1. Advanced (2.9 stars, 283 notes)
2. Another (4.99 stars, 528 notes)
3. Easy (1.46 stars, 113 notes)
4. Ex (6.32 stars, 617 notes)
5. Expert (5.47 stars, 514 notes)
6. Extra (5.29 stars, 533 notes)
7. Extreme (5.87 stars, 587 notes)
8. Hard (3.59 stars, 358 notes)
9. Hyper (4.11 stars, 382 notes)
10. Insane (4.43 stars, 420 notes)
11. Insanother (4.72 stars, 476 notes)
12. Normal (2.25 stars, 218 notes)

1. 00:09:822 (2) - clap pls
2. 00:16:725 (1) - 00:16:194 (2) - addclapp
3. 00:33:849 (6) - 00:38:096 (6) - finish doesnt sound gud here imomimoimo
4. 00:40:552 (3) - shouldnt it be drum clap?
5. 00:41:415 (1) - add finish too? give this more impact, and there's resonance afterwards that your custom would cover nicely, i gess
6. 00:15:132 (3) - 00:17:256 (5) - NC? to keep constancy on the section
7. 01:08:096 (2) - add whistle? sounds a bit plain here.
8. 02:07:698 (2) - drum clap sound better hereo.o . It sounds more drummy to me

1. 01:16:459 (1,2) - avoid ugly overlap by 2 pixelll im cool right?riiiiiight?

• 00:33:981 (3,4) - this feels like mapping nothing on concrete, maybe ctrl g the rhythm or something different

1. 02:07:433 (3,4,5) - the only part with 3 circles on a row wowowo

1. 00:22:167 (1,2,3,4) - i actually think this play way more natural up and down style thing also looks cooler on my eyes ww
2. 01:25:486 (3) - rotate it like -45~90° cuz ur map flow circle-slider something something, isnt that bad but this is a bit bad

1. i got a b, happyface

1. i got a d... ;__;

Milan- wrote:

dit: i asked around and yes, you can give me kd again cuz my mods are very high value and i need to farmit omg no change sry

samplefish wrote:

DONT LET ME GOOOOO

WHOAAOAAAAAAA

Kroytz wrote:

hi

just cause

a mod thing

Another

00:14:999 - This beat is missing from previous patterns. Feels awkward and undermapped without it too. the drum thing isnt there tho, unlike 00:10:751 (2) - 00:12:875 (2) -
00:41:415 (1) - Spaced more for more emphasis. dont want any monster jumps when there are 4 other higher difficulties lul
01:25:486 (3,4,5,1) - I think this can be spaced higher for more emphasis towards the (1). ^
01:59:203 (2) - Could map this as a stream of circles and lift the (3,4) sliders to bring more emphasis down to 01:59:999 (1) - didnt even map it as a stream on the 6 star diff so doing so here wouldnt make much sense
02:13:406 - Could be mapped because it's building into that ending of the song. rather not lol

Insanother

Idk bout this CS tho

00:39:822 (3,4) - These two notes have been in motion throughout the section, why stack now? idk
00:41:415 (1) - not enough emphasis. hgdsg
01:01:061 - This could be mapped. Or not. Doesn't matter. Applies to all diffs.breaks are gud
01:08:760 (6) - Could be raised above the fading (5) instead of below it. pourquoi
01:42:211 (2) - Flow feels too dropped at this slider. This could go more in front of the (1) slider, or the previous sliders can slowly increase in spacing to make 01:42:477 (1) - more emphasized. repeated sound so parallel sliders flow can suck me

Extra

00:26:017 (5,6,7) - Could be spaced higher to accommodate for slider leniency (the [4] slider against the [5] is pretty close). they were supposed to be just like the other custom stacky stuff. made that more obvious
00:45:663 (1,2,3,4) - Reasoning as to why (2) is stacked beneath (1) but (4) is in motion? Because you stack this 00:47:787 (1,2) - and 00:48:849 (1,2) - and even the following parts for this kiai seems random as to why some notes are stacked below the slider and others in motion. interchanging stacking and lowerspacing wherever it just plays better. it is stupid yes dont do it. at least emphasized sounds are properly spaced always :p
01:25:486 (3,4,5,1) - Repositioning more towards the leftward center and not so far down could add more emphasis to the ending (1) yea
02:18:052 (1) - Slider feels a little too slow by maybe .2 SV idk what .2 SV is supposed to be referring to but it's the same as every other diff

