3,4) - , 00:45:915 (4,5) - , 00:45:540 (4,5) -
    這幾個點分別做成1/4的短滑條 , 配合這個間距這樣的手感我個人覺得比較好 , 也跟Ex的節奏做個分別
    同時也配合這幾個點的Vocal有一點拉長的感覺 (我猜你是跟Vocalㄏㄏ)
  5. 00:59:821 (1) - Slider到長白線就可以停了 , 那邊有一個比較重的鑼聲 , 反而藍線上沒任何聲音
  6. 01:01:696 (3,4,5,6,7) - 為啥特地排的這ㄇ擠 ? 音樂好像也沒什ㄇ變
    覺得擠
  7. 01:11:228 (1,3) - 前面的梗還滿對稱中線的 , 這邊就放中線上吧 , 繼續對稱感覺比較整齊不會有歪一邊的感覺
    可以的話(2)也一起移動ㄅ
    SPOILER
  8. 01:14:978 - 跟00:19:978 - 一樣 , 消Break time?
  9. 01:22:790 (3,4) - 這2個調換位置如何loool ?
  10. 01:36:228 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 這邊的話 , 迴轉之後的(1,2,3,4)我個人會喜歡跟欠面慢慢錯開的擺放
    SPOILER
    一方面好讀 , 另一方面玩的時候感覺比較活潑些
    可以參考看看
  11. 01:40:603 (5) - 放個NC配合你的梗ㄅ
  12. 01:41:228 (1) - 可以的話這顆也擺跳吧 , 跟01:40:603 (5) - 的跳還有背景音樂作呼應會有4拍一跳的段落感很嗨
    不過倒不如說後面都Jump了這個點反而不跳很奇怪
  13. 02:59:040 (2,3,4) - 我還是不太鳥解為啥這邊要縮間距@__@
  14. 03:15:915 (4) - 這顆Slider是在1/6拍的地方結束喔 ---> 03:16:123 - <---這邊:3
    同時節拍換了 , 請使用NC作為提醒
  15. 03:17:478 - ㄜ這邊應該加個Note就可以回到1/4了
    參考:
    SPOILER
    目前的設法會有點不對拍的地方:
    ---03:17:790 - 這邊的白線有個鼓聲
    ---03:17:946 - 就我聽起來 , Vocal是從這邊開始的

Good luck ~! :P
Foreverends
992 posts
Joined July 2011
Foreverends
brbrbrbrbrbr afk 4個月的再開mod就獻給你了<333 (?
mod得可能有點爛請見諒<(_ _)>

Extra
00:11:540 (3,5) - 試試blanket? 然後感覺00:12:009 (5) - 可以再拉上一點
SPOILER
00:14:040 (3,5) - 兩個重?在一起感覺不太舒服x( 試試00:14:509 (5) - 放到大約x:476 y:72?
00:21:853 (3,1) - overlap之注意,把00:21:853 (3) - 拉上一至兩格吧 \:D/
00:22:790 (2) -
你看怎麼樣owo
00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 看到這梗直接跪了orz btw 00:25:603 (1) - Nc可以讓人有一個嶄新的體驗(?
00:29:353 (3,4,5) - 我較推崇三角形跳啊~~~
不錯吧owo(?
00:32:009 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 呃...就比較亂了一點,00:32:478 (1) - 先nc一下?
btw其實我建議將00:32:478 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 這一部分弄成六角形跳
概念圖
00:35:603 (3,4,5,6) - 感覺有點奇怪 ;w; 或將00:35:759 (4) - 放到00:35:290 (2) - 上面做個blanket吧~
00:36:853 (4,5,6,7) - 我覺得這有點太擠了啊;w; 稍為縮放一下吧(?)
大約
[img]https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3160158/img]
00:37:321 (7) - blanket得不太好><
00:38:728 (1,2,3,4) - 感覺這裡是沒梗了吧lol(?
00:49:196 (2) - 可以放遠一點試試~ try x:376 y:36 :D
00:49:353 (3,1) - overlap了比較沒有那麼好看
你覺得這個怎麼樣owo
01:01:540 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這個排版看起來比較不太好;w;
然後我把它弄成兩個四角型了_(:3
01:09:353 (5) - NC
01:12:478 (6) - NCCCC~
01:39:353 (6) - 用circle代替吧~
01:52:010 (10,11,12,1) - 就這樣連過去浪費了啊QAQ~既然前面都縱橫這樣,所以我建議打直也來一個(?)
我說是這樣子啦~
03:08:936 (4) - 用1/3把尾給snap好
03:10:290 (2,3,4) - 全部用1/3把尾給snap好\:D/
03:15:290 (2,3,4) - ^
03:45:446 (2) - add finish大功告成\:D/

後面的排版越來越好啊OAO
先這樣吧\:D/
抱歉拖了這麼久;wwwwwwww;
btw好圖要繼續加油哦ow<~
good luck \:D/
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

Xinchii wrote:

嗨你好 From queue ~

好大致上的改進方向HW跟LK說了 , 所以我就不說廢話了
做個單Diff的mod騙kd會不會感覺很偷懶阿ㄏㄏ

[General]
  1. Starfy's Normal的LetterboxInBreaks忘記關惹
  2. 喔還有 , custom colour也不一樣 , 統一一下ㄅ
[Insane]
  1. 00:19:978 - 因為這段空白比較短 , 我覺得不太需要Break time @@ (其他Diff同樣建議)我都加上NOTE跟SLIDER了
  2. 00:37:790 (3) - 太靠近(1)的尾巴了 , 不太整齊 , 可以往旁邊移一些已修改
    SPOILER
  3. 00:39:353 (5) - 這個音跟(3)是同樣強度的 , 但是(3)有個反跳的梗這邊沒有會覺得不太平衡
    還是建議改放個大一點的跳已修改
  4. 00:40:290 (3,4) - 這邊之後的雙擊跟Ex難度不一樣 , 沒有跳梗來配合 , 所以玩的時候挺拘束的 , 而且紅線上的鼓拍也讓人很想敲
    比較建議把
    00:40:290 (3,4) - , 00:40:915 (4,5) - , 00:41:540 (4,5) -
    00:45:290 (3,4) - , 00:45:915 (4,5) - , 00:45:540 (4,5) -
    這幾個點分別做成1/4的短滑條 , 配合這個間距這樣的手感我個人覺得比較好 , 也跟Ex的節奏做個分別
    同時也配合這幾個點的Vocal有一點拉長的感覺 (我猜你是跟Vocalㄏㄏ)已修改(對啊我跟VOCAL @@
  5. 00:59:821 (1) - Slider到長白線就可以停了 , 那邊有一個比較重的鑼聲 , 反而藍線上沒任何聲音
  6. 01:01:696 (3,4,5,6,7) - 為啥特地排的這ㄇ擠 ? 音樂好像也沒什ㄇ變已修改
    覺得擠
  7. 01:11:228 (1,3) - 前面的梗還滿對稱中線的 , 這邊就放中線上吧 , 繼續對稱感覺比較整齊不會有歪一邊的感覺
    可以的話(2)也一起移動ㄅ已修改
    SPOILER
  8. 01:14:978 - 跟00:19:978 - 一樣 , 消Break time?已修改
  9. 01:22:790 (3,4) - 這2個調換位置如何loool ?已修改(很不錯
  10. 01:36:228 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 這邊的話 , 迴轉之後的(1,2,3,4)我個人會喜歡跟欠面慢慢錯開的擺放已修改
    SPOILER
    一方面好讀 , 另一方面玩的時候感覺比較活潑些
    可以參考看看
  11. 01:40:603 (5) - 放個NC配合你的梗ㄅ已修改
  12. 01:41:228 (1) - 可以的話這顆也擺跳吧 , 跟01:40:603 (5) - 的跳還有背景音樂作呼應會有4拍一跳的段落感很嗨
    不過倒不如說後面都Jump了這個點反而不跳很奇怪已修改
  13. 02:59:040 (2,3,4) - 我還是不太鳥解為啥這邊要縮間距@__@已修改
  14. 03:15:915 (4) - 這顆Slider是在1/6拍的地方結束喔 ---> 03:16:123 - <---這邊:3
    同時節拍換了 , 請使用NC作為提醒已修改
  15. 03:17:478 - ㄜ這邊應該加個Note就可以回到1/4了03:17:634 (1) - 我刪掉了
    參考:
    SPOILER
    目前的設法會有點不對拍的地方:
    ---03:17:790 - 這邊的白線有個鼓聲NOTE刪掉了
    ---03:17:946 - 就我聽起來 , Vocal是從這邊開始的已修改

