o me de tou~
chinese 100/100
chinese 100/100
forum
Chitose Sara - Arcadia
posted
Total Posts
88
gratz~, nice song.(std難しい...)
Topic Starter
ありがとうございますYasaija 714 wrote:
おめでとうございます
Pokechan a ri ga toupocket-Gao wrote:
o me de tou~
chinese 100/100
otaku song、太鼓できないyuzu__rinrin wrote:
gratz~, nice song.(std難しい...)
ありがと！
Topic Starter
谢了！imoutosan wrote:
恭喜
後は銀色遥かだけ...-Maruk- wrote:
いいゾ～これ
Wow, gratz
I wish my Japanese skills can be as good as your Chinese
I wish my Japanese skills can be as good as your Chinese
Topic Starter
多谢，你也加油sahuang wrote:
Wow, gratz
I wish my Japanese skills can be as good as your Chinese
Congrats!
Topic Starter
Thankswajinshu wrote:
Congrats!
我 喜欢 你。Pururut wrote:
恭喜~~
それまじ草生えるHatsuMin wrote:
wow!
Late gratz!
Late gratz!
late gratz... finally it has been ranked
Topic Starter
aaaaaaaaRegraz酱、太谢谢你了！Regraz wrote:
wow!
Late gratz!
Long time no see! Thanks ChristinAdol Christin wrote:
late gratz... finally it has been ranked
some thoughts...
[Arcadia]
00:14:060 (2,3,4,5,1) -
00:15:746 (4,5,6,1) - right side
00:16:757 (2,3,4,5,1) -
0:17:937 (2,3,4) -
00:36:307 (1,2,3,4,5) -
00:55:352 (1,2,3,4) -
00:58:723 (3,4,5,6) -
00:59:734 (2,3,4,5,6) - r
01:15:071 (4,5,6) -
01:21:307 (2,3,4,5) -
01:34:790 (2,3,4,5,6) -
01:36:307 (2,3,4,5,1) - r
How often can you repeat the same jump pattern xD
00:49:285 (1,2,3,4) - isnt it a bit cheap. I mean the vocals do this wierd thing but it ruins the flow and you completely ignore the upbeat here 00:49:959 - . Completely disregarded theintensity and emphasiszed it through 4 stacked notes :/
00:50:465 (1,2,3) - overmapped triple. Feels extra wierd to play after the player had to play 4 stacked notes for a second...
00:50:802 (4) - same but slider
00:51:139 (5,6,1) - is ok since its build-up the next part i guess
01:32:094 (2) - NC mb, cause its kind of a finisher on 01:31:757 (1) -
01:31:841 - also why kiai here, lol. Thats a low point of the song
Also you could use a better mp3, this sounds kinda awful to me :<
http://levol.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2 ... _short.mp3 (source http://levol.jp/1st/download.htm)
[Arcadia]
00:14:060 (2,3,4,5,1) -
00:15:746 (4,5,6,1) - right side
00:16:757 (2,3,4,5,1) -
0:17:937 (2,3,4) -
00:36:307 (1,2,3,4,5) -
00:55:352 (1,2,3,4) -
00:58:723 (3,4,5,6) -
00:59:734 (2,3,4,5,6) - r
01:15:071 (4,5,6) -
01:21:307 (2,3,4,5) -
01:34:790 (2,3,4,5,6) -
01:36:307 (2,3,4,5,1) - r
How often can you repeat the same jump pattern xD
00:49:285 (1,2,3,4) - isnt it a bit cheap. I mean the vocals do this wierd thing but it ruins the flow and you completely ignore the upbeat here 00:49:959 - . Completely disregarded theintensity and emphasiszed it through 4 stacked notes :/
00:50:465 (1,2,3) - overmapped triple. Feels extra wierd to play after the player had to play 4 stacked notes for a second...
00:50:802 (4) - same but slider
00:51:139 (5,6,1) - is ok since its build-up the next part i guess
01:32:094 (2) - NC mb, cause its kind of a finisher on 01:31:757 (1) -
01:31:841 - also why kiai here, lol. Thats a low point of the song
Also you could use a better mp3, this sounds kinda awful to me :<
http://levol.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2 ... _short.mp3 (source http://levol.jp/1st/download.htm)
Topic Starter
It's too late now. Please suggest it a little fasterSmokeman wrote:
some thoughts...
[Arcadia]
00:14:060 (2,3,4,5,1) -
00:15:746 (4,5,6,1) - right side
00:16:757 (2,3,4,5,1) -
0:17:937 (2,3,4) -
00:36:307 (1,2,3,4,5) -
00:55:352 (1,2,3,4) -
00:58:723 (3,4,5,6) -
00:59:734 (2,3,4,5,6) - r
01:15:071 (4,5,6) -
01:21:307 (2,3,4,5) -
01:34:790 (2,3,4,5,6) -
01:36:307 (2,3,4,5,1) - r
How often can you repeat the same jump pattern xD
00:49:285 (1,2,3,4) - isnt it a bit cheap. I mean the vocals do this wierd thing but it ruins the flow and you completely ignore the upbeat here 00:49:959 - . Completely disregarded theintensity and emphasiszed it through 4 stacked notes :/
00:50:465 (1,2,3) - overmapped triple. Feels extra wierd to play after the player had to play 4 stacked notes for a second...
00:50:802 (4) - same but slider
00:51:139 (5,6,1) - is ok since its build-up the next part i guess
01:32:094 (2) - NC mb, cause its kind of a finisher on 01:31:757 (1) -
01:31:841 - also why kiai here, lol. Thats a low point of the song
Also you could use a better mp3, this sounds kinda awful to me :<
http://levol.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2 ... _short.mp3 (source http://levol.jp/1st/download.htm)
Thanks misure chan!Misure wrote:
wa I missed this...
late congratz