1. Easy (1.62 stars, 123 notes)
2. Hard (3.33 stars, 250 notes)
3. Insane (4.69 stars, 351 notes)
4. Normal (2.09 stars, 167 notes)

1. I think offset is a bit slightly off , try offset 959

1. 00:26:541 (4,1) - this would flow better if you make the angle here a bit more sharp , try move (1) to around x408 y248
2. 00:38:405 (7,8,9) - if you adjust these three notes a bit like making them lining down a bit , would make flow here 00:38:405 (7,8,9,1) - nice
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:48:914 (1,2,3) - I feel like if you can make spacing consistent just like what you did here 00:48:405 (1,2,3) - , it would make the flow better here lol
4. 00:51:286 (3,1,2,3) - flow here is a bit awkward imo , looks like somehow the spacing here is pretty big compare to the others jumps that you make and also player need to play 00:51:286 (3) - slider here then do quick turn to this 00:51:456 (1) - which require really fast movement and I don't think that the song here fit for that somehow lol , I will suggest you to stack these 00:51:456 (1,2,3) - and might as well decrease spacing here maybe that would make this one work better imo (it doesn't really affect star rating tho lol )
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:29:253 (1) - mhmm maybe you can make it slightly curve just like what you did here 00:28:575 (2) - that would fit the song here a bit
2. 00:45:015 (3,3) - accident or intentionally ? fix stack ? would make pattern looks better here
3. 01:24:168 (1) - maybe if you move this up or down it would make flow here 01:23:659 (1,2,3,1) - a bit instresting , placing (1) lining up with 01:23:659 (1,2,3,1) - just feel a bit idk linear or somthing lol

1. there are some redundant green timing point , I recommend delete them because they don't affect anything 00:01:964 - ,00:03:659 - ,00:04:676 - ,00:05:524 -
2. 00:11:456 (7) - adjust tail a bit so it would make flow here 00:11:117 (6,7,1) - better imo
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:49:931 (1) - end this spinner here 00:51:117 - just like the other diffs ?

1. there are some redundant green timing point , I recommend delete them because they don't affect anything 00:01:964 - ,00:03:659 - ,00:04:676 - ,00:05:524 -
2. 00:27:558 (4,1) - try this rhythm ? might be a bit easier for beginners to play
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:28:405 - feel a bit weird that you skip this snare beat , try this instead ?
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:38:236 (4,1) - place a bit too close , maybe you can move (1) a bit
   SPOILER

   

Kibbleru wrote:

let me know if u need bn

1. 00:11:795 (1) - stack on 00:10:100 (3) - ?
2. 00:27:558 (4) - add additions soft and clap on both
3. 01:08:066 (3,4) - you can put clean more.
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:26:710 - recommend to pick up this sound. beginner will confuse in playing ;;
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:27:558 (4) - add additions soft and clap on head and tail
3. 00:41:625 (1) - nazi. end point more down?
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:27:558 (4) - add additions soft and clap on head and tail
2. 00:49:846 (1) - end on 00:51:625 - ?

1. 00:06:286 - add 10~20% green line?
2. 00:14:846 (3,4,5,6) - feels too close. 00:14:846 (3) - more right?
3. 00:27:558 (1,3) - add additions soft and clap
4. 00:29:761 (2) - stack perfecly on 00:29:253 (6) -
5. 00:51:456 (1,2,3) - Ctrl+G? better flow imo

1. Sth. just unimportant （you can always ignore it）
2. My personal opinion and suggest
3. Highly recommended (plz think over it)

1. 00:12:473 (3) - make better blanket with 00:12:473 (3)
2. 00:38:405 (7,8,9) - 这里改成稍微向下倾斜是不是更好，flow或许更好一点，而且之后是减速段让9和1间距小点感觉更合适
3. 00:58:575 (3) - 这里ctrl G感觉更合适
4. 01:03:659 (2) - blanket well
5. 01:13:829 (3,4) - 这里感觉间距大了点，4稍微往上面移点？
6. 01:18:744 (3) - stack well?
7. 01:20:100 (1) - 这里感觉flow太直，试试改成向左边微弯？