Good luck ~! :P
謝謝MOD 有很多很不錯的IDEA呢
我都記住了OWO
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
[quote="Foreverends"]brbrbrbrbrbr afk 4個月的再開mod就獻給你了<333 (?
mod得可能有點爛請見諒<(_ _)>

Extra
00:11:540 (3,5) - 試試blanket? 然後感覺00:12:009 (5) - 可以再拉上一點已修改
SPOILER
00:14:040 (3,5) - 兩個重?在一起感覺不太舒服x( 試試00:14:509 (5) - 放到大約x:476 y:72?已修改
00:21:853 (3,1) - overlap之注意,把00:21:853 (3) - 拉上一至兩格吧 \:D/已修改
00:22:790 (2) -已修改
你看怎麼樣owo
00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 看到這梗直接跪了orz btw 00:25:603 (1) - Nc可以讓人有一個嶄新的體驗(?已修改
00:29:353 (3,4,5) - 我較推崇三角形跳啊~~~已修改
不錯吧owo(?
00:32:009 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 呃...就比較亂了一點,00:32:478 (1) - 先nc一下?已修改
btw其實我建議將00:32:478 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 這一部分弄成六角形跳 原本的我比較喜歡@@
概念圖
00:35:603 (3,4,5,6) - 感覺有點奇怪 ;w; 或將00:35:759 (4) - 放到00:35:290 (2) - 上面做個blanket吧~已修改
00:36:853 (4,5,6,7) - 我覺得這有點太擠了啊;w; 稍為縮放一下吧(?)已修改
大約
[img]https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3160158/img]
00:37:321 (7) - blanket得不太好><已修改
00:38:728 (1,2,3,4) - 感覺這裡是沒梗了吧lol(?是沒梗了=W=
00:49:196 (2) - 可以放遠一點試試~ try x:376 y:36 :D已修改
00:49:353 (3,1) - overlap了比較沒有那麼好看 已修改
你覺得這個怎麼樣owo
01:01:540 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這個排版看起來比較不太好;w;看不到圖QWQ
然後我把它弄成兩個四角型了_(:3
01:09:353 (5) - NC已修改
01:12:478 (6) - NCCCC~已修改
01:39:353 (6) - 用circle代替吧~ 已修改
01:52:010 (10,11,12,1) - 就這樣連過去浪費了啊QAQ~既然前面都縱橫這樣,所以我建議打直也來一個(?)看不到圖QWQ
我說是這樣子啦~
03:08:936 (4) - 用1/3把尾給snap好已修改
03:10:290 (2,3,4) - 全部用1/3把尾給snap好\:D/已修改
03:15:290 (2,3,4) - ^已修改
03:45:446 (2) - add finish大功告成\:D/已修改

謝謝MOD@@
排版越來越好是因為HW給我很多建議所以才改的
不然最一開始的EXTRA
很亂呢OWO
Enon
2,690 posts
Joined November 2012
Enon
:3
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
:0
Cancel
956 posts
Joined August 2012
Cancel
I'm sorry, but there's nothing i can find in this map that needs improving, so here, have a star.

