Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Pending Beatmaps

EBICO & jioyi - Slit

posted
Total Posts
47
show more
Axey
1,216 posts
Joined October 2009
Axey
hi
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

BakaHuang wrote:

hi
皇爷=3=
Lavender
886 posts
Joined January 2014
Lavender
排版都好工整啊。。。没什么可挑的了，送星不要打我(其实是不太喜欢听音游曲
Shad0w1and
1,588 posts
Joined April 2011
Shad0w1and
[Insane]
00:19:795 (5) - 和 00:18:977 (2) - stack？00:21:159 (1,2) - 這個也一起？（故意的話就算了）
01:10:250 (2,1) - 對直，拿尺子量我也是醉了
01:14:523 (3,4,5) - 對好 _(:3
01:20:341 (3,4,5) - ^建議關掉格子排
[Another]
00:26:977 (1,1) - 差一個像素 _(:3
01:35:613 (5,6) - ^_(:3 這個會stack其實沒關係
[Standard]
00:55:341 (1) - 音效感覺稍有違和
[Beginner]
CS4?!?!?比Standard還高？

強挑的幾個點，不改都行
Peachtrees
815 posts
Joined May 2013
Peachtrees
no more placeholders!=w=

Beginner:

00:21:886 (1,2) - the overlap is most likely fine, I'm just personally dislike overlaps like this so I feel obligated to suggest a different pattern https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3023373

00:37:159 (2) - very nazi, but see if you can have the little bump exactly in the middle of the slider for perfect symmetry?

00:40:795 (2) - I think slightly de-curving this would look a tad bit nicer

00:56:795 (4) - this feels very strong uwu not sure if try to cover this sound, I think the current rythm is fine too!

01:08:432 (1) - wouldnt it be super neat to have the change in the sliders shape right here 01:08:795 (1) - because it'd go along with song I think ><

01:42:613 (4,1) - blanket /me runs

01:42:977 (1,1) - what's with the uneven spacing? is this intentional?

Standard

00:16:068 (1,2) - I'd personally feel like de-curving this would end up making this blanket look neater, though this is 100% fine as it is and my personal preference. The same obviously applies to similar blankets later on. again, I this is just MY prefence ~

00:39:341 (1,1) - kinda just me again, but I feel as though both of these slider could use a little more...uuh power i guess? I mean they're mapped to represent a very strong sound so I curve seems a bit blunt

01:05:523 (1,2) - I'm guessing this wasn't supposed to be blanekting?

Hard

00:22:977 (4,5,1) - nazi blanket ;c uuh not 100% if this was supposed to be blanketing though..being a nazi is hard ><

00:38:977 (4,1) - aaah the tiny overlap is driving me crazy ><

01:03:341 (2) - minor suggestion: why not give this a liiiitle downward curve to match the next slider and to go for a little 'swing' into the next slider

I'm not going to nazi out on every single blanket just to make this look longer ><

Hyper

01:09:704 (10,1) - idk, but I feel as though this feels strong enough to justify a little jump, especially since it's the build-up so making this a bit more intense should be fine yes?

00:22:977 (7,1) - ^

01:40:068 (1,2,3,4) - note sure if you want this to be a straight line, but it looks a little bit uneven?

01:43:341 (4) - any particular reason for the 20% HSV?

01:45:886 (4,5) - I feel as though this should feel a bit more intense

Another

00:47:341 (3,5) - nazi stack..I guess ><

01:08:068 (7,8,2) - ^ /me runs

01:10:613 (1,2) - I feel like this could bit a little more intense

Extra

Tried testplaying but tensing my arm up causes pain so I couldn't ><. I don't think I can come up with anything for this one, sorrry!

I hope I could atleast give ONE proper suggestion..very neat set ;w;
Last edited by Peachtrees , edited 1 time in total.
Karen
2,860 posts
Joined August 2013
Karen
M4M: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/292823
大哥好久没做音游曲，好棒。


[General]
  1. 怎么跟2ha一样用1365*768的BG，这是爱么
  2. mp3是128kbps的，虽然允许但是还是有点危险，建议换个高点的
  3. 这是什么，title不一样？
    SPOILER

[Beginner]
  1. 00:21:886 (1,2) - 这两个碰一起略丑啊..后面那个滑条换个位置吧
  2. 00:36:432 (1) - 今天一张图的easy因为1/2滑条被dq了，虽然感觉这个没什么问题但是，你懂得。
  3. 00:42:250 (4,1) - spacing error
  4. 01:01:886 - 这个BPM，转盘后要空4拍

[Standard]
  1. 00:38:613 (3,1) - 这碰到不好看吧
  2. 01:16:795 - normal空两拍
  3. 01:19:704 - ^
  4. 01:26:977 - ^
  5. 01:32:795 - 加个圈？后面凭空原地单点，好坑的感觉
    这节奏真难...

