Precious

1. For approved,HP-1 will better i think.
   Also,you need put some break time,i know you want to approved but you can get some place easy.
   For example,02:25:050 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - can want more easy.
   
2. 01:11:973 (5) - move up 1 pixels
   01:26:792 (7) - i think this put on 8 will better
   01:32:787 (1,2,3,4,5) - why not isosceles triangle?
   01:45:457 (1) -
   02:25:050 (1,2) - delete
   02:26:860 (1,2) - ^
   02:29:688 (4) - ^
   02:31:611 (4,5,6,7,8) - try this
   SPOILER

   
   03:10:412 (7,1) - move right 2 pixels,blanket to 03:09:959 (5,6) -
   03:33:828 (1,2) - delete
   03:35:185 - to 03:35:638 - and 03:38:805 - to 03:39:258 - need add note
   03:41:633 (4) - delete
   04:31:407 (4,5,6) - put five streams,look like 00:28:534 (3,4,5,6,7) -
   05:03:081 - delete

1. 00:16:317 (4,1,2) - Not fond of this pattern, solely because (1) is 3/4ths away from the sound at (4), which is not on beat, meaning that the player has to literally predict when to hit (1). I'd suggest this rhythm instead, which should play and sound a bit better:
   
   try this!

   
2. 00:23:104 (5,1,2) - This suggestion is like 00:16:317 (4,1,2) - , but (5) is a slider-end, so adjust the rhythm accordingly.
3. 00:40:977 (5,3) - Why don't you stack these? It looks untidy, having (5) mislodged from the rest of the stack even if there is two notes in-between them. I'd move (5) to stack with 00:40:977 (5,3,4,5) - , and 00:40:751 (4) - to keep the triangle you've made intact.
4. 00:50:253 (6,7) - ^
5. 01:13:670 - Considering that triplets are very common on vocal sections like this, I don't see how it would be inappropriate to place a circle here. There's clearly a vocal, and it would sound/play a lot better if you were to add a circle to reflect on this.
6. 01:22:832 (3) - Minor suggestion, but why don't you curve this slider as well? It will go with 01:21:927 (1) - because that's curved as well, so the pattern will just look nicer as a whole.
7. 01:31:769 - Like I suggested for 01:13:670 - , you should add a circle here because there's another vocal that lacks emphasis.
8. 01:32:787 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think this would look nicer as an equilateral triangle. At the moment, it is slightly off, which looks untidy.
9. 01:44:552 (5,6,1) - Like I said for above (although it isn't as bad as the above) you can improve the triangle here.
10. 01:50:434 (4) - I'd add a clap here, it would sound nicer and more consistent, considering that 01:49:077 (1) - has a clap as well. The part after it, the music changes, so it's fine if a clap is missing there.
11. 01:55:864 (4) - Add a clap here as well, because it will be more consistent. Other parts like this have a clap, so why not this?
12. 03:02:267 - I'd add a note here, because there's three vocals, it doesn't make much sense that one of them is lacking emphasis.
13. 03:11:882 (4,5,1) - The triangle between the two slider-ends and the head of (1) is slightly off, looking untidy. I suggest you fix this.
14. 03:17:651 - Consider adding a circle here, because most other areas of the song have a triplet when there are three vocals in a succession like this, so I don't particularly see why this is any different.
15. 03:18:670 (3) - The clap at the end of this slider feels very out of place because it is on it's complete own. I would get rid of it so it can sound nicer.
16. 03:22:968 (1,2) - So it can look nicer, I suggest moving (1) to a position where it can create a line of symmetry with (2).
17. 03:48:534 (11) - I'd add a new combo here, it is inconsistent with your current NC pattern and 11+ is way too long compared to the rest of the map.
18. 03:49:891 (13) - I'm not too fond of how this ends on a downbeat, because these are the beats that need to be stressed in order to get the most satisfaction from hitting them; leaving it as it is would be bad rhythm-wise. Why don't you replace it with two circles?
19. 03:50:570 (1) - You should move the end of this spinner back 1/4, because that's when the drum role actually ends. Although it will be off the downbeat, it doesn't matter because the player isn't consciously hitting a note on that downbeat; it is more important to ensure spinners end where they should rather than to snap them to powerful beats.
20. 03:53:964 (4,5,6) - I'd fix this stack, it looks very untidy at the moment, and you should move (4) to fix this.
21. 04:01:203 (1,2) - Like I have mentioned for 03:22:968 (1,2) - , it would look nicer if you were to move (2) to a position where it would gain a line of symmetry with (1)
22. 04:37:403 (1) - Why don't you make this slider identical to 04:33:783 (1) - and 04:41:022 (1) - in terms of length? The music is pretty much the same, so I don't see why you wouldn't do this.