Good luck.
Flask
Beatmap Nominator
3,460 posts
Joined July 2011
Flask
[Extra]
  1. 00:11:853 (4,5,6) - 這裡的音樂和00:11:228 (1,2,3) - 滿像的, 怎麼不是用同一種節奏? 00:12:087 - 可以在加一顆note
  2. 00:32:478 (1) - 這裡不用nc吧
  3. 00:34:353 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡排版怎麼突然縮起來了 我看你前面都是用大跳
  4. 00:37:321 (7,2) - 壓到了有點醜啊, 彎個角度擺到下面一點?
    SPOILER
  5. 00:39:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - 這個部分很容易讀錯orz 老實說我也不知道要怎麼改才比較好 (當然後面也是)
  6. 00:49:978 (1,2) - 沒必要疊在一起吧?
    SPOILER
  7. 01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 這裡spacing變小了, 但後面01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 突然間間距很大有點反應不太過來, 建議你01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 可以做個跳
  8. 01:11:071 (5,6) - 這裡應該是跳點吧...怎麼突然變小了
  9. 01:19:978 (1,2) - 這裡照理來講沒有理由突然間距變小 可以這樣改
  10. 01:30:603 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡也是不應該突然變小才對
  11. 01:43:415 (6) - 這個可以移到左下角去 左下角滿空的而且滿flow的
  12. 01:51:384 (6) - 沒nc?
  13. 02:19:665 (6,7,1) - 可以稍微等距一下
  14. 02:25:290 (3) - 略醜 建議你順時針轉90度
  15. 02:58:103 (3,4,5) - 一樣 不應該突然變小間距的
  16. 03:22:321 (1) - 因為03:22:478 - 有一個很大聲的鼓點所以我覺得你應該要把這slider拆成1/2跟一個note
老實說這個難度我覺得作為新人圖沒有很差了, 但是我自己本人不喜歡間距不固定的圖 >: 個人覺得有點亂亂的
加油!
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
[quote="Flask"][Extra]
  1. 00:11:853 (4,5,6) - 這裡的音樂和00:11:228 (1,2,3) - 滿像的, 怎麼不是用同一種節奏? 00:12:087 - 可以在加一顆note已修改
  2. 00:32:478 (1) - 這裡不用nc吧已修改
  3. 00:34:353 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡排版怎麼突然縮起來了 我看你前面都是用大跳已修改
  4. 00:37:321 (7,2) - 壓到了有點醜啊, 彎個角度擺到下面一點?已修改
    SPOILER
  5. 00:39:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - 這個部分很容易讀錯orz 老實說我也不知道要怎麼改才比較好 (當然後面也是)這邊是對Vocal的
  6. 00:49:978 (1,2) - 沒必要疊在一起吧? 已修改
    SPOILER
  7. 01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 這裡spacing變小了, 但後面01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 突然間間距很大有點反應不太過來, 建議你01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 可以做個跳已修改
  8. 01:11:071 (5,6) - 這裡應該是跳點吧...怎麼突然變小了已修改
  9. 01:19:978 (1,2) - 這裡照理來講沒有理由突然間距變小 可以這樣改已修改
  10. 01:30:603 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡也是不應該突然變小才對已修改
  11. 01:43:415 (6) - 這個可以移到左下角去 左下角滿空的而且滿flow的已修改
  12. 01:51:384 (6) - 沒nc? 已修改
  13. 02:19:665 (6,7,1) - 可以稍微等距一下已修改
  14. 02:25:290 (3) - 略醜 建議你順時針轉90度已修改
  15. 02:58:103 (3,4,5) - 一樣 不應該突然變小間距的已修改
  16. 03:22:321 (1) - 因為03:22:478 - 有一個很大聲的鼓點所以我覺得你應該要把這slider拆成1/2跟一個note這樣配合03:22:712 (2,3) - 會很奇怪
對不起一直催你@@ 還是很謝謝MOD ww
Foreverends
992 posts
Joined July 2011
Foreverends
yayayayayayaaayayaaaaa
irccccccccccccccc
21:01 SnowNiNo_: @@
21:16 Foreverends: hiiiiiiiiiiiilo
21:16 Foreverends: just finished my dinnerrrrrrrrr
21:16 SnowNiNo_: .
21:16 Foreverends: sorryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ><
21:16 SnowNiNo_: 想請你幫忙修圖
21:16 Foreverends: can I help u
21:17 Foreverends: nani
21:17 Foreverends: which map
21:17 SnowNiNo_: you can help me
21:17 SnowNiNo_: the map that you had modded
21:17 SnowNiNo_: but different diff
21:17 Foreverends: :o
21:18 SnowNiNo_: cause the BAT said that my light insane is not good enough
21:18 SnowNiNo_: so need more mod on light insane
21:18 Foreverends: !
21:18 Foreverends: I need BAT too QAQ
21:18 Foreverends: where can I get one ;wwwwwwwwww;
21:19 SnowNiNo_: ask the red name
21:19 SnowNiNo_: .
21:19 Foreverends: hum
21:19 Foreverends: thats
21:19 Foreverends: help a lot
21:19 Foreverends: thank you \:D/
21:20 Foreverends: but I think I cant help ;wwwwwwwwww;
21:20 SnowNiNo_: for the return you need to help me
21:20 SnowNiNo_: why
21:20 Foreverends: Final EXAM
21:20 Foreverends: damn
21:20 SnowNiNo_: .
21:20 Foreverends: sorry ;wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww;
21:21 Foreverends: forgive me orz
21:21 SnowNiNo_: just a few minute?
21:21 SnowNiNo_: mod in irc isfine
21:21 Foreverends: maybe I do it right now
21:21 SnowNiNo_: just light insane diff
21:21 SnowNiNo_: ok
21:21 Foreverends: okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
21:21 SnowNiNo_: ok stop the english
21:22 SnowNiNo_: 我英文很破你一定要用英文嗎
21:22 SnowNiNo_: .
21:22 Foreverends: 英語好方便嘛wwwwwwwwwwww
21:22 Foreverends: 好吧
21:22 SnowNiNo_: 我打字很慢@@
21:22 Foreverends: 來了~
21:22 SnowNiNo_: 來吧
21:22 SnowNiNo_: 修排版就可
21:22 SnowNiNo_: BAT說
21:22 Foreverends: 00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 怎麼一進來就是這個QAQ
21:23 SnowNiNo_: 有質量的圖四腳都要放到
21:23 Foreverends: okkkkok
21:23 SnowNiNo_: 阿 不好嗎
21:23 Foreverends: 要考慮在00:10:603 (5) - 加個NC嗎
21:23 Foreverends: 好像比較分明一些
21:24 SnowNiNo_: 恩
21:24 Foreverends: 00:14:353 (4,5,6,7) - 不太推薦直線放
21:24 Foreverends: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3210557
21:25 Foreverends: 或許可以這樣放_(:3
21:25 SnowNiNo_: 恩
21:25 SnowNiNo_: 改了
21:25 Foreverends: gooooooooooood
21:25 Foreverends: 00:15:603 (2,3,4,5) -
21:25 Foreverends: 00:15:603 (2,3,4,5) - ctrl h一下
21:26 SnowNiNo_: 我往左移易點喔
21:26 SnowNiNo_: C+H之後
21:26 Foreverends: 現時這樣放未免太過順(?
21:26 Foreverends: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3210565
21:26 Foreverends: 像這樣
21:27 SnowNiNo_: 恩
21:28 Foreverends: 00:19:353 (3,4,1) - 叠一起有點奇怪了吧;w;
21:29 Foreverends: 00:19:978 (1) - 這個可以放遠一點 owo
21:29 SnowNiNo_: OK
21:30 Foreverends: 00:22:321 (1) - 如果按照這樣放flow會有一點怪
21:30 Foreverends: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3210586
21:30 Foreverends: you can try something like this
21:31 SnowNiNo_: OK
21:31 Foreverends: 00:22:790 (2,5) - 這兩個叠在一起了
21:31 Foreverends: 隨便找一個放遠點
21:32 SnowNiNo_: 好ㄌ
21:32 Foreverends: 抱歉我打字有點慢;w;
21:32 SnowNiNo_: 沒關西@@
21:32 SnowNiNo_: 你英文打比較快也可用英文
21:32 SnowNiNo_: 我英文打很慢所以不用了
21:32 SnowNiNo_: .
21:33 Foreverends: 好\:D/
21:33 Foreverends: 00:31:071 (10,1) - 叠了QAQ
21:33 SnowNiNo_: 好了
21:33 Foreverends: 分開它們吧
21:34 Foreverends: 雖然有一點殘忍
21:34 SnowNiNo_: =W=
21:34 Foreverends: 00:33:103 (3) - 可以再放低一點啊啊啊啊啊啊啊QAQ
21:35 SnowNiNo_: 好了
21:36 Foreverends: 00:50:603 (3,4,5) - 太擠了吧lol
21:36 SnowNiNo_: 排開嗎@@
21:36 Foreverends: Insane其實我較建議用ds1.2
21:36 Foreverends: yessssssssssssss
21:37 SnowNiNo_: 我不會用DS
21:37 SnowNiNo_: :\
21:37 Foreverends: 有些排位實在太擠了所以會造成重叠lol
21:37 Foreverends: hummmm
21:37 Foreverends: alt \:D/
21:37 Foreverends: 按alt然後滾輪向上或向下調\:D/
21:38 SnowNiNo_: 總之排開ㄌ
21:38 SnowNiNo_: :D
21:38 Foreverends: 尋找最適合你的ds吧!
21:38 Foreverends: yeaaaa
21:38 Foreverends: 00:52:478 (1,2,3) - 這三個重音可以不要那麼吝嗇呀~~~~
21:39 Foreverends: 排開排開 owo/
21:39 SnowNiNo_: 我放大唷
21:39 Foreverends: gooooooooooooooooooooo
21:40 Foreverends: 00:54:353 (4,5,6,7,8) - 可以試試這樣排
21:40 Foreverends: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3210618
21:40 Foreverends: 你懂的(?
21:42 SnowNiNo_: SORRY剛去廁所@@
21:42 Foreverends: 大丈夫\:D/
21:42 SnowNiNo_: OK好了
21:44 Foreverends: 01:29:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這個排位放得不太合適:o
21:44 SnowNiNo_: 我這邊是用2個3絞刑然後放大
21:44 Foreverends: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3210633 <-參巧用(?
21:45 Foreverends: 因為跟前面都叠在一起感覺不太美觀
21:45 Foreverends: @@
21:45 SnowNiNo_: 這個梗我很喜歡說ww
21:45 Foreverends: 01:30:602 (1,2,3) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3210636
21:45 Foreverends: ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
21:46 Foreverends: 那不改好了wwww
21:47 SnowNiNo_: 恩
21:47 Foreverends: 01:41:228 (1) - 試試放x144 y332
21:47 Foreverends: 順前面的flow
21:47 SnowNiNo_: ok
21:48 Foreverends: 01:47:165 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 跟01:46:540 (2) - 尾叠了lol
21:49 Foreverends: 01:47:165 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 用ds 1.2/1.3放上一點
21:49 SnowNiNo_: 好
21:51 Foreverends: 其實大多問題都是在重叠那一方面 /w\
21:51 SnowNiNo_: :0
21:51 Foreverends: 然後後面越做越好
21:52 Foreverends: 感覺不出太多問題
21:52 SnowNiNo_: 哪邊還有跌到
21:52 Foreverends: waitttttttt
21:53 SnowNiNo_: 好 慢慢來@@
21:53 Foreverends: 01:36:228 (1,4) -
21:53 SnowNiNo_: ok
21:54 Foreverends: 02:21:696 (5,1) - 一點點
21:54 SnowNiNo_: ok
21:54 Foreverends: 02:40:603 (3,1) -
21:54 Foreverends: 02:44:353 (3,5) -
21:55 SnowNiNo_: ok
21:55 Foreverends: 然後就沒了
21:56 Foreverends: 此mod已完\:D/
21:56 Foreverends: 辛苦了 :D/
21:56 SnowNiNo_: good
21:56 SnowNiNo_: 謝謝><
21:57 SnowNiNo_: PO一下@@
Snow Note
920 posts
Joined January 2011
Snow Note
Re-Mod light insane