[Hard]
  1. 是不是说不摸这个来着？记性有点差...

[Hyper]
  1. 00:56:068 (7) - 跟钢琴轨的话这个圈就多余了吧
  2. 01:13:523 (4,5) - 感觉离太近了，容易误读，不如干脆把折返放圈下面
  3. 01:26:886 - 滑条头5%音量应该是必死的（
  4. 01:37:704 (1,2) - 这个也太近的感觉

[Another]
  1. 00:56:068 (8) - 同hyper，建议去掉这个
  2. 00:43:341 (3,4) - 这两个建议远一点，比如可以这样
    SPOILER
    别的找不出啥了orz。。

[Extra]
  1. 00:28:250 (2,3,4) - 感觉3连不能表现出这里的音乐，建议跟another一样00:28:068 - 从这里开始弄两个1/4滑条
  2. 01:08:250 (9) - 这个finish多余的吧
  3. 01:21:523 (1,2,1,2) - 完全重叠也太坑了点，建议错开一点。。
  4. 00:50:523 (4,7) - NC提示一下拆串吧
  5. 00:55:341 - 建议加个圈
lkx_Shore
1,453 posts
Joined January 2010
lkx_Shore
卸腿

General

  1. Beginer的title和其他难度不一致。
  2. 添加多477ms的lead-in?

Extra

  1. 00:39:341 (1) - 00:39:523 - 音是从这里开始出现的，把00:39:341 (1) - 从这个音分成两个不同的部分体现音的变化？(就是前面反方向扭或者曲折啥的)

Another

  1. AR9?...我觉得AR8.5左右最合适。
  2. 00:31:341 (1) - 改成稍微有点曲折的滑条？
  3. 00:32:795 (4) - 有点风险...顺便00:33:159 - 不加个note嘛。
  4. 00:39:523 - 音是从这里开始出现的，把00:39:341 (1) - 从这个音分成两个不同的部分体现音的变化？(就是前面反方向扭或者曲折啥的)
  5. 00:50:977 (1) - 我觉得用finish更好。

Hyper

  1. 00:08:613 (3) - 尾巴有声音感觉有点奇怪...降低音量?
  2. 00:31:704 (2) - 这里音乐有疾走感...note弹出去会更好。
  3. 01:05:886 (2) - 间距太大了。
  4. 01:24:523 - 和01:24:704 - 加note，01:24:613 (2) - 去掉。
  5. 01:26:977 - 着力点在这，可以把滑条改成01:26:977 - 开始，01:26:886 - 加个note。
  6. 01:44:068 (1,2,3,4,5) - 20%音量感觉不是很必要...用20%音量有什么特殊的理由吗?

Hard

  1. 01:19:341 (2) - 尾巴加Soft-finish?

Standard

  1. 01:23:886 (2) - 低难度直接跟主旋律吧？跟鼓感觉不适合。如果采用的话↓
    01:23:886 (2) - 移到01:23:704 - 加折返。
    01:24:432 (3) - 加折返，01:24:977 (4) - 改成在01:25:159 - 开始，01:25:704 - 结束。
  2. 01:44:432 - 加Note?

Beginner

  1. Fine.

Other

  1. 找齐mod以后记得喊我回来。
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka
lkx我被你的星吓着了....

直接跪倒在了地上......

吃完饭看mod :roll:
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Kagamine Ren wrote:

M4M: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/292823
大哥好久没做音游曲，好棒。


[General] :arrow: all fixed
  1. 怎么跟2ha一样用1365*768的BG，这是爱么
  2. mp3是128kbps的，虽然允许但是还是有点危险，建议换个高点的
  3. 这是什么，title不一样？
    SPOILER

[Beginner]
  1. 00:21:886 (1,2) - 这两个碰一起略丑啊..后面那个滑条换个位置吧 :arrow: 算是故意的先这样试试
  2. 00:36:432 (1) - 今天一张图的easy因为1/2滑条被dq了，虽然感觉这个没什么问题但是，你懂得。 :arrow: 我懂...还是try一下
  3. 00:42:250 (4,1) - spacing error :arrow: fixed
  4. 01:01:886 - 这个BPM，转盘后要空4拍 :arrow: 容我哭一哭，缩短了spinner

[Standard]
  1. 00:38:613 (3,1) - 这碰到不好看吧 :arrow: 确实有点..不过先这样好了.w.
  2. 01:16:795 - normal空两拍 :arrow: [/color]
  3. 01:19:704 - ^
  4. 01:26:977 - ^
  5. 01:32:795 - 加个圈？后面凭空原地单点，好坑的感觉 :arrow: 好像还行？就先不改了
    这节奏真难...