Expert

00:15:397 (4,5) - spacing feels a little too close to the (3) slider. Moving (4,5) to x 98; y378 would make a rhombus with the previous (1,2) sliders. And the (6) could be repositioned over the fading (2) slider. If you decide to change. did
00:25:884 (5) - Could be spaced more away from the (2,3,4). Try inbetween (1,2) at 128;215 barely did
00:33:981 (1) - Spaced a little too far out. The following (2,3) isn't spaced as much compared to this one. cuz 1 more important
01:10:751 (4) - I would've expected this to come up in place of the 5 instead of stacking over the (3). Something like this: http://puu.sh/hBMDD/1b9980e2e9.jpg but more emphasis on 5 than 4
01:25:486 (4) - Feels very momentum kill. Remove repeat and add another circle to jump to the ending (1). ejhj
01:55:220 (3) - Why not another curve slider to compliment the previous (1) because i touch myself at night and i like nocurve slider

Extreme

00:26:017 (6,7,8,1) - The flow between these is too sharp. I'm sure moving the (8) lower at around 352;304 can help fix this. yea
00:41:415 (1) - Spaced further for more emphasis. not yea triangle si hot
00:45:132 (3) - The usage of this repeating and 00:53:627 (3) - (and the other few in this kiai) feels random and not rhythmically fluent. got rid of the beat 3 reversesliders
01:25:884 (1) - Spaced more off to the right side at 266; 347 w.

These diffs are really good. Didn't really know what to say really.

byfar wrote:

selling bubble guns 1 $$€€££¥¥ each

1. 00:09:822 (2,3) - Try Ctrl+G'ing this rhythm since there's a vocal on 00:09:955 - that's held, but the beat on 00:10:087 (3) - . is quite feint in comparison. It would fit better as a slider-end better imo.
2. 00:34:645 (6) - You could extend this slider to 3/4. Also imo, you should emphasize this slider with a larger jump than from 4>5, since 5>6 has the addition of vocals, making it stronger.
   
   Maybe you could try something like this.

   
3. 00:36:769 (4,5,1) - Larger jump from 5>1?
4. 01:21:636 (1) - You use some nice linear patterns here so how about moving this to 308||306 So it makes a nice linear pattern with 01:20:972 (3,5) - .
5. 01:40:884 (1,2) - At this difficulty, you usually associate this kind of pattern with circles that are coming 1/4th after the slider...I mean, of course this works, but try putting the circle on 249||61 so the player has to play through the whole slider without pausing.

1. 00:11:149 (4,5,6) - Try a sharper angle? 00:11:282 (5) - 360||134 would create a nice linear pattern with 00:11:149 (4,5,1) -
2. 00:13:539 (6,1) - Make this jump bigger too? 00:11:282 (5,6,1) - Felt better to play lol.
3. 01:23:760 (1) - Idk about this slider honestly... I think breaking it into 1 circle and 1 1/2 slider would be better so you can map 01:23:893 - .
4. 01:33:715 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - Is there a reason the DS keeps decreasing with this particular jump sequence? It just felt a bit out of place for me...
5. 02:17:256 (2,3) - This last section is supposed to be intense, no? Since you mapped streams here. You don't need to overlap these sliders imo.
   
   You can try something like this.

   

1. 00:12:211 (3,4) - Ctrl+G this for multiple reasons. Emphasizes 3 better, flows better (imo), also makes it slightly easier to read since there will be more time in between the overlap with slider1's tail.
2. 00:51:503 (3,4) - Cltr+G this and then bring 4 to 00:51:769 - ? I think this plays better.
3. 01:08:760 (5) - 310||173 looks nicer, but up to you~.

1. 00:15:795 (1,2) - Man this angle into 2 is really sharp... Try rotating 2 like 90 degrees from selection center.
2. 01:04:645 (1,2,3,4) - I find it odd that you first map the bass with slider 1, and then proceed to follow the drums after. I mean, you do this for higher diffs which is fine since most players can identify this change, but I can definitely see this being confusing for newbies. Try shortening slider 1 to a simple 1/1 slider and moving all the repeats onto red ticks. That way there also isn't any polarity shift from white > red > white > red through this short section.
   
   This rhythm makes more sense honestly.