[Light Insane]
音量方面不要超過75%,不然很吵 (例如 00:53:571 開始的段落
平常段落的音量不要低於50% (像是 02:37:478 開始的段落
音量統一一下,不要一時30%,一時90%... (差太遠了

00:17:478 (7,8) - 換成4個圓圈會比較好,因為這裡全都是重音
00:23:728 (1) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了
00:36:384 (2) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了
00:36:853 (3,4) - 弧度太低了,不如弄成直線吧
00:49:978 (1,2,3,4,5) - 這個排列不順手
00:57:321 - 這個位置應該是圓圈
01:04:978 (1,2,3,4) - 這個節奏和歌曲不合
01:08:571 (1,2,3) - 把(1)的尾和(2)(3)弄成直線
01:20:290 (3) - 上移一格
01:56:228 - 這個段落的節奏和上一個相似的段落不同
02:00:603 (5) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了
02:09:821 (2) - (滑條頭)不用突然增加音量
02:28:415 (2,3,4) - 距離上一個物件太近
02:29:392 - 把這個Break的開始點位到02:29:978
02:42:165 (4) - 右移一格,上移一格
02:58:571 (5,7) - 把它弄成平行
03:00:603 (9) - 右移一格
03:01:228 (1,2,3) - 距離上一個物件太近
03:17:373 - 加個note
03:26:071 (1,2,3,4) - (flow)不順手的排列

如果想要提升質量的話,光是mod是沒有什麼用的
最好的方法就是當Mapping上準提升後再回來ReMAP
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

Snow Note wrote:

Re-Mod light insane

[Light Insane]
音量方面不要超過75%,不然很吵 (例如 00:53:571 開始的段落
平常段落的音量不要低於50% (像是 02:37:478 開始的段落
音量統一一下,不要一時30%,一時90%... (差太遠了

00:17:478 (7,8) - 換成4個圓圈會比較好,因為這裡全都是重音已修改
00:23:728 (1) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了已修改
00:36:384 (2) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了已修改
00:36:853 (3,4) - 弧度太低了,不如弄成直線吧已修改
00:49:978 (1,2,3,4,5) - 這個排列不順手已修改
00:57:321 - 這個位置應該是圓圈已修改
01:04:978 (1,2,3,4) - 這個節奏和歌曲不合已修改
01:08:571 (1,2,3) - 把(1)的尾和(2)(3)弄成直線已修改
01:20:290 (3) - 上移一格已修改
01:56:228 - 這個段落的節奏和上一個相似的段落不同節奏也不一樣@@?
02:00:603 (5) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了已修改
02:09:821 (2) - (滑條頭)不用突然增加音量這要改變滑條速度
02:28:415 (2,3,4) - 距離上一個物件太近已修改
02:29:392 - 把這個Break的開始點位到02:29:978已修改
02:42:165 (4) - 右移一格,上移一格已修改
02:58:571 (5,7) - 把它弄成平行已修改
03:00:603 (9) - 右移一格已修改
03:01:228 (1,2,3) - 距離上一個物件太近已修改
03:17:373 - 加個note已修改
03:26:071 (1,2,3,4) - (flow)不順手的排列已修改

如果想要提升質量的話,光是mod是沒有什麼用的
最好的方法就是當Mapping上準提升後再回來ReMAP
我還是需要別人MOD才知道要怎麼作圖質量比較高
所以才一直找MOD
不找MOD也沒法提升mapping水準