[Hard]
  1. 是不是说不摸这个来着？记性有点差...

[Hyper]
  1. 00:56:068 (7) - 跟钢琴轨的话这个圈就多余了吧 :arrow: 我也不知道跟的什么...
  2. 01:13:523 (4,5) - 感觉离太近了，容易误读，不如干脆把折返放圈下面 :arrow: 大概算是antijump
  3. 01:26:886 - 滑条头5%音量应该是必死的 :arrow: [/color]
  4. 01:37:704 (1,2) - 这个也太近的感觉 :arrow: 打起来实感一般...就先这样了

[Another]
  1. 00:56:068 (8) - 同hyper，建议去掉这个
  2. 00:43:341 (3,4) - 这两个建议远一点，比如可以这样 :arrow: 虽然图片并没有刷出来但是拉远了一些
    SPOILER
    别的找不出啥了orz。。

[Extra]
  1. 00:28:250 (2,3,4) - 感觉3连不能表现出这里的音乐，建议跟another一样00:28:068 - 从这里开始弄两个1/4滑条 :arrow: 他应该跟的是鼓，先这样
  2. 01:08:250 (9) - 这个finish多余的吧 :arrow: done
  3. 01:21:523 (1,2,1,2) - 完全重叠也太坑了点，建议错开一点。。 :arrow: 不是特别想改这个梗
  4. 00:50:523 (4,7) - NC提示一下拆串吧 :arrow: done
  5. 00:55:341 - 建议加个圈 :arrow: done
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Shad0w1and wrote:

[Insane]
00:19:795 (5) - 和 00:18:977 (2) - stack？00:21:159 (1,2) - 這個也一起？（故意的話就算了）
01:10:250 (2,1) - 對直，拿尺子量我也是醉了
01:14:523 (3,4,5) - 對好 _(:3
01:20:341 (3,4,5) - ^建議關掉格子排
[Another]
00:26:977 (1,1) - 差一個像素 _(:3
01:35:613 (5,6) - ^_(:3 這個會stack其實沒關係
[Standard]
00:55:341 (1) - 音效感覺稍有違和
[Beginner]
CS4?!?!?比Standard還高？

強挑的幾個點，不改都行
昨天改了好像没回？=-=我也忘记改了啥地方好像大多都改了- -
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Peachtrees wrote:

no more placeholders!=w=

Beginner:

00:21:886 (1,2) - the overlap is most likely fine, I'm just personally dislike overlaps like this so I feel obligated to suggest a different pattern https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3023373 :arrow: kinda intended to do that~

00:37:159 (2) - very nazi, but see if you can have the little bump exactly in the middle of the slider for perfect symmetry? :arrow: fixed?

00:40:795 (2) - I think slightly de-curving this would look a tad bit nicer :arrow: done

00:56:795 (4) - this feels very strong uwu not sure if try to cover this sound, I think the current rythm is fine too! :arrow: .w.

01:08:432 (1) - wouldnt it be super neat to have the change in the sliders shape right here 01:08:795 (1) - because it'd go along with song I think >< :arrow: well, just try new things maybe?

01:42:613 (4,1) - blanket /me runs :arrow: fixed?

01:42:977 (1,1) - what's with the uneven spacing? is this intentional? :arrow: fixed a bit

Standard

00:16:068 (1,2) - I'd personally feel like de-curving this would end up making this blanket look neater, though this is 100% fine as it is and my personal preference. The same obviously applies to similar blankets later on. again, I this is just MY prefence ~ :arrow: fixed

00:39:341 (1,1) - kinda just me again, but I feel as though both of these slider could use a little more...uuh power i guess? I mean they're mapped to represent a very strong sound so I curve seems a bit blunt :arrow: Q.Q

01:05:523 (1,2) - I'm guessing this wasn't supposed to be blanekting? :arrow: fixed

Hard

00:22:977 (4,5,1) - nazi blanket ;c uuh not 100% if this was supposed to be blanketing though..being a nazi is hard ><