1. 00:17:727 (2) - whistle？
2. 00:20:439 (2) - ^
3. 00:58:236 (2) - blanket

1. 00:02:981 (4) - whistle here?
2. 00:21:795 (4) - ^

1. How about adding some more tags, like "opening" "TV Size"

1. 00:05:185 (2) - I think this would sound much better if you remove the whistle on slider's tail, since i don't really hear anything in music here o3o
2. 00:21:795 (4) - how about adding a whistle on this repeat, it felt like something missing here, so yeah =3=/

1. 00:05:185 (1) - same as i said about this in normal =3=/
2. 00:20:439 (2) - switch the whistle from the tail to the repeat, imo it might sound much better. Since i honestly don't hear anything that follows that whistle on the tail =3=

zj0924 wrote:

Hi!飞球~From in-game request

夭寿啦！飞球竟然又作图了，说好的Having a deep deep deep break from mapping呢？阿扎里XD

Default = Normal mods
Blue = Strongly recommended
Red = Unrankable issue

[General]

• 
  Fine~

[Easy]

1. 00:02:812 (4,1) - 这里可以flow角度大点来强调后面那个重音我觉得没必要
   
2. 00:04:676 (3) - 包的可以再好看一点？现在这样蛮好看
   
3. 00:07:388 (2,3) - 试试这样的flow？我感觉更顺点那样看起来不polish了
   
4. 00:15:863 (3,4) - flow角度略大，对新手不友好，况且这里不应该强调距离感（要强调也应该是00:17:219 (1) - ）所以建议做以下变化
   http://puu.sh/hc2gh/fd58c2660f.jpg
5. 00:33:490 (1) - 弯一点？觉得更好看，flow也不这么僵硬了[就是摆直滑条在这的/color]
   
6. 00:45:015 (2,2) - 不介意nazi的话，317 237？
7. 01:06:033 (1) - polarity？打起来怪怪的，早点换到红线比较好，建议这样（在滑条尾和2各加上kick （normal-clap））[/color]
   
8. 01:10:101 (3) - 不介意的话，我认为这里用1/2折返非常合适，排版：
   
   没大区别
9. 01:15:524 (3) - 1/1往返箭头我觉得很合适不过这里比较难动了，只是一个建议我easy本着简化接哦组来的，用一些2/1，然而1/1折返并不行
10. 01:19:592 (1,2,3) - 打击感美丽，这样下节奏试试？
    
11. 01:24:507 (4) - 同上，比起bass的长音我觉得，01:24:846 (5) - 这个音更重要，不应该放滑条尾草率带过……nope，另外没有那个规定。有没有规定看rc（话说ez是不是有spinner前面1/2不能加单点的规定啊，不过我觉得应该不影响，毕竟这个转盘比较长）
    

[Normal]

1. 00:00:948 (1) - 建议三个音都加上kick（normal clap）会更有底气，只有crash感觉虚了点，毕竟还有bass的音，其他难度同理
2. 00:03:659 (1) - ^
3. 00:06:371 (1) -弯一下让flow看上去困难一点比较好，因为红白过渡容易看不出节奏，新手这时候极有可能会慢半拍打这个音。这样我觉得也美观些……
   
4. 00:07:727 (4,5,6) - 这里我觉得不应该突然没有1/2，照着前面的感觉，因为你map了00:06:880 (2) - ，后面没有1/2浑身难受，至少在bass强烈的地方map1/2.建议这样
   
   我觉得没事
5. 00:07:727 (4,5) - 上面那条其实后来觉得是这个东西搞的鬼，用这样的00:08:405 (6) - 咚咚哒我就不觉得违和了……same
6. 00:15:863 (1) - 打击感又美丽(00:15:863 (1,2) - 这里跟bass,00:16:541 (3) - snare normal hit 都可以)我喜欢这样的跟节奏法
   
7. 00:18:066 (2,4) - 避免红白过渡问题，00:18:744 (3) - 加个圈比较容易让新手跟上节奏，不加也没事换了另外一种
8. 00:18:914 (4) - whistle？
9. 00:24:337 (3) - ^滑条头whistle？
10. 00:31:117 (2,3) - 节奏好奇怪...突然跟了vocal，不如用1/1折返箭头带过 没事，我这里前面也是跟的vocal统一
    
11. 00:31:964 (4) - 还是觉得怪怪的，这里折返箭头有加速的感觉我觉得不合适，应该是减速会比较好一点。00:46:032 - 要map也是因为vocal而不是bass，现在的排列会让我觉得是bass，可是bass只到00:45:863 - 所以建议这样没什么区别啊
    