謝謝你的Re-mod
RandF
1,245 posts
Joined March 2013
RandF
From my queue~

[Hard]
  1. recheck all stacks. i think several stack pattern is not correcty (do you check "stacking" in editor-option?)
  2. 00:11:696 (2) - i prefer to delete
  3. 00:26:540- add a note. very strange
  4. 00:57:946 (2) - i prefer circle pattern to slider
  5. 00:58:571 (3) - NC
  6. 01:05:446 (2,3) - why not combine into 1 slider?
  7. 01:17:790 (6,7) - i recommend to make genter curve
  8. 01:34:353 (3,1) - i found several overlappings like this. the overlapping on slider-start is hard to see. especially hard-diff, i recommend to fix them
  9. 01:39:978 (1,2,3,4) - you can make better flow, imo
  10. 01:46:462 (2) - delete. unnecessary, imo
  11. 01:52:790 (2,3) - this stack is confusing
  12. 02:07:321 (1) - end at 02:08:415
  13. 02:21:071 (5) - delete
  14. 03:02:790- follow this strong sound. why not end 03:02:321 (2) - at 03:02:790-
  15. 03:11:853 (1,2,3) - too hard to find rhythm because of spacing. recheck spacing and i suggest to follow 1/1 rhythm like this
  16. 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - too large spacing for hard, imo
[Light Insane]
  1. 00:58:571 (5,1) - i prefer slider for following vocal
  2. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^
  3. 01:05:915 (1,6) - swap NC
  4. 01:06:228 (5,6) - symmetric slider is better
  5. 01:53:728 (1) - end at 01:55:290
  6. 02:28:728 (5) - why not Ctrl+G?
  7. 02:50:290 (2,5) - this overlapping is hard to see
  8. 02:54:118- add a note?
  9. 03:12:321- i recommend to follow this drum sound
  10. 03:33:571 (1,5) - this overlapping is hard to see
[Insane]
  1. 00:51:228 (1,4) - just a suggetion. why not rotate more?
    SPOILER
  2. 00:58:572 (5,1) - i recommend to increase spacing
  3. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^
  4. 03:28:571 (5,1) - ^
  5. 01:04:977 (5,1) - swap NC?
  6. 01:11:228 (1,3) - stack correctly
  7. 01:15:290 (2,3) - this jump is hard to find rhythm
  8. 02:54:821 (1,2,3) - awkward flow
  9. 03:07:478- i recommend to follow this drum sound
  10. 03:12:321- add a note. follow drum sound
  11. 03:15:915 (1) - very hard to find rhythm. simple vocal following is better, imo
  12. 03:45:290 (1,2) - i prefer to keep "from left to right" pattern by the same way as 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2) -
[Extra]
  1. 01:06:228 (1) - it is better to make 1/2 rhythm not 1/1 at this part
  2. 01:22:478- circle is better, imo
  3. 01:51:227 (5,1) - swap NC?
  4. 03:06:436 (7,8) - keep spacing 1.93x
[Chu's Easy]
  1. 00:39:353 (6,7,1) - for easy, stack x3 is so confusing
  2. 00:41:228- clap?
  3. 00:37:478 (3) - NC
  4. 00:56:540 (5,1,2,3,4) - too difficult for beginner. for easy, circle rush on red line is hard to find rhythm
  5. 01:03:728 (4) - NC
  6. 01:27:165 (5,6) - avoid overlapping. for easy, confusing layout should be avoided as much as possible
  7. 01:32:478 (1,2,3,4) - this stack pattern is so confusing for beginner
  8. 01:55:290 (4,1) - swap NC
  9. 01:58:103 (5,6,1) - avoid overlapping
  10. 02:01:228 (4) - NC
  11. 02:06:696 (2) - start at white line 02:06:540
  12. 02:52:321 (3) - u~m, i prefer slider
  13. 03:11:853 (1) - in this part, i highly recommend to keep 1/1 rhythm (white line's rhythm) . please end at 03:12:478
  14. 03:19:509 (1) - start at 03:19:978- it is better to follow drum sound than vocal
  15. 03:40:603 (2,3) - why not blanket correctly
  16. 03:43:103 (6) - end at 03:43:571- in the same way as 03:41:853 (4) -
[Starfy's Normal]
  1. 00:41:540 (4,1) - u~m, not good flow
  2. 01:05:603 (2) - why not start at 01:05:446? i prefer to follow vocal at this part
  3. 01:34:509 (4) - in this part, keeping 1/1 rhythm is better, imo
  4. 01:51:228 (3) - touched life-bar!
  5. 02:57:478 (1,4) - blanket correctly~
  6. 03:05:290 (2,3) - combine into 1 slider. in this part, relax mapping is suitable
  7. 03:10:290 (2,3,4) - suggetion
  8. 03:12:478~03:17:478- in this part, i recommend 1/1 mapping (don't avoid white line)
  9. 03:24:040 (3) - NC

cute song <3
~Good Luck~
chucentry
401 posts
Joined April 2013
chucentry
Easy:

AR = 3


00:28:728 (1) - change this slider for a circle
00:31:853 (2) - Change this slider for 2 sliders. 1 00:31:853 - to 00:32:165 - and another one from 00:32:478 - to 00:32:790 -
http://puu.sh/iy11h/ed23b71a30.jpg
00:39:665 (7) - remove this note
00:41:228 (2,3) - this could be one object if you extend (2) over (3)
00:44:665 (2) - remove this note
00:46:228 (3,4) - this could be one object if you extend (3) over (4)
00:53:103 (1) - ew this is an easy, think of the recovery time. I`d strongly recommend you to replace the spinner with something else... or you could just remove that slider
00:57:634 (2,3,4) - remove these notes and replace them with a reverse slider.
01:18:415 (6) - remove
01:27:165 (5) - move to x:72 y:74 for perfect distance snap
01:28:415 (7) - remove
01:41:540 (2,3,4,5) - remove (2), (3), (4) and put a slider from 01:41:540 - to 01:41:853 -
01:51:228 (3,4) - change these note for slider from 01:51:228 - to 01:51:540 -
01:58:415 (6) - remove
02:00:915 (3) - remove
02:03:415 (8) - remove
02:09:353 (1) - same as 00:53:103 (1) -
02:17:790 (5) - remove
02:23:103 (2,3) - remove and put slider from 02:23:103 - to 02:23:415 -
02:44:978 (3,4) - remove and put slider from 02:44:978 - to 02:45:290 -
02:47:165 (1) - remove
03:01:853 (1) - same as 00:53:103 (1) -
03:11:853 (1) - extend this slider to 03:12:478 -
03:27:634 (1,2,3) - same as 00:57:634 (2,3,4) -
03:29:665 (1) - remove
03:31:540 (6,7) - remove and put slider from 03:31:537 - to 03:31:853 -
03:32:790 (2,3) - remove and put slider from 03:32:790 - to 03:33:103 -
03:38:103 (1,2) - same as 00:53:103 (1) -
02:59:353 (4) - placement would be better placed in to x:212 y:356
03:09:353 (5) - NC
03:45:290 (1) - NC

Im learning, no bullying pls
Starfy
1,046 posts
Joined November 2012
Starfy

RandomEffect wrote:

[Starfy's Normal]
  1. 00:41:540 (4,1) - u~m, not good flow But I can't think better solution
  2. 01:05:603 (2) - why not start at 01:05:446? i prefer to follow vocal at this part Feeling is a bit of strange if I follow the vocal
  3. 01:34:509 (4) - in this part, keeping 1/1 rhythm is better, imo That's ok, imo
  4. 01:51:228 (3) - touched life-bar! It doesn't matter
  5. 02:57:478 (1,4) - blanket correctly~ Fixed
  6. 03:05:290 (2,3) - combine into 1 slider. in this part, relax mapping is suitable I'll consider about it
  7. 03:10:290 (2,3,4) - suggetion I'll consider about it
  8. 03:12:478~03:17:478- in this part, i recommend 1/1 mapping (don't avoid white line) humm too strange
  9. 03:24:040 (3) - NC Fixed

cute song <3
~Good Luck~
Tks for mod
http://puu.sh/iB0G1/ea4bfbae1a.zip
arronchu1207
804 posts
Joined December 2012
arronchu1207

RandomEffect wrote:

[Chu's Easy]
  1. 00:39:353 (6,7,1) - for easy, stack x3 is so confusing fixed
  2. 00:41:228- clap? Oh I missed this one lollll fixed
  3. 00:37:478 (3) - NC ok
  4. 00:56:540 (5,1,2,3,4) - too difficult for beginner. for easy, circle rush on red line is hard to find rhythm Change to sliders
  5. 01:03:728 (4) - NC ok
  6. 01:27:165 (5,6) - avoid overlapping. for easy, confusing layout should be avoided as much as possible deleted that circle
  7. 01:32:478 (1,2,3,4) - this stack pattern is so confusing for beginner fixed
  8. 01:55:290 (4,1) - swap NC ok
  9. 01:58:103 (5,6,1) - avoid overlapping fixed
  10. 02:01:228 (4) - NC ok
  11. 02:06:696 (2) - start at white line 02:06:540 fixed
  12. 02:52:321 (3) - u~m, i prefer slider fixed
  13. 03:11:853 (1) - in this part, i highly recommend to keep 1/1 rhythm (white line's rhythm) . please end at 03:12:478 ok
  14. 03:19:509 (1) - start at 03:19:978- it is better to follow drum sound than vocal ok
  15. 03:40:603 (2,3) - why not blanket correctly fixed
  16. 03:43:103 (6) - end at 03:43:571- in the same way as 03:41:853 (4) - ok
Thanks 4 ur helpful mod >w<
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_
[quote="RandomEffect"]From my queue~