00:38:977 (4,1) - aaah the tiny overlap is driving me crazy >< :arrow: me too, fixed

01:03:341 (2) - minor suggestion: why not give this a liiiitle downward curve to match the next slider and to go for a little 'swing' into the next slider :arrow: yes

I'm not going to nazi out on every single blanket just to make this look longer ><

Hyper

01:09:704 (10,1) - idk, but I feel as though this feels strong enough to justify a little jump, especially since it's the build-up so making this a bit more intense should be fine yes? :arrow: fixed in another way

00:22:977 (7,1) - ^ :arrow: keep this first~~

01:40:068 (1,2,3,4) - note sure if you want this to be a straight line, but it looks a little bit uneven? :arrow: well, you're right

01:43:341 (4) - any particular reason for the 20% HSV? :arrow: I just followed extra and fixed

01:45:886 (4,5) - I feel as though this should feel a bit more intense :arrow: hmmm, I will reconsider it :3

Another

00:47:341 (3,5) - nazi stack..I guess >< :arrow: done

01:08:068 (7,8,2) - ^ /me runs :arrow: done

01:10:613 (1,2) - I feel like this could bit a little more intense :arrow: same as hyper

Extra

Tried testplaying but tensing my arm up causes pain so I couldn't ><. I don't think I can come up with anything for this one, sorrry!

I hope I could atleast give ONE proper suggestion..very neat set ;w;
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

lkx_Shore wrote:

卸腿

General

  1. Beginer的title和其他难度不一致。 :arrow: done
  2. 添加多477ms的lead-in? :arrow: 虽然不知道为什么是477但是还是加了

Extra

  1. 00:39:341 (1) - 00:39:523 - 音是从这里开始出现的，把00:39:341 (1) - 从这个音分成两个不同的部分体现音的变化？(就是前面反方向扭或者曲折啥的) :arrow: 拆了个circle出来

Another

  1. AR9?...我觉得AR8.5左右最合适。 :arrow: done
  2. 00:31:341 (1) - 改成稍微有点曲折的滑条？ :arrow: 改了个奇怪的形状？
  3. 00:32:795 (4) - 有点风险...顺便00:33:159 - 不加个note嘛。 :arrow: done
  4. 00:39:523 - 音是从这里开始出现的，把00:39:341 (1) - 从这个音分成两个不同的部分体现音的变化？(就是前面反方向扭或者曲折啥的) :arrow: 和Extra一样处理了
  5. 00:50:977 (1) - 我觉得用finish更好。 :arrow: 加上了

Hyper

  1. 00:08:613 (3) - 尾巴有声音感觉有点奇怪...降低音量? :arrow: 20%
  2. 00:31:704 (2) - 这里音乐有疾走感...note弹出去会更好。 :arrow: done
  3. 01:05:886 (2) - 间距太大了。 :arrow: 应该还行？这里先不改了><
  4. 01:24:523 - 和01:24:704 - 加note，01:24:613 (2) - 去掉。 :arrow:
  5. 01:26:977 - 着力点在这，可以把滑条改成01:26:977 - 开始，01:26:886 - 加个note。 :arrow: done
  6. 01:44:068 (1,2,3,4,5) - 20%音量感觉不是很必要...用20%音量有什么特殊的理由吗? :arrow: 这一定是饼干的锅！（强行甩锅

Hard

  1. 01:19:341 (2) - 尾巴加Soft-finish? :arrow: done

Standard

  1. 01:23:886 (2) - 低难度直接跟主旋律吧？跟鼓感觉不适合。如果采用的话↓
    01:23:886 (2) - 移到01:23:704 - 加折返。
    01:24:432 (3) - 加折返，01:24:977 (4) - 改成在01:25:159 - 开始，01:25:704 - 结束。 :arrow: done
  2. 01:44:432 - 加Note? :arrow: 好像有点难了？先这样/w\

Beginner

  1. Fine.

Other

  1. 找齐mod以后记得喊我回来。
liangv587
472 posts
Joined April 2013
liangv587
  • [General]
  1. 加leadin是为了开始前能有2000ms的缓冲时间，另外Extra没加上
  2. bg逼死强迫症

    [Another]
  3. 00:38:977 (4) - 怎么不延长两节，00:39:341 (5) - 这里是结束，不应该用圈
  4. 00:47:250 - 加个圈补下节奏？
  5. 01:25:795 (1,1) - Insane级转盘后要隔1/2，或者不要那个圈了