   

1. 00:13:672 (1,2) - 0.9x DS?
2. 00:37:034 (1,2) - Any way you can move 1 and 2 down a bit so you can blanket them better without covering too much of the hp bar?
3. 01:04:645 (1,2,1,2,3) - Same as in Normal, sticking to red-tick polarity for this section would be more beginner-friendly.
   
   Try this rhythm instead?

   [img]http://puu.sh/hTwSB.jpg
   [/img]
4. 01:07:433 (2,3) - Wouldn't hurt to reduce the DS here to 1.40. It's right before the break anyways lol.

1. You sure there's nothing to tag? Maybe some keywords relating to the song?

1. HP3 seems too high for this map. Easy should be passable for beginners, and this is not. I recommend lowering to at most HP2.5.
2. 00:39:822 (2,3,1) - Consecutive 1/1 at such high speed is too hard for Easy.
3. 01:57:875 (3) - Maybe the hitsound should be the same as 00:58:406 (3) These parts sound the same to me, so it might make sense to use the same hitsounds. Same suggestion for all diffs.

1. 00:34:247 (3,4) - Clap + Clap + Drum finish.
2. 00:59:999 (4,1) - The 1/2 beat spacing between these comes quite unexpected. It's likely the players would miss it, since they've gotten into a 1/1 groove with the whole section preceding this and don't expect this syncopation. This would help to make it easier to read: http://puu.sh/i5UQL/80818dddf8.jpg or make the rhythm of clicking straight like this: http://puu.sh/i5UUS/bebe6ba803.jpg
3. See hitsound suggestion in Easy.

1. 00:27:610 (4) - Seems like you're doing 4 beat combos, so you should probably start a new combo here.
2. 01:54:689 (1) - I don't think it's necessary to start a new combo here.

1. 1/4 triple was only used in two places in the map, causing spikes in difficulty. This could be frustrating for players who can play all the rest of the map easily, but can't tap the triple. I recommend removing them so that the difficulty within the map is more consistent throughout.
2. 00:16:725 (4,1) - lol why manual stack? It's like... one pixel difference from the automatic stack. Well, it doesn't matter, just kind of meaningless.
3. 01:22:831 (1,2,3) - Opportunity to make a pattern of gradual rotation and gradual curve reduction: http://puu.sh/i5W43/bc77098326.jpg
4. 02:17:256 (2,3,4) - Could you reduce the hitsound volume just a little? The overlapping of the hitsounds makes a wall of sound that's kind of overwhelming. Same for the other diffs that use 1/4 here.

1. 02:18:318 (2) - What are you clicking here? Doesn't seem like anything worth clicking. Same for the higher diffs.
2. There's not much difference in rhythmic complexity between Hard and Hyper. Maybe you can add some more complex rhythms here, like more 1/4 and stuff.

1. 00:12:211 (3,4) - Maybe just difference in style, but I think it would play nicer to swap their positions. I just feel like the current jump is awkward because it cuts very sharply into the curve.
2. 00:21:503 - I think it's worth considering to put something to click here, for the snare. For example: http://puu.sh/i5XYr/6a4258072b.jpg Just try it.

1. Use of CS6 is iffy. It really pops out from the spread. It definitely looks like it was designed around CS6, but I'd recommend using a lower circle size, because the diffs directly above and below it are both using CS4. I'd understand if you gradually increased the circle size over each threshold of difficulty, but this jump up and back down just isn't really appropriate. No other maps in the set have circle size that even come close to it, not even any of the Xs.

1. 01:08:627 (6) - I just thought it'd be better as two circles.
2. 01:46:459 (2) - Might feel better spaced out a bit by moving it up? and if you do that, probably angle them inward: http://puu.sh/i7rcn/56e1eba17e.jpg

1. 01:53:096 (3,4,5,1) - When I played this, the impact at (1) felt a bit weird. I guess it's because the parts where you used this rhythm before tended to have 01:53:362 (4,5) move away from the head of (1), and this one is different.

Priti wrote:

You can still mod, I'll rebubble

1. 00:28:406 (5,6,1)
2. 00:30:530 (5,6,1)
3. 00:32:654 (5,6,1)
4. 01:32:123 (6,7,1)

1. 00:37:964 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1)
2. 00:40:353 (1,2,3)
3. 01:37:433 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1)