[Hard]
  1. recheck all stacks. i think several stack pattern is not correcty (do you check "stacking" in editor-option?)
  2. 00:11:696 (2) - i prefer to deleteFIXED
  3. 00:26:540- add a note. very strangeFIXED
  4. 00:57:946 (2) - i prefer circle pattern to sliderFIXED
  5. 00:58:571 (3) - NCFIXED
  6. 01:05:446 (2,3) - why not combine into 1 slider?FIXED
  7. 01:17:790 (6,7) - i recommend to make genter curveFIXED
  8. 01:34:353 (3,1) - i found several overlappings like this. the overlapping on slider-start is hard to see. especially hard-diff, i recommend to fix themFIXED
  9. 01:39:978 (1,2,3,4) - you can make better flow, imoFIXED
  10. 01:46:462 (2) - delete. unnecessary, imoFIXED
  11. 01:52:790 (2,3) - this stack is confusingFIXED
  12. 02:07:321 (1) - end at 02:08:415FIXED
  13. 02:21:071 (5) - deleteFIXED
  14. 03:02:790- follow this strong sound. why not end 03:02:321 (2) - at 03:02:790- FIXED
  15. 03:11:853 (1,2,3) - too hard to find rhythm because of spacing. recheck spacing and i suggest to follow 1/1 rhythm like thisFIXED
  16. 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - too large spacing for hard, imoFIXED
[Light Insane]
  1. 00:58:571 (5,1) - i prefer slider for following vocali think it's fine
  2. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^
  3. 01:05:915 (1,6) - swap NCFIXED
  4. 01:06:228 (5,6) - symmetric slider is betterFIXED
  5. 01:53:728 (1) - end at 01:55:290FIXED
  6. 02:28:728 (5) - why not Ctrl+G?FIXED
  7. 02:50:290 (2,5) - this overlapping is hard to seeFIXED
  8. 02:54:118- add a note?not good in here
  9. 03:12:321- i recommend to follow this drum sound03:12:478 - here got a drim sound to so i wont change it
  10. 03:33:571 (1,5) - this overlapping is hard to seeFIXED
[Insane]
  1. 00:51:228 (1,4) - just a suggetion. why not rotate more?FIXED
    SPOILER
  2. 00:58:572 (5,1) - i recommend to increase spacingFIXED
  3. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^FIXED
  4. 03:28:571 (5,1) - ^FIXED
  5. 01:04:977 (5,1) - swap NC?FIXED
  6. 01:11:228 (1,3) - stack correctlyFIXED
  7. 01:15:290 (2,3) - this jump is hard to find rhythmFIXED
  8. 02:54:821 (1,2,3) - awkward flowFIXED
  9. 03:07:478- i recommend to follow this drum soundFIXED
  10. 03:12:321- add a note. follow drum soundFIXED
  11. 03:15:915 (1) - very hard to find rhythm. simple vocal following is better, imoFIXED
  12. 03:45:290 (1,2) - i prefer to keep "from left to right" pattern by the same way as 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2)FIXED -
[Extra]
  1. 01:06:228 (1) - it is better to make 1/2 rhythm not 1/1 at this partFIXED
  2. 01:22:478- circle is better, imoFIXED
  3. 01:51:227 (5,1) - swap NC?FIXED
  4. 03:06:436 (7,8) - keep spacing 1.93xFIXED
really thanks for the mod :D
NeNe_GoShyuJiN
27 posts
Joined June 2010
NeNe_GoShyuJiN
無限期支持內內狗休金RK
M o M i Z i
29 posts
Joined August 2009
M o M i Z i
無限期支持內內狗休金RK
neonat
Beatmap Nominator
3,528 posts
Joined April 2012
neonat
Just really brief comments and what really just stood out sorely in Insane

whistle 2 is quite redundant....you can't hear it, doesn't sound much different from the other whistle as well

without the emphasis of the cymbals with hitsound crashes just don't make as much impact in the song imo, without the regular finishes or more custom cymbal sounds, there is no nice touch in the parts that end or start strongly with cymbals

Insane

02:12:321 (1,2) - honestly why do you space it like this, also makes no sense for 02:12:790 (2,3,4,5) to be larger than even 02:13:259 (5,6) - the 2x spacing is at a place where it isn't so special in the song
02:47:478 (1) onward - diversify the shape or rhythm. 02:47:478 (1,2,3,4) is different from 02:44:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) but you made it repetitive
03:35:603 (1,2) - slider 1 looks cramped

Light Insane --> Insane will not really cut it tbh, you skipped the 02:29:978 section in Light Insane and that was where Insane got really crazy with streams, even if it wasn't too spaced, but still dense with streams.

Try to get more mods though
Skubi
841 posts
Joined December 2013
Skubi
Hello! :3

[Pochiko]

00:12:478 (1,4) - the touch, ugh..
00:13:806 (3,4) - put 4 lower, because its ugly that way
00:56:228 (1,2,3) - it's ugly, because its not straight
01:05:134 (1,2) - Ctrl+G
01:05:603 (1,2) - ^
01:09:353 (4) - NC?
01:25:524 (7) - curve it more to the right, to match the stream pattern
02:17:321 (1,2,3) - It doesn't fit here. Like.. It hurts in the ears when you hear something like this. Make 1,2 a long slider or something
02:34:899 (8,9) - slider here?
03:03:103 (2) - NC?
03:07:399 (1) - remove NC, (2) - NC
03:12:321 (1) - ^

[Insane]

00:11:123 (8,1) - wut? Stack it..
00:11:853 (3,4,5,6) - What is that shape?
also 00:11:853 (4) - remove this touch with (2) slider
00:13:337 - something wrong is with (10) here...
00:17:478 (7) - NC
01:00:212 (2,3) - that stack doesnt fit here imo
03:05:134 (1,2,3) - Not straight
03:04:821 - Man, decide if you are using 1/4 or 1/6.. like.. 03:05:134 (1,2,3) - wtf is this?...
03:05:603 (4,5,6) - DS
I would remap that part ^


Hope you liked it! GL!
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

CptSqBany wrote:

Hello! :3

[Pochiko]

00:12:478 (1,4) - the touch, ugh..fixed
00:13:806 (3,4) - put 4 lower, because its ugly that wayfixed
00:56:228 (1,2,3) - it's ugly, because its not straightmaybe not
01:05:134 (1,2) - Ctrl+Gok...
01:05:603 (1,2) - ^ok...
01:09:353 (4) - NC?of course
01:25:524 (7) - curve it more to the right, to match the stream patternok...
02:17:321 (1,2,3) - It doesn't fit here. Like.. It hurts in the ears when you hear something like this. Make 1,2 a long slider or somethingmatch with vocal
02:34:899 (8,9) - slider here?just 02:34:977 (9) one
03:03:103 (2) - NC?of course
03:07:399 (1) - remove NC, (2) - NCof course
03:12:321 (1) - ^fixed

[Insane]