12. 00:48:405 (4) - 还是打击感的问题，觉得好奇怪，这两下kick应该是同样重要的，建议换成原地俩单点更好，况且原地单点有减速的效果，结合这里的旋律，需要骤停的感觉，如果用滑条会有一定的初速度，达不到骤停的震撼力……同上，normal是简化节奏，个人觉得低难度不存在打击感的问题，节奏准就行，滑条尾巴不尾巴不管。后面同理
13. 00:54:507 (5,1) - 不平行一下？弯了我觉得对flow也没什么大影响还不如平行的好……
14. 00:56:541 (4,5,6,7) - 我还是觉得snare不应该放滑条尾，有些违和，后面一些地方同理。00:54:507 (5) - 这样的就不错，本来就是低难度，新手不会介意的，像这样有规律的重复我觉得新手打起来会很爽。
15. 01:05:524 (5) - 漏了kick？
16. 01:07:558 (4) - ^
17. 01:24:168 (2,3) - 这里我觉得加上kick更好，其他难度同理
    
    相比较hd和ins，NM我觉得可以在提高一下

这hd和ins根本摸不出啥，我的论文啊XD
玩好之后觉得不摸都行，排列和节奏近乎完美，尤其是排列，我怎么就做不到这么精致的排版啊XD。不过还是给一些另外的节奏下法还有更好的摆放建议吧（想摸音效，一看是飞球的图……）

[Hard]

1. 00:05:185 (1) - 玩起来没问题，但我觉得把这个bass map进去会更好懒改，说法不大
   
2. 00:09:083 (1,2,3,4) - 根据节奏我觉得这样下比较好
   
3. 00:14:846 (3,4,5,6) - 多边形弧度有些窄，感觉有些卡手，试试类似这样的？
   
4. 00:47:388 (2) - 试试这样的flow？不好
   
5. 00:58:914 (4,2,3) - 叠好 192 176
6. 01:10:100 (1,2,3,4) - 虽然玩起来不违和，但是结合这里的旋律，采用四个短滑条会比较适合吧，像01:22:303 (1,2,3,4) - 我主要跟鼓点
   
7. 01:17:897 (4) - 滑条换成单点更适合旋律？说法也不大
   

[Insane]

• 
  Insane更摸不出什么了，全都是从我自身角度出发的一些建议，估计没啥用

1. 00:23:829 (2,3) - 节奏有些奇怪，滑条更适合点吧，长滑条压着人声，单点跟着间奏音
   
2. 00:38:405 (7,8,9) - 有些卡手啊，而且结合这里的旋律我觉得距离缩紧点比较好，试试类似这样的这样反而别手，不符合我的摆法风格
   
3. 00:45:693 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - 试试这样的flow？跳起来会更爽……额这有意义吗？整个给我换了个梗。。。
   
4. 00:51:117 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 我这里是断成狗了……后来发现00:51:286 (3) - 滑条尾也按一下就好了
5. 01:13:998 (4) - ctrl+g对我来说更顺一点……对我不顺
6. 01:16:880 (1,2) - 感觉有点远了，01:17:558 (3,4) - 这里会有点卡手的感觉，影响不大的确没影响

抱歉HD&INS摸得水了点……不过真的很难挑出啥毛病了……
神图~再射颗星
GL~
丫的，飞球赶紧起飞
modding time:2h

CelsiusLK wrote:

As requested

[general]

1. I think offset is a bit slightly off , try offset 959 changed to 955 instead

[insane]

1. 00:26:541 (4,1) - this would flow better if you make the angle here a bit more sharp , try move (1) to around x408 y248
2. 00:38:405 (7,8,9) - if you adjust these three notes a bit like making them lining down a bit , would make flow here 00:38:405 but the lines are better for me, "down" seems not good (7,8,9,1) - nice
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:48:914 (1,2,3) - I feel like if you can make spacing consistent just like what you did here 00:48:405 (1,2,3) - , it would make the flow better here lolThat will be a little random for me
4. 00:51:286 (3,1,2,3) - flow here is a bit awkward imo , looks like somehow the spacing here is pretty big compare to the others jumps that you make and also player need to play 00:51:286 (3) - slider here then do quick turn to this 00:51:456 (1) - which require really fast movement and I don't think that the song here fit for that somehow lol , I will suggest you to stack these 00:51:456 (1,2,3) - and might as well decrease spacing here maybe that would make this one work better imo (it doesn't really affect star rating tho lol )
   SPOILER

