1. Easy 4K - 4Key (1,1 stars, 191 notes)
2. Hard 5K - 5Key (2,02 stars, 547 notes)
3. Normal 4K - 4Key (1,6 stars, 351 notes)

nadapan wrote:

Just to tell you so is this song not the ending, this song is the opening song don't forget to add it to the tags

Frim4503 wrote:

i think your hard dif in not hard enought
i suggest you dif like this

easy : below 2 star
normal: below 2 star
hard: above 2 star but below 3 star
insane above 3 star but below 4 star

Nikollo wrote:

Hello. Don't you mind me creating NM diff? Just start working on it today, i'll try to complete on the week.

Kominaru wrote:

Nikollo wrote:

Hello. Don't you mind me creating NM diff? Just start working on it today, i'll try to complete on the week.

4K NM is already done, but I would reallty thank a 5K or 7K if you did it, obviously!

Frim4503 wrote:

col:1,2,3,4,5,6,7

first, i'm sorry i have to drop my GD cuz i have unmotivated to mapping
second, for apologize i will mod your map

General

00:58:358 - 01:26:050 - make this to KIAI time ]Yup, fine!

4k Easy

00:19:512 - add note ]Seems fine
01:10:089 - ^ ]^
01:10:474 - ^ ]Not this one, sounds less monotonic without it , imo.
01:19:127 (79127|3) - make double same as 01:17:589 (77589|3,77589|0) Hm, why not. -

4k Normal

00:05:089 (5089|0) - wrong place, must at 00:04:897 - Yup, fine
00:09:512 (9512|0,9704|0) - move to 2,3 ^
00:23:550 (23550|1) - wrong place, must at 00:23:358 - ^
00:45:474 - add note ^
00:45:858 - add note ^
01:05:666 (65666|0,65858|1) - ctrl+H and move to 3,4 This one is fine like it's now (pitch relevancy)
01:20:089 - add note Yup, fine
01:21:243 - add note ^

Kruzon wrote:

Hi, as usual, my modding column format: 1 l 2 l 3 l 4 l / 5

4K Normal

SPOILER

00:41:627 (41627|0,41820|1) - preserving pattern repetition would look natural and sync with the rhythm- therefore, align them on the same column as 00:41:050 (41050|1,41243|2) -

this suggestion are based on PR and pattern flow, since it's an alternative to present better notes flow without denser notes density, due to difficulty reasons
00:39:512 (39512|0,39897|2,39897|3,40281|0) - recommended to press Ctrl + H, for upcoming pattern flow,
00:40:281 (40281|3) - you may then move this to 3,
00:40:666 (40666|0) - move to 4, implement similarity due to same sound, 00:42:204 (42204|3) -
-

00:47:397 (47397|1) - is not equal to 00:47:974 (47974|1) - , but both of these 00:46:820 (46820|3,47974|1) - has equal piano sound, suggest to align both of them on the same column. How about, 00:47:974 (47974|1) - move to 4, and
00:48:358 (48358|3) - you may move this to 3, neater pattern flow 00:48:358 (48358|2,48550|0,48743|2,48935|0,49127|1) -

00:50:281 (50281|0,50474|1) - bland positioning, i rather mirrored this for variety purposes. therefore, press Ctrl + H

00:52:781 (52781|0) - move to 3, and
00:52:974 (52974|3) - move to 2. at this point, you should have realized already that i asked you to placed the note with piano sound on the same column to separate it from other sound and make the notes meaningful. Though, the placement should be varies depend on section/part of the songs as it progresses to avoid boring. For example,

00:49:127 (49127|1,49897|1,51050|1) - these were placed on column 2, while
00:46:050 (46050|3,46820|3,47974|3) - these were placed on column 4, despite having the same sound but this is not the problem as long you coupled the notes to emphasized the similarities element of sound between the notes. Yes, they may be placed in different column, but you should plot them accordingly depend on the part of the songs. Furthermore, your pattern will be consistent throughout the map

5K Hard

SPOILER

00:10:474 (10474|3,10666|3,10666|4) - these jacks are awkward and don't have meaning, suggest to:
00:10:666 (10666|3) - move to 2,
00:10:858 (10858|0) - move to 4,
00:11:050 (11050|1) - move to 5, you gotta preserve consistency with this pattern you plotted 00:09:704 (9704|0,9897|1,10089|0) -

00:11:243 (11243|3) - perhaps move to 3, and
00:11:627 (11627|1) - move to 4
00:11:820 (11820|2) - move to 2
00:12:012 (12012|0) - move to 4,
00:12:204 (12204|0) - move to 5, should have the same base gap for consistency as well 00:12:204 (12204|4,12204|1) - = 00:10:666 (10666|4,10666|1) -
reference: 00:11:627 (11627|3,11820|1,12012|3,12204|1) -

00:12:397 (12397|2) - move to 1
00:12:589 (12589|3) - move to 3
00:12:781 (12781|2) - move to 5
00:12:974 (12974|4) - move to 2 refer 00:12:204 (12204|1,12204|4,12397|0,12781|4,12974|3,12974|1,13166|0) -

00:18:935 (18935|2) - move to 5, PR and pattern consistency 00:18:166 (18166|1,18358|0,18550|1) - I had doubts with this one, since the PR was already correct, but since it looking too monotonic placing it at 3, I decided to change it and place it, like you said, in 5, basically cause the flow feels more natural

00:30:089 (30089|2,30281|2) - inappropriate/meaningless jacks, suggest to move 00:30:089 (30089|2) - to 1
00:30:666 (30666|2,30666|1) - bad flow, therefore move 00:30:666 (30666|1) - to 5 instead
00:30:858 (30858|0) - move to 2
00:31:050 (31050|4) - move to 1
00:31:435 (31435|3) - move to 2, gives wider gap to represent stronger sound and refer 00:30:666 (30666|2,30858|1,31050|0,31243|2,31435|1,31627|0) -

00:36:050 (36050|4,36050|3) - gives wider gap if you follow the above statement, this is for consistency. also, i'll leave it in your hands where to place it
00:39:127 (39127|4,39127|3) - this as well,

- mod ends -

good luck c: Thanks! >w</