00:11:123 (8,1) - wut? Stack it..dont get it =w=
00:11:853 (3,4,5,6) - What is that shape?00:11:854 (3,4) - ctrl + H, ctrl + J and DS
also 00:11:853 (4) - remove this touch with (2) sliderfixed
00:13:337 - something wrong is with (10) here...fixed
00:17:478 (7) - NCfixed
01:00:212 (2,3) - that stack doesnt fit here imofixed
03:05:134 (1,2,3) - Not straightwut, is straight LOL
03:04:821 - Man, decide if you are using 1/4 or 1/6.. like.. 03:05:134 (1,2,3) - wtf is this?...
03:05:603 (4,5,6) - DSfixed
I would remap that part ^


Hope you liked it! GL!
thanks for mod :)
Monstrata
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
4,642 posts
Joined May 2013
Monstrata
[pochiko]

00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these streams are barely audible... mapping them is kinda odd. i'd just do like 1/4 repeat sliders or something more passive.
00:52:478 (1,2,3) - I'm kinda surprised you didnt make these jumps bigger xD.
00:56:540 (4,5,6) - I think the DS from 5>6 should be bigger than 4>5 for better emphasis.
01:06:540 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here too. Try and map larger jumps to white ticks instead of red ticks if you want to follow the emphasis of the song.
01:22:478 (5) - NC here would be cool.
01:33:103 (5,6,7,8) - Not really getting why these are so spaced compared to 01:33:728 (1,2,3) - . I feel like spacing concept here is a bit weird and just done for difficulty.

[expert]

00:16:853 (2) - NC for clarity.
00:24:196 (1,2) - Swap NC's. NC'ing on white ticks are better like 00:24:353 -
01:09:509 (2,3,4) - This angle felt kinda awkward for the jump.
Something i tried
03:00:603 (9) - Hmm, I would NC here tbh.
03:06:228 (6) - And NC here for downbeat. 03:11:228 (6) - Here too, applies to other parts too. NC pattern isn't very consistent here.
03:28:571 (5,2) - Maybe dont overlap xd.
03:38:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NC spam~ Since you did that for 01:07:478 (1,2,1,2,1,2) -

[insane]

00:13:963 (2,3,4,5) - This didn't flow too well for me. Try 00:14:197 (4) - 443||188 since it makes the transition smoother.
00:22:790 (6,7) - Here would be a good place for a jump. You could also add an NC here on 7.
00:28:415 (2,3,4,5) - Sounds really overmapped for me xP. You ahve harder diffs, you don't have to map 1/4's that are barely audible on Insane imo xD
00:37:165 (1) - I would split this into a 1/2 slider and a Circle on 00:37:478 - for the downbeat (and NC there instead).
00:40:290 (3,4,1,2) - I think stacking these doubles will be easier for people playing this difficulty. Space them on higher diffs instead xD. Having to play doubles + move (because they are spaced) makes these patterns extra difficult.
02:47:790 (2,4) - Better to not overlap imo, it doesn't look that nice ;C
02:54:743 (6,8) - These sound overmapped. I think it's better if you delete them and rearrange this rhythm since this is Insane and not one of your Extras

[hard]

00:15:915 (3,1,2) - This spacing is going to confuse people because 3>1 is 1/2, but 1>2 is 1/1.
00:30:603 (7,8) - Jump instead of stack? for emphasis.
00:50:915 (4) - This slider doesn't really fit the pattern like the other 3 sliders. It's too close to slider 3.
00:52:478 (5) - I would NC here/
01:40:290 (2,3,4) - The jump from 2>3 felt kinda random. But 3>4 could definitely have a jump for emphasis.
01:41:071 (6,1) - Don't overlap? xd
01:45:915 - Not going to map this?
02:09:821 (4) - I would NC here since the Kiai begins here.
02:17:321 (1,2,3,4,5) - Rhythm felt a bit weird.
Try this instead!

checked a few diffs. good luck!
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

monstrata wrote:

[pochiko]

00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these streams are barely audible... mapping them is kinda odd. i'd just do like 1/4 repeat sliders or something more passive ok them, fixed.
00:52:478 (1,2,3) - I'm kinda surprised you didnt make these jumps bigger xD. sure lets make it bigger XD
00:56:540 (4,5,6) - I think the DS from 5>6 should be bigger than 4>5 for better emphasis.yap, ur right :)
01:06:540 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here too. Try and map larger jumps to white ticks instead of red ticks if you want to follow the emphasis of the song.fixed
01:22:478 (5) - NC here would be cool.cool
01:33:103 (5,6,7,8) - Not really getting why these are so spaced compared to 01:33:728 (1,2,3) - . I feel like spacing concept here is a bit weird and just done for difficulty.this part im want to make this DS bigger than smaller, so i make 01:33:728 (1,2,3,4) bigger

[expert]

00:16:853 (2) - NC for clarity.sure
00:24:196 (1,2) - Swap NC's. NC'ing on white ticks are better like 00:24:353 - sure
01:09:509 (2,3,4) - This angle felt kinda awkward for the jump.fixed
Something i tried
03:00:603 (9) - Hmm, I would NC here tbh.yap NC here
03:06:228 (6) - And NC here for downbeat. 03:11:228 (6) - Here too, applies to other parts too. NC pattern isn't very consistent here.fixed
03:28:571 (5,2) - Maybe dont overlap xd.of course XD
03:38:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NC spam~ Since you did that for 01:07:478 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - yap, fixed it

[insane]

00:13:963 (2,3,4,5) - This didn't flow too well for me. Try 00:14:197 (4) - 443||188 since it makes the transition smoother.fixed
00:22:790 (6,7) - Here would be a good place for a jump. You could also add an NC here on 7. fixed
00:28:415 (2,3,4,5) - Sounds really overmapped for me xP. You ahve harder diffs, you don't have to map 1/4's that are barely audible on Insane imo xDdelete 00:28:493 (3,4,5) notes and change 00:28:415 (2) - spot
00:37:165 (1) - I would split this into a 1/2 slider and a Circle on 00:37:478 - for the downbeat (and NC there instead).fixed
00:40:290 (3,4,1,2) - I think stacking these doubles will be easier for people playing this difficulty. Space them on higher diffs instead xD. Having to play doubles + move (because they are spaced) makes these patterns extra difficult. make every 00:40:290 (3,4,1,2) DS bigger
02:47:790 (2,4) - Better to not overlap imo, it doesn't look that nice ;Csure
02:54:743 (6,8) - These sound overmapped. I think it's better if you delete them and rearrange this rhythm since this is Insane and not one of your Extrasfixed

[hard]

00:15:915 (3,1,2) - This spacing is going to confuse people because 3>1 is 1/2, but 1>2 is 1/1.sure, fixed the DS
00:30:603 (7,8) - Jump instead of stack? for emphasis.fixed
00:50:915 (4) - This slider doesn't really fit the pattern like the other 3 sliders. It's too close to slider 3.change 4 to 2 notes
00:52:478 (5) - I would NC here/sure
01:40:290 (2,3,4) - The jump from 2>3 felt kinda random. But 3>4 could definitely have a jump for emphasis.fixed
01:41:071 (6,1) - Don't overlap? xdi fixed this part , so no overlap :3
01:45:915 - Not going to map this?nope, i play this diff with DT it's fine for no note here :\
02:09:821 (4) - I would NC here since the Kiai begins here.
02:17:321 (1,2,3,4,5) - Rhythm felt a bit weird.fixed it
Try this instead!

checked a few diffs. good luck!
Man your mod is awesome :D
thanks for your mod :)
moonlightleaf
2,155 posts
Joined September 2011
moonlightleaf
3min 8diff , 真多....☆
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

moonlightleaf wrote:

3min 8diff , 真多....☆
馬拉松的話看時間唷XD
5分鐘的圖 MOD我2個DIFF就可owo
要多mod也可 看你"3
Aeril
Beatmap Nominator
666 posts
Joined May 2014
Aeril
Well since you accepted the M4M on your queue I can now start your mod ;3 Don't think I'm going to find much though after monstrata modded this a bit
BTW the Pochiko diff is so much fun to play!