1. 00:27:176 (5,1) -
2. 01:05:638 (3,4) -
3. 01:29:846 (2,3) -
4. 01:49:077 (1,3) -
5. 01:54:507 (1,2) -
6. 02:22:561 (4,5,1) -
7. 02:34:326 (1,2) -
8. 02:42:018 (3,4) -
9. 02:45:864 (5,6) -
10. 02:53:330 (3,1) -
11. 03:06:000 (4,6) -
12. 03:10:072 (6,7) -
13. 03:42:199 (6,1) -
14. 03:45:819 (4,5,1) -
15. 03:58:489 (4,1) -
16. 04:10:253 (1,2,3,4) -

可愛い :3 (another meaning of Precious)

1. 00:16:656 (1) - I'm agree with Gaia. It's a bit hard to play. And I don't know what did you follow here. The small volume guitar acoustic ? Then there should be a note at 00:16:543 - too since I hear same guitar acoustic here. (But I prefer to delete it rather than add a circle). Or maybe you can move that circle to red tick just like 00:19:937 (4,5,1) - . (same to 00:23:896 (1) - )
2. from 00:30:344 - to 00:40:977 - for part like 00:30:344 (1,2,3,4,5) - It looks not consistent pattern with other part like this. like 00:29:213 (1,2,3,4,5) - . 00:29:213 (1,2,3,4,5) - used for other part around 02:03:330 (1,2,3,4,5) - and 04:46:226 (6,7,1,2,3) - but why just this part that have difference from the other ? but I suggest to follow the other pattern because the slider clicks was following the piano. For example move 00:30:344 (1,2,3,4,5) - back 1/2 beat so the slider can started at white ticks that have piano on it.
3. 00:54:778 (1,2) - maybe move them a bit to make 00:54:778 (1) - 's head straight with 00:53:873 (2,4) - .
4. 00:56:588 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I suggest to change the pattern to be like this => http://puu.sh/gZH7o/ee228327f5.jpg . 00:56:588 (1) - make it end on the blue tick since I hear a kick there. And move 00:57:041 (2) - to 00:57:380 - to make 00:57:041 (2,3,4,5) - follow the piano. And then move 00:58:059 (8) - back to white tick to make 00:57:719 (6,7,8) - follow the drum. (why I explain this when I've already screenshot it XD)
5. 01:08:918 - there's a kick but no notes. I suggest to add a circle here. (But it's not a big problem, your pattern is still readable XD)
6. 02:34:326 (1,2,3) - I have a same suggestion with Gaia. the tail was triangle but not the head.
7. 02:55:140 (4,5) - I see you generally didn't ignore the vocal in kiai, but you ignored it here. I suggest to make the pattern like 01:35:502 (3,4,5) -
8. 04:21:113 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - maybe change their pattern to something like => http://puu.sh/gZJfu/c5465196eb.jpg Since I think it's not a good idea to ignore vocal
9. 05:02:629 - and you ignore piano here
10. 05:04:665 (1) - I think white tick where you put the green line is the perfect timing to end the spinner not the blue tick after it.

1. 00:28:873 (6) - i think this note is not needed here, since it doesnt follow anything, and the only thing i can here is the triple bong sound here 00:28:534 (3,4,5) - but nothing on (6)
2. 00:42:787 (2) - nazi stuff, blanket this better
3. 01:21:249 (5) - the flow break here doesnt feel good while i played it, try to ctrl+G this slider for better circular-like movement on that part
4. 01:23:511 (4) - im pretty sure 1/4 or adding a note here 01:23:624 - fits perfectly on the vocal
5. 01:28:149 - add note here, to make it more consistent on the other part with the same vocal
6. 01:30:072 (3) - This is kinda disturbing me lol, you can blanket this to the tail of 01:29:167 (1) - to make it more appealing at least
7. 01:31:769 - same as here, try to add a note, but try to consider it since itll be a major(?) change on that part for you
8. 01:36:407 (1,2) - i got a feeling that speeding this slider up feels better to emphasize the cymbals + the intense vocal
9. 01:55:412 (2) - some nazi, maybe the new stack thingy system ruined it lol
10. 02:34:326 (1,2) - this one is quite far imo, i tried many times but for some reason i always get 100
11. 02:43:036 - put note here, you missed to follow the bass sound here
12. 02:50:615 (1) - blanket this please ;w; it really doesnt look good
13. 03:40:389 (3) - remove the repeat here and try to put notes here 03:40:728 - and 03:40:841 - you should follow the beat sound there
14. 05:04:665 (1) - the slider end tho, not sure if you intentionally put the end on the blue tick