    [Hard]
  6. 01:31:159 (3) - 这样如何http://puu.sh/hiSqI.jpg

    [Standard]
  7. 01:37:523 (1,2,1) - 低难度不要叠滑条尾吧
  8. 01:49:159 (1,2) - 同上
  9. 01:42:977 (4,1,2) - 这种很难打，可以把后面那组01:43:159 (1,2,3,4) - 换成滑条，01:44:613这里也应该补个圈切换回来
唔，做得太好了找不出问题，水点摸就起飞
Doormat
2,049 posts
Joined September 2013
Doormat
Hello, from my mod queue victim list :)

Beginner
- Got nothing to fix here; it's pretty solid in my opinion.

Standard
- Make the slider at 00:18:977(1) less curvy so it blankets 00:20:432(2) better
- Make the slider at 00:20:432(2) less curvy so it blankets 00:21:886(1) better
- Make the slider at 00:58:250(2) less curvy so it blankets 00:59:704(3) better
- You don't need to make the note at 01:09:886(1) a new combo
- The transition from 01:14:795(1) to 01:15:068(2) feels off
  • :idea: Maybe you can use the pattern from 01:17:159(1, 2) here as well?
- Consider adding an note at 01:44:613
- The sliders at 01:46:523(2) and 01:47:068(3) feel too long in my opinion
  • :idea: Maybe you can shorten the sliders so it's something like this?
    SPOILER
    Before

    After
Hard
- Sliders at 01:12:795(1) and 01:13:523(3) could be made a little bit more curvier so that they better blanket 01:13:341(2)

Hyper
- Distance snap isn't followed at 00:02:613(5).
  • :idea: Maybe you can reverse (Ctrl + G) the slider and move it to somewhere here?
    SPOILER
- Try rotating the slider at 00:36:432(5) by 3 degrees anti-clockwise (-3 degrees clockwise) from its selection centre so that this slider is parallel with 00:36:068(3, 4)
- Consider reversing (Ctrl + G) the following:
  • - 00:43:341(5) and 00:43:704(6)
    - 00:46:613(1)
- The distance between 01:05:795(1) and 01:05:886(2) is a little large :o Consider making this jump shorter?

I took a look at your Another and Extra maps, but I don't exactly have a whole lot of experience when it comes to how these types of maps should be designed, so I didn't mod them :/

Hopefully some of my suggestions with the easier difficulties help you out (:

I used to play Cytus on my friend's iPad all the time before I started playing osu! lol
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka
=333333333333333= Thank you!!!!
Hollow Wings
1,514 posts
Joined July 2010
Hollow Wings
bubbled.
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka
:o modded on QQ

too long to upload the log.

Thanks HW =3=
Rixia Mao
53 posts
Joined September 2013
Rixia Mao

jyc-Binggan wrote:

am I pro?
ofc
lkx_Shore
1,453 posts
Joined January 2010
lkx_Shore
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Rixia Mao wrote:

jyc-Binggan wrote:

am I pro?
ofc

Thx, lkx.
cmn_891127
928 posts
Joined July 2010
cmn_891127
o(≧v≦)o~~好棒
Skyhmer
372 posts
Joined November 2013
Skyhmer
wat
Anyways congratz
Lach
1,118 posts
Joined November 2012
Lach
Hey this map is cool but I really think you should have offset the second half of these notes 01:21:523 (1,2,1,2) - in the extra in a way that makes them more visible.
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Lach wrote:

Hey this map is cool but I really think you should have offset the second half of these notes 01:21:523 (1,2,1,2) - in the extra in a way that makes them more visible.
No, thanks. :3
Mafumafu
Beatmap Nominator
3,361 posts
Joined August 2013
Mafumafu
Gratz!
Nice song and map indeed
DeletedUser_1574070
DeletedUser_1574070
i miss u, binggan
Rizia
3,114 posts
Joined January 2012
Rizia
Gratz!
rip ends
FlobuFlobs
575 posts
Joined June 2011
FlobuFlobs
y u no rayark games tag qwq

Gratz lol
Skystar
1,628 posts
Joined May 2011
Skystar
我操 大哥啊
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

我操 大哥啊
我操 星爷啊



Thanks all <3
Rixia Mao
53 posts
Joined September 2013
Rixia Mao
我操拉客修

lkx best BN confirmed
gratz, binggan
pw384
2,286 posts
Joined January 2012
pw384
我操大哥 开不开slit iii和slit ooo啊
xxxafiqxxx
xxxafiqxxx
priti's ultra is good ;w;
IamKwaN
osu! Alumni
3,905 posts
Joined August 2012
IamKwaN
Greetings, your map has to be taken away from the Qualified section.