   

[hard]

1. 00:29:253 (1) - mhmm maybe you can make it slightly curve just like what you did here 00:28:575 (2) - that would fit the song here a bit
2. 00:45:015 (3,3) - accident or intentionally ? fix stack ? would make pattern looks better here
3. 01:24:168 (1) - maybe if you move this up or down it would make flow here 01:23:659 (1,2,3,1) - a bit instresting , placing (1) lining up with 01:23:659 (1,2,3,1) - just feel a bit idk linear or somthing lolI did this on purpose lol

[normal]

1. there are some redundant green timing point , I recommend delete them because they don't affect anything 00:01:964 - ,00:03:659 - ,00:04:676 - ,00:05:524 -
2. 00:11:456 (7) - adjust tail a bit so it would make flow here 00:11:117 (6,7,1) - better imo
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:49:931 (1) - end this spinner here 00:51:117 - just like the other diffs ?changed in hard diff

[easy]

1. there are some redundant green timing point , I recommend delete them because they don't affect anything 00:01:964 - ,00:03:659 - ,00:04:676 - ,00:05:524 -
2. 00:27:558 (4,1) - try this rhythm ? might be a bit easier for beginners to play
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:28:405 - feel a bit weird that you skip this snare beat , try this instead ?
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:38:236 (4,1) - place a bit too close , maybe you can move (1) a bit
   SPOILER

   

great mapset

you can ask me for recheck later

good luck

iMage-- wrote:

hey M4M

Easy

1. 00:11:795 (1) - stack on 00:10:100 (3) - ?
2. 00:27:558 (4) - add additions soft and clap on both
3. 01:08:066 (3,4) - you can put clean more.
   
   SPOILER

   

Normal

1. 00:26:710 - recommend to pick up this sound. beginner will confuse in playing ;;
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:27:558 (4) - add additions soft and clap on head and tail
3. 00:41:625 (1) - nazi. end point more down?
   
   SPOILER

   

Hard

1. 00:27:558 (4) - add additions soft and clap on head and tail
2. 00:49:846 (1) - end on 00:51:625 - ?

Insane

1. 00:06:286 - add 10~20% green line? I usually don't mute sliderend
2. 00:14:846 (3,4,5,6) - feels too close. 00:14:846 (3) - more right?
3. 00:27:558 (1,3) - add additions soft and clap
4. 00:29:761 (2) - stack perfecly on 00:29:253 (6) -
5. 00:51:456 (1,2,3) - Ctrl+G? better flow imo

good luck desu

1. I found a bit slightest delay in normal-hitfinish and normal-hitwhistle that can be optimized a bit , use this normal-hitwhistle, normal-hitfinish

1. 01:00:277 (5) - adjust slider like this would make flow here 01:00:277 (5,1) - better imo
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:16:887 (1,2) - spacing here is a bit big imo that make the flow here somehow a bit weird for me imo , suggest move this to x336 y112 also gonna suggest pattern here as well
   SPOILER

   
   it doesn't affect star rating tho if you change this
3. 01:18:243 (1,3) - fix stack ?

1. 00:20:785 (2,3) - try this pattern , somehow I feel like this overlap is a bit tricky for beginners
   SPOILER

   

Kibbleru wrote:

wtf :X

lol u got 2 bn alrdy ;w;

CelsiusLK wrote:

[insane]

1. 01:00:277 (5) - adjust slider like this would make flow here 01:00:277 (5,1) - better imo I make the ds smaller, but the way you provided seems flow is not good for me
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:16:887 (1,2) - spacing here is a bit big imo that make the flow here somehow a bit weird for me imo , suggest move this to x336 y112 also gonna suggest pattern here as well hmm I think it's fine, it's slider jump which is much easier than circle jump, and it's flow well so I don't think it's hard to play(I test some times and catch it everytime)
   SPOILER

   
   it doesn't affect star rating tho if you change this
3. 01:18:243 (1,3) - fix stack ?it's a manual stack, if stack perfectly it will have a bad show when playing under the stack leniecy

[easy]

1. 00:20:785 (2,3) - try this pattern , somehow I feel like this overlap is a bit tricky for beginners okay
   SPOILER

   

poke me back