1. 00:07:719 (1) - I think the whistle at the end of this spinner is unneeded, since it's only emphazing a fade-out, and that sound has no relation to the soft cymbal the whistle does. So, I suggest to remove it.
2. 00:13:149 (4,5) - I personally think you should delete the slider there and add a 2/1 slider on this place, since the "drums" already started on the place where you hit first circle (4) and it kinda doesn't make sense for me to click on 00:13:602 - since it's a very soft beat and you could start holding it the right moment it starts (hopefully this is clear enough). It kinda gives players a nice feeling of holding sound until it changes and it emphatizes the main beats of the song (and it also emphatizes 00:13:602 - since slider tick, so it shouldn't be much of an issue that this place loses the clickeable element). If you plan on doing this, you should reduce a bit the Slider Velocity, since slider would be quite big.
3. 00:16:543 - You could place a note here, since playing doubles (in this case, 00:16:656 (1,2) - ) is kinda ankward since it's technically the first "stream" (no matter how short) the players play. This is also because it's pretty ankward how the song's rhythm suddenly changes, from 1/2 clicking to a 3/4 clicking (and some players could react to the note either as a 1/2 note or as a 1/1 note, lowering their acc). It also wouldn't be overmapping, since there is a beat on this place, if that's what it worries you (and clicking triplets is sooo relaxing >.<).
4. 00:23:783 - ^ (not the first double, but you got my point, I guess)
5. 00:47:538 (1) - You're skipping the vocal change on 00:47:765 - so this is kinda weird to play as you're holding and you suddenly let player go on another vocal change. So, maybe shorten slider so that it ends on 00:47:765 - and adding a note on 00:47:878 - would do the trick? That rhythm would also work with 00:48:443 (5,6) - since there's also a beat (not vocal, percussion) on 00:48:783 - but it's up to you.
6. 00:52:968 (1,2,3) - Uh... maybe making those a equilateral triangle? Idk, I think it looks a bit better, and if you do it shouldn't change much your flow.
7. 00:55:570 - It feels a bit weird to play next slider, given the fact you follow vocals with 00:54:778 (1,2,3) - (through maybe not intentionally on 3) and you don't place a note here. Well, if you add or not a note it's up to you.
8. 00:56:588 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I'm quite certain this place should be actually mapped like 02:30:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - for two reasons: For mere consistency and because you're skipping several beats of the song that makes this part quite ankward to play. Mentioning this since those two areas of the song sound practically the same, yet they are mapped so differently (and first part is honestly quite ankward). And you should map the beat on 00:57:946 - too, since it's also quite loud and it's ankward if you skip it and map doubles before and after it instead.
9. 01:05:638 (3,4) - Maybe check the blanket here? Kinda minor, tho.
10. 02:21:656 (1,2) - ^
11. 02:32:063 - Feels kinda weird if you skip the beat here, then go back to the doubles. It's increadibly annoying while playing since you're skipping a loud beat ;w;.
12. 02:34:326 (1,2,3) - I'm not even sure if you're blanketing here, but if you do, they kinda need a little check. Patterns like this are kinda cool, tho >.<
13. 02:52:425 (1,2) - and 02:53:330 (3,1) - ^
14. 03:06:452 (6,1) - ^ (juuuust a small adjustment, through >.<)
15. 03:12:335 (2,1,2,3) - ^
16. 04:03:013 (1,4) - ^
17. 04:50:072 (3) - Kinda feel like you skipped the NC here.
18. 05:04:552 (3) - Replace Whistle for Finish? I dunno. Note here is loud, and finish HS is loud, so...