[Pochiko]
  1. 00:12:946 (4,5) - increase the spacing here maybe?
  2. 00:13:571 (3,4,5) - this looks better imo as a straight triple + slider but doesnt really matter https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4249971
  3. 01:48:415 (11,12) - I feel like it would do better if these were switched or atleast the spacing from 10 to 11 was increased
  4. 03:19:561 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ?
  5. 03:26:071 (1,2,3) - it feels really awkward to curve upwards like that after the jump, maybe CTRL+J and move the blanket to the other side?
[Expert]
  1. 01:42:634 (2) - i feel this would flow better curved the other way
  2. 02:39:665 (3,1) - increase spacing?
  3. 03:19:457 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ?
[Extra]
  1. 00:40:290 (3,4) - why are these doubles not stacked like in Expert and Pochiko?
  2. 02:48:415 (7) - maybe stack this on the slider after?
  3. 03:19:457 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? (Master at copy paste >:3)
  4. 03:34:821 (8) - maybe stack on slider after?

Welp that's it, other than it looking a bit messy I didn't find many playability problems :) Since there wasn't really that many things I had to find you only have to mod 4 diffs on my mapset if you want at most. I had a lot of fun playing this map and hope it goes far. Bye bye~ !
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
Topic Starter
SnowNiNo_

Aeril wrote:

Well since you accepted the M4M on your queue I can now start your mod ;3 Don't think I'm going to find much though after monstrata modded this a bit
BTW the Pochiko diff is so much fun to play!

[Pochiko]
  1. 00:12:946 (4,5) - increase the spacing here maybe? maybe not
  2. 00:13:571 (3,4,5) - this looks better imo as a straight triple + slider but doesnt really matter https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4249971 nope
  3. 01:48:415 (11,12) - I feel like it would do better if these were switched or atleast the spacing from 10 to 11 was increased switch it
  4. 03:19:561 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? yap, fixed
  5. 03:26:071 (1,2,3) - it feels really awkward to curve upwards like that after the jump, maybe CTRL+J and move the blanket to the other side? do something similar
[Expert]
  1. 01:42:634 (2) - i feel this would flow better curved the other way fixed
  2. 02:39:665 (3,1) - increase spacing? yap
  3. 03:19:457 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? fixed
[Extra]
  1. 00:40:290 (3,4) - why are these doubles not stacked like in Expert and Pochiko? ty different style on every diff XD
  2. 02:48:415 (7) - maybe stack this on the slider after? i think is fine
  3. 03:19:457 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? (Master at copy paste >:3) all spinner fixed LOL
  4. 03:34:821 (8) - maybe stack on slider after? nope

Welp that's it, other than it looking a bit messy I didn't find many playability problems :) Since there wasn't really that many things I had to find you only have to mod 4 diffs on my mapset if you want at most. I had a lot of fun playing this map and hope it goes far. Bye bye~ !
thanks for mod :3
moonlightleaf
2,155 posts
Joined September 2011
moonlightleaf
M4M here

[Hard]

3.7啊,有点高

00:12:790 (3,4) - 降星可以改滑条,4-5 1.3x 也不是不可以的 5有高音或者就1.0x
SPOILER

00:14:821 (5,1) - 这个是要叠还是不叠,很难看,而且和前面4挨着了

00:26:540 (3,4) - 建议3删 4放前面9上 参考00:36:228 (1,2,3,4) -

00:33:571 (8,1) - 这要包不包的 挺难受,试试别的排版
SPOILER

00:36:384 (2) - 太远了

00:57:946 (2,3) - 对于hard 这俩个单点挺不友好的 换2滑条?

01:12:478 (4,5,6,7) - 目前这个排版不是很顺,试试↓ (会升0.01星
SPOILER

01:14:821 (1) - 转盘很不合适 前面那个也是

01:17:790 (6,7) - 1.9x... 试试换单点+滑条折返

01:20:368 (2) - 不好看 我会摆这样
SPOILER

01:29:978 (1) - 位置不好,按照曲线的话 大概这里会非常好
SPOILER

01:34:353 (3,4) - 旋转30度 放这里试试
SPOILER

01:36:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - try
SPOILER

01:37:790 (2,3,4,5,1) - 虽然5边型,单flow不好

01:40:290 (2,3) - 我觉得叠都比那样放好

01:53:103 (3,4,5,6) - 这位置?
SPOILER

02:18:103 (3,4) - stack

02:22:165 (3) - 叠4上

02:49:040 (4) - 1.9太远了

03:16:123 (3) - 突然就1/6 有点坑

03:42:790 (2,3,5) - 这种overlap 很不好看

这图感觉ds很乱,重音跳也没有固定一个ds,看你的排名估计按照insane方式去摆了,这个是hard,可以善良点

[Insane]

5.3+ > 5.25 Ex标了

00:12:166 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - 56ctrl+g 其他滑条也一并ctrl+g

00:17:478 (1,2) - ^

00:23:103 (1,2) - 12没必要这么远 然而00:23:571 (4,1) - 才是要加DS的地方

00:24:353 (3,4) -
SPOILER

00:26:228 (1) - ctrl+g+h 那个样子才顺,参考00:26:540 (2,3,4) -

00:28:415 (2) - 放后面1上?

00:32:009 (4) - 放 (56,144) ,然后45ctrl+g

00:34:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 这边好乱七八糟,弄整洁点,参考下,
SPOILER

00:38:415 (7,1,2,3,4,5) - 这flow你打的习惯吗(卡手吗

00:55:759 (5) - 钝角跳有点不好,试试叠前面5上00:55:603 (4) - 你可以放(228,104)这样版面好看多
SPOILER

01:00:446 (3,4,5,6,1) -
SPOILER

01:04:353 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - 这连打藏的略坑

01:19:509 (8,9,10) -
SPOILER

01:21:228 (1) -
SPOILER

01:24:665 (5,1) - stack

01:29:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 不好看

01:41:228 (1,2) - 突然就反向断flow了orz 之前俩4边形flow多好啊

01:54:040 (9,1) - 这俩直滑条好一些, 1->2 flow不好

01:56:384 (2) - 试试(52,164)

02:06:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 正5边然后6放中心

02:49:665 (5) - 缩小点DS

03:01:540 (3) - 叠 要不就放右下点(怎么有种非常随意的就放在那里的感觉

03:24:353 (4) - 钝角好难受 (25,76)?

03:29:196 (4) - (96,168)folw会好很多

感觉没有用心做,很随意,排版和flow还能提高一些

话说也有45sp了,为何还是好像新手图的样子 ;w;;;

PS: 给你一个控星的方法: 连续的单点越多星级越高, 跳的距离越大,星级越高
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
38 / 236