Timing
  1. The offset is too early, +15 would work.
Snapping

  1. Huge bunch of snapping issues across all the difficulties:
  2. 00:31:341 - Another, follow 1/6 on Extra.
  3. 00:32:068 - 1/6 snapping if +15 ms for offset; Extra, Hard http://puu.sh/hx6oJ/c24a54104f.jpg
  4. 00:34:250 - Hard: http://puu.sh/hxnCW/3751c65d19.jpg
  5. 00:42:250 - Extra, Another, Hyper: http://puu.sh/hxnFV/e1174edfaf.jpg
  6. 00:43:704 - Hyper, Hard, Standard: http://puu.sh/hxnGw/84d4841e07.jpg
  7. 01:18:795 - Hyper, Hard: http://puu.sh/hxnNn/d2e6348fa3.jpg
  8. Pictures are mostly taken from Extra, follow Extra's snapping as majority of the snapping is fine except those mentioned above.
Extra
  1. 00:32:613 - 00:38:795 - We wonder why these are empty. It's so hard to read the polarity.
  2. 01:21:523 (1,2,1,2) - You should get rid of the complete overlap of (1,1) as the first 01:21:523 (1) - doesn't disappear completely before the next 01:22:068 (1) - appears. Amend this gimmick to something like 00:40:068 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - .
  3. 01:25:159 (1,2,3) - The spacing here is quite confusing as well, as it's so similar.
Another

  1. 00:33:704 - We wonder why this is empty, the synthesizer is strong here.
  2. 01:44:250 (4,1,2,3) - The transition is quite bad, something less choppy could improve the case with such solid rhythm support in the current background music, like filling in 01:44:432 - and 01:44:523 - with circles.
Hyper

  1. Some usages of spacing are not appropriate, especially anti-jumps. A little more care are necessary to nerf the readability issues, e.g.:
    00:05:523 (2) -
    00:46:250 (8) -
    01:12:068 (1,2,3) - Consistent spacing is highly recommended as the current placement looks so untidy and unreadable.
    01:13:886 (5) -
  2. Moreover, the kiai is supposed to be the most intense part of the song. Hilariously, there aren't many jumps in the kiai but before the kiai, 01:02:613 - . Some more works are probably needed to handle the density issue (i.e. reverse the spacing density of kiai and that before the kiai):
    01:03:704 (6,7) -
    01:10:613 (3,4,5,6) -
    01:17:613 (3) -
Hard

  1. 00:21:159 (2,3,1) - Spacing looks really distorted, we don't expect they are of the same rhythm gap.
Standard

  1. 00:39:341 (1,2,3,1) - What's going on for this spacing, particularly 00:40:432 (3) - ? Just no, it's 1/1 rhythm afterwards.
  2. 01:03:341 (2,3) - 01:04:795 (4,1) - Why jumps?
  3. 01:46:523 (2,3) - We have problem understanding these, even higher diffs don't do blue tick rhythms here.
  4. 01:38:250 (2,1) - Stacking circles at the back of sliders aren't recommended.
  5. 01:47:704 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - Different types of stacks are used within a short period of time. Is that necessary? We think not as they are too confusing.
On behalf of the Team, I urge BNs taking good care of the map and good luck.

###CM
Rixia Mao
53 posts
Joined September 2013
Rixia Mao
whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

wait does that me i can shoot a star now?

take my star!!!1111
spboxer3
Global Moderator
3,616 posts
Joined November 2009
spboxer3
之後過了幾年 我依然懷念著我的腿
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka
...我先捞个船，晚点改
Rixia Mao
53 posts
Joined September 2013
Rixia Mao

Megurine Luka wrote:

...我先捞个船，晚点改
一捞三天过去了 lol
Megurine Luka
2,579 posts
Joined November 2010
Topic Starter
Megurine Luka

Rixia Mao wrote:

Megurine Luka wrote:

...我先捞个船，晚点改
一捞三天过去了 lol
lol，刚回国....我得找饼干思量思量怎么搞=3=不急~
Charles445
Elite Mapper II: Aspirant / osu! Paragon
2,881 posts
Joined March 2009
Charles445
This needs some serious rhythm and spacing work x_x
A lot of the gimmicks are neat ideas but they cause lots of readability problems.
Lemme know if you want a mod
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
3 / 47