1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Beatmap Graveyard
show more
posted
I was under the impression that was a swimsuit; nevermind I guess.


Mazziv wrote:

Why do QAT's need to hide behind that profile? lmao no ballz kekeke
No one's "hiding" behind anything; it's long been a problem now that anytime a map was DQ'd, the QAT member who posted the disqualification notice would be treated as a scapegoat as if the entire takedown of the map was that person's decision alone, which it wasn't. Placing blame on someone for faults pointed out within a map when it's removed from Qualified is not the purpose of the posts, so to prevent abuse and such, a generalized QAT account was made to handle all DQ notices.
posted
well its your problem if you cant ,,take the blame'' for it.
posted
It's not an individual decision though, its not as if a single QAT member just decides to DQ a map. It's the quality assurance TEAM after all.

Sidenote: Can someone explain to me why qualified maps give PP? I'm feeling some of that post PP loss depression from this DQ
posted

Mazziv wrote:

well its your problem if you cant ,,take the blame'' for it.
the point has been completely missed
please keep re-reading the post until you get it



Litharrale wrote:

Sidenote: Can someone explain to me why qualified maps give PP? I'm feeling some of that post PP loss depression from this DQ
1. no one would play them if they didn't give pp
2. would be kind of weird to 'activate' pp only after the map got ranked
posted
can confirm i only play the osu g a m e solely for the pp
posted
Cut useless QQ. Just took random QQer top ranks and saw full of DT farm.



You are helpless in this case, insteed of QQ you could actualy give usefull informations to help make this mapset ranked faster.

If you realy want your damn DT-#balanced-PP, help creator, not just QQ.
posted
I wouldn't mind helping out with the issues pointed out by the QAT (and others that I can see in the map), so if you want to get it ranked that'd probably help a lot.
posted

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Disqualification Notice



Unsuitable Background
  • Due to visibility of the character’s underwear, we consider your background unsuitable for all age groups. Please change it.
Yet this is fine :D?
http://puu.sh/inF4o.jpg

retarded weeabo logic gg
posted
DNA: Do not link to the old BG, thanks.
posted

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

we consider your background unsuitable for all age groups.


actual lol
posted
but seriously tho, what happened to ringatings (spelling w/e) edited bg? you know the censor with the butterflies?
posted

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Unsuitable Background
  • Due to visibility of the character’s underwear, we consider your background unsuitable for all age groups. Please change it.
ahahahahahaha
posted
hey guys, can you please stop complaining about the BG issue?

[–]houndbluedragon 11 pontos 5 hours ago
that was worded really badly but it's a kind of valid issue
I mean, there are thousands and thousands of generic anime wallpapers on the internet, why pick exactly one that has something suggestive on it?

btw I agree with Anxient, should just use Ringating's BG and go with it. easy fix, win4win
posted

Anxient wrote:

but seriously tho, what happened to ringatings (spelling w/e) edited bg? you know the censor with the butterflies?
yeah, what he said
posted
QATs are so funny

old ranking system was way better than this, same for old BATs

I'm fine if you say this is not a quality map and it needs more work, but not if more than half ranked beamaps are mapped exactly like this. Just rank it as the rest, ora just don't rank any of these maps. Don't try to find random stuff to change for no reason like the rhythm things in the [Relaxing] difficulty, please lol

this will get ignored as everything in this game :) no one cares. but it's important to expose our own thoughts

don't take it as an offence, DNA. same for QATs. I just dislike the way work on this game, but I also know it's not as easy as everyone thinks.
posted
The only issue that bugs me with this ranking system is the fact that the BNG and the QAT are two totally different things and don't interact with eachother.


At least with the old system, everyone gave a green light, not just half of the people.


The qualification part o the system is great though imo.
posted
lol rip my 351pp score
I expected that DQ, to be honest, haha.
Good luck on requalifying your map, that was funny to spend 30 mins playing this map with HDNCSD :3
posted

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Unsuitable Background
  • Due to visibility of the character’s underwear, we consider your background unsuitable for all age groups. Please change it.
lmao this is what i expected
posted

Blue Dragon wrote:

hey guys, can you please stop complaining about the BG issue?

[–]houndbluedragon 11 pontos 5 hours ago
that was worded really badly but it's a kind of valid issue
I mean, there are thousands and thousands of generic anime wallpapers on the internet, why pick exactly one that has something suggestive on it?

btw I agree with Anxient, should just use Ringating's BG and go with it. easy fix, win4win
Why? Nobody has replied about the ridiculous hypocrisy even though it may not be the biggest of concerns. Just sweep it under the rug like always I guess.
posted

Cherry Blossom wrote:

lol rip my 351pp score

Cherry Blossom wrote:

I expected that DQ
why do you torture yourself like this
show more
Please sign in to reply.