1. No Widescreen Support here because no SB.

1. 00:07:719 (1) - Why not increase volume at 00:08:624 - / 00:09:529 - / 00:10:434 - to get emphasis with music ?
2. 00:29:439 (3,4,3,4,3,4) - You should use same spacing for these patterns, it's to unconsistant like that.
3. 00:59:077 (1) - Why a NC here ? Should be here 00:58:172 (9) - if I follow your logic.
4. 01:05:638 (3,4) - Blanket nya~
5. 01:21:927 (1,3) - Place them on the same y value (y:112).
6. 01:22:832 (3,4) - Flow is not really good here, I would rather go for a better flow and reduce jump with 01:23:737 (1) - than get it positioned like that.
7. 01:55:412 (2,3,4) - This flow is eeeeehhhhh :/ Just follow flow started by 01:55:412 (2) - .
8. 02:03:556 (3,4,3,4,3,4) - Same as 00:29:439 (3,4,3,4,3,4) - .
9. 02:10:796 (3,4,3,4,3,4) - Same as above.
10. 02:29:348 (2) - Move it to 429:293 to blanket with 02:28:896 (1) - .
11. 02:30:253 (6,1) - Blanket nya~
    02:32:403 - You forget a circle here right ? You follow voice everytime after, so pls add one for consistency.
12. 02:34:326 (1,2,3) - Dunno if was your plan to blanket these but if yes, that's bad.
13. 02:40:660 (4,1) - ^
14. 02:57:855 (3,4) - / 02:58:760 (3,4) - When I overlays them, they're not the same, they should imo.
15. 03:12:335 (2,3) - Again this flow is not intuitive, you should replace 03:12:787 (3) - to improve flow.
16. 03:38:353 (4,1,2) - Blanket nya~
17. 03:47:855 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - You should use the same shape as 03:47:629 (4) - for the direction, looks a little messy.
18. 04:33:783 (1,3) - Blanket nya~
19. 04:38:986 (6,1) - ^
20. 04:46:452 (1,2) - Use same spacing than other after (~2.30x).
21. 04:50:072 (3,4,3,4,3,4) - Use constant spacing for these patterns.
22. 04:53:692 (1,2,3,4,3,4) - ^

1. um.. yea I think mochi is right. 6.5 hp better owo
2. 00:00:480 (1) - I guess this note isn't snap
3. 00:27:629 (1) - how about add finish?? I think better to hear.
4. 01:04:280 (2,3) - Not that difficult compared to the other parts? I feel that even greater emphasis should part.
5. 01:16:498 (1) - add finish like here 01:30:977 (1) -
6. 01:29:167 (1) - add finish better I think
7. 02:40:660 (4) - add finish in head like 01:06:543 (5) -
8. 02:41:565 (1) - same above like 01:07:448 (1) -
9. 02:50:615 (1) - add finish on head better I think
10. 02:58:760 (3) - add finish on head like 01:24:642 (6) -

1. So many triples 0-0 But I love it <3
2. Audio lead-in: 2000ms? Just to be safe.
3. Why did you add “king” and “record” twice in your tags? I think you have to remove one of both.
4. 00:03:873 (1,2,3) –Why not stack these notes on 00:03:194 (2) - ? Like you did here: 00:01:384 (2,1) – Just for consistency reasons. And if you want to stack it then, I suggest you move this circle: 00:03:194 (2) – till it’s here:
   
   Picture

   
   To avoid a crammed pattern.
5. 00:07:832 (1) –I slowed down the music and listened carefully and imo the spinner has to end here: 00:11:339 – instead.
6. 00:20:389 (1,2,3) –Why not try to make a nice double blanket here? Nazi thing, but austhetics is important as well for the “look” of the diff.
7. 00:25:819 (1) –I suggest changing this slider into a curved slider to support 00:26:271 (2) – and 00:27:176 (5) –
   
   Picture

   
   I just copied and pasted: 00:27:176 (5) – and then rotated it into place.
8. 00:42:108 (1) –Just to make the diff look neater, maybe place this slider right between these two notes: 00:41:203 (1,2) –
9. 00:50:932 (7) –Move this circle a bit to the left to make the blanket with 00:50:253 (6) – look neater.
10. 01:03:828 (1,2) –You can try to make a nice double blanket here as well. Like this:
    
    Picture

    
    I just moved 01:04:280 (2) – a bit to the right.
11. 01:22:832 (3) –Make this a straight slider to support 01:22:380 (2) – better. It forms a kind of blanket.
    
    Picture

    
12. 01:23:624 –There’s a clear vocal here that has to be mapped imo. Either place a circle there or a short slider.
    
    Picture

    
13. 01:33:127 (3,4) –I suggest rather stacking these as well. The rhythm is quite fast for a jump like that.
14. 01:55:977 –Imo, this beat has to be mapped. I suggest changing 01:55:864 (4) – into a short slider instead to follow the music better and more effectively.
    
    Picture

    
15. 02:34:326 (1,2,3) –Try to improve these blankets
16. 03:45:819 (4,5) –Improve this blanket please~
17. 04:20:208 (3,5) -^
18. 04:38:986 (6) –It’s a bit hard to see that this a short slider since the tail is hidden by this slider’s head: 04:38:308 (3) – Try to place (3) somewhere where it’s more visible. Perhaps here:
    
    Picture