HP+1~2
1. 00:06:206 (6) - dont like this slider at all. it looks weird. it would be nice if u will change it on similar to this 00:05:717 (5) (ctrl+g, ctrl+j)
2. 00:06:859 (8,1) - feeling bad about the distance
i mean thisu can also stack 00:07:348 (1) - with 00:08:000 (5) - and make some other jumps:
3. i dont like that jumps either:
xmpl 4. 00:10:282 (4) - i think u should stack that with the beginning of this 00:09:304 (1)
5. 00:10:935 (1,2) - make them similar (1^)
6. 00:15:826 (6) - stack that with the end of this 00:16:152 (1)
7. 00:16:152 (1,2) - bad blanket, need to fix that
8. 00:17:946 (6) - stack the end of that with the end of this 00:16:152 (1)
9. 00:18:272 (7) - NC here
10. 00:21:369 (4,1) - i think u should stack the beginnings of these sliders
11. 00:31:152 (3) - this slider will look comfortable if this 00:30:826 (2) - would be smth like
this12. 00:40:119 (2,3,4) - i dont like this jump also u need to correct the impostion of this note with this slider 00:39:630 (1) - 00:40:446 (4)
13. 00:42:239 (1,2) - i think these sliders will look better if u will change their form:
xmpl14. 00:46:641 (3) - stack with 00:47:456 (1)
15. 00:48:109 (4) - with 00:47:456 (1)
16. 00:50:391 (2,3) - look at №13
17. 00:56:750 (1,2) - make a flow here, it will look nicer:
xmpl18. 01:09:956 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i think here should be jumps
xmpl19. 01:13:869 (4) - stack with the end of 01:14:032 (5)
20. 01:29:196 (1) - stack the end with 01:28:869 (5) - and 01:28:543 (3)
21. 01:32:945 (7) - stack with the end of 01:33:109 (1)
22. 01:43:543 (5,1) - make a flow here (look at №17)
23. 02:02:293 (6) - u have imposition with this slider 02:01:641 (4) - here, so fix it
24. 02:10:283 (1) - dont like this slider, maybe u will do it similar to 02:14:522 (5)?
25. 02:12:891 (8) - ^ same
26. 02:15:174 (2) - check №11
27. 02:18:924 - u are missing an important note here.
28. 02:24:794 (4